Caroline Grannan writes here about the rise and fall of a Big Reform Idea called “the parent trigger,” championed by an organization called Parent Revolution. Ben Austin started Parent Revolution as a way to empower disgruntled parents to take control of their low-scoring public school and turn it over to a charter operator. Austin led the charge for new legislation to codify Parent Revolution’s big idea (Gloria Romero claimed credit for writing the legislation; she became executive director of DFER after leaving the legislature). Parent Revolution attracted millions of dollars from the usual billionaires, including Gates, Broad, and Wasserman.
After many favorable articles, editorials, and massive publicity, what has PR accomplished?
Not much.
Grannan writes:
“Parent Revolution (PRev) started in Los Angeles in a blaze of publicity in 2009, predicting with great fanfare and much enthusiastic press coverage that it would transform many “failing” public schools into charter schools. PRev created the “parent trigger,” whereby a 50%+1 majority of parents at a school can sign a petition forcing “transformation” of the school, or forcing the school to close. PRev lobbying led to a California law in early 2010 allowing parent triggers statewide.
“Despite the fanfare, in those seven years, PRev has succeeded in turning only one school into a charter school – Desert Trails Elementary in Adelanto (San Bernardino County), Calif., in 2012. That effort ripped the school community apart — splitting up friendships, creating deeply hostile factions and even leading to schoolyard fights among the kids. Reports on the results of the charterization are wildly mixed, and the mainstream media, which descended on Adelanto eagerly to cover the battle, lost interest in following up afterward.
“Parent Revolution began in 2009 under the auspices of Los Angeles’ Green Dot charter school chain, launched by the mercurial, once-admired Green Dot founder Steve Barr. The intent appeared to be to enable Green Dot to take over schools.
“Barr’s name is no longer mentioned in connection with PRev, possibly because of his checkered history, including a rapidly squelched flap about misuse of funds and some much-publicized failed projects. The story of Barr and the Green Dot charters he founded has been marked by rifts, feuds and separations, as has the story of PRev itself. Since PRev began operating on a statewide and then national scope, there has never again been public discussion of Green Dot taking over a parent trigger school.
PRev has run parent triggers in a few schools around Los Angeles, claiming to have achieved some changes less drastic than charterization. In one case, its petitions got the principal fired – and all but one or two teachers left the school in protest, with many parents objecting that they hadn’t meant to get rid of the principal or drive out the teachers.
The
“There’s never anything but the most vague and sketchy press follow-up of PRev efforts. Reports pop up in the press trumpeting PRev efforts that are never heard from again. I started following PRev to begin with because former PRev Executive Director Ben Austin told the press he had operations going in my school community in San Francisco. Yet there has never again been a sighting of PRev operations here.
PRev moved to the national stage, lobbying to get laws allowing parent triggers in various states. Because my ability as a volunteer to keep tabs on every PRev activity is limited, I can’t give a complete count of what states PRev lobbied in and what states passed parent trigger laws, but the efforts and the story that the parent trigger was spreading nationwide were widely and enthusiastically covered in the press.
“During those campaigns, PRev had paid staffers pose as school parents and testify before lawmakers – as was known to happen in Florida and Texas – and PRev claimed routinely and falsely that it had successfully transformed many schools in California, as reported in the Florida press.”
In short, after spending millions of dollars, PRev took over one public school.
PRev now plans to advise parents on how to choose a school.
PRev has been yet another disastrous failure for corporate reform.
The parent trigger fires blanks.

The reason Parent Revolution failed is because the at risk children that need the most support to gain an education mostly live in poverty and/or come from dysfunctional homes with dysfunctional parents or parents so busy working two-or-three jobs that pay poverty wages, they don’t have time to be parents even if they want to.
Starting an organization called Parent Revolution isn’t going to change what can’t be changed unless failing parents want to change or jobs start paying livable wages so parents that want to do a better job can spend more time supporting their children’s education. Children that come from homes with caring engaged parents don’t need to be saved, because most if not all of these children will learn in any school and any classroom no matter what.
LikeLike
That’s definitely the heart of the matter and the heart of the reason Parent Revolution has failed. Also, it was never an attempt to help any children who live in poverty — it was an attempt to help charter-school operators — but charter-school operators didn’t want the help. Once that became apparent, Parent Revolution’s goal simply became keeping itself alive and its funders convinced for as long as possible.
LikeLike
Simply, Parent Revolution was and still is a con that’s making money off the likes of gullible Eli Broad, the Waltons, Bill Gates, et al.
LikeLike
I resist the use of the term reformers, quotes or not. if you use a word, it retains meaning. I call them now enemies of public education.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Enemies of the state, because their plan destroys a vital component of American democracy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Something we all have to deal with. My choice has been to use “so-called ‘reformers,’ ” always with scare quotes, and using “so-called” in its proper sense, which is to convey an air of extreme cynicism.
LikeLike
And I use Deformers.
LikeLike
Jesse Hagopium has an insightful article at Truthout, “Black to School: The Rising Struggle to Make Black Education Matter”. He exposes the big picture campaign of the financial and tech industry plutocrats. The “parent trigger” was a tactical move in the attack against American communities, taxpayers and kids.
LikeLike
Ed reform in Ohio continues to be a disaster for Ohio:
“72.5 percent of all state charter funding went to charters that do not perform as well as the local school district; 80 percent of all money sent to eSchools came from higher performing local school districts.”
All the national politicians will be parachuting in here shortly, for campaign season.
Maybe one of them could tear themselves away from the ed reform echo chamber long enough to address this?
It might be time to start directing some investment towards the unfashionable and forgotten “public school sector”
https://knowyourcharter.com/2016/08/16/new-state-report-card-data-show-low-scores-continue-plague-ohios-charter-schools/
LikeLike
Parents are not using the parent trigger because they do not see their public schools as “failing.” “Reform” is not a legitimate movement. It is imposed movement back by billionaires, corporations and some political leaders including our president. “Reform” is more about greed, politics and social engineering than education. One of the best articles about the social impact of school closure is from the current “Mother Jones” blog. While they trace the impact of school closures in Philly, their supporting statistics are shocking. While many teachers have been victims of “reform,” teachers and communities of color have been disproportionately impacted. In addition to destabilizing and reshaping urban neighborhoods, they are firing a lot of teachers, especially minority teachers. The charter replacement alternative schools are mostly hiring white teachers, and the prevailing ideology of the new school is mostly colonialist. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/09/black-teachers-public-schools-education-system-philadelphia
LikeLike
This is how you handle those douchebag charter school recruiters.
A couple years back, Eva’s winged monkey recruiters had been lurking outside traditional public schools in a more upscale New York City neighborhood where Eva was about to open a school, accosting parents with a sales pitch to ditch their public school for one of Eva’s test prep factories.
Unlike the uninformed lower income immigrant community folks and who were duped into enrolling at Success Academy, and who were unaware of how the existence of a Success Academy school would drain funding from the pre-existing traditional public school, these folks knew what these recruiters were all about.
The parents and teachers then got in the face of one of Eva’s winged monkey recrutiers, with the confrontation captured on video: (is he wearing one of Success Academy’s L.L. Bean’s backpacks?)
I’m urging parent leaders Karen Wolfe and Adam Benitez, and teacher union leaders to like UTLA President Alex C-P to play this video to every parent and teacher, respectively that each of them can get to watch it.
The Broad Plan will unleash hundreds of these paid recruiters to accost parent and student at our traditional public schools., in an effort to poach the students attending public schools … with the ultimate goal being to trash the entire system, and — as in New Orleans — convert all schools into privately-run corporate charter schools.
Get lost, you money-motivated charter shills!!!!
One of the teachers / parents here in the video was Jamie Fidler, a nationally renown teacher who came into prominence in the documentary AMERICAN TEACHER (a mixed bag of a film, but that’s another story).
They kept protesting, and Eva’s winged monkeys were never seen again.
HAPPY ENDING
… or better yet, here’s some video confronting Parent Revolution organizers outside Weigand Elementary, in South Los Angeles:
and here:
When things calmed down, here’s an account from two parents: (Sorry, it’s in Spanish… )
And from one teacher: (again, it’s in Spanish … I believe the words in the title are “lying” and “violence”):
LikeLike
Jack…don’t know if you got this email…sent to a long and old list from former exposes on PRev. Again, Gabe Rose who is second in command with a hefty salary, skirts legality. Remember Adelanto when the hoaxed uninformed Latino parents tried to change their signatures to NO, and Austin and Rose were there on the spot to force the petition through. This email below seems to have been intercepted by an insider and just sent to many to show what scam artists these PRev leaders still are. Gloria Romero is defecating bricks. Hope this gets broader publication as with Karin Klein and Howard Blume (even though it is dated 2010) who can really investigate this new intrigue and report on it for all the world to read. As you can see, Ben Austin is still in on this crap…even though he now works full time for Eli Broad. Surprised that Deasy and Villaraigosa, and Monica Garcia, the other Broad collaborators, were not also copied.
From: Gabe Rose [mailto:grose@parentrevolution.org] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 4:50 PM To: Marco Petruzzi; Vielka McFarlane Cc: baustin@parentrevolution.org Subject: big favor
marco and vielka –
we are in the middle of a brutal rescission fight with compton unified – school staff is going all out to browbeat parents into taking back their signatures. we are obviously fighting this out on the ground, but we want to get a better grip on legal issue of rescission, and how much latitude CUSD has to rescind on behalf of parents.
just got off the phone with dan chang, and he said that paul minney and team wrote an opinion for Green Dot about this exact same issue during the locke fight (except with teacher signature rescissions), in the summer of 2007. memo was all about case law surround the right to rescind one’s signature once it is submitted to a governmental agency. this would obviously be extremely helpful for us to have and read through.
vielka, could you request this from paul, and marco, would you be willing to release it to us? i’m sure it is under attorney/client privilege, so we’d definitely need your permission. would really appreciate it!
gabe
LikeLike