As you surely know, Senator Bernie Sanders endorsed former Secretary Hillary Clinton at a joint appearance in New Hampshire today.
I listened on the radio to their respective speeches. Bernie was inspirational as he recapped his campaign themes and said that he believed Hillary Clinton would be faithful to his agenda. Hillary Clinton echoed much of what Bernie Sanders said. Both sought unity, facing what is likely to be a tough campaign against Donald Trump. Trump has turned his campaign into an almost stereotypical Republican tough-guy appeal to the Silent Majority. He continually tells people that America is weak but he is strong. He supports “America First,” a phrase that I thought was long associated with the discredited isolationist wing of the GOP. He says that the world laughs at us because we are losers; he will turn us into winners again. I listened to him speak in Indiana this evening, and he said–referring to the Dallas shootings–that he is the candidate who is “tough on crime.” He said again and again that he would build the wall shutting off our southern border, with a gate that opens only for those who have met legal requirements. He said to the crowd, “Who will pay for the wall?” And they thundered back, “Mexico!” I want to know why Trump thinks that the Mexican government is ready to pay billions of dollars to build a wall. I don’t get it.
He is hitting all the right notes in appealing to an angry, fearful public, one that is rightfully worried about their jobs and their economic well-being. Underlying their fear, however, is old-fashioned nativism, a sense that outsiders, aliens, immigrants are taking over the country and that white males are losing their commanding power.
I juxtapose these events with my day. I decided a few days ago that since I had endorsed Hillary and plan to vote for her, I would make a contribution to her campaign. I bought tickets to a special matinee of “Hamilton,” whose cast and crew put on a Tuesday matinee for a private performance dedicated to her campaign. I sat with my partner, Mary, my son and his spouse, and our 9-year-old grandson. For reasons I don’t understand, the show has an enormous following among teens and pre-teens. My grandson was mouthing the words as he watched.
The show was everything it is cracked up to be. I am not a huge fan of rap, yet this show won me over. It seemed to be a rap operetta. The energy of the dancing and staging is remarkable. It is dazzling, fast-moving, and conceptually brilliant. It is the story of the founding of America, with the founding fathers played by actors of color. The show was introduced by historian Ron Chernow, who wrote the Hamilton biography that served as source material for the play.
When it ended, Lin-Manuel Miranda, the man who wrote the book, music, and lyrics, spoke to the audience about the show. He literally reinvented the founding of our nation to include everyone. He said the show was about our founding ideals, and our struggle to reach them, which always fell short. Because humans are fallible, he said, we never reach them, yet we keep trying. And he posed the question: Who is likely to keep trying to meet those ideals–Clinton or Trump? The choice was easy.
Miranda then introduced Hillary Clinton, who had just flown in from New Hampshire and was glowing. The audience belonged to her, so there was a lot of love in the room.
Bernie Sanders promised to travel the nation to rally his followers to vote for Clinton. The threat of a Trump presidency is unthinkable. From his performance today, we can expect that he will use his travels to build the movement that he launched. And that will be good for all of us.
So guess Billy will be her economic advisor as she stated early on? If so, well …
And does she understand the perils of charter schools and the power of public schools?
I could go on, but won’t.
Bottom line: Bernie doesn’t want to be responsible for a Drumph presidency.
I am disgusted to the core.
Disappointed but not shocked that Sanders endorsed Hillary. Makes no difference to me: #StillNotWithHer. Likely voting for Jill Stein. Donald Clinton or Hillary Trump mean more suffering for everyone who matters to me.
Bernie supporters are very upset. Why? Because in failing to pick Bernie, we blew it. We lost the chance to have one of the greatest, if not the greatest President to ever lead this country — at the exact time he was needed.
I would slightly rather the criminal, unethical, sophiopathic Hillary get elected over the insane, ridiculous, and bigoted Trump, but I’m still voting Jill Stein, who is 100x closer to the kind of leader and platform we need. Here’s a piece of advice to anyone who plans on blaming Stein voters for a Trump presidency: you will not only be wrong, since it will be at least as much Hillary’s, the DNC’s, the mainstream media’s, etc. fault if Trump is elected — but you will lose the respect of those you blame. Jill Stein voters are voting for “the change they want to see in the world.” If everyone voted this way rather than out of fear, we could elect someone like Jill Stein, and have tuition-free college, single-payer healthcare, green energy program, and all the things we really need. If we don’t get these things, you can just as quickly blame those who didn’t vote for Jill.
It is true that Jill has far less exposure, and the public is generally brainwashed to vote against their own best interests, so it is true that in the November election Jill does not have much chance to actually become president. If Jill gets to 5%, however, her party gets national funding; if she gets to 15%, she gets on the national televised debate stage (though we should work to change those stupid rules.) My state is going for Hillary, no matter how I vote. Swing-state voters are in more of an unfortunate situation than I am. If swing voters believe Trump would be worse than Hillary, they should consider taking the bitter medicine and voting slightly lesser of two evils, because they have more power to decide which evil takes office.
Sorry, but if you live in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, or even Wisconsin, Michigan, Colorado, Nevada or any other deep or light “purple” state—where the stakes are high and the outcome could be very close—and you STILL might vote for a third party, then you’re gambling, quite literally, with the fate of the nation and much more important, the fate of humanity and the planet itself.
I’m no fan of Hillary Clinton either—isn’t it amusing to remember that in 1992 to 1994 she was seen as this “wild eyed liberal political radical and feminist” who would pull her spouse “far to the left”—but I can’t imagine voting for Stein or anyone else unless you reside in California or Massachusetts or Alabama or Texas, where the outcome is already a foregone conclusion.
Elections are rarely about one superb, dream candidate versus a horrific one. (However, this year, the “horrific” part is clear when it comes to Trump.) Voting for Hillary isn’t about putting an ideal candidate into the White House—rather it’s about stopping a true neo-Fascist, sociopath who would then assume the most powerful office on the face of the earth.
Please don’t miss the main point here: this election is about protection, and survival. We can’t afford to even think about “making a statement” here; the result, this time, wouldn’t be a McCain, or Dole, or Romney—as bad as any of them would be, the harm they could do would pale in comparison to the unmitigated evil and mental instability of Donald Trump.
Though I understand your point of view, and have agreed that certain voters will have to more strongly consider voting Hillary — you are another who is underestimating the potential evil of Hillary and overestimating the guilt that 3rd party voters should take on. Trump is not just some kind of anomaly, he has gained this kind of support because of the conditions that these “lesser evils” helped create. Trump is one logical conclusion of this attitude that we must eternally prevent the worst, rather than vote for what we really want. Blaming 3rd party voters if Trump gets into office would be like blaming the final broken link in a long chain, when all the previous links were already very weak and caused the final one to snap.
I expect all who clearly understand the problem with lesser evil voting will work to fix our election system beyond this 2016 election. Or should we continue casting blame on 3rd party voters when we do nothing to change the system that allows us only two bad choices?
not just overestimating the guilt 3rd party voters should take on, but the responsibility.
Disgusted by everything, and everyone. The empire is corrupt to the core.
Entirely agreed, 21st Century Poet. Now that Bernie has endorsed HRC, the country can proceed to exist like it’s the setting for The Emperor’s New Clothes– Let’s all just pretend that HRC isn’t beholden to Wall Street and the likes of Alice Walton, because Bernie endorsed her. Forget it. I’m voting Green. This country is a joke.
Nader is usually my conscience (protest) vote. Now it will be Jill Stein.
Republicans oppress and repress us and like it. Democrats oppress and repress us and expect us to like it. Oh, and be “civil.” Now that’s a joke. Too bad it’s on us.
I like Thomas Jefferson. Harriet Tubman should’ve replaced Alexander Hamilton instead of Andrew Jackson on our currency. And while I kinda respect Hamilton as a former member of the cabinet, I wouldn’t vote for him or his candidates to lead the executive branch because of his support of wealthy bankers over the average American. Sounds disturbingly familiar.
Andrew Jackson was a slave owner and he launched the terrorist campaign against American Indians.
I vote for Hamilton, born out of wedlock on the island of Nevis in the West Indies, arrived penniless. See the show.
And none of them let their wives vote. Besides slavery and killing Native Americans, another horrific and backward practice in which nearly everyone believed, participated or allowed back then was pistol dueling. Hamilton tried to shoot a former Vice President of the United States!
I forgot to write that I also like Thomas Jefferson’s VP, Aaron Burr. He fought Hamilton over the banks and had better aim. Just sayin. And I still can’t vote for someone who supports the international banking system from which we fought for independence, even if that person wasn’t born with silver spoon. The parallels are amazing.
It’s funny that you should mention “Hamilton”, as that douche-nozzle Andy Smarick — a contributor writing for Campbell Brown’s website “THE 74” — tried to co-opt both the play and its author to promote corporate education reform and “grit”.
https://www.the74million.org/article/smarick-is-this-still-hamiltons-america-teaching-privilege-and-persistence-in-2016
Needless to say, I found this ludicrous, and posted this in the Comments section:
——————————————————-
——————————————————
Andy,
Lin-Manuel Miranda’s story is indeed truly inspiring.
However, for you to portray it as exclusively a triumph of “grit” is at best, simplistic and incomplete, and at worst, the misleading demagoguery of an elitist. Furthermore, you’re also using his story to attack struggling working class folks — in particular, the ones who attempt to voice both their very real struggles and the unfair challenges that they face. For you to demean them and claim that they are just whining about “privilege” is also reprehensible and condescending.
Since you’re co-opting Miranda and his art — without Miranda’s permission, I’m guessing — to promote corporate education reform, this prompts me to ask the question:
“In your Brave New Corporate Ed. Reform World, would the talents of future Lin-Manuel Miranda’s of this world be likely to be nurtured, to the point where they would achieve the success that Miranda has?”
I’m going to answer “No” to that one.
As a 17-year teacher, I have seen corporate ed. reformers time and again, gutting and cutting the arts — music, drama, art classes & teachers — whenever and wherever corporate reformers were able to do so in the public schools that service the middle and working classes.
Andy, be honest. Your corporate reform allies, when it comes to the children of the middle and working classes, view the arts as unaffordable and useless frills. Instead, they devote money that would otherwise have funded the arts towards test prep, I-pads, replacing teachers with computers, etc.
In covering the Parent Trigger debacle out here in Adelanto, California, parent and education writer Caroline Grannan touched upon corporate reform’s disdain for the arts.
http://parentsacrossamerica.org/more-deception-by-fake-reformers-in-latest-parent-trigger-move/
———————————————-
CAROLINE GRANNAN: “The Desert Trails parents want arts, music and science, but the relentless, punitive testing regimen endorsed by Gates and his fellow corporate reformers has squeezed out everything but math, English and test prep – lots and lots of test prep.”
———————————————-
Out here in Los Angeles, the corporate reform board members led by Monica Garcia and Broad Academy alumna and then Superintendent-John Deasy carried out the marching orders of their corporate masters and imposed massive cuts on the arts in LAUSD. Incredibly, in support of Garcia’s 2012 re-election, a phony corporate ed organization called the “L.A. Fund” posted billboards falsely touting Garcia’s love and support for the arts:
Los Angeles Teacher Matt Kogan told the story here:
https://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/03/who-cut-arts-education-in-los-angeles/
———————————————–
MATT KOGAN: ” ‘In four years (approximately when Eli Broad began exerting influence on LAUSD, Jack), the LAUSD has gone from running a nationally recognized arts education program’, to today struggling to piece together a drastically reduced and inequitable program. However, neither the website nor billboards point out that it was Monica Garcia and John Deasy who cut the arts program to the bone and created this crisis in the first place!
“The LA Fund website points out how the arts promote creative thinking while at the same time, Deasy and Garcia have supported a stripped down curriculum focused on standardized tests. To put it simply, they have created a phony crisis by cutting the arts and are now using that very crisis to ask for monetary donations to be made to Deasy’s foundation.
“And how is that money used?
“The LA Fund website states that ‘All proceeds raised throughout Arts Matter will directly support arts integration in LA. public schools’ when in fact, a great deal of their money is being used to create billboards of Monica Garcia! This is the same Monica Garcia who recently let the school board know how she feels about funding programs supported by the community. She suggested that, instead of funding the arts, adult and early childhood education, LAUSD should spend $500,000 on ipads for each student! It is also important to point out that Superintendent Deasy is an employee of LAUSD supervised by Ms. Garcia who has voted in favor of a number of raises for Deasy in the time since he founded the LA Fund.
“The bottom line………Deasy created a crisis, created a non-profit to collect money to fix it and instead spends it on political ads for the woman who helped create the crisis and is responsible for his employment.”
———————————————-
I talked to the teacher and union official who represents the Arts teachers in UTLA, and she told me how on countless occasions, in an effort to save their programs, arts teachers had invited both Monica Garcia and John Deasy to actually watch classes in art, music, drama, dance, etc. However, Garcia and Deasy never took them up on this offer, then went ahead and trashed arts programs that had existed in Los Angeles for decades.
I could go on with more examples around the country, but you get the point. Those are your allies, Andy, who have removed arts from schools whenever and wherever possible, and who will not rest until this is the norm nationwide.
Therefore, for you to even attempt to co-opt Miranda’s artistic accomplishments to the services of promoting corporate education reform — a movement that you well know disdains arts education for the very communities, ethnicity, and socio-economic milieu from which Miranda emerged — is dishonest and shameful.
When it comes to the role that school arts programs play, countless other famous examples come to mind: John Lennon’s talents in poetry and music; Spielberg’s talents in story-telling and the visual arts. Read the biographies of both of these men, as I have, and see how low income and middle class public school arts programs first stimulated and nurtured these two men’s abilities. In the case of these artists and countless others, consider how much great art the world would have been denied, had they been educated in schools like the ones you and your fellow corporate reformers promote as the new ideal.
However, that’s the schools of the 99%, as you envision it.
When it comes to the education of the 1%, its a different story. It strikes me as hypocritical that in the rich kids’ private schools where corporate reformers send their own kids, the arts programs are flourishing, with massive funding and full-time teachers dedicated to teaching only the arts.
Take the case of Campbell Brown, the 1%-er who runs this site. Here’s what you can get at Heschel, her kids’ school —a comprehensive Arts Curriculum— one that is impossible at public schools thanks to so much its funding going to test prep Pearson, Common Core-related vendors, etc.:
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=1130
From the link above:
=======================================
“The Arts at Heschel
“As students are exposed to a multitude of media in their daily lives, art courses can help them navigate the unfolding context of contemporary culture and technology in order to understand and find meaning in the possibilities through creating and analyzing.
“The Visual Arts department is rooted in the school’s vision that the discovery of personal meaning and the growth of individual identity can emerge from the rigors of study, of student centered inquiry and the development of a sensitive eye, a discerning mind and skillful hand.
“Music as non-verbal expression continues to say something universal, essential, and native to even the humblest of involved seekers. Music education, therefore, must stand alone as an important and necessary part of the total learning and growing process.”
=======================================
Can you please point to me to just one time that Ms. Brown — whose own children are benefiting from the rich kids’ private school programs described above — has done anything to fund or promote the same kind of arts programs in the traditional public schools of NYC, or has even said a word in support of them? Of course, she wouldn’t do that, as her avowed goal is to sabotage and eliminate those traditional public schools and replace them with privately-managed private schools that are not transparent to the public, not accountable to the public, and who don’t educate all the public. Having a full rich curriculum with art, music, drama, dance, etc. might lead to traditional public schools succeeding — or building on their current success — and Campbell can’t have that happen, now, can she?
Andy, here’s another quote that’s not from the Heschel website, but from elsewhere.
Who do you think wrote this in an article?
“Physical education, world languages, libraries, and the arts are not frills; they are an essential piece of a well-rounded education.”
That’s from Dr. David McGill, the leader of the Chicago Lab School, where Obama sent his kids before leaving Chicago for D.C.. That’s also where corporate ed. reform Mayor Rahm Emanuel and former Secretary of Ed. Arne Duncan now send their own children. Chew on that for a while. (and where my niece and nephew attended… FUN FACT.)
That’s from the video here, from a speech by Chicago school parent and activist Matt Farmer.
Early on, Farmer talks about how the Lab School — in contrast to the arts-free public schools — has several, full-time teachers whose sole responsibility is teaching kids the arts. Farmer talks about how Penny Pritzker, the billionaire and appointed school board member, voted to cut the arts in Chicago public schools and to close the libraries in those schools. At the same time, she spearheaded a fund-raising drive to support those same things in the Chicago Lab School, where Pritzker’s own children attended.
Farmer then says the following.
( 4:44 – 6:04 )
( 4:44 – 6:04 )
MATT FARMER: “Do you want to know what Dr. Magill at the Chicago Lab School says about standardized testing? The same testing that fills our (public schools’) calendar for weeks?
” (Magill writes) ‘Measuring outcomes of standardized testing, and referring to those results as the evidence of learning, and the bottom line is, in my opinion, misguided, and unfortunately continues to be advocated under a new name, and supported by the current (U.S.? Chicago Public schools?… not sure…) administration.’
“That’s the Lab School, folks!”
“Do you want to know what Dr. Magill from the Lab School has to say about art, music, physical education, and libraries?
“He says, QUOTE – ‘Physical education, world languages, libraries, and the arts are not frills; they are an essential piece of a well-rounded education.’
—————————————-
Jack Covey
This is an awesome comment. Thank you.
“( 4:44 – 6:04 )
MATT FARMER: “Do you want to know what Dr. Magill at the Chicago Lab School says about standardized testing? “
====================
I have no idea what Dr. Magill SAYS about standardized testing. Here is what the Chicago Lab School DOES about standardized testing:
===================
ASSESSMENTS
“At the Laboratory Schools, teachers assess students by observing and interacting with them in the classroom, evaluating their day-to-day classroom work and homework assignments, meeting with their parents, and administering standardized tests.
“Standardized testing at Lab is viewed as only part of the profile of students; it gives teachers a snapshot of each child’s strengths and difficulties. Standardized tests are designed to give a common measure of students’ performance. Since standardized tests are given to large groups of students throughout the country, a common standard of measure is derived. Lab teachers and administrators may use this information to tell how well school programs are succeeding or to learn more about the skills and abilities of individual students.”
====================
Huh. Well, that sure flies in the face of all the rhetoric, even if it seems reasonable enough. But I bet that the Chicago Lab School doesn’t give COMPUTERIZED standardized tests. And they CERTAINLY must only give them once or twice over the course of a student’s K-12 career. Wait, what’s this?
====================
Grades 3 and 4, 6 and 8 –ERB/eCTP TEST
The Comprehensive Testing Program (CTP) is an achievement test, designed to measure what students have already learned in school. At Lab, we administer the electronic eCTP version of the Electronic Records Bureau (ERB) test. Included are sub-tests in English language arts, mathematics, and verbal and quantitative reasoning. Lab administers the online eCTP to third, fourth, sixth, and eighth graders in the fall or spring of the year.
====================
http://www.ucls.uchicago.edu/about-lab/welcome/assessment/index.aspx
Please let us all know how it went when your niece and nephew opted out, Jack.
====================
JOHN DEWEY, “The School and Society,” 1900 (PAGE 3): “What the best and wisest parent wants for his own child, that must the community want for its own children. Any other ideal for our schools is narrow and unlovely; acted upon, it destroys our democracy.”
_______________________
Tim,
Please don’t smear John Dewey’s name by using his eloquent words to support Eva Moskowitz.
So, Tim, what percentage of a teacher’s review at Lab is based on his/her student’s test scores?
I haven’t the foggiest idea. Maybe you can ask Jack, or Matt Farmer.
“Lab teachers and administrators may use this information to tell how well school programs are succeeding . . .”
My nephew is actually attending a Big Ten school right now, and my niece graduates next year. Thanks for asking.
“I have no idea what Dr. Magill SAYS about standardized testing.”
Actually, you DO have a pretty good idea … and exact idea, in fact, as Matt Farmer is giving direct quotes from Magill’s own pen:
” (Magill writes) ‘Measuring outcomes of standardized testing, and referring to those results as the evidence of learning, and the bottom line is, in my opinion, misguided, and unfortunately continues to be advocated under a new name, and supported by the current (U.S.? Chicago Public schools?… not sure…) administration.’”
You and I have been at this rodeo before, Tim, so if you insist, I’ll once again recap how the testing regime at elite private schools attended by the children of well-heeled corporate ed. reformers — and how those tests are used and emphasized — is radically different than the way you corporate ed. reformers are forcing on the schools of the middle and working classes of this country.
The Lab School employs the ERB standardized test system. Dr. David Magill serves on the ERB board, applying the brakes, as it were on the excesses of standardized testing. While, as the his anti-testing quote indicates, Magill is wary of the misuse and overemphasis on test score results, he nevertheless reluctantly accepts that, like it or not, they’re part of today’s landscape.
In my on-line surveying of ERB, it seems to be a sort of standardized testing LITE for elite private schools, radically different from the Common Core version that is mandated for the public school system.
On that score, here’s a piece from Lois Levy, an administrator (“Assistant Head of School”) at a different private school, the Center for Early Education (CEE), describing “what ERB standardized testing is and isn’t.”
http://www.centerforearlyeducation.org/page.cfm?p=774&eid=559
Loise Levy says CEE subjects students to standardized tests reluctantly. It’s part of the world we live in NOW, so the folks and her school can’t NOT do it. (This is likely the same view that the folks running Heshel and other elite private schools share.)
—————————————
LOIS LEVY: “A major reason for administering the ERBs is that they provide our students with practice taking standardized tests. Whether we like it or not, standardized tests are currently a part of the educational world, mainly due to the fact that they provide an efficient way to produce data.”
—————————————
Levy minces no words about the limitations of ERB standardized tests, and standardized testing in general.
—————————————
LOIS LEVY: “Before receiving student results that will be mailed home early in the summer, it is important for parents to reflect on what these test results represent as well as what they don’t represent.
“Unlike today’s public schools, CEE is lucky in that we aren’t forced into the position of using test scores as the dominant means of evaluating our curriculum (and the quality of the teachers, school, etc. JACK).
“Instead, we are able to use our mission statement and school philosophy to guide our development of curriculum. Evaluating the effectiveness of our curriculum relies on feedback from our standardized testing program, but also on feedback from other means of assessment as well as from faculty, administration, parents, and CAIS Accreditation teams.
“It is important to first understand what ERB test results do not tell us about our students.
“ERB tests do not even attempt to measure a student’s initiative, motivation or ability to persevere.
“ERBs do not measure study skills, organizational skills, collaborative skills, cooperative skills, communication skills or creativity.
“This list could go on and on, but it is obvious that all of the above skills are essential for being a successful student, and, for that matter, a successful adult. Yet standardized tests are not able to measure these essential learning skills/life skills.
“Thus, when looking at children’s standardized test results, we always need to remember that they are not a summary of all qualities that are needed to be a successful student.”
————–
Amen, sister!!!! Testify!!! Testify!!!
She blows apart the test prep strategies that Eva and Campbell force upon the kids of the 99%. (i.e. the administrator at SUCCESS ACADEMY who proudly bragged to New York Magazine that SUCCESS ACADEMY employs marathon test prep sessions that turns its students into “little test-taking machines.”)
Levy contends that such an insane amount of tutoring and/or test prep itself nullifies the very purpose of testing — assuming one accepts that there is such a purpose — and renders the results meaningless.
—————————————
LOIS LEVY : “(Test prep) Tutoring actually defeats the purpose for what the school hopes to learn from the tests. We want to know how the curriculum supports children’s learning, not how tutoring may or may not bolster results.
“For many years, tutoring for ERBs was not even an issue as it was understood that the ERBs are not ‘high stakes’ tests; they are not admissions tests. But as parents get more concerned about how well their young children ‘measure up’ against other children, fear and anxieties can drive parents to tutoring.
“Test prep is a huge business and professional tutors are more than happy to take parents’ money, especially since their work preparing children for admissions tests end in December or January.”
” .. ”
“In summary, my goal is to help parents understand what ERB test results do measure, and what they don’t measure. When parents receive the one sheet of paper summarizing their child’s ERB test results, it is important for them to remember that these results don’t point to any hard cold facts about their child.
“Instead, the results need to be viewed in conjunction with the child’s classroom performance, the child’s developmental learning path, as well as teacher and parent observations.
“Standardized tests are indirect measurement tools that measure how a child performed on a given day and on a given set of questions.
“Once we understand what these test results tell us, as well as what they don’t tell us, the ERB information gathered through the years can be helpful to the school as well as to parents.”
—————————————
So “Tim” (or should I say, Peter Cunningham 😉 ) this points out the stark difference between what version of standardized testing and its accompanying emphases & importance as they are administered at Heschel and other elite private schools… and what Campbell wants for the children of the middle and working classes in her Brave New Privatized School World.
Do you get it? The difference between…
… what Campbell Brown and other corporate reformers want for their own children, and for the other children of the 1%—
VERSUS
… what Campbell Brown and other corporate ed. reformers want for “other people’s children” of the 99%, should she achieve her David Cameron wet dream of eliminating all public schools (that currently have oversight and input from the public via democratically elected school boards) and replacing them with privately-managed charters with ZERO accountability to the public, ZERO transparency to the public, and which do not educate all the public… basically private schools with public money ?
And another thing: I’m not against all standardized testing, nor am I against them being administered on computers (assuming those students are in high school, not elementary or middle school.)
To whom it may concern:
Historically, I am afraid that people did not actually and thoroughly understand how damage the idiot and cruel authority can wreck like the world peace, and can keep people in silence by force.
I always prefer to live under the greed authority much more than the idiot and cruel authority. If people enjoy living with freedom in capitalism, then please make up your mind to fight for democracy in theory (70% due to corruption) and in practice (30% for the rich, famous and academics).
If people are afraid of retaliation in present for speaking up for their basic rights, then what would people think or do under the idiot, cruel and greedy authority with corrupted and brutal gangsters as its arm and leg force from local control?
All the rich and academics like media and scientists will be gone in the first phase; then the celebrity will be treated like slaves or be gone in the second phase; lastly all educators and all conscientious military personnel will be re-educated and under a tight control by gangsters or local control.
Please see the Chinese government from 1950 to the present, or the Russian government, or the North Korean government in order to be affirmative about the choice and the opportunity to exercise the people power in voting the right choice in fighting back the corruption or in sufferance without the means” to fight back due to a tight control”.
It is no kidding or joking about a senseless killing from the idiot, cruel and greedy authority because they are insecure and very afraid of revolution from the rich, academic and celebrity people who are conscientious. Back2basic
I love this, Diane. Your writing is superb. You’ve taken the same route I have in coming to Hillary. Over the years you’ve suffered a lot of slings and arrows. I’m sorry some of your followers are so rigid. Sorry for you and sorry for the country. I voted for Hilary late in the day on March 17 in Illinois based on a blog you’d written that day. I know you’ll stay at it once she’s physically in the White House. I’ll be watching, waiting for my marching orders.
Thanks, Regan. If Hillary is elected (and I pray that she is as the words “President Trump” makes my brain hurt, we will watch her appointments and policies closely. If the testing continues, opt out will grow. If the charters continue to grow, we will fight in here and in the courts. I hope she is the same person who was chosen by her graduating class in 1969 to give the commencement speech, and she declared herself then to be a flaming radical. There is an inner Hillary, and I am hoping it will win out.
Regan said: “I’m sorry some of your followers are so rigid. Sorry for you and sorry for the country.”
Typical spin and condescension that I’ve seen from so many Hillary supporters. Take those who wish to vote their conscience and blame them for being “stubborn” and “rigid,” rather than “hopeful” and “ethical” and “principled.” Shame them and the entire country. You’re soooo sorry they are that way. The problem is with them; it’s their fault.
Also interesting how you voted for Hillary “based on” Diane’s post on March 15, in which Diane explained why she would not endorse either candidate!
And look, there I am in the comments saying that nominating Hillary instead of Bernie will make Trump viable. Which, by the way, I was screaming for a good 6 months prior to that.
If Donald wins, those who voted and supported Hillary in the primaries can blame themselves as much as anyone else. The information was all there about Hillary’s strong neoliberal history, and weakness against Donald Trump.
Ed Detective : Agreed , the fact that this race is even close in swing states is testament to just how weak Hillary is . The dump should be so far back that they risk losing the Senate and the House . He is not
If I didn’t see the damage that Reagan did to working class Americans I would almost prefer Trump to win just to end the neo liberal rule of the Democratic party . ready to puke in November.
I too was struck by the line about followers being so rigid. An analogy: Let’s say I teach a middle school class and the students have a chance to vote for school lunch choices. The students want pizza and soda. I want them to vote for salad and fruit. If I really want them to vote for salad, I will give them reasons to vote for salad, and perhaps offer some croutons. But if I tell them they’re just being childish in their desire for grease and sugar, they will not listen to me. They’ll vote pizza and start eating candy in class to spite me.
I’m a Bernie supporter. You will have a hard time convincing me to vote if it’s Hillary v Donald. It’s possible, but not without some croutons. But if pushed hard enough, I could see myself voting, and voting in a way you, reader, probably find unthinkable. Out of spite.
Speaking of the inner liberal Hillary who gave the commencement speech… She graduated and then, she met Eli Broad, who she said in an interview years ago “changed [her] life”. If you meet the Emperor and it changes your life, it’s gonna be dang near impossible from then on to use the OptOut, Luke.
Left Coast Teacher,
I met Eli Broad in his 5th Avenue penthouse in NYC, and I left wondering how a man who knew so little about education could have the chutzpah to try to control it.
Diane,
Chuckle. Eli Broad buys and sells schools the same way he buys and sells artwork — as with everyone who spends a lifetime in pursuit of massive wealth — he appreciates the price instead of the value.
Speaking of which, I think you’ll like this video my mom sent me:
http://video.genfb.com/1098228533570890
Hopefully before you click on the link above, two things:
1. The video is glitchy.
2. I just looked up the poem from which the video originates. The poem is not nearly as true to teaching as the video, and is on TedTalks. I’d provide a link to TedTalks, but I think I’ll just stop now.
“I want to know why Trump thinks that the Mexican government is ready to pay billions of dollars to build a wall. I don’t get it.”
Because if Trump gets elected, Americans are going to be the ones illegally immigrating to Mexico. The fence would be to keep us out.
“Bernie … said that he believed Hillary Clinton would be faithful to his agenda.”
I think that’s the first time I’ve heard him blatantly lie. It doesn’t suit him well. He knows exactly whose agenda Hillary will be faithful too – it was the whole point of his campaign. I guess we knew all along this was coming, still sad to see it actually happen though. Guess Bernie never understood his own campaign.
He said that not because he fully believes it, but in the way you might say to a child, “I believe in you to do the right thing.” It’s a psychological pressure, publicly on record. The only way Hillary will do any Sanders stuff is if you get her ego involved, and the public outraged. She changed her position dramatically in the primaries because she had to… she will go back if we let her. Another Sanders tactic, honestly.
Lin-Manuel Miranda’s creativity is a testimony to the opportunities in the New York City public schools. These schools have served him well, and now he can share his gifts with the world. He was fortunate to have attended a selective public magnet school which attracts gifted students from all socioeconomic levels. A charter most likely would have conditioned the creative talents out of him while a comprehensive public school nutured them.
Correction: testament
Hunter College Elementary/High School, LMM’s alma maters,
A. are public schools not operated by the NYC DOE and are not directly accountable to NYC voters (neither are NYC DOE schools, but that’s another story)
B. Select their students on the basis of an IQ test administered to 4-year-olds (this was how LMM was accepted) or by a highly rigorous exam administered to a pre-screened population of 6th graders who must have demonstrated elite performance on standardized tests.
C. Enroll a student population that is spectacularly non-diverse; 2% black, 2% Latino, and 13% low-income. Most students are upper-middle or upper class. There are zero SWDs or ELLs.
D. Counsel out students (most commonly after sixth grade) who the school believes cannot handle the rigor and might stain the school’s college placement stats.
This is all okay, though, because Hunter’s teachers are traditionally credentialed and unionized, and while this particular public school (like many others that use exams or pricey real estate to screen students) doesn’t accept anyone or everyone who wants to go there, somewhere there is a public school that will.
Tim,
Yes, all teachers should be credentialed. Let us know the next time you visit a doctor who is not credentialed, or fly with a pilot who was never licensed.
Those kinds of analogies can get very tricky. After all, we aren’t assigned doctors or airlines on the basis of where we happen to reside. And when doctors and airlines don’t do their jobs, we (or our estates!) can sue them to receive compensation for the harm done to us and to punish any negligence or malpractice–a process that provides a continuous incentive for providers to improve safety and performance for all.
So the question remains: if traditional credentialing is so important, then why do the elite private schools allow for so much flexibility? Once source claims that at the Chicago Lab School, only 50% of teachers have an advanced degree. Of that 50%, quite a few likely have an advanced degree not in education, but in mathematics, physics, or a foreign language. Private schools trust teachers and school leaders to determine who has the content knowledge and ability to teach. Why is it acceptable for Dalton to do this, but not the hoi polloi?
The U of Chicago Lab School is unionized, Tim.
Let me know the next time you seek out a non-credentialed person to perform a professional service.
Barbers and hairdressers must be licensed.
So do real estate agents.
I assume you are back to defending Eva’s non-credentialed staff.
I support alternatives to traditional credentialing after the very positive experiences my children have had at their traditional public schools with NYC Teaching Fellows, one of whom was quite vocal about the worthlessness of the courses they were taking at a very highly regarded school of education.
As usual, charter schools in general and Eva in particular have nothing to do with the conversation. And I’ll assume you’ll go back to making excuses for creaming (Central Park Easts), test-based screening (test schools), and the brutal exclusion of self-contained and physically disabled students (PS 321)–it’s okay when a unionized district school does it!
Tim,
Whatever the service, it should be performed by a credentialed professional, not a willing amateur. Whether it is a doctor, a teacher, a real estate agent, a psychologist, an auto mechanic, the professional is preferable. If you prefer to use unqualified amateurs, that’s your choice. But don’t impose your choices on others.
Tim, thank you for unwittingly acknowledging that charter schools are free to do the things that Hunter College Elementary School does.
You are 100% correct that HCES is not a public school. That is why their statistics and test scores are never compared to public schools. That is why the principal doesn’t go around bragging about being “better” than public schools — including Stuy.
You are wrong about one thing, however. The counseling out that you think is rampant doesn’t happen. The attrition rate is quite low, as attrition rates for ALL good schools are quite low. The one exception is charters. For some odd reason, the better the charter, the more the parents in it leave. THAT is what counseling out is, Tim. And when it comes to charters, kids who “stain” their stats are gone.
The fact that you used that term “stain their stats” was also very revealing for someone so close to the charter movement. I guess that’s the kind of things the administrators at charters say in private, right?
Once again, you unwittingly revealed far more than you intended.
Tim, you wrote, “After all, we aren’t assigned doctors or airlines on the basis of where we happen to reside.”
Actually, Tim…we are, at least to some extent. Are you going to argue that people living in West Virginia, Mississippi or any remote, rural area, in any state, have access to the same medical professionals as someone in Manhattan, San Francisco, Boston or Seattle?
Can absolutely anyone buy a ticket and fly anywhere, anytime? Not unless you’re independently wealthy and don’t have to show up for work almost every week of the year.
In fact, location is of secondary importance in any of these cases. We all know that $$$ determines your “choices” of doctors, airlines OR schools. Those of means will always be able to fly—often in a private jet or helicopter—from any location, to where the finest doctors and hospitals are located.
Funny how some people think that opening “charters” or pushing “vouchers” will somehow vitiate the vast and cruel gap between those who live in communities with well funded public schools and those who do not. It’s a fraud and I’m increasingly leaning towards the belief that it’s set up to shift attention from the obvious; that money—and NOT “the best teachers” however you define such a thing—is THE major factor here, allowing for small, select class sizes, in superbly maintained facilities.
In such lavishly funded schools, you can get by with teachers who aren’t as well trained as public school faculty; it’s easier to teach 15 students from affluent homes headed by college graduates, working in lucrative fields, than it is to supervise and try to reach 30 or more kids whose backgrounds are radically different from those of your average Choate or Dalton pupil.
If former Bernie supporters don’t vote or vote third party, Trump has a very good chance of winning. I voted for Bernie and was for him from day one of his announced campaign. I also understood from day one that Bernie would support Hillary if he did not win or prevail.
Please vote for Hillary because Trump will appoint God knows how many extreme right wing nuts to the supreme court. That’s a huge, HUGE, difference. Hillary is the much lesser evil by a very wide margin.
I agree with you and Diane. The Supreme Court appointments have huge implications. Do we really need another Scalia?
How about 3 more Scalias?
“If former Bernie supporters don’t vote or vote third party, Trump has a very good chance of winning.”
If Hillary wins the primaries, Trump has a very good chance of winning.
Oops, are we going to blame the people who voted Hillary and failed to support Bernie in the primaries?
Thanks Diane for your writing this piece. I am an avid Bernie supporter and it’s hard to come around to accepting that I must get on board with Hilary or risk helping Trump win. You help me feel better about this because I trust you.
“Who is likely to keep trying to meet those ideals–Clinton or Trump? The choice was easy.”
Neither.
Trump is hitting an issue on immigration and trade because they are issues. Issues that have been dismissed by the neo-liberal elites of both parties .It is an issue at the low end where Americans are told the jobs that immigrants are taking are low wage jobs that Americans do not want now that they have become low wage. Then at the high end where unlimited H1bs are sought to fill jobs that we are told Americans are too lazy and stupid to pursue the education required for STEM occupations. One does not have to be a demagogue nor punish those that are already here to address these issues . Immigration is a labor law issue. It is a matter of being able to hire people at less than the prevailing wages and bennifits for any given industry. There is a reason why even in the depths of the financial collapse unemployment in Japan was around 4 % .
The issue could be explained to those on this board by comparing it to Albert Shanker’s original vision of Charters, to what we have today. He did not envision them as a place to undercut the living standards of professional teachers in order to reap profit .
We could look at Chomsky’s description of the corporate University similarly. Where teaching assistants are used to replace much that was done by tenured professors. Diminishing the demand for full tenured professors and starving adjuncts have become the norm.
So the old expression applies, it is a recession when your unemployed a depression when I’m unemployed . Similarly on Trade which has devastated millions of Americans turned the industrial mid west into Red States from Wisconsin to Pennsylvania .
Dean Baker one of the most progressive economists in the nation points out regularly that if Doctors and Lawyers were subject to free trade in their services they would feel different . As Robert Reich has continuously hollered the Democrats ignore this concern at their own peril.
Jeffery Sachs certainly not a demagogue, last week had an excellent piece on Brexit that covers both issues . And a whole lot more well worth the short read.
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/meaning-of-brexit-by-jeffrey-d-sachs-2016-06
Now before Diane tells me to go vote for Trump again , lets get on to Heir Dump .
The Donald wants to build a big wall a very big wall with lots of tunnels running underneath it to supply all of the immigrant labor that he Shelly and other oligarchs need.
The Dump hardly ever manufactures in the USA,USA,USA. The Donald only builds Union when he has to and is one of the few major casino resorts in Vegas that is Non Union. Fighting the NLRB and the workers who have voted for a Union.The Dump’s bankruptcies have not only cost workers their jobs but have shaved their pensions . Not a friend of American workers , the Dump wants Right To Work . .
The Donald has railed against illegal immigrants yet had no problem hiring them as far back as 1980 to demolish Bonwitt Teller ,to make room for his glass towered palace on fifth and 57th in NYC. He could not build a project of that scope in New York non union at that time . Yet he had no problem hiring 150 mostly undocumented, Polish workers to work round the clock and demolish the existing building. Most were not paid in a timely manner, most were shorted on overtime pay , non were paid the prevailing wage and almost all were exposed to large amounts asbestos. Certainly no friend of Blue collar American workers ,of any worker.
The Dump is opposed to the Common Core ,it sounds great to the folks on the right, I have to deal with on one of the face book boards in NY I participate in. (not Jeanette’s) , But the driving force behind the Core was the Business Round Table . We have a STEM shortage that miraculously seems to defy the basic law of Capitalism . The law of supply and demand . Wages even in STEM are stagnant. The Round Table and the 21st century Robber Barons in the Tech Sector have consistently pushed for H1B visas to import educated labor on the higher end of the wage scale . They fight every effort to force them to prove they sought to advertise and hire an American worker or haven’t laid off American workers seeking to bring down wages. . Thus we have the specter of of American workers being forced to train their replacement on the way out the door. The Dump has a solution for that as well . He loves H1B visas he thinks we need lots more of them . He thinks Americans are over paid and will do all he can to bring down their high wages from opposing increasing the minimum wage to unlimited tech visas.
So no I can not vote for Donald Dump, but from every conversation I have out here in beautiful scenic Long Island ,I may not have the luxury of voting for Stein . That is a pathetic indictment of the failures of the Democratic party and the candidate who will lead them. An indictment of a failure to address the concerns of working class Americans. . I hope I am wrong but from here this looks like a Tsunami.
By the way Diane you probably enjoyed Rap more than I enjoyed Dylan covering Sinatra. .
non=none … …
The corporate education model won’t even meet a speed bump in a Clinton administration. Holding her feet to the fire is improbable because if you disagree with her, the Clinton Machine will roll right over you. Let us know, Diane, if HRC ever calls you to ask your opinion on ed policy. I won’t hold my breath though.
To Ed Detective:
Being as an educator, you would know the outcome of talent-less people with supreme power of waging war at the international level.
All talent-less people, yes all of them, they are coward and easily manipulated by evils because they will hung on their comfort at the expense of their family members, their country and their citizens.
Please believe me that all conscientious people will fight for their freedom to their last breath if they have resources. All ordinary people, who just mind their own business (= security of their own family members and their own comfort) regardless of their intelligence and religious belief, will moan, whine, blame, curse and suffer their misery and life-less living.
We find the way to have the hope in the decency of TRULY well educated and well brought-up leadership in Mrs Clinton. The way, that Donald Trump express his feeling, like his disrespect for higher authority like Supreme Court Judge and his threat to retaliate anyone who did not support him, is a sign of all dictatorships will do in their mind and in action.
What would Jill Stein do as compare to Hillary Clinton in all aspects regarding network, connection, experience in administration of a country? A doctor runs small eatery business and loses her first love! What is Mrs. Stein ‘s priority in study to graduate with MD medical? If she looks for wealth and fame, then she will never look after the welfare of her country and her people. I bet my soul on it.
In short, all politicians must know HOW to play their games intelligently until they have secured their power and the 100% support from voters. At this moment, politicians will happily sacrifice their last breath to carry out and to prove the world step by step their legendary or ideology in their childhood’s dream.
(PS: Toronto Mayor Mel Lastman, and Legendary Mississauga Mayor Hazel McCallion are the exemplary and politician figure who earn people’s trust for their devotion and true care for people’s welfare. Greedy businesses try hard to destroy them through set up, but not succeed. Thanks God.)
Honestly, please tell me, Ed Detective, would you sacrifice your career, your life and the lives of your entire family member for the coward, greedy, and ungrateful crowd? I bet you that you would never do. Back2basic
“Being as an educator, you would know the outcome of talent-less people with supreme power of waging war at the international level.”
That’s why I’m so concerned about politics right now, and why I have strongly supported Bernie over Clinton and Trump. If we’re concerned about war, Hillary has a proven record of that, where Trump only has words so far.
As for Jill Stein, she consistently speaks truth to power, sense, reason, and compassion. Her platform is very similar to Bernie’s. In fact, it is better in some ways, and she has borrowed some of Bernie’s phrases and ideas — to actually implement them, not just give lip-service for votes, like Hillary. Hillary Clinton has hardly run on a strong platform, or the important issues, until Bernie came along and forced her to pretend. Or, as some would say, “pull her to the left.” She has met Bernie less than halfway, and there’s not much reason to believe she will stay there. Political Compass, an independent analysis group, puts Hillary Clinton pretty far to the right, and groups Jill & Bernie close together on the near-left. This analysis is based on personal statements and political history. Hillary is pretty close to what we used to call a right wing extremist. She is pro-war and pro-corporate. She “says” she wants us to have equal opportunity… except with her policies, which will often perpetuate and reinforce inequality, continuing to widen the “opportunity gap” that we would like to close.
It is Hillary who is doing this for the wealth and fame, not Jill Stein. I don’t understand your analogy because you could easily say Jill became a doctor to heal people, just as I became a teacher to help young people learn and grow. Hillary became a politician… why? Perhaps to help people, at first, but that’s not always where a good motive ends up. Especially after a lifetime of politics. As we see politics now, the politicians end up helping themselves, and whoever paid them. Not us. Bernie Sanders has been a shining exception.
I am much more wary of a lifetime politician like Hillary, than I am of a doctor who decided to go into politics late in her life, because she thought that was the way she could “heal” the most people. That’s what she has said in interviews, and I believe her when she says it.
As I’ve said many times, Hillary may very well be the lesser of two evils in this race of evils, and swing state voters who favor lesser destruction probably should vote for her. I don’t think we should lose sight of the fact, though, that “lesser” evil is still evil — we cannot afford to convince ourselves that Hillary is in this game for the poor, minorities, and working class. She’s in it much more for herself, and maybe, a few people around her. It’s the political norm, and Hillary is not an exception to the norm. She IS the norm. She is a perfect example of the kind of corrupt, deceptive politics that Bernie fought so hard to evolve beyond. Any benefit from a Hillary Clinton administration will be a side benefit, a second priority, crumbs from the table of Hillary’s personal fame and agenda. Hillary is not one of us, and she never will be.
May, hope all finds you well and always enjoy your astute commentary (not that I always agree as we shall see).
“What is Mrs. Stein ‘s priority in study to graduate with MD medical? If she looks for wealth and fame, then she will never look after the welfare of her country and her people. I bet my soul on it.”
I had the fortunate opportunity to sit and chat with Jill Stein at the United Opt Out Conference in Philly this last February. It was during a break in the presentations, I think she might have been up next but anyway she and her campaign manager were sitting in the room by themselves so I pulled up a chair and started talking with them. (I’m not sure how many there even knew who she was. I did as I had voted for her the last time around-2012).
Jill is a humble, intelligent and energetic woman who is giving up a lot (she is a pediatrician) to do what she is doing and she knows that the game is rigged and she has no chance to win. But she is doing this so that eventually the Greens can break through the duopoly of the two oligarchic parties. It is a long game and she knows she is just a small part of the process.
I sensed no egotism whatsoever on her part when we chatted (for about 10-15 minutes) nor when she gave her speech, one of the main speeches/addresses of the conference. Were she to win I don’t believe we would see egoistic driven behavior on her part but intelligent critical thinking analysis of problems and various options for solutions. I certainly don’t think we’d see dogmatic behavior on her part. Alas, unfortunately we won’t get the opportunity to see a true, honest, caring person in action.
I hope that clarifies who/what Jill Stein is about, at least from my meager observation.
Duane
When I read the title of the post, I thought that the Hamilton was in reference to all the $10 bills Sanders must be receiving for this endorsement.
Thank you señor Swacker for your details of Dr. Stein. I respect your keen observation.
In political arena, naivete and gullibility would harm politicians. Flexibility, intelligence, determination and prioritization of humane benefits from all aspects in reality are the character must-to-be in any leadership for all fields.
I do not believe that monk, priest, pediatrician, or surgeon could be tough enough to deal with KGB, FBI, or CIA or all crooked tycoons. Simply, I do not like to deal with weasels on a daily basis. I would prefer to be a music composer, a painter, or a philosopher to live a simple life with tranquility if I could.
Teacher would be more successful to involve in politics as advisers and speech writers.
I accept politicians with conscientiousness in protect their country and their citizens at all cost to invaders or traitors. If we do not want to be weasels, we should stay away from politics and economics. May.
Dear Señor Swacker:
I just wonder if Dr. Stein mentioned about her concern of global infested privatization of all public services with her solutions. Also, has she thought about a meeting with Dr. Ravitch regarding American Public Education being robbed by low grade owners of all charter schools? I am sincerely sorry to misunderstand Dr. Stein’s passion in participation in politics because it seems to be odd to see medical doctor who gives up practices to run a small upscale eatery. I hope that your support to Dr. Stein’s platform will be successful. Would it be any chance that Green throws support over Democrat to defeat Republican? I am not sure that could be possible.
Thank you for your reply in advance if you have a bit of free time to cultivate me. May.
Diane, did you spring for the level of donation that allowed you to actually talk to Hillary? That’s the only way to get access to her. I read that the seat next to her at Hamilton cost $250,000. I don’t think it is wonderful that the story of our nation’s founding was sold to raise money for Hillary, I find it obscene.
“The audience belonged to her, so there was a lot of love in the room.” Not true at all. The audience belonged to Bernie and they had to use well controlled sound system to obliterate the Bernie chants. Perhaps you missed this, Diane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpce0faSaFA
Examples of Hillary’s quietly authoritarian, anti-democratic campaign have been evident this entire primary season. Another drop in the bucket of evidence.
You’re right that there were lots of Bernie supporters at the joint rally, even though Hillary’s staff tried to stop them from coming in. Those inside were treated terribly, a male Hillary staffer literally ripped a Bernie sign out of a woman’s hands. (Imagine the cries of “Bernie bro” if the roles were reversed.)
Diane was talking about the Hillary fundraiser at Hamilton on Broadway, where donors paid $2700 (minimum ticket price), $30,000 (photo with Hillary included), and up to $250,000 (sit next to Hillary) to watch Hamilton with Hillary. That is indeed a crowd that belongs to Hillary, her rich donors.
It costs a lot of money to run for President. If you want your candidate to win, you give money. Now that polls show a dead heat, it is more urgent than ever to stop a nativist from winning
But concerned citizen, she’s “fighting for us”
I think people don’t fully appreciate what an enormous impact this election will have on the Supreme Court. There has been a conservative majority on the Court for so long that people seem unable to imagine what it was like before. Right now we have a Court that is evenly divided. The next President will tip the balance with Scalia’s replacement. And we have three Justices who are 79-83 years old. The next President could appoint a total of *four* justices — even in a single four-year term.
At a minimum, in a Clinton presidency, 4-4 cases like Friedrichs immediately become 5-4 wins, assuming that Clinton’s SCOTUS appointees are Obama-esque. At maximum, nearly every controversial trend in Constitutional law is in play, including precedents like Citizens United, Heller, maybe even Zelman (a 5-4 vote, recall).
On the other hand, if you’re even moderately concerned about the current direction of the law on campaign finance, voting rights, public employee unions, gun regulation, and of course abortion rights, then prepare to have your mind blown by President Donald J. Trump’s Supreme Court.
I know many people here think they’ve heard this song before, but this is something to seriously consider.
FLERP,
If Trump shapes the Court for a generation to come, you can say goodbye to abortion rights, gun control, and any regulation of corporations or the environment.
And if Hillary shapes the Court, we would have a Supreme Court that was not dominated by conservative Republican appointees for the first time in about 45 years. I don’t know if the significance of that can be overstated.