Anita Senkowski is a blogger in Michigan who has been closely following the unraveling of Grand Traverse Academy, a charter chain founded by optometrist Steven Ingersoll. Ingersoll developed a new pedagogy, he said, based on “visual learning,” and he gathered a governing board of other optometrists to lead the charter venture. Unfortunately, no one kept close watch on the financial affairs, and Dr. Ingersoll transferred millions of dollars from the schools’ account to his personal bank account. The members of the board were not troubled by this minor oversight, but federal prosecutors were not so understanding. Ingersoll was indicted and convicted. But the saga continues.
Anita Senkowski wrote to me:
File this one under “I thought I’d seen everything”: Steven Ingersoll’s optometry license may be yanked (revoked) by the Michigan Board of Optometry, and guess who sent letters of recommendation? [Board members] Mark Noss and Brad Habermehl:
In addition, in late March, federal prosecutors revealed a former Noss accountant blew the whistle as he exited the place and revealed a years-long pattern of cash payments:
However, using the accountant’s information, federal prosecutors later substantiated two previously undiscovered Ingersoll bank accounts and ID a total of (wait for it!) $627,624.14 was paid to Ingersoll by Noss. Although it’s later claimed that one of the payments was a reimbursement for an early payroll payment made by Ingersoll during the transition from his Smart Schools Management to Noss and Full Spectrum, that’s still a hell of lot of money. And did Ingersoll report the money on his taxes? According to the government, nope!
http://glisteningquiveringunderbelly.blogspot.com/2016/04/full-diaperfilled-with-money-complete.html
At the start of each fiscal year (July 1), beginning in 2007 and continuing for six years until 2013, Grand Traverse Academy (GTA) manager Steven Ingersoll advanced his entire annual Smart Schools Management, Inc. fee from the Traverse City, Michigan charter school’s bank account before it had been earned — and before he was contractually entitled to receive it. Although based on a percentage of the GTA board’s approved preliminary budget figures, Ingersoll’s management fee was adjusted downward after actual budgets were calculated.
However, Ingersoll never really repaid the difference between the amount he’d advanced himself and the actual management fee he received.
How did the receivable grow from $538,864 on June 30, 2007 to $3,551,328 on June 30, 2012 if Ingersoll, as he claimed to the GTA board, booked each year’s fee overpayment as a receivable and paid it off at the beginning of the next fiscal year?
Simple: after Ingersoll had paid the previous year’s receivable balance using Michigan state aid money provided to the Grand Traverse Academy, he transferred that money back from the Academy’s bank account to one of his Smart Schools accounts, and created a new, and even larger, receivable balance. (Ingersoll finally admitted the scheme on December 9, 2015 while testifying during his ongoing sentencing hearing).
Representatives of the GTA board, including its then-president Mark Noss, met with attorneys from the Thrun Law Firm and Steven Ingersoll on May 20, 2013. During the meeting, Ingersoll admitted owing the charter school at least $3.5 million but asked to have the debt classified as a “loan”.
According to the May 30, 2013 Thrun Law Firm legal recommendation to Noss, the issue before the Board “relates to funds withdrawn from the Academy’s general fund by Steven Ingersoll and/or representatives of SSM, which exceed the amount appropriated or authorized by the Board to be paid to SSM for either management fees or the reimbursement of Academy expenses.”
The letter estimated Ingersoll’s debt to the Traverse City charter school at $3,548,319 (based on information provided by Ingersoll’s handpicked CPA, Tony Henning). As Henning had relied solely on “financial reports and representations of Steve Ingersoll” to determine the amount, Thrun repeatedly urged the GTA board to “independently verify the full sum due” instead of merely accepting Henning’s number.
Representing the interests of the GTA and its board, not Steven Ingersoll and Smart Schools Management, Thrun affirmed in its May 30, 2013 letter that “Steven Ingersoll openly admitted, when asked by us during the May 20th meeting, that a conflict exists between his personal interests and the interests of the Academy.”
However, the Academy Board ignored Thrun’s recommendation to verify Ingersoll’s numbers, instead using CPA Henning’s exact $3,548,319 amount in its June 13, 2013 “demand letter” to Steven Ingersoll.
On June 30, 2013, the GTA board and Ingersoll agreed on a “repayment plan”, revealing the details in the Academy’s 2013 financial statement. The agreement allowed Ingersoll to “work off” his balance by foregoing management fee payments over the remaining three fiscal years of his management contract.
GTA board president Mark Noss oversaw an early morning meeting on March 19, 2014 where the board voted unanimously to officially “withdraw from the management contract with Smart Schools Management, Inc.”
Minutes later, the board accepted the resignation of “Mark Noss as the President of the Board.” Although Noss tendered his resignation during this meeting, the resignation was not effective immediately.
GTA records reveal Noss continued to serve in a dual role as a board member until its May 2014 meeting, nearly two months after signing a multi-year, multi-million dollar management contract.
Steven Ingersoll was indicted on April 9, 2014.
Ingersoll was charged with three counts of wire fraud, two counts of tax evasion, one count of conspiracy to defraud the government, and one count of attempted conspiracy. (Four co-defendants, including Ingersoll’s wife Deborah, were also charged on various fraud and conspiracy counts).
An April 24, 2014 superseding indictment further charged Steven Ingersoll with tax evasion regarding his attempt to “disguise the money allegedly received from Grand Traverse Academy” —which was also named by the government as the motive for the bank fraud conspiracy and tax evasion conspiracy.
Steven Ingersoll was convicted of three counts of fraud and tax evasion on March 10, 2015.
Ingersoll’s sentencing hearing began on October 21, 2015 and is scheduled to resume July 11, 2016.
On March 15, 2016, an accountant formerly employed by Mark Noss at Full Spectrum Management reveals to the GTA board and the charter school’s authorizer, Lake Superior State University, Noss had been making $12,500 monthly payments to Ingersoll since April 2014, shortly after Noss assumed control of the GTA.
Using information provided by the whistleblowing accountant, (who resigned shortly after making his revelations public), federal prosecutors were able to substantiate that between April 8, 2014 and March 1, 2016, Steven Ingersoll received a total of $627, 624.14 from Full Spectrum Management, the educational services provider owned by Mark Noss and holder of the management contract for the Grand Traverse Academy or Grand Traverse Academy itself. All of that money went into accounts owned by Steven Ingersoll and his solely owned entities.
An excerpt from the April 29, 2016 document: “In assessing the credibility of Habermehl as a witness and Noss as an affiant in this matter, the court must consider the relationships they have with Ingersoll and how their financial and personal relationships with Ingersoll have influenced the representations that Habermehl and Noss have made to the court.
The evidence discussed above casts doubt on the credibility of Ingersoll, Noss and Habermehl.”
Stuff like this, which seldom are noticed by the mainsteam media, can drive bloggers crazy. Is anyone listening? Does anyone care?

Is this a “public” charter school? Was it a set up as a non-profit? Was it authorized at the local or state level? We need a common lexicon to define these schools to ensure accountability for authorizers and legislators that allow these schools to exist. No more “I support public charter schools.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too bad this cannot be linked to someone in the architecture of Clinton’s campaign, especially since she appears to be totally misinformed about charters. On the other hand, if you look at the personnel working on the campaign, you will not see much more than Obama loyalists. http://www.p2016.org/clinton/clintonorg.html
LikeLike
all charter schools are technically “public” schools
all charter schools in Michigan must be “authorized” by a school district, LEA, or a university–these authorizers may then “sell” the management of these charters to various “charter management companies,” such as National Heritage Academies
charter oversight in Michigan is practically non-existent, thanks to groups like the Mackinac Center and the Great Lakes Education Project–their “advocacy” allows persons like Dr. Ingersoll to set up and plunder his schools as a personal ATM
Michigan leads the nation in “for-profit” charters–a very unfortunate distinction
a growing body of literature is demonstrating that the distinctions between “for-profit” charters and “not-for-profit” charters are non-existent (see: https://dianeravitch.net/2016/07/07/peter-greene-there-is-no-meaningful-difference-between-a-for-profit-charter-and-a-non-profit-charter/)
the only lexicon we really need is “public schools” and “non-public schools”–the charter school “experiment,” regardless of its original intentions, has failed spectacularly, and it’s time to call the question.
this news comes on the heels of Randi Weingarten’s support for charters in the Democratic Party platform, effectively tethering the Party to the financial fortunes of the charter industry, along with such dubious “partners” as the Match and Relay “Gradaute Schools of Education,” the Harvard Graduate School of Education, KIPP, Uncommon Schools, and Eva Moskowitz and her Success Academies.
it’s becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish our allies from our enemies without a program…
LikeLike
Well stated. The charter industry continues its forced march over the bodies of starving public schools. Evidence and merit have little to do with it. They are staring at a $650 billion dollar bundle of public money they want to turn into private wealth, and the government is clearing a path for them. It’s not all about the children!
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are staring at a $650 billion dollar bundle and simply wondering how to get a slice for themselves; there is little to no interest in actually focusing upon the children.
LikeLike
CROSS POSTED at
with this comment which has embedded links:
“If you go to the Ravitch blog and put in charter school failure, you will be astonished at the truth of what is ongoing in America as Public Education is defunded and handed over to charlatans and snake -oil salesmen like this one.
“Years ago, I wrote an essay Magic Elixir: No Evidence required! http://www.opednews.com/articles/Magic-Elixir-No-Evidence-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-130312-433.html You see, in education, unlike in medicine or physical sciences, any cockamamie scheme is accepted and foisted on the public.
Tha is how Billionaire Koch can write North Carolina’s social studies curricula:
Here is a link to Diane’s posts on charter school corruption
https://dianeravitch.net/?s=corruption
.
LikeLike
Sorrry, here is the address of the cross-post at OPED NEWS..http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/A-Big-Time-Charter-Fraud-i-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Charter-School-Failure_Charter-Schools_Diane-Ravitch_Fraud-160710-932.html#comment606093
LikeLike
I strongly believe that people can change level of salt in a river, but cannot sweeten all 7 seas.
In another word, greed/privatization can influence one generation, but good virtue/”whole child education”concept cannot transform GLOBAL evil rooted greed.
Therefore, would all veteran educators come up with the best solution to wipe out the GLOBAL infested “privatization of public education”? Back2basic
LikeLike
Besides Hillary. I am shocked about the University of Michigan School of Education faculty being silent on the many charter frauds in the state. We need you Diane to speak at U of M. Do we know of a pro public school philanthropist who might engineer this?
LikeLike
Gail,
There are few pro-public school philanthropists, but there must be some in Michigan.
See who supports public education and the common good.
Michigan can’t be bereft of civic-minded philanthropists.
It can’t be all DeVos all the time.
LikeLike
You can bet that the media noticed but someone high up in corporate management said no to the story running and buried it. Let’s not forget that 90% of the traditional media is owned by six corporations. How many of those corporations are making money off of the autocratic, for profit, opaque and often fraudlent corporate public education reform movement?
LikeLike
One should also note other key players in this scandal that are currently running these schools right into the ground.
Brian Lynch, son-in-law of Mark Noss, currently manages Bay City Academy and its satellite campus, North Central Academy through Mitten Educational Management.
After reading through much of Anita’s blog, Brian Lynch’s illigal actions of sending a letter to the FCC stating that he is the Superintendant is very concerning. The signed document is displayed right on her blog. In addition, it appears that the condition of the school buildings violate a plethora of OSHA rules and regulations. How is this allowed to happen?
The actions and lies concerning Steve Ingersoll, Mark Noss, and Brian Lynch make this case truly interesting. I’ll be curious to see how this develops in the near future with Noss and Lynch.
LikeLike
Funny, this ongoing story has had little if any play in the local Traverse City or Petoskey paper. Real sad that local journalists simply shrug their shoulders and turn a blind eye to a critical issue.
LikeLike