Paul Krugman asks in this column how the Republican Party could have allowed a con artist like Donald Trump to take over the party and become its nominee. Why didn’t other Republicans expose the scams and frauds that have generated profits for Trump? Why were reporters able to discover what was in plain sight but not the other candidates?
He says it is because a party that worships profit and insists that government is the problem is wide open for frauds, profiteers, and grifters. “Greed is good” is not a maxim to live by.
He writes:
Consider this: Even as the newspapers are filled with stories of defrauded students and stiffed contractors, Republicans in Congress are going all-out in efforts to repeal the so-called “fiduciary rule” for retirement advisers, a new rule requiring that they serve the interests of their clients, and not receive kickbacks for steering them into bad investments. Paul Ryan, the speaker of the House, has even made repealing that rule part of his “anti-poverty plan.” So the G.O.P. is in effect defending the right of the financial industry to mislead its customers, which makes it hard to attack the likes of Donald Trump.
Finally, the con job that lies at the heart of so much Republican politics makes it hard to go after other, more commercial cons. It’s interesting to note that Marco Rubio actually did try to make Trump University an issue, but he did it too late, after he had already made himself a laughingstock with his broken-record routine. And here’s the thing: The groove Mr. Rubio got stuck in — innuendo that the president is deliberately weakening America — was a typical example of the political snake-oil the right sells along with free money and three-minute cures for high blood pressure.
The point is that Mr. Rubio was just as much a con artist as Mr. Trump – just not as good at it, which is why, under pressure, he kept repeating the same memorized words. So he, like all the G.O.P. contenders, didn’t have what it would have taken to make Mr. Trump’s grifting an issue. But at least so far it appears that Hillary Clinton and her allies won’t have the same problem.
In the months ahead Republicans will claim that there are equivalent scandals on the Democratic side, but nothing they’ve managed to come up with rises remotely to the level of even one of the many Trump scams in the news. They’ll also claim that Mr. Trump doesn’t reflect their party’s values. But the truth is that in a very deep sense he does. And that’s why they couldn’t stop him.

It seems the Genital Obsessed Party had trouble focusing on its Graft Only Policies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always think of it as the Genitals On Parade party. That acronym was especially relevant in the years of Bush and Dick. 🙂
LikeLike
How did the new york times have Paul Krugman the former consultant of Enron write from them and put him in jail for fraud.
LikeLike
pkarchive.org
LikeLike
A better question: How did the Democratic party allow a lying, corrupt criminal win their nomination for president?
LikeLike
Obvious: Money. We need to get rid of Citizens United, and fight hard against bipartisan gerrymandering and GOP voter restriction. However, this November we need to keep Trump out of the White House. Say whatever you want about Hillary, she is not a reality show huckster.
LikeLike
Was Hillary indicted? I must’ve missed the news. Here I thought Constitutional principles required a trial before conviction as a criminal.
LikeLike
Wait a minute. The Clintons are corrupt but not like this:
The Donald pillaged his companies; he ripped off his business partners,his investors and his contractors; he shifted his own debts onto the companies then walked away.
(And he calls Hillary a crook?)
Now he is moving onto bigger things. Like, the US Treasury. Suddenly, his plans are becoming clearer to me.
This makes for grim reading. Plus, it reveals the inequity and
corruption of a system where you or I could go to jail for stealing an iPhone, but The Donald can steal millions (billions?) and not get a hand slap.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/nyregion/donald-trump-atlantic-city.h
tml?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
h/t MHClarke
LikeLiked by 1 person
Genital Obsessed Party? Anthony Weiner is not a Republican!
LikeLike
Weiner is obsessed with his own. Republicans are obsessed with everyone else’s.
LikeLike
How did the Democratic party allow – even manipulate the primary process – a grifter to become its nominee for president? That’s twice – first there was Bill, now it’s his wife, Hill. Only in third world countries does that happen. Krugman is a long-time hack shill for Hillary.
Please stick to education.
LikeLike
Krugman has identified the root problem of greed, but the hypocrisy of Krugman & the Dem Party is overwhelming — they are part of this problem.
“In the US, there is basically one party – the business party. It has two factions, called Democrats and Republicans, which are somewhat different but carry out variations on the same policies. By and large, I am opposed to those policies. As is most of the population.”
Noam Chomsky.
The Democratic Party is a faction of fraud and social/economic violence. Trump is out in the open. Democrats still try to hide it through half-clever pieces such as this.
LikeLike
Good call Kim.
Krugman’s Nobel Prize would be more impressive if Obama didn’t have one too.
Economists are the modern day snake oil salesmen. They are a lot like politicians: when they get it right they are brilliant; when they get it wrong, it’s someone else’s fault. Even some people who ingest questionable tonics get better anyway.
LikeLike
Krugman’s “Nobel prize’ would be more impressive if it were actually a “Nobel” prize
It’s not.
It was started — and dubbed the “Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel” – by Sweden’s central bank in 1969 as a PR stunt to lend credibility to the economics profession.
Members of the family were vehemently opposed to it at the time and have tried (unsuccessfully) ever since to get it removed from any association with Nobel.
Given that it has been awarded to people whose “theories” were demonstrably just plain wrong (and one year they gave to people with opposing “theories”) , the prize is really just a joke.
Paul Krugman seems fairly intelligent, but he is not even close to the caliber of people who have real Noble Prizes (eg in science or literature.)
LikeLike
Kim Kaufman,
It is my blog. I write what I want, on any subject. I don’t ask for permission. If you don’t like what I write, go somewhere else.
LikeLike
I don’t know but I told my son not paying employees is not a legitimate way to make money no matter what Donald Trump or his entourage say.
I hope that’s not “optional” now, paying people for the work that they do. I knew standards were pretty low, but this is ridiculous.
Stealing wages and services isn’t a “business model”. It’s just stealing.
LikeLike
A bigger problem that is bankrupting America: Paying people for work they DO NOT do.
And seriously…Trump wouldn’t have been in business as long as he has if he were guilty of not paying employees. Please.
LikeLike
Please yourself. Trump has declared bankruptcy four times specifically to avoid paying people. That’s the problem with Trump – he doesn’t stay in business long. He just starts new businesses once he’s sucked all the profit out of his existing businesses.
LikeLike
Chiara, why do you hate America? Volunteers (and volunteerism) are “an underutilized resource by schools.” Well trained reading specialists aren’t wasting their well-paid time on instruction with children. In today’s innovation zones reading specialists are needed to coach teachers.
Not paying the help is KEY for raising reading scores in our 21st century economy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/can-volunteers-help-kids-read-more-proficiently-new-research-says-yes/2015/03/28/7141c57c-c4ec-11e4-ad5c-3b8ce89f1b89_story.html
LikeLike
Scott, you ought to read the coverage of Trump’s series of failed businesses in Atlantic City. He walked away with profits while leaving debts unpaid. Many small contractors were put out of business because the work they did for Trump was not paid for.
LikeLike
Scott,
The stories you want are over there
—————–>
at Brietbart.
LikeLike
Trump is the ideal candidate for the Replutocrats, absolutely perfect for their goals. He is the exact type of figurehead pitchman they need in order to sell the same old snake oil policies. He is not, as the lame stream media would have you believe, a populist outsider who will be cleaning up DC, the reality is that he cut a deal and has agreed to be a wholly owned subsidiary of the GOP if they get him elected. The circumstances surrounding his recent attacks on judge Curiel illustrate that they had almost nothing to do with the election other than the fact that they were coming from the presumptive nominee of the GOP. They were entirely self serving since Trump has some very serious financial and personal brand exposure in the case which he is all but guaranteed to lose. They were also extremely stupid since there was a negative chance that the attacks would help his legal case or his election. The response from the GOP leadership was interesting to say the least. Paul Ryan suddenly discovers racism after 7+ years of silence on the anti Obama hate from the entirety of the right. Mitch McConnell is roused from his back room torpor and demands, in a fit of pique, that Trump gets back on message, the parties message. Christie, who is the GOP liaison to Trump walks Trump through it and within hours Trump meekly obeys his masters in the home office. Till next time. The GOP leadership really couldn’t care less about all the hate speech and other buffoonery, what they fear is that any realization that Trump is merely a figurehead could take hold and spread within their voting base, one that does actually despise the ossified GOP leadership and still thinks that Trump can and will clean house and fight DC corruption on their behalf. While much of that same leadership does despise Trump on a personal level, they are backing him as the sole survivor of the attrition of the clown car of candidates they managed to prop up, the majority of whom would also have been naught but figureheads themselves. We already knew that Trump had neither the temperment, the experience nor the basic knowledge to do the job. What he does have is the abilities of a cult status salesman who can sell just about anything to just about anyone who is still taken in by his bluster, even if it is quite obviously not in their own best interests to buy it. This is the true danger of a Trump presidency and his greatest weakness as a candidate. The racist and bigoted speech he spews is an almost inescapable distraction for the opposition to focus on and at the same time a permission slip for the same and worse behaviors from his most ignorant supporters, which furthers the scope and effects of the distraction.
LikeLike
Wow, that kool-aid must really taste good. Ed Detective called Krugman’s piece “half-clever.” Your diatribe is at least just as good.
LikeLike
Project much?
LikeLike
His attacks on the judge are based on the fact that he supports an organization that does not believe in borders. His businesses went bankrupt (corporation law) just like other businesses. No one complained about the CEOs in 2008 that made a fortune while their companies were going under. The Democrats have two old white people. One that would steal the furniture ops she did. The other one lives in dream land
LikeLike
While I agree with most of what you posted, I do not think it’s correct to state that Trump cut a deal in which he agrees to be the GOP mouthpiece. He didn’t even need to do that. Once he had the lion’s share of the delegates, there was nothing the party regulars could do. They tried on the idea, threatening to pull an open convention upset, & swiftly retreated, realizing they’d lose their base. All Trump did was throw them a few bones to help them save face in case he needs them later. The true danger of the Trump candidacy is only partly that he can sell anything to his supporters. The more profound concern is that no one knows precisely what he stands for (if anything)– to what ends he would wield his power.
LikeLike
Both parties have been corrupted by allegiance to big money interests. With the exception of a few members, they rarely represent the interests of their constituents. They are more interested in making contacts to feather their own nests than providing a public service. Lots of them leave and become lobbyists when they leave office while they collect a generous pension package. This trend will continue unless we pass laws to regulate their behavior, and I doubt they will be willing to put an end to their own excess.
LikeLike
I am so glad you said we need to pass laws to regulate their behavior! The concept of “public service” does not even relate to our current set of publicly-elected officials: all congressmen are at minimum millionaires, & that’s due to laws which make it difficult to become a publicly-elected rep unless one is already a millionaire– & assures candidates they will attain that status within one term if they’re not yet there.
I’d like to see on this board less whining about how our elected officials act and more info as to bills we taxpayers can initiate &/or support to rein in their activities.
LikeLike
If Krugman wants to know how Trump did what he did, all he needs to do is take a good look at the American “news’ media — including the organization he works for (NY Times).
For most of the campaign (up until they realized that “Oh no, this guy might actually become the nominee”) they gave Trump hour after hour of free air time with virtually no questions asked about or challenges made to anything he was saying.
The media were treating the Republican nomination campaign like it was just one big Trump reality show, with columnists and even “statistical experts” like Nate Silver assuring everyone that “Trump has absolutely no chance of getting the nomination”
So, hell, why not just enjoy the show while it lasts, right?
LikeLike
The CEO of CBS said that while Trump is bad for America, he’s very good for the bottom line of CBS and the rest of the media. Therein lies the problem, just as false measures of teacher quality distort and diminish teaching, so do false measures of broadcast quality such as the price that can be charged for ad time based on ratings. It’s the old “If it bleeds it leads.” dynamic on steroids. Ratings are based simply on the market share of viewers during a particular time period. This is used as an obviously bogus proxy for quality. This is how the FAUX network can simultaneously be the most popular and most inaccurate network out there. The wrong thing is being measured and used to set policy.
LikeLike
Jon– yes, we know that. And I think we also know why: isn’t it because a free press– like transportation and education and postal and even justice/ prison systems– are public goods? And under our present governmental paradigm, public goods are viewed as overhead costs that the “business” (the USA) can ill afford in global competition, thus must be cut to the bone? Hence press that speaks only to its ‘target market’, owned by a few billionaire media conglomerates.
I thank my stars for the free internet while it lasts– & for CSPAN! (sh! Or it might lose its funding!)
My point is that citizens must join to support a return of profits from offshore where they may be taxed to bring about a return of public goods to the peolple.
LikeLike
“Dienne
June 13, 2016 at 4:27 pm
Please yourself. Trump has declared bankruptcy four times specifically to avoid paying people. That’s the problem with Trump – he doesn’t stay in business long. He just starts new businesses once he’s sucked all the profit out of his existing businesses.”
‘Businesses’ – like Trump University. Only if one redefines “business” to mean “scam”
I don’t know- can standards go any lower? I don’t think they can but we’ll find out.
LikeLike
Right, sorry about that. Of course I meant “scam”.
LikeLike
Chiara, you are so right. It is humbling and even shameful that we have a Rep candidate who thought to plump his bottom line w/a “University” that shares the stage with every get-rich-quick-by-flipping-properties late-night infomercial that has regularly aired since the ’80’s.
LikeLike
http://majority.fm/2016/05/18/518-wayne-barrett-donald-trump-mob-connected-trust-fund-baby-m/
Here’s an illuminating interview with Wayne Barrett, journalist, legendary Trump biographer and author of the new Kindle book Trump: The Greatest Show on Earth: The Deals, the Downfall, the Reinvention, explains why and how Donald Trump didn’t run in 2012. Trump’s Mob connections. Why Trump’s race baiting is all that matters in a Republican primary. Why Donald Trump would be nowhere without his dad’s money.
LikeLike
Well I agree with Krugman about the Republicans . But he just participated in a hatchet job on the best chance the nation had to defeat the con men . His daily diatribes contradicted many points he had raised in the past. Like this one
Like Dean Baker says : why is it that his fellow economists who love to tell you they are the smartest people in the room . Could not see one of the largest financial crisis and bubbles in history. Many did including Baker . Krugman was not on top of anyone’s list for calling the collapse.
But yes the Republicans are conman along with many others .
LikeLike
Edit button please: con-men
LikeLike
I just finished reading “Confidence Men”.
Economists should all carefully examine their field and perhaps start over from scratch 🙂
LikeLike
You’re right about Krugman.
He seems to have a very short memory which does not include policies he supported up until fairly recently.
Krugman showed himself to be a political hack, but he will be rewarded for it with an appointment in a Clitnon administration.
..which, of course is why he did what he did.
I much rather see Joseph Stiglitz as an economic adviser than Krugman. He isn’t a Democratic hack — and is much smarter than Krugman to boot.
LikeLike
Please. The Ds and the Rs are the same. Its one big party and they manipulate us like puppets. The fix was in, and the fix is in. Whether you’re “with her” or “with him” doesn’t matter. Each of them will screw us over, and each of them is in like Flynn with the privatizers and the charterizers and the voucher crowd. Trump has already given the same old speech about failing schools, blah blah blah. Come meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
THEY ALL KNEW, and they allowed the circus to play out.
LikeLike
Just curious if XQAmerica are ever going to reveal that Arne Duncan works for the foundation that funds them:
“Former U.S. Sec of Ed, @arneduncan, on the importance of a nation that unites under common goals in #education.”
Now there’s a shocker. Arne Duncan supports the same goals as his employer!
Are ed reformers familiar with the word ” incestious”? It applies.
LikeLike
The corruption and insane and distributive policies of the GOP have been on display for decades and yet fools keep supporting a party that does not represent their best interests.
The GOP represents the best interests of millionaires and billionaires but there are only about 10.1 million household in the U.S. that have this kind of wealth.
The votes those 10.1 million household represent is not enough to keep voting in one GOP representative after another.
The same goes for the Democratic Party. If a representative is clearly not representing your best interests, don’t vote for them. The only answer why these corrupt representative keep lying to voters and fooling them is because there are too many ignorant fools voting in the U.S. that are easy to fool.
What can we do about the middle class fools that keep voting in corrupt frauds who do not represent the middle class? Nothing.
LikeLike
“The only answer why these corrupt representatives keep lying to voters and fooling them is because there are too many ignorant fools voting in the US that are easy to fool.”
I so disagree, Lloyd! The reason representatives don’t support their constituencies is because they are paid not to! The vote becomes a rote exercise– obtained by lies– when the election is paid for by deep-pocket special interests, & every vote the elected representative casts in Congress is influenced by deep-pocketed lobbyists.
The answer is not somehow educating ‘fool’ voters. The answer can only be found in legislation that gets special-interest money out of our elections, and drastically limits lobbyist activity.
LikeLike
I came here ready to lay down some serious Krugman bashing, but at this point I’d just be piling on. Good job everyone.
LikeLike
I quote that article in many places! He is not always on the mark, but he is here!
LikeLike
Serious question: how can schools do a better job at immunizing citizens from fraud? The boilerplate answer is “teach critical thinking skills”. But I wonder if it would be better to teach concrete examples of fraud. Also: to teach how the world works more robustly. I’ve heard that the ignorant are more prone to believe outlandish claims. Are the schools doing all they can to banish ignorance?
LikeLike