In 1989, a female jogger was brutally attacked and raped in Central Park in New York City. The crime gripped the city for weeks. Five teenagers were arrested, confessed and implicated one another after intense police questioning, convicted, and sent to prison. They were exonerated years later based on DNA evidence and the confession of another criminal. Trump to this day insists that the original teens who spent 13 years in prison were guilty.
“New York” magazine describes Trump’s intense interest in punishing the perpetrators, taking out full-page ads in every NYC newspaper.
“On Thursday, Trump reaffirmed his view that law and order must take a backseat to punishing people (particularly, nonwhite people) whom he has declared guilty. Asked by CNN for a comment on the exoneration of the Central Park Five, the Republican nominee provided this statement:
“They admitted they were guilty. The police doing the original investigation say they were guilty. The fact that that case was settled with so much evidence against them is outrageous. And the woman, so badly injured, will never be the same…..”
The story says:
“In 1989, five teenagers — four black and one Hispanic — were arrested for the rape of a 28-year-old white woman in Central Park. The woman was left bound, beaten, and brain-damaged. She was identified as a banker, an ambitious career woman, the kind of person the city needed more of. The “Central Park Five” were identified as hoodlums, superpredators, the kind of people the city needed to expel.
“The crime sold papers.
“And Trump took out full-page ads in all of New York City’s major ones, two weeks after the attack, calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty. The mogul never explicitly mentioned the five, but did reference criminals who “beat and rape a helpless woman.”
“After two days of questioning, police secured confessions from all five of the accused — although each teenager denied raping the woman himself, and placed guilt on someone else within the group. They later retracted those confessions, claiming they’d been coerced. They were convicted nonetheless.”
“But in 2002, a convicted rapist named Matias Reyes confessed to the crime, saying he had acted alone. While police were unable to connect DNA from any of the Central Park Five to the scene of the crime, Reyes’s DNA matched that in semen found on the victim’s body. The five were exonerated and paid a $41 million settlement in 2014.”
But Trump still believes the Central Park 5 were guilty. It was one of his obsessions, like his campaign to prove that President Obama was not born in the US.

The man is despicable beyond words. He must be kept out of the White House. I’m really getting sick of people trying to draw some kind of equivalency between him and HRC. Or the Hillary haters might say, well at least Trump won’t start WWIII. Given Trump’s outrageous behavior, he might be the one to start WWIII not Hillary. It’s Hillary or this malicious prevaricator who has no respect for our laws, judicial system or due process. I will vote for the only other alternative to this bellowing fascist.
LikeLike
Trump should be on the cover of some muckraking rag, and not running for the highest office in the land. He is the opposite of what we need.
LikeLike
Another hideous aspect to his continuing belief that the Central Park 5 are guilty is that it appeals to the racists, a not so subtle dog whistle, (it’s more like a fog horn). I will remain optimistic that America will reject this most horrible of presidential candidates in my memory or ever. But how did he get this far?
LikeLike
It’s a hard fact to accept, but he got this far through the support of our fellow Americans, people we’re sharing this country with. Let it be a wake up call for the rest of us that our society needs a lot of work: these attitudes not only still exist, but are prevalent.
LikeLike
Someone ought to investigate whether he used Trump Foundation money for those full-page ads. Bet he did.
LikeLike
Please sign this petition to MGM:
“Release any and all recordings of Donald Trump’s off-air remarks during the filming of ‘The Apprentice’. The American people deserve to be informed about their choices in this election.”
https://act.credoaction.com/sign/apprentice_tapes?t=2&akid=20078.4465700.t6gm0z
LikeLike
This morning Nate Silver’s forecast had Trump down to a 16 percent chance of winning the election
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo
I’ve read that the odds given by offshore gambling sites has predicted the winner in every election, and the odds currently favor that Hillary Clinton by a huge margine that she is going to win this election.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/mayakachroolevine/2016/10/09/people-are-placing-actual-bets-on-the-election-and-tonights-debate/#701ca35c797a
LikeLike
Speaking of bullies, our friend Eva is up to her usual tricks. I thought they would no longer be holding huge public rallies anymore. Maybe they meant that they would no longer be publicizing their rallies. Earlier in September, I had seen stickers on two children about a “march.” Then one day in midtown, when I saw a parent with children all wearing shirts with a new “possible” slogan, I knew something was up. Curiously, I googled the slogan that evening and could not find it online. Surprising for a group which likes to use social media. Never fear, their rally has already been turned into a commercial showing on NY1, a channel broadcast in almost every doctor’s office in NYC, so there is ample opportunity to misinform unknowing people.
I surely hope Trump loses. Once that happens, he can crawl back into whatever hole he came out of and he is welcome to take Eva with him.
LikeLike
But Beth, she gets high scores. That is supposed to mean she gets more money and preferential treatment. Tell John.
LikeLike
Eva ripped off the “possible” slogan a few years ago from AT&T, which had been running a “Rethink Possible” ad campaign around that time. (Those two words appear on my grandfathered AT&T hotspot every time I turn it on.) Apparently, there are no moral parameters constraining Eva’s notion of “possible”.
LikeLike