I am on the train returning from Wellesley to New York City, after Pasi Sahlberg’s brilliant performance last night. I say “performance” because he didn’t give a conventional lecture. He used a multi-media platform to entertain, interact, and inform the audience. He began his talk by posing a mathematical question, which appeared on the screen behind him. He urged the audience to add the numbers, out loud, simple whole numbers, as they appeared on the screen. Many of us showed how easily we were fooled by what we thought we saw. How easily we draw false conclusions. That was his introduction to a performance that included film clips, music, data, and exposition. If you have a chance to invite him to your state or organization, I urge you to do so. He is amazing. As soon as I have the video link, I will post it.
In talking to parents and teachers during my visit, I learned that all those millions from hedge fund managers, billionaires, and union-busters are now showing up as television commercials blanketing the state with lies. Earnest “parents” explain in the commercials that they are voting for Question 2–the approval of more privately run charter schools–because they “support” public schools, they want to “help” public schools. They do not explain that passage of Question 2 means that neighborhood public schools will be closed and replaced by corporate-controlled charter schools. They do not explain that more money for charter schools means less money for public schools. They do not explain that those who vote for Question 2 are voting to cut the budgets of their own public schools.
It is a low, misleading, dishonest campaign. Why are the “reformers” dishonest? Simple. If they told the truth, the public would overwhelmingly reject their goal of privatizing public schools and turning over control to out-of-state corporations. This is the billionaire-funded propaganda campaign that dare not speak its name.
Corporate reform refuses to be truthful. It wraps itself in self-righteous lies about promoting civil rights and closing the achievement gap. Destroying a democratic institution is not promoting civil rights. Creating colonialist “no excuses” charter schools that exclude or kick out low-scoring students does not promote civil rights or reduce the achievement gap. Making a fetish of standardized testing guarantees that the “achievement gap” will never close because the standardized tests are designed to produce achievement gaps that never close.
Where do the “reformers” find the white teachers willing to enforce the harsh discipline of no-excuses schools and impose unquestioning compliance on nonwhite children? Very likely, these teachers attended progressive private or public schools. Did they learn the value of conformity and obedience in TFA training or at the Relay “Graduate School of Education”?
As Alan Singer wrote on Huffington Post, Massachusetts is now ground zero in the battle for public education. It may be the most liberal state in the nation. It is far and away the most successful state school system, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress. If the billionaires can persuade the people of Massachusetts to turn over a dozen schools a year from here to eternity, they can do it anywhere. After all, what’s a couple of million dollars to the Waltons, whose family wealth exceeds $130 billion? If the billionaires can hoax the people of Massachusetts for only $15 million, what state will be outside their reach? You can be sure that the charter industry won’t stop in Boston and the small cities of the state. They have their eyes on the suburbs, too.
What happens on November 8 will matter to the future of public education in America.
Will the corporate reformers pull the wool over the eyes of the public? Will their deceptions and lies cover up their goal of undermining one of our most important democratic institutions?
Or will the grassroots actions of parents and teachers strip away their evasions, lies, and propaganda and demonstrate that the public schools of the Bay State are not for sale? Not at any price.

You keep saying things like “corporate controlled” or “out of state corporations.”
Yet Massachusetts does not allow for-profit charter schools.
Moreover, this post completely ignores the fact that many rigorous studies have shown that Massachusetts charter schools (at least the ones for poor urban kids) have dramatically positive impacts, far beyond just test scores.
The out of state millionaires are giving away money, not because there’s a shred of benefit for themselves, but because they want to benefit poor kids. And if poor kids and their families don’t want the charter schools, then they will not go there, and raising the cap will make no difference.
The motivation for opposing poor kids and their families isn’t clear.
LikeLike
Have you considered the possibility that Boston charters do well because there is a cap on the number? Remove the cap and the usual corporate raiders will descend. Why does Masssachusetts, with the best scores in the nation, need to have a dual school system? Why not improve the schools you have rather than turn them over to out of state corporations? You are a bit late in the day to claim that the out of state billionaires have no motive other than helping poor kids. Their motive is privatization and union-busting. They have proved it in state after state, where they donate exclusively to privatization, never to public schools.
LikeLike
I have often wondered if the villain knows they’re the villain. When millionaires sit back in their filtered communities and think the sprinkling of money into ed reform will benefit the poor is a pathetic smoke screen. If they cared at all about reform movements they would focus first on residential inequalities. I am so tired of hearing about people living in Wellesley (and such suburban towns) caring so much about the students in Boston, Lawrence, or Brockton. If they cared so much they insure that more affordable housing would be available in their communities. If studies show sizable learning gaps being identified in children at the age of four, the problem does not begin within the school. One must consider socioeconomic status, family environment, community, and racism into the mix. To think the charter-super-cape of the ‘do good’ out-of-state millionaires can just swoop in to save the day is grossly ignorant, ill-informed, and dangerously neglectful. If you want to read a report about the data findings of charter schools, whom they are actually serving and how their numbers don’t quite add up to high honors they claim, then read the report from the Massachusetts Association of School Committees. A reliable source that actually would have the interest of MA’s students, unlike out-of-state millionaires and corporate shills who just want to drain the coffers of school funding. https://www.masc.org/images/news/2015/20151013_MASC_Charter-Schools_Who-Is-Being-Served_opt.pdf
LikeLike
Brendan, while you justifiably point to exceedingly important priorities other than charter schools, e.g., fixing exclusionary zoning, your view of the characteristics and motives of those who support Question 2 seems excessively narrow.
In respect to that MASC document you mention, it is plagued with major errors of the kind that I have repeatedly detailed on this blog and elsewhere, e.g., here:
http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2016/10/charter-school-attrition-in-ma-reader.html
What’s worse is that MASC has been repeatedly apprised of such defects and fails to correct them.
LikeLike
Hi,
I’ve just started reading this blog to learn more about the charter school debate. While I get the idea that charter school funding is like robbing Peter to pay Paul, what is the motive of the funders of charter schools? If they indeed do not have the interests of the kids at heart, why do they do what they do? They’re certainly not making money by investing in charter schools.
>
LikeLike
Stray,
Read more. There are huge profits being made in the charter industry. Real estate deals, tax breaks, old-fashioned graft. And then there is Ohio, where the big charter operators have collected hundreds of millions for bad schools
LikeLike
Sadly, making money is the ONLY reason many charter school “reformers” enter the game.
LikeLike
There are also issues of control woven throughout the charter issue, separate from the looting they are prone to.
There is the desire to have iron control of the labor force, explaining why charters are over ninety percent non-union: the desire, as seen virtually everywhere else in the labor markets, to replace full-time employment with temporary/ contingent labor, the desire to pay teachers less, and the desire to have them under the thumb of management, which is much more difficult to maintain in a union, career-oriented environment where institutional memory has value. Thus, it’s no accident that charters have such extreme staff turnover, and often have teachers working from scripted lessons. As has occurred in so many other industries, the de-skilling of the workforce is a management axiom.
There is also a social engineering aspect of charter schools, especially prevalent among the “no excuses” chains (KIPP, Success Academies, Uncommon Schools, et. al.), which are obsessed with herding and controlling children in punitive, Skinner Box- type environments. It’s about training children, not educating them, to be docile and obedient, no matter the oppressiveness of the environment, prepping them for the lack of autonomy they’ll face in the adult workforce, and preventing them from having even an inkling that another world is possible.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane. Like!!!!! 🙂
LikeLike
Greed is one of three worst toxic substances (greed, ego and lust for sexual fulfillment).
Evil always lure people without conscience into fame and fortune which people cannot handle it, but they are willing to die for it.
IMHO, people who are with conscientiousness, will only take the job within their PRACTICAL experience, knowledge and credibility. As a result, confidence, dignity and worth of being a human will create the true leadership at all level in all backgrounds in all aspects in society. That is how there are not masters and slaves, rich and poor, educated and illiterate.
“Walled garden” is the creation from EVILS in order to produce UNWORTHY, DEPLORABLE, and SNOBBISH leaders who DO NOT QUALIFY for the jobs, except these greedy people love fame and fortune and they are willing to trade their souls and to be slaves for EVILS. Back2basic
LikeLike
During the next month leading up to Tuesday, November 8, as you see or listen to the slick and expensive Madison Avenue-level TV/radio commercials promoting “YES” on Question 2 promulgating such lies as …
“Question 2 will add more money to public schools (LIE: it won’t. In fact it will do just the opposite.
or
“Question 2 won’t take money away from existing public schools (LIE: it will… a lot of money, in fact.)
… or when view the slick mailers you find in your mailbox, or when listen to robo-calls, think about this following post:
The latest is that over $21.7 million of out-of-state money from the most ruthless capitalists who have ever walked the Earth — Eli Broad, the Walton family of Walmart, Wall Street hedge fund managers, etc. — is pouring into Massachusetts to pass Question 2.
Read this well-researched article here for that $21.7 million figure:
These profit-minded plutocrats who are pouring in this money obviously …
— do not live in Massachusetts,
— have no children, grandchildren, or other relatives that attend public
schools in Massachusetts
— have never given a sh#% about the education of middle or lower income until recently, when they realized they could make a buck off privatizing Massachusetts schools via the expansion of privately-run charter schools,.
They want to these corporate charter schools to replace truly public schools — the ones that, for generations, have been accountable and transparent to the public via democratically elected school boards, and which are mandated to educate ALL of the public… including those hardest or most difficult to educate … special ed., English Language Learners, homeless kids, foster care kids, kids with difficult behavior arising from distressed home lives.
Are proponents of Question 2 seriously making the argument that out-of-state billionaires and Wall Street hedge fund managers are pumping in all this money because those folks care so much about the education of kids in Massachusetts?
You really think they are NOT seeking a big money return on these ($21.7 million campaign donations?
Does that pass the smell test?
Can you provide an example of JUST ONE TIME in the past where they poured in this kind of cash to something … no strings attached, and with no expectations of return?
If, as Q 2 supporters like Marty Walz claim, the most ruthless capitalists that have ever walked the Earth are now kicking in this kind of cash to pass Question 2 merely because they care about children’s education —
… and if they are not about their profiting through the privatization of public schools brought about by the expansion of privately-run charter schools,
… then I’m sure one of you Q 2 supporters could google and find a past example where they have done something similar .. .again out of generosity… with no expectation of an eventual monetary return…
Something like …
“Well, back in 2000-something, or 1900-something, these same folks donated $20 million to the (INSERT CHARITABLE CAUSE HERE). Here’s the link that proves this.”
No, I didn’t think so. When this was brought up in a debate, Mary Walz refused to address it, saying, “We need to talk about the kids, not the adults.” Well, keeping money-motivated scum from raping and pillaging Massachusetts public schools IS CARING ABOUT THE KIDS, Marty! (By the way, those are many of the same folks who raped and pillaged the housing/mortgage industry a decade ago … go watch the film THE BIG SHORT to get up to speed on that … they’ve just moved on to new place to plunder.)
So the real question is:
To whom do the schools of Massachusetts belong? The citizens and parents who pay the taxes there?
Or a bunch of money-motivated out-of-state billionaires and Wall Street hedge fund managers who are trying to buy them via Question 2, and the expansion of privately-managed charter schools which they control, or also profit from their on-line and digital learning products that will be sold to these charter school chains?
If you believe the former, THEN FOR GOD’S SAKE, VOTE “NO” ON QUESTION 2.
Send them a message: Massachusetts schools are NOT FOR SALE!!!
Oh and go watch the John Oliver charter school video:
Oh and listen to this dissection of a “YES on 2” radio ad:
http://wrsi.com/monte/dissecting-the-great-schools-massachusetts-ad-on-question-2/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jack: “The latest is that over $21.7 million of out-of-state money from the most ruthless capitalists who have ever walked the Earth ”
If you read Mercedes’ piece again, Jack, you’ll find that the $21.7 million combines the amounts for and against the campaign, and I’m not sure that the good teachers whose unions donated much of that sum in opposition to the ballot measure would appreciate your characterization.
LikeLike
Whenever you think the so-called reformers couldn’t possibly be any more dishonest or loathsome, they come up with stuff like this.
LikeLike
Massachusetts Charter Public School Association executive director Mark Kennan and other pro-Question 2 folks are engaging in race-baiting to get Question 2 passed.
Playing the race card or the white guilt card (or wealthy guilt car) is a pretty lame and divisive tactic on the part of Marc Kenan — the Executive Director and Foiunder of the Massachusetts Charter School Association, and who helped draft Question 2 — and all the folks allied with Marc to pass Question 2.
Go here:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
( 35:02 – )
( 35:02 – )
MARC KENAN: “We have our strongest opposition from the teachers unions across the state, whose leadership is primarily white… (So-effing-what, Marc?! JACK) … our goal, and whom we are trying to serve, are those black and brown parents and young parents who are trying desperately to get alternatives for their children.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
With tens of millions of dollars going to political campaign operatives, I’m guessing this specious race-baiting was dreamed up by those guys, and then tested on focus groups where those experts found out that these messages worked in getting folks to vote YES on 2.
This scuzzy and divisive tactic works two ways:
ON WHITES: it’s a way to use white guilt to pressure white voters into voting Question 2.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
MESSAGE to Whites:
“You don’t want to be one of those racists who keep blacks from getting a good education, now, do you? Vote ‘YES’ on Question 2, and earn your ‘I’m-No-Racist!’ merit badge.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
For whites, it’s an easy way to prove you’re not a racist, and make yourself feel good in the voting booth… regardless of how off-base that thinking actually is.
ON BLACKS: it’s a way to use historical black anger against white oppression and mistreatment to vote “YES” on 2.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
MESSAGE to African-Americans:
“White folks in upscale Massachusetts cities and neighborhoods are stealing black kids’ promise of a great education and keeping black kids from having good schools, just the way they’ve been doing this forever. Stick it to those racist whiteys and vote ‘YES’ on Question 2.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
As a Los Angeleno, this demagogic re-framing of the issues reminds me the way attorney Johnny Cochran, in the O.J. Simpson trial, successfully manipulated the black jurors and black population into abandoning their common sense and critical thinking to render their verdict, and act the way they did. He brought in an irrelevant and inflammatory context of historical racism, and attached it to the way a true black person should think and act regarding O.J.’s guilt or innocence.
“Here’s your chance to even the score with The Man. Vote to acquit!”
or
“If you’re in the black community, back your brother O.J. in his time of need, and stick it to the racist power structure.”
That’s how and why you got this abomination. (Note the different reactions of blacks and whites to the live announcement of O.J.’s acquittal):
( 1:01 – )
( 1:01 – )
For Marc Kenan and his Massachusetts Public Charter School Association (which Marc founded) to stoop to this level of pernicious exploitation of historical racism is pretty scuzzy and skeevy. However, I imagine this is what the high-priced political campaign experts whom the “YES” on Question 2″ folks hired told him to say at the debate and elsewhere. … and Marc figures,
“Oh what the heck. As scuzzy and skeevy as this tactic is, all’s fair in politics, and you do whatever you have to in order to win. The ends justify the means, blah-blah-blah … ”
In all my campaigns for which I’ve volunteered — for school board members, politicians, initiatives, etc. — I’ve never had to be associated with such sleazy campaign tactics or messages that violated my own moral code, and I never will be, as I will drop out if engaging in this kind of stuff is what you have to do in order to win.
Indeed, on her pro-charter blog, Erika Sanzi engages in this as well in her response to ultra-progressive Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren’s endorsement of the “NO” on 2 campaign. Sanzi makes Warren out to be the Second Coming of George Wallace, standing in front of the University of Alabama door and barring black students from entering:
http://goodschoolhunting.org/2016/09/elizabeth-warren-baby-got-wrong-back.html
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
ERIKA SANZI: “Perhaps those zip codes that act as barbed wire fences for poor kids have simply fallen through the cracks of her broken foundation where principles have given way to power and money and special interest. Adult interest in this case.
“It’s actually hard to imagine the disgust that low income parents, especially black and brown ones, must feel that their world famous Senator, their fighter for the ‘little guy,’ has now lost interest in that proverbial ‘little guy’. ”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Oy vey!
Here’s another piece, this one from Campbell Brown’s “The74” blog that goes all in this specious race-baiting. Michelle Rhee hagiographer Richard Whitmire calls out those rich white Massachusetts folks who back “NO on Question 2.”
http://the74million.org/article/its-heartbreaking-boston-parents-ask-why-their-wealthy-neighbors-are-fighting-charter-schools
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
‘It’s Heartbreaking’: Boston Parents Ask Why Their Wealthy Neighbors Are Fighting Charter Schools”
RICHARD WHITMIRE:
“However, recent polls, along with unexpectedly intense anti-charter activity in places like Newton, suggest that support may be soft. Just before school opened in Newton this year, the union staffed a table outside its ($200 million) high school to encourage teachers to oppose the cap lift. Recently, Tillman attended a meeting in Newton where she said she heard plenty of talk against lifting the cap.
“All of which makes her ask: Why would Newton teachers and parents, who are unaffected by charters, vote to deny better schools for the low-income neighborhoods of Boston?
“ ‘It’s heartbreaking,’ said Tillman (an African American in favor of Question 2 and expanding charter schools). ‘This does not affect their budget. Why don’t they want to help their brethren in our ZIP code?”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Because they’re evil racists, Ms. Tillman. Shame on them.
What nonsense.
How do the pro-charter, pro-Question 2 folks reconcile this line of argument with both the NAACP and the Black Lives Matters leaders coming out strongly against Question 2, and the expansion of privately-run charter schools in general? Are those black leaders all stupid, or dupes of the white racists?
I could post seven more examples of this low tactic, but I won’t
Whatever.
Oh and go watch the John Oliver charter school video:
Oh and listen to this dissection of a “YES on 2” radio ad:
http://wrsi.com/monte/dissecting-the-great-schools-massachusetts-ad-on-question-2/
LikeLike
I can hear these greedy corporate deformers echo the voice of Gordon Gekko. Kick the hell out of Billionaire Troll Streeters.
LikeLike
As in Chicago, pro-charter forces in Massachusetts, including Massachusetts Charter Schools Association leader and Question 2 co-writer Marc Kenan, have repeatedly denied that school closings are connected to charter school proliferation.
However, this private email of Marc’s shows otherwise:
https://btu.org/city-superintendent-and-charter-leaders-meet-quietly-to-decide-on-what-to-do-with-surplus-school-buildings-proposed-for-closing/
However, here’s a private email that wrote to his fellow charter allies… or charter friends:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
“From: Marc Kenan [mailto:kenen@rcn.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 08:31 AM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:
Subject: Boston charters sit down with BPS and the city
“Dear charter friends,
“In an unprecedented meeting yesterday, Boston charter school leaders met with Boston Superintendent Carol Johnson, her staff and high ranking members of the Menino Administration. The topic of discussion was a possible “compact of collaboration” between Boston charters and BPS addressing the question: “are there ways to work together that would improve the education of all Boston students?”
“The meeting was the first in a series to be held over the next couple of months to explore collaboration. Many issues were put on the table in an initial brainstorming session with more in-depth follow-up scheduled for future sessions.
“In a related story, the Globe reported this morning that Mayor Menino and Superintendent Johnson announced yesterday the possibility of the city leasing empty, or soon to be empty BPS buildings to Boston charter schools. This is being discussed in the city in relationship to the move by the district to close a number of BPS schools and reorganize/consolidate/move others. Such a real estate relationship would obviously be a tremendous breakthrough for charters the state. As goes Boston so goes….. ”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
The Boston Teachers union responded to this:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
“BTU: “Charter School Operators to Benefit at Our Students’ Expense
“Last week, as thousands of Boston students, parents, and teachers were learning – many for the first time – that the Superintendent was about to propose that their school be closed, charter school operators were meeting secretly with city and school officials to plan on how to make use of the closed buildings.
“As you will read in the below verbatim email from Marc Kenan, executive director of the Massachusetts Charter School Association, charter school leaders are salivating at the possibility of leasing ‘surplus’ Boston School buildings – even though the final decision on the superintendent’s proposal to close as many as a dozen Boston schools has not yet been made.
“Charter schools currently drain over $60 million from the public schools’ education budget. Under the Ed Reform law, charters will double and the yearly outflow to charters will reach an estimated $110 Million. As our schools suffer through yet another round of budget reductions, we have to ask, How much will be left for our public schools after charters grab their share? Looked at another way, how strong is the city’s commitment to our public schools?
“Here is the verbatim email by Marc Kenan, ED of MA Charter School Association: … ”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
AND THEN THEY SHOW THE ABOVE EMAIL
LikeLike
Since We the People have stuck with and revere the words of our Founding Fathers in our general government, we should give the same reverence to our Founding Fathers’ ideas about public education: For example, Thomas Jefferson wanted a public education system that truly educated our nation’s children, not one that trained them to fit into careers cogs that served businesses and the economy.
Jefferson declared that “it is the business of the state,” not private enterprises, to provide genuine education because he knew that if private businesses controlled education, our nation’s children would end up being trained to fill the needs of business instead of being broadly educated in a way that equipped them to be informed voters in our system of government.
Jefferson’s superb idea for public education was to truly educate children in a broad range of subjects, especially in history, because as he stated: “Apprising them of the past will enable them to judge the future.” He said that children should be taught Greek, Roman, and European history in particular in order to understand the grecian roots of democracy and the Roman and European roots of dictatorship and ruling classes. In addition, he wanted children taught to read and write Greek and Latin so that they could better grasp the ideas and the mistakes of the past by reading about them in the original languages.
Today, under the “reform” movement that is led by business moguls, teachers in public schools are reprimanded for “wasting time” teaching History of any kind, and only token attention is given to foreign languages, let alone classical languages because “they aren’t on the test’ — that is, they aren’t tested by the statewide standardized testing upon which school funding and statistical data depends. Similarly, music and the arts are almost completely ignored because they aren’t tested on the standardized tests. Only the basic skills that businesses want — math and reading — are tested. If we truly wanted well-educated children, we would test for and teach all the subjects.
So, today instead of being broadly educated as Jefferson said was necessary for them to participate in our form of government that requires broadly knowledgeable voters, our are being narrowly trained to fit into the career cogs that business moguls want them to fill in their businesses.
Jefferson warned: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” Ignorance of History is the gravest danger to our form of government because already too few people recognize in current trends the emergence of mistakes of the past that have led to ruin.
Today, we have an increasing number of well-trained but not broadly and well-educated professionals who are simply ignorant of vital knowledge and are unfit to participate in our form of government; many of the business moguls who are leading the “reform” movement are among this group. They are trying to push our nation onto the road to ruin, and they have a lot of clout — in the form of cash to buy politicians and media — to do it.
From the very beginning of our nation we have held that everyone is created equal, should have equal opportunity, and that it is our collective duty as We the People to use our system of government to assure that everyone has access to that equality, because business certainly isn’t going to give it to us without governmental rules and laws to make them do so.
Compare our nation’s philosophy of equal opportunity in education to the philosophy of business:
We must recognize that “reform” doesn’t necessarily mean “improve” — it means only what it says: remaking something into something that it wasn’t. The business moguls behind today’s “reform” of public education simply want to remake it into a conveyor belt system that cranks out children who fit into the career cogs of the business machine to create greater profit for the business owners. These business moguls don’t care at all about children learning History or reading classical novels that teach them about our human nature and where it can go wrong — in fact, the less the children know about such things, the better for the business moguls because the less likely it is that bee hive (cubicle) workers will protest the huge amounts of money that the moguls pay themselves or question whether what the business is engaged in and its products are good or harmful to society.
Moguls want minions, not well-educated, questioning workers. And that’s what schooling based on standardized tests of just a couple of subjects is churning out.
LikeLike