A recent article in The Guardian in the U.K. revealed the secret of Europe’s most successful school system: Finland. It is a four-letter word: P-L-A-Y.
The author, Patrick Butler, visited the Franzenia daycare center and describes what he saw.
Central to early years education in Finland is a “late” start to schooling. At Franzenia, as in all Finnish daycare centres, the emphasis is not on maths, reading or writing (children receive no formal instruction in these until they are seven and in primary school) but creative play. This may surprise UK parents, assailed as they are by the notion of education as a competitive race. In Finland, they are more relaxed: “We believe children under seven are not ready to start school,” says Tiina Marjoniemi, the head of the centre. “They need time to play and be physically active. It’s a time for creativity.”
Indeed the main aim of early years education is not explicitly “education” in the formal sense but the promotion of the health and wellbeing of every child. Daycare is to help them develop good social habits: to learn how to make friends and respect others, for example, or to dress themselves competently. Official guidance also emphasises the importance in pre-school of the “joy of learning”, language enrichment and communication. There is an emphasis on physical activity (at least 90 minutes outdoor play a day). “Kindergarten in Finland doesn’t focus on preparing children for school academically,” writes the Finnish educational expert Pasi Sahlberg. “Instead the main goal is to make sure that the children are happy and responsible individuals.”
Play, nonetheless, is a serious business, at least for the teachers, because it gives children vital skills in how to learn. Franzenia has 44 staff working with children, of whom 16 are kindergarten teachers (who have each completed a three-year specialist degree), and 28 nursery nurses (who have a two-year vocational qualification). The staff-child ratio is 1:4 for under-threes and 1:7 for the older children. Great care is taken to plan not just what kind of play takes place – there is a mix of “free play” and teacher-directed play – but to assess how children play. The children’s development is constantly evaluated. “It’s not just random play, it’s learning through play,” says Marjoniemi.
He cites British researcher David Whitbread, who says:
Carefully organised play helps develop qualities such as attention span, perseverance, concentration and problem solving, which at the age of four are stronger predictors of academic success than the age at which a child learns to read, says Whitebread. There is evidence that high-quality early years play-based learning not only enriches educational development but boosts attainment in children from disadvantaged backgrounds who do not possess the cultural capital enjoyed by their wealthier peers. Says Whitebread: “The better the quality of pre-school, the better the outcomes, both emotionally and socially and in terms of academic achievement.”
Importantly, early years care in Finland is designed and funded to ensure high take-up: every child has a legal right to high-quality pre-school care. In Franzenia, as in all daycare centres, there are children from a mix of backgrounds. Fees, subsidised by the state, are capped at a maximum of €290 (£250) a month (free for those on low incomes) for five-day, 40 hours a week care. About 40% of 1-3-year-olds are in daycare and 75% of 3-5-year-olds. Optional pre-school at the age of six has a 98% take-up. Initially envisaged in the 70s as a way of getting mothers back into the workplace, daycare has also become, Marjoniemi says, about “lifelong learning and how we prepare young children”.
Finnish educator look at the big picture, not test scores.
Daycare is not the only factor underpinning academic success. Hard-wired into Finland’s educational mission is the idea that equality is vital to economic success and societal wellbeing, as well as the belief that a small nation, reliant on creativity, ingenuity and solidarity to compete in the global economy, cannot afford inequality or segregation in schooling or health. Behind its stellar education ranking is a comprehensive social security and public health system that ensures one of the lowest child poverty rates in Europe, and some of the highest levels of wellbeing. Gunilla Holm, professor of education at the University of Helsinki, says: “The goal is that we should all progress together.”
Finnish children do not face the competitive pressures of children in the UK and US. When test scores on PISA dipped, what do you think Finnish educators did?
As UK educational policy becomes more narrow and centrally prescribed, Finland devolves more power to teachers and pupils to design and direct learning. Teachers are well paid, well-trained (they must complete a five-year specialist degree), respected by parents and valued and trusted by politicians. There is no Ofsted-style inspection of schools and teachers, but a system of self-assessment. Educational policy and teaching is heavily research-based.
Worried that its sliding Pisa scores reflected a complacency in its schools, national curriculum changes were introduced this year: these now devote more time to art and crafts. Creativity is the watchword. Core competences include “learning-to learn”, multiliteracy, digital skills and entrepreneurship. At the heart of the new curriculum, the National Board of Education says unashamedly, is the “joy of learning.”

It begs the question: Why do Finnish educators care about PISA scores?
I reckon many of them do not. I recall lots of Finnish teachers saying this very thing.
The ones who do are probably more concerned for economic reasons. PISA has brought fame to Finland, and they have always been struggling economically. A drop in PISA scores might not discredit themselves — to themselves — but it would look “bad” to other nations. Maybe the other nations won’t have to care so much about Finland anymore if the PISA scores fall too much…
Maybe the Finns, for educational and social benefit, would consider a different kind of economic system that is not reliant on competition and capital. As Albert Einstein said in his essay, Why Socialism?:
Einstein also said:
Unfortunately it is difficult to have a socialist economy when everyone else is doing capitalism, which pulls so strongly away from “play” and toward “work.” The Finns have managed to resist the pull of profit, capital, and competition in their education system, better than the rest of us it seems, but their “economy” pays the price in a global capitalist framework.
And no, a social welfare net is not “socialism,” that is capitalism with a social welfare net. Finland is a capitalist country that has “blunted” the “excesses” of capitalism as far as can possibly be done. Yet they still feel a strong economic pressure on their education system, and it is a burden on their society.
LikeLike
Ed Detective: thank you for the quotes from Albert Einstein.
For those interested in pursuing it further, I googled and found a link to the entire piece from which you draw your first citation—
Link: http://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
After a brief search I could not find the source of the second, but I would underscore its praise of the importance of intrinsic motivation in driving the development of creativity, perseverance and quality. [*e.g., see Daniel Pink, DRIVE, 2011]
Thank you for your comments.
😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
KrazyTA: Here is the source of the second quote: Albert Einstein ““On Education.” If you click “On Education,” that will take you to the link. (I linked to his essay in my previous post if you click on “Why Socialism?” — not sure how it appears in your phone/web browser/whatever.) There are some typo errors in the transcription. In the original, the two sentences I provided are separated slightly, and I should have put a “…” instead of a “.” Here is from the source:
[blockquote]Therefore, one should guard against preaching to the young man success in the customary sense as the aim of life. For a successful man is he who receives a great deal from his fellow men, usually incomparably more than corresponds to his service to them. The value of a man, however, should be seen in what he gives and not what he is able to receive.
The most important motive for work in the school and in life is pleasure in work, pleasure in its results, and the knowledge of the value of the result to the community. In the awakening and strengthening of the psychological forces in the young man, I see the most important task given by the school. Such a psychological foundation alone leads to a joyous desire for the highest possessions of men, knowledge and artist-like workmanship.[/blockquote]
The entire transcript is well worth reading, as is the previous essay. Einstein wasn’t just a “physicist,” he was a great philosopher of humankind.
LikeLike
Ed Detective: and thank you for the source of the second quote.
IMHO, an even better read than the first, from 1949, because it is much earlier, from 1931!
Raymond Chandler’s Philip Marlowe ain’t got nothin’ on you!
😎
LikeLike
From Albert Einstein On Education
LikeLike
“The most important motive for work in the school and in life is pleasure in work, pleasure in its results, and the knowledge of the value of the result to the community. In the awakening and strengthening of the MIND in the young, I see the most important task given by the school. Such a MENTAL AND PHYSICAL foundation alone leads to a joyous desire for the highest possessions of men, knowledge and artist-like workmanship.”
As a master upholsterer and teacher, I’ve found very few in possession of that “artist-like workmanship” in any craft, job, or position. What is the difference between “artist-like” and just plain workmanship? It is attention to the smallest details that most overlook. It is a “feel” for the work in which those small details are tended to. It is a connoisseurship of detail.
How can folks get to that point of “artist-like workmanship”? Well it begins with knowing that in the teaching and learning process we teach nothing. It is the student that learns something and as teachers we should be guiding each student in their own path of learning within the realm of our subject matter/grade level.
And as we’ve been instructed by the constitutional mandate for providing public education public education the fundamental purpose must be:
“The purpose of public education is to promote the welfare of the individual so that each person may savor the right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the fruits of their own industry.”
So that all students may acquire that “artist-like workmanship” in all areas of life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Had forgotten about that particular Einstein writing. Thanks for the reminder.
LikeLike
Very informative and thought provoking article.
Here, in Pakistan, sending young kids of 3 to 4 years is becoming a trend. I also think that the minimum age for a kid to go school should be seven years as it is in Finland.
Its the age when a kid gains a handsome vocab and can take care of himself too..
LikeLiked by 1 person
I assume they do not feel competitive about their PISA score, but responsive to it. Their philosophy of life is very reflective and whole, so why would they not analyze what they could do better? This is why they do so well, they research, practice, teach, and live in a way that works for everyone.
LikeLike
“Their philosophy of life is very reflective and whole, so why would they not analyze what they could do better?”
Because they are wise enough to know that a higher PISA score does not necessarily mean “better education system.”
Five nations are above Finland in reading PISA scores:
Shanghai (China)
Hong Kong (China)
Singapore
Japan
South Korea
Do you think the Finnish are looking to trade their education system with the Chinese, for example?
Yong Zhao explains in his book, Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Dragon? that the Chinese are secretly desperate to move away from their own system… and more toward a system like the Finns’.
Must say something about the validity of PISA scores as education system “measures.” If your PISA scores increase, does it really mean your ed system got better? If the scores decrease, does it mean you’re really doing worse?
LikeLike
Finland is the top country in Europe on Pisa tests.
LikeLike
It seems to me that PISA tests can be useful if they are not taken too seriously, or used as the “goal” for education system reform. Yong Zhao and Pasi Sahlberg have varying opinions on the purpose and validity of PISA, but it seems we could all agree on that point.
That’s a big IF. How likely is it that we can keep PISA scores in a proper perspective/context? It seems to me that the most likely use of PISA is for political and business opportunists, who can claim that education systems are failing if scores ever drop or if they are not high overall. Are we going to revamp our ed system if PISA scores drop? Are we going to use PISA as a reason to say we are not as good as the other countries, and then, what will be our solution? Probably hasty reforms.
Is someone in Europe going to pass Finland on PISA, and then we believe that surely this country has the better ed system? But what if they did it by increasing test culture to sacrifice arts, humanities, creativity, etc.? That might give them scores like the Chinese.
And the more you believe education is about “human potential” rather than just comprehension in literacy, math, or some narrow discipline, the less seriously you can take PISA or any test/score.
LikeLike
“How likely is it that we can keep PISA scores in a proper perspective/context?”
Slim to none!
But that question begs this one:
Why give any credence to a process that has been shown to be COMPLETELY INVALID?
LikeLike
Well-trained, trusted and respected teachers; teachers who are free to create their own curriculum based on play and the arts. What a wonderful prescription for early childhood education. When will the US wake up?
LikeLike
Our politicians think that only THEY are God’s chosen people on education and many other vitally important subjects. Tragically they are killing, as we all know, quality education here BUT some corporate CEOs are making out like bandits in charters and for profit colleges. Indeed, we can count on corporate know how to – make money the bottom line. Forget people. Soon they will have a pile of money and well join the rest of the 3rd world countries.
LikeLike
“Our politicians think that only THEY are God’s chosen people. . . ”
They are! That is they are the underworld gods’ chosen people.
LikeLike
I know folks might think I’m lately having bad case of Success Academy O.C.D., but gosh darn it, I just recalled some stuff that Eva once said this is relevant to the above topic:.
During an interview with REASON TV’s Nick Gillespie, Eva advocates for and brags about her schools implementing what ed reformers continually refer to as “rigor”… which is …
THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT THE FOLKS IN FINLAND ARE ADVOCATING:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
( 1:53 – )
( 1:53 – )
EVA MOSKOWITZ: “One of the fundamental differences between us and other schools is the level of RIGOR that we have.
(GET READY FOR THIS QUOTE)
“What’s kids are doing now (in public school) in Third Grade, we (at Success Academy are doing in First Grade and Kindergarten. We are MANIACAL about reading.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
I can just imagine any Finnish readers — of this blog rolling their eyes and shaking their heads at that one. Actor Matt Damon’s mom, early child expert Nancy Carlsson-Paige, has demolished this approach to early education, and done so in detail OVER and OVER and OVER … yet in charter-land, it remains “the coin of the realm.”
But wait, it gets better.
Check out Eva’s classic speech from “Camp Philos 2014” — the annual corporate ed. reform retreat and closed event where all the premier corporate education reformers give speeches to each other and share their latest brilliant innovations and overall philosophies for education.
Any-hoo, Eva bragged about and shared the heart-warming of Sidney, the deathly-ill Success Academy child who demanded she nevertheless be allowed to take a state standardized test (Common Core). Mind you, Sidney was in the throes of a life-threatening and on-going battle with sickle cell anemia (!!!), and she was asking to be tested in her hospital bed (!!!) and on the day very that she had just her infected spleen removed (!!!) WTF???!!!
No, this is not from THE ONION.
I mean, seriously, you CAN’T make this sh%# up. Forget the internal Success Academy training videos Eva just scrubbed from the net; THIS is the one that should have been taken down.
The galactically tone-deaf and deranged Eva tells this too-creepy-for-words story to lead up to her main point (again, Eva’s sort of the anti-Finland):
““Children are incredibly resilient, and I would urge you to think about NOT treating children AS children… ”
Wow! Great advice, Eva! I’ll be implementing that with my students first thing Monday morning!
During Common Core testing, Sidney, again, was in a life-threatening battle with sickle-cell anemia. Even at the most severe moment of crisis in her health, Sidney insisted on taking the entirety of that year’s Common Core testing. The adults around argued otherwise, because she had just had just had infected spleen removed, and she “had lost a lot of weight,” and “was extremely cold and weak.” In the light of this, the principal informed Sidney that she was entitled to claim a “medical excuse” and delay taking the test.
However, Sidney wouldn’t hear of it, and took the test.
“I want to get a 4,” Sidney replied, with Eva recounting these words with emotion.
Eva’s point?
( 02:10 – 03:03 )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY719-TpYas
( 02:10 – 03:03 )
EVA MOSKOWITZ: “Children are incredibly resilient, and I would urge you to think about NOT treating children AS children… I think that we have underestimated in this country the pleasure that comes from achieving mastery, and from performance. In my experience, kids actually want to perform. They WANT to MASTER. Sidney was a PERFECT EXAMPLE, even though she was in a life-threatening situation.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Sweet Lord! What is WRONG with this woman?
“Cue the Supremes:
Here’s the coverage on this blog of the Eva’s 2014 Camp Philos speech: (with some funny Comments):
And don”t forget! Eva recently used her political clout to circumvent a court order denying public funds for her unregulated Pre-K classes. The courts had said, “No regulation, no cash for Pre-K — PERIOD — THE END”, and the matter seemed closed.
However, Eva called in her favors with folks the New York state legislature whose campaigns that she and her allies funded. Per her marching order, those politicians did an end-run around this court-mandated obstacle. In the end, Eva got those funds, no strings attached, as she demanded in the first place..
(In the same bill, Eva’s folks in Albany also changed the law that mandated that her teachers were barred for teaching without a credential for more than one year — they now can do so for up to 5 years — but that’s another story.)
That’s right. Eva is now fully funded, and totally free of oversight to inflict this on children as young as 4 (or 3 for those with late birthdays in Sepember-thru-December.)
LikeLike
Good reading. Thanks Jack.
LikeLike
Finland’s educational system is terrific. But the most critical component in how kids do in school ironically is not the facilities they attend but what goes on in the home. If we compare the populations of Finland vs. the US, one very significant difference is the remarkably high literacy rate in Finland, hovering around 98-99%. In this country the best estimates are about 73-77%. While the infusion of refugees coming to Finland will undoubtedly lower that percentage, it is unlikely to sink as low as the US. Family literacy changes dramatically the behaviors at home. Low literacy parents are much less likely to read to their preschool children. And the modeling their kids see doesn’t include reading as an ordinary part of their day. There are rarely any printed materials in their homes including newspapers or magazines, shopping lists or the myriad pieces of papers customarily hanging around a literate household. There are a slew of behaviors that conflate with this absence. Schools promote one view that is (in psychological terms) “sabotaged” by a different attitude at home. It isn’t that these parents don’t want their kids to succeed, they don’t know how vital their role is in ensuring their children do well in school. Moreover even if they do they don’t have the tools to help their kids effectively.
Aside from how much additional family supports are offered in that tiny country against the at best benign indifference of the US, Finland is astonishingly homogenous. 99% share the identical religious background. Almost all speak at least another language (Swedish was mandated from early grades on) and an inordinate percentage speak some English. Finnish is notoriously difficult to acquire so many citizens are forced to become multi-lingual. With a highly educated population from virtually the same culture, it is considerably easier to educate its children. Compare that to say Selma, AL. Once the only separate demographics were racially based, Caucasian and African-Americans. Since that seminal march across the Pettit Bridge, today kids entering Selma schools speak 50+ languages at home. Their cultural backgrounds are vastly different, and parental modeling is impossible to neatly characterize. Social services are strained (broken might not be too fine a point to use), and healthcare for children in AL, despite the strong support for their CHIP program in that state, is badly funded. Most working poor adults have no access to Medicaid. There are few resources for psychological help available.
If we want to level the playground in the US, Finland is unfortunately a pipe dream.
LikeLike
What Finland does is not a pipe dream, even here. They make sure that kids have medical care and food. And they do what is developmentally appropriate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. Yeah, Finland is different from the US, but it doesn’t mean, their main ideas about education should be discarded.
This argument of “they are different hence we need to something different” is a standard excuse of the reformers and many others.
I add to Diane’s advice “give more free time to kids and parents” so that they have more time together. Giving less breaks, less home works have nothing to do with a country being homogeneous or multicultural.
LikeLike
Play is essential to the learning process. Without play, children lose their creativity. And without creativity, there is no innovation. I find it extremely interesting that Finland doesn’t think that children should be in school until the age of seven. I think that is a great thing. To give the children more time to run and play and develop socially before putting them into the conventional school setting. Thank you for posting such an interesting topic!
LikeLike
Could we envision that all children can swim, float and tread in the water? Or would we prefer a few excellent children can swim far and fast, but the majority of other children sink and drown?
This is exactly the difference in education between public schools and charter schools.
Public schools offer from Special Ed, Applied, and Gifted curriculum that are suited to all children who enjoy their appropriate learning levels.
Charter schools loot public education fund, pick and choose learners, then discipline them in military style. Finally, administrators and its teaching staff are not certified or unqualified for their positions.
Why do GOP and corporate enforce public to suffer all chaos like CCSS and all strenuous – invalid over-testing scheme?
Why do they want to sink and drown the public children?
People contribute their working tax into the public education fund for public school to support a FREE “whole child education” concept. Back2basic
LikeLike
There is no doubt that the Finnish schools and methodology are prime examples of exemplary education. We need to consider in the mix, however, that the entire population of Finland is that of the population of school children in the city of New York and that the population is more homogeneous. This said, there is no doubt that we have lost in many societies, child-directed/adult-monitored play, giving way instead, to adult-directed, highly competitive activities, e.g., sports that eat up and result in less confident, often less imaginative and resourceful young learners.
In America where I practiced for many years as a speech-language pathologist specialized in diagnosis and treatment of hard-to-diagnosis children with academic difficulties, we saw the downward extension of upper-level curriculum into the lower grades and preschool. In Italy, where I have an educational project now, we see (despite the pioneering work of Maria Montessori), a woeful lack of teaching methodology, prepared teachers and a structure of supporting challenged learners. So, while it is easy to point to Finland’s plan for success as a model, we need also, to consider the cultural/societal structural factors of a small country that make it possible. Of particular interest and importance here, is the notion of giving teachers more control — with the caveat that they are well-prepared as teachers. The of importance of instilling success as one engages in their ‘trade’, i.e., the teacher and the developing child, is crucial to the advancement of all learners including teachers.
We need to make sure that teachers are well-prepared, well-paid and respected for their essential work that often has lifelong effects on children as empathetic learners. Further we need to insure that parents are given the means to make sure that their children have access to education that is inclusive and promotes active learners without having to compete for a place in an exclusive educational setting.
Nancy Rose Steinbock, M.A., CCC-SLP
Creator/Director
Inglese Dinamico
Venice, Italy
http://www.inglesedinamico.com
LikeLike
There is nothing done in Finnish schools that we couldn’t do in the US
LikeLike
Diane said: “There is nothing done in Finnish schools that we couldn’t do in the US.”
Exactly… anything else is a rationalization. What they do in Finland is not super complicated. It may actually be less complicated.
Here is my review of Finnish Lessons:
Review: Finnish Lessons 2.0
LikeLike
“What they do in Finland is not super complicated.”
I think the complication is not where many claim it to be; it’s not with the multiple cultures in the US but with the resistance to making social changes.
LikeLike
Yes, the education and policy ideas are simple. What is more complicated and difficult in the U.S. is breaking down ideology and moving forward politically. We love to believe we are “number one.” Why change if you are the greatest country, and gatekeeper of the great virtues of “the profit motive” and “competition?” Pfft, we don’t need no Finnish solutions.
LikeLike
A few things to note. The difference between Finnish girls and Finnish boys performance on PISA is, I believe, the largest among OECD countries. Boys are falling behind; girls are suffering from academic burnout in their early 20s and earlier. I believe teachers in the States are better paid than teachers in Finland; the difference is that the there are a lot more jobs in the States that pay much higher salaries than teachers than there are in Finland. Finland’s success is bringing up the lowest performers and largely ignoring students above average. Surely all children should be taught to their potential (the US fails weak students). Finnish is by and large a phonemic language and thus much easier to learn to read than English. Many children thus already know how to read before school. Finland’s success in PISA is success on a test. It doesn’t translate into economic success (The Finnish economy is one of the weakest in Europe; Nokia was run into the ground by poor decision making by its Finnish executives). Economic success is not the only measure, obviously, but labeling a country as a success because its students perform well on a test isn’t a very good one either.
LikeLike
“Finland’s success in PISA is success on a test”
That’s the problem with PISA. You can claim it is “just” success on a test, and you’re right. How do we know it is actually a “good” ed system?
But Finland does have a good education system. Not just good — it is visionary. Not ideal, but it is beyond the rest of us.
The real success of Finland is their social equity, broad curriculum, local autonomy, learner-centered methods, high teacher qualifications, play-based early childhood education, and much more. These are real successes. None of these things are impossible for us.
Good education systems — philosophically speaking — do not necessarily mean large and stable economies. And vice versa. The economy is not a measure of education quality; it is not even a measure of economic well-being. GDP tells about productivity, not quality of living. The U.S. has a great big economy, but also extreme inequality and high child poverty. There’s a lot of stuff wrong here that isn’t wrong in nations with much less “powerful” economies.
Nor is military power indicative of well-being or good education systems. It indicates that we have a large budget and are willing to prioritize so much of it towards the military.
PISA may just make it more difficult to determine what is the right way. Finland happens to have high scores and be a good ed system. Other systems with high scores are not necessarily “good,” in my opinion, and in the opinion of others like Yong Zhao. It’s a big flaw in PISA (and this entire method of “measurement”) that two systems can both get a score of “550,” for example, and be very different systems. What does that “550” really mean?
Just as two students can both get an “88%,” and they are very different students who learned very different things.
What’s this obsession with measuring everyone and everything by the same “yardstick,” and this yardstick was created by… people? To determine who is smarter or better, or whatever. Rarely do we hear about the test designers’ vision of what “smarter” or “better” really is. That higher PISA scores are “better” says that it is imperative for all people/ed systems to do whatever will bring higher scores. Who says I need to have a higher score on PISA than someone else? Does that make them smarter or better? Only if you believe PISA (the people who made PISA) is OMNISCIENT.
More likely, a good education system would acknowledge that people are different, have different goals, and have their own different limits and priorities. That doesn’t necessarily make them worse or better.
Test scores can never be our compass. We are removing ourselves from judging ed systems based on logic, reason, observations — and placing judgment in the hands of a test metric. That’s insanity, though it is very politically convenient. If PISA is our compass, that’s a mistake.
(This was a rant, not all directed to you, Joe)
LikeLike
“It doesn’t translate into economic success (The Finnish economy is one of the weakest in Europe; Nokia was run into the ground by poor decision making by its Finnish executives). ”
One of the weakest? Are you directly comparing a country of 5 million people and not yet 100 years old with, say, France which is 1500 years old with a population of 66 million?
The economy of the rich, which is often measured in world influence, doesn’t translate into the well being of the people.
LikeLike
Can someone remind me again how we know that Finland’s education policies are an “amazing success”?
LikeLike
FLERP,
I have visited public schools in Finland. They look like our best private schools. Architects compete to design beautiful schools. Teachers spend five years preparing. Teachers are respected. The schools of Finland are an amazing success.
LikeLike
Each one of those things sounds good to me, and, ceteris paribus, every school should have them. But it’s a description of what Finland’s schools are, not an explanation of how they succeed, unless we define a “successful school” as “a school that does the things I think a school should do.”
LikeLike
Why do they have to resemble some of our best ‘private’ schools. Lest we forget, we have some extraordinary public schools in America. And, more than just a handful.
LikeLike
Finnish first
http://blip.tv/hdnet-news-and-documentaries/dan-rather-reports-finnish-first-6518828
LikeLike
I never understood the push to do better than everyone else on the PISA? What for? Bragging rights?
I’m sorry. I don’t need to fill my ego with the idea that my child is smarter than yours. I just want my children to be happy.
On a personal note – I graduated from college Phi Beta Kappa, Magna Cum Laude but high grades didn’t get me a job. In the grand scheme of things – nobody cares (except maybe me). I still have to pay over $2.00 for a cup of coffee and not once has the DMV asked to see my diploma.
So, let kids be kids and stop worrying if they can do algebraic equations better then the other kindergarteners.
LikeLike
Finland doesn’t care about test scores. It’s high ranking on PISA keeps away the free market zealots, which Pasi Sahlberg calls GERM–the Global Educational Rwform Movement
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
Perhaps it’s worth emphasizing that the 5 year teacher training in Finland means more than just one extra year over the usual US teacher training: while US teachers accumulate about 120 credit hours during the 4 years, Finnish teachers need to complete about 300 credit hours.
At least this is my understanding of
Studies
are quantified in credit units within the Euro-
pean Credit Transfer and Accumulation System
(ECTS) used in 46 European countries. ECTS is
based on the assumption that 60 credits measure
the workload of a full-time student during one
academic year, and each ECTS credit stands for
around 25 to 30 working hours. Teacher educa-
tion requirements are 180 ECTS credits for a
bachelor’s degree followed by 120 ECTS credits
for a master’s degree.
This is on page 3 of
Click to access secret-finland%E2%80%99s-success-educating-teachers.pdf
In other words, in college, Finnish teachers work twice as much as their US counterparts while before, as students, and after, as teachers, they work half as much as US teachers.
LikeLike
This is a wonderful documentary by Dan Rather
” Finnish First”
http://blip.tv/hdnet-news-and-documentaries/dan-rather-reports-finnish-first-6518828
LikeLike
So inspiring!
LikeLike
Love school in Finland. You can study a good variety of subject without worrying about the cost. In the States, we have to pay by credits, which hinders your design to learn more.
LikeLike