As we learned in recent weeks, the state of Massachusetts placed Dever Elementary School in receivership, with no benefit to the children. The Boston Globe ran a major story about the state’s failure: the company that took charge of the school had never run a school; it went through five principals in two years; teacher turnover was high. The school was not turned around. The state failed the children of Dever Elementary School.
But that’s no reason not to do it to another school and more children!
Our reader Christine Langhoff in Massachusetts reports on the latest plan to turnaround a struggling school. Please let me know, dear reader, if You are aware of a successful state takeover anywhere. I can’t think of any.
Christine Langhoff writes:
Despite what is obviously an egregious failure, whose casualties are the children used as guinea pigs in this experiment, the state of Massachusetts with its appointed department of education goes merrily on its reformy way.
Holyoke, Springfield and Southbridge are three of our poorest communities, which have very high ratios of English language learners and SWD’s. So it’s no surprise that MA DESE has targeted them for takeover, just as they have in Lawrence and Boston.
MA DESE took over the Holyoke Public Schools last year, so now they’re hiring TFA’s to do the job of all those teachers they turned out, including Gus Morales, president of the Holyoke teachers union.
This “news” article:
includes “Five questions about Teach for America answered:”, helpfully answered by TFA.
And in Springfield, MA, DESE has turned over another school to UP Academy.
http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2016/05/parents_students_excited_about.html
On Friday afternoon (well known as a great time for a news dump), DESE issued its turnaround plan for the latest school system targeted for takeover, Southbridge, MA. Here are some of the key recommendations and “solutions”. This comes after many teachers and paraprofessionals have been notified that they have been terminated.
Click to access 1Southbridge%20TAP%206%2023%2016%20FINAL%20ENGLISH.pdf
Merit pay based on the local edition of VAM – Roland “Two-Tier” Fryer is a member of the board, so perhaps he is due credit for this:
5. Revamp compensation approach: The district will revamp its approach to compensation to ensure that individual effectiveness, professional growth, and student academic growth are key factors in a professional compensation system and that employees have opportunities for additional responsibility and leadership. (See also Appendix A, III.)
A major goal is to attract teachers because:
“The most significant school-based factor in students’ learning is the quality of the teaching they receive. Southbridge is committed to attracting and retaining a caring, qualified, and highly competent workforce of teachers and leaders.
Strategy D: Use the Receiver’s authorities to lay the foundation for successful turnaround
1. Limit, Suspend, or Change Provisions in Collective Bargaining Agreements to Support Plan Priorities: The district will limit, suspend, or change provisions in collective bargaining agreements and employment contracts in order to achieve the goals of the Turnaround Plan. Further, the Receiver must have the ability to address issues as they arise, including making additional changes to collective bargaining agreements to maximize the rapid improvement of the academic performance of Southbridge students. Appendix A contains changes will take effect as of July 1, 2016, and must be incorporated into future collective bargaining agreements. The Receiver and/or the Commissioner, at their discretion, will initiate discussions and processes as appropriate pursuant to G.L. c. 69, § 1K. (See also Appendix A.)
2. Change employment contracts: Certain changes to employment contracts between the district and individual employees are necessary to achieve the goals of the Turnaround Plan. The Receiver must have the flexibility to choose and retain principals and other administrative staff who are effective leaders, have the appropriate skills, and bring focus and urgency in implementing the terms of the Turnaround Plan. Consequently, the end date for all employment contracts or agreements entered into with administrative staff members before the declaration of receivership on January 26, 2016, is changed to June 30, 2017. The Receiver may, at her discretion, extend any such employment contract or exercise the termination provisions of any contract. The changed end date supersedes any contrary provisions in any individual employment contract between the district and an individual employee. (See also Appendix A.)”
and because non-turnaround schools are required to provide 990 hours of instruction:
“As of the 2017-2018 school year, there will be a minimum of 1,330 hours of instruction for students K-8. (See also Appendix A, IV.)
The Receiver will establish the school calendar each year. (See also Appendix A, IV.)
All newly-hired teachers may be required to participate in a week-long teacher
orientation/induction program as part of their professional obligation without additional
compensation. (See also Appendix A, IV.)
Explore additional school calendar options to provide additional time for instruction and
enrichment, to reach the required minimum of 1,330 hours of instruction annually for students K-8. This may involve programming options during vacations, extended day, year-long opportunities, and summer school.”
So the plan is to attract the best teachers by taking away any contractual protections, changing the school calendar at will and having them work an extra 340 hours without compensation. I’m sure that’s a great plan.
I’m old enough to remember when educational decisions at the state level were made by educators and informed by research. This triumph of ideology is devastating to our poor communities and the children who live in them.

What Failure?
The money is going where they want it to go,
So of course they double down on their bet.
LikeLike
Exactly: in the world of so-called education reform, nothing succeeds like failure…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Failure is in fact a goal: In our inner-city district, if our school board couldn’t argue for FAILURE, they couldn’t attract money. Failure soon became the point of our whole district budget.
LikeLike
A system that feeds itself, sustains itself, and reproduces itself is a successful system. The fact that it lives and grows by killing off the system of education and government we once knew and loved is just a matter of which side of the fence you’re on.
Make no mistake, the beast is feeding contentedly or it wouldn’t keep doing what it’s doing.
LikeLike
Massachusetts has a centuries-long history of governmental corruption, so it is not implausible that someone making these decisions is somehow benefiting.
Follow the money and you will find that it leads to Beacon Hill.
LikeLike
I have a question for the experts on this site. Is there a possible situation where you would consider a standardized test (or some other “blind” measure) an aid to “equity”?
Here’s why I ask. Our public school has an “advanced” track that starts in 7th grade. It’s not (actually) that different from the regular track- I’ve had kids on both. But, parents make a big deal out of it so kids make a big deal out of it. We have about 50% low and lower income kids and lower income parents complained that their kids were not put in these classes. They felt it was biased. It was based on teacher recommends and grades but they added a test score component- 2 measures rather than 3. I have a kid in there now and I believe there are more lower income kids in there with the 3 measures rather than 2. I admit I don’t have “stats” but my older kids were on this same track and it seemed like it was all higher income then (10 or so years ago). Parents think it’s “fairer” now too. Is there a place for a “blind” measure in schools? Is that valuable, especially if your school is economically diverse- a mix of people who are conscious of differences in incomes and wary of “special treatment’ for better-off kids?
LikeLike
I am no expert. In my opinion, every test is biased. It may be standardized, or teacher-made. By virtue of the fact that a test addresses only some of the material, it is biased. In a district in my area, the children placed in the fast track AP classes were from higher socio-economic status families than the students denied access to these classes. Some high schools offer no AP classes. The story is the same across the country.
LikeLike
Roland (Two-Tear) Fryer may be more appopriate
LikeLike
“Roland ‘Nobel-less Ed lab’ Fryer” (apologies to the late great Warren Zevon, RIP)
Roland was a warrior from the land of the Crimson sun
An econ man for hire, fighting to be done
The deal was made at Harvard on a dark and stormy day
So he set out for the White House to join the Edu-fray
Through merit pay and testing he fought the Edu-wars
With his finger on the figure, knee-deep in the scores
For days and nights he battled, the unions and their ties
He tried to earn his living, with some help from Condi Rice
Roland the Ed lab Fryer
Roland the two-tier Fryer
His comrades fought beside him, Raj Chetty and the rest
But of all the Ed Lab hires, Roland was the best
But his merit-pay experiment went belly-up to hell
That son-of-a-gun experiment, blew up his Nobel
Roland “Nobel-less Ed lab” Fryer, Harvard’s bravest hire
They can still see his Nobel-less body stalking through the night
In the brilliant flash of Roland’s “merit” fire
In the brilliant flash of Roland’s “merit” fire
Roland “Nobel-less Ed Lab” Fryer
Roland “Nobel-less two-tier” Fryer
Roland “Nobel-less two tear” Fryer
Talkin’ about the man, Roland “Nobel-less Ed Lab” Fryer
LikeLike
Amazing
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
“I’m old enough to remember when educational decisions at the state level were made by educators and informed by research. This triumph of ideology is devastating to our poor communities and the children who live in them.”
A religious belief in unfounded and failed philosophy leads to misery. Unfortunately, it is innocent students and their families who will suffer the most.
LikeLike
While I do not agree with most of the turn around efforts in MA I don’t think it is accurate to say that there has been no improvement in schools taken over by the MA DESE – Lawrence has shown improvement since 2012, especially in math, and though it is too early to know if it will be sustained, the gains are there – or that it is never a good idea for the state to step in.
Southbridge has been a highly dysfunctional district for some time, churning through 7 superintendents and 7 high school principals since 2010. Many in the community, including school committee members, students and teachers, appeared to welcome the intervention. While Southbridge is one of the poorest districts in MA it does not have a particularly high rate of students with disabilities, ELLs, or students whose first language is not English. Many MA districts with higher levels of each subgroup are higher achieving, i.e. have higher MCAS scores, some significantly higher. Southbridge does have a disproportionately high rate of ELLs who are also on IEPs, but that is likely due to inappropriately identifying language differences as disabilities.
Here is a link to comparative data on Lawrence and Southbridge. If no Lawrence data appears select Lawrence in the drop down menu for “Comparable District”, then click the tiny orange arrow. Both districts’ data should appear on the graphs.
http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/analysis/curriculum.aspx?orgcode=02770000&orgtypecode=5&
None of this is to say that the turn around approaches have long term efficacy, are democratic, or will lead to a stronger public education system. Springfield’s Empowerment Zone is riddled with pro-privatization, de-unionization, Gates-funded initiatives. Those are problems.
LikeLike
Improvement in schools is not equal to higher standardized test scores. Ever.
Has poverty decreased in the neighborhoods? Has employment increased? Has quality of life improved for residents? Mortality? Health? Are the physical plants that make up the schools better maintained and fiscally supported? Are there better and more services for residents and their children.
These are real, measurable improvements.
The lie that better test scores means a better life has been refuted over and over and over and over again yet the economists who created this zombie Frankensteinian lie chuckle every time someone sincerely refers to it as truthful. Recent research has shown that there is no correlation whatsoever between test scores and quality of life down the road outside of very generalized earning potential, which the economists who keep messing around with education use as their ‘data source’.
Happiness, success outside of income and wealth creation, stable marriages and families, community engagement and civic involvement, charitable outlook, kindness, forgiveness, helping those who need it whether they “deserve” it or not, these are the things that show real improvement and successful outcomes in struggling neighborhoods.
None of these things are measured by, encouraged by, or in any way affiliated with higher test scores. Yet so many still quote that as a measure of ‘success’ when it is only a measure of success at taking standardized tests.
LikeLike
Chris, I don’t disagree with you. I referred to test scores because that is what school’s are judged by in determining their Level status in Massachusetts, and that will be the basis for determining when the state will release its control. Level 5 schools and districts, have chronically very low scores and low levels of growth in comparison to similar districts.
The school in question in this post, Dever Elementary, has not made improvement on the state’s own measures after two years of state control. The jury will be out for a while yet on whether Lawrence will enjoy sustainable gains on multiple measures of improvement, including many of the criteria you mention.
LikeLike