Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey unveiled a new funding plan, which he claims is “fair.” The essence of his plan that all children in the state would get exactly the same dollar amount–$6,599–, and that is fair! So, whether you are a child in a wealthy district or a child in an impoverished district, you will get the same! Isn’t that fair? Well, not really. That’s like saying the rich and the poor are equally permitted to sleep under bridges.
Julia Sass Rubin of Rutgers University explains why Chris Christie’s plan is a hoax and a swindle. It is not just because giving exactly the same amount to children in rich and poor districts is divisive and harms those with the greatest needs, but because so much of the budget is already earmarked that there is not enough to divvy up fairly.
Although numerous commentators pointed out the devastating impact that Christie’s proposal would have on children who live in communities with high rates of poverty, none actually verified the governor’s claim that dividing state aid equally among all New Jersey students would result in $6,599 per pupil funding.
Had they done so, they would have found that the $6,599 per pupil figure, and the promises of property tax reductions predicated on it, are both false.
There simply is not a $9.1 billion state education budget available to distribute across New Jersey while also protecting special education funding and charter schools.
State special education funding alone accounts for almost a billion dollars. And state funding pays for less than a third of all special education expenses. So if the governor distributed state aid evenly, he would eliminate the ability of many districts to provide special education services as their local tax base is inadequate to fund the additional costs.
Then there’s the state funding Christie would need to set aside to protect charter schools. In 2015-16, charter schools received in excess of $600 million in funding, primarily in the form of state aid pass-throughs from high poverty districts. And charter school funding is growing rapidly as the Christie administration increases the number of charter school students.
The governor’s numbers also ignore other programs he is unlikely to cut, such as pre-school funding and choice aid.
Eliminating state pre-school funding would remove another $656 million from the funds Christie could distribute to all districts. Cutting the funding would not only be bad public policy, it also would jeopardize federal preschool funds New Jersey currently receives.
The $54 million in choice aid funds the popular Interdistrict Public School Choice program that the governor supports and that benefits many small, rural districts.
There are many other examples.
When all is factored in, the actual amount that the governor’s plan would distribute is approximately $4,800 per student, nearly $2,000 less than he promised in his speech….
For example, Union City, which Christie lauded for producing “extraordinary growth under very trying circumstances,” would see its state and local funding drop from approximately $16,400 to $6,100 per student, a funding level below that of Mississippi.

Will Christie be Trump’s VP running mate. If so, that would be a match made in hell.
LikeLike
Citizens should understand that voting for a Tea Party governor will lead to chaos and destruction of the best parts of your state. The Tea Party believes in individualism, and you cannot count on them to do anything compassionate or even logical for the common good. North Carolina knows this, and Kansas is finding this out too.
Christie is particularly offensive. In addition to being a bully and a liar, he has a particularly obnoxious attitude toward the teachers in the state. When asked who he would like to punch in the face, he mentioned the head of the teachers’ union. The union has negotiated in good faith with Christie on several occasions, and he just goes back on his word. At this point Christie knows he is out the door and he is not a “rising star” in the party. Even Trump is not anxious to consider him for VP. Christie’s funding formula is probably a parting middle finger salute to the teachers, but it also harms lots of vulnerable students as well. He’ll probably become a lobbyists for charters as he seems to have burned most of his other bridges.
LikeLike
He never supported public schools, but ed reformers don’t care about “public schools”- their number one priority is charter schools. As long as the governor in question supports charter schools they support whatever that governor does to public schools.
It’s a litmus test. Check the “charter” box and you’re golden. It’s a political trade-off. They traded support for public schools for charter schools in state after state. Obama practically endorsed Christie.
LikeLike
President Obama and Arne Duncan were huge backers of Chris Christie, especially on education:
http://blog.nj.com/njv_editorial_page/2012/08/arne_duncan_better_education_s.html
I wonder if they’ve changed their minds. Oh, well. They’ll all be down the road by the time these cuts devastate public schools.
Maybe Christie will run education for the Trump Administration. That will be very innovative and game-changing.
LikeLike
If that ticket wins, Nova Scotia is looking better all the time.
LikeLike
From think progress, 2011: The private law firm at which Christie worked as a lobbyist between 1999 and 2001 actually lobbied New Jersey’s government on behalf of Edison Schools:
From 1999 to 2001, Christie was a registered lobbyist at a law firm that lobbied New Jersey government on behalf of Edison Schools, according to filings with the state Election Law Enforcement Commission. While the firm was representing the multinational education company, Chris Cerf was its general counsel.
The firm, Dughi, Hewit and Palatucci, also represented Mosaica Education, a for-profit charter school operator, and the University of Phoenix, a for-profit online university. At the time, the firm listed two lobbyists, Christie and William Palatucci, a longtime political ally of the governor who is a named partner in the firm.
http://thinkprogress.org/education/2011/06/13/243804/christie-firm-school-privatization/
LikeLike
Ed reformers in Kansas “rebrand” public schools with a derisive term:
“Somewhere along the way, the term “government schools” entered the lexicon in place of references to the public school system.
The use of the term has set off alarms even among some Republicans, who fear that it signals still less support, financially and otherwise, for the public schools in a state that had long felt pride over the quality of its education system. The recent adoption of a school finance plan that was acceptable to Mr. Brownback, the Legislature and the Kansas Supreme Court has not entirely assuaged those concerns.
Davis Merritt, a columnist for The Wichita Eagle, said in a column in May that state legislators’ “deaf and blind” ideology was threatening public schools.”
It’s still hard for to get used to: thousands of publicly-paid state employees attacking the public schools that 95% of the public attend.
Jeb Bush, who advised Arne Duncan on public schools, uses the term “government schools”. Are publicly-paid federal employees hostile to “public schools?” They know they’re public employees, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
AH, more smoke added to the shell game.
LikeLike
This is from Democrats for Education Reform:
“This proposal is something we might expect from Donald Trump. It pits low-income urban communities, predominated by people of color, against middle-class and wealthy communities, predominated by white families, and is the type of poorly considered and racially polarizing tactic that we would expect from Trump. But this is not who we are in New Jersey, and we will work with New Jerseyans across all lines of politics, ideology, culture, and geography to stand firm in support of equity for all of New Jersey’s schools.”
Ed reformers lock-step supported Chris Christie on education for years. They’re now pretending they didn’t all fawn over him and promote him as a “rock star”?
I guess he played the Best and Brightest for fools.
LikeLike
The equal distribution of funds is “fair.” That is the mindset. No need for the budget to address the concept of equity. Just like Trump dismiss that idea as a case of “political correctness.”
LikeLike
Cross posted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Julia-Sass-Rubin-Governor-in-General_News-Diane-Ravitch_Dishonesty_Education_Education-Funding-160710-769.html#comment606087
Here is my comment at that link, whites embedded links back to Diane’s blogs..
The subtle war on public education is fought with the constant removal of funding, so that public schools fail, or are the only schools for the poorest students.
This war is hidden , because there are 15,880 systems in 52 states, and the skirmishes that end real education in each state do not make the news. The anti-privatization website “In the Public Interest” reports on an interesting development.
I have written many series here on this war, like this one on privatization http://www.opednews.com/Series/PRIVITIZATION-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150925-546.html which demonstrate the WAR ON PUBLIC EDUCATION, as state legislatures demolish public schools with funding decisions but here is a look at the charade of charter schools. http://www.opednews.com/Series/legislature-and-governorsL-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150217-816.html
The Department of Education issued a press release boasting of its commitment to transparency and noting that the agency had committed $1.5 billion to support new charter schools since 2006. When the CMD requested a list of the schools that had been closed or never opened, the Department claimed it did not have any information. Some transparency.
In Oakland, California, a grand jury impaneled to investigate the oversight of charter schools reported that the schools were performing poorly and needed better management and more supervision. Despite results like this, the California State Board of Education, the legislature, and Governor Jerry Brown acquiesce to every demand of the California Charter Schools Association. CCSA has a rich PAC which they use to eliminate candidates who don’t support continued expansion of their private sector. They want more and more charter schools, no matter how pathetic their performance. Diane Ravitch asks :”At what point does evidence matter?”
My answer… our government representatives are impervious to evidence, and the public never gets to see this war –that will end income equality and our democracy, which depends on shared knowledge,– because the media is too busy pushing entertainment: Trump and the political circus, and the endless violence.
AND by the way, while everyone is busy, the Global corporate entities see education as A MARKET. The Charlotte Observer in North Carolina reports that Chinese investors put up $3 millionto start up a new charter school, which is now struggling for survival.
Is a foreign-financed charter school a public school? Maybe Governor Christie would invite such ‘investment’?
LikeLike
New Jersey’s Governor Christie seems to have no clue about the impacts of poverty and deprivation on children. His latest piece of suggested “brilliance” to the NJ legislature is to provide all New Jersey school districts with the same amount of funding per student because every child should be valued the same way.
This career politician who incredibly wanted to be president appears to have no idea that the USA has one of the highest relative child poverty rates in the developed world. Governor Christie has most likely never heard of the UNICEF report, which notes that material well-being of children is highest in the Netherlands and in the four Nordic countries and lowest in Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and the United States.
Incredibly, Governor Christie may not believe that this matters. He seems ignorant of the reality that New Jersey’s children raised in poverty are faced daily with overwhelming challenges that affluent children never have to confront.
Hundreds of thousands of students from New Jersey public schools in economically depressed areas are impacted by poor health care quality and access, inadequate nutrition, limited family income and child-rearing assets, questionable role models, and problems with neighborhood quality in terms of community resources and safety issues.
More than 85 percent of the foundation for effective communication, problem solving and critical thinking is developed before entering school. Yet, millions of American children never receive the advantages of a quality pre-school experience at ages 3 and 4, i.e., those educational, health and social supports that build future success.
The ignorance (or is it callousness) of elected officials like Christie about the impacts of poverty and deprivation on children is shocking.
Governor Christie…all children are not equal. One in five children are disadvantaged which is a national disgrace. And it is the legitimate role of government to equalize opportunity for those whose birth has placed them into a lower income or a poverty family.
Joseph Batory
Philadelphia PA
LikeLike
Christie and his ilk live in a bubble of denial. Like a tantruming five year year old, he sticks their fingers in his ears, and choose ignorance over reality. Or as my mother used to say, “There are none so blind as those that will not see.” This can be applied to the whole “reform” crowd.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think we could change that to: There are none so blind than those who can only see $$$$.
LikeLike