Awash in contributions from billionaires, the California Charter Schools Association claimed victory in several contested legislative elections.
Its candidate in the 43rd Assembly District, Laura Friedman came in first, bolstered by more than $1 million in campaign gifts by the powerful lobby.
The charter lobby, as usual, ran under false colors, pretending to be “all about the kids” and fighting for high-quality schools.
But Steve Zimmer, president of the Los Angeles Unified School District board, called them out, saying it was all about contracts and money.
LA Unified school board President Steve Zimmer railed Wednesday against the tactics used by the CCSA Advocates in the hotly contested 43rd Assembly District race and compared its spending in that race, at least $1.2 million, to special interest spending from oil and tobacco industries, which lobby for deregulation.
“This is no longer about choice. This is no longer about kids. It’s certainly not about civil rights,” he said. “It’s about deregulation. It’s about privatization.”
An independent expenditure committee called Parent Teacher Alliance sponsored by CCSA Advocates, the political arm of the CCSA, spent $910,791 on mailers supporting Glendale City Councilwoman Laura Friedman and $304,355 to oppose Glendale City Clerk Ardy Kassakhian, as of Friday, state campaign finance records show.
Friedman won the primary race, earning 31.9 percent of the vote total, capturing 24,372 votes, according to preliminary election results. Kassakhian finished in second place with 24.3 percent, receiving 18,618 votes. The two Democrats topped the eight-candidate ticket to replace outgoing Assemblyman Mike Gatto, D-Burbank, who could not seek re-election due to term limits. They will likely compete in the Nov. 8 general election. The election results will not be finalized until mail-in and provisional ballots are counted. Voter turnout in the district was about 29 percent.
Zimmer denounced the negative mailers sent by CCSA Advocates that flooded voters’ mailboxes in the district that includes Glendale, Burbank, La Canada Flintridge and parts of Los Angeles.
“It is base thuggery, no more or no less,” Zimmer said.
He called Kassakhian, whom he endorsed, the target of the mailers, an “innocent bystander” and said Kassakhian’s only crime was having a mother who was a public school teacher and support from teachers’ unions.
“I aspire to be half as decent a guy as Ardy Kassakhian is,” Zimmer said. “To take him out the way they did, to use the hate in those mailers, it’s a new standard of low. It has no rules, no boundaries, no ethics, no morals.”
The spending by charter school supporters in this race could be a preview of what will happen in March, when three seats on the LA Unified school board will be contested. Zimmer is up for re-election in what is sure to be a highly contested race. A challenger has already announced in the race. In 2013, Zimmer’s last re-election bid, millions were poured into the three races by outside groups. He captured 52 percent of the votes to defeat his opponent, Kate Anderson, who was backed by CCSA.
Friedman and Kassakhian will have a run-off in November as the top two finishers in the race.
The charter industry continues to descend into a pit of slime in its drive for money and power and its desire to cripple public education.

The mailers and flyers keep coming, stuffing mailboxes throughout Los Angeles. The ugliness of the Reformers claims is now the new normal here.
Progressives have to rethink strategies to counter the CCSA narrative, particularly when it comes from Democrats.
I would suggest a well publicized Teach-In. I want the Democrats who are Pro Reform to participate in a debate with Social Justice Education advocates and have at where each stands and WHO backs WHO.
This is a way to cut through the clutter and have the California Democratic candidates honestly say whose money they are accepting and WHY.
I would hope smart progressive education advocates have the wherewithal to strongly challenge the CCSA and corporate money and direct their attention to the many Republicans who share their Education agenda.
LikeLike
There likely has to be as much anti-test advertising as there is pro-reform advertising. And that’s A LOT — and very expensive; the money is not typically on the side of those who resist.
LikeLike
Search on “EdVoice” (an organization that supports charter schools) at this link and you will see similar things going on. I think their independent expenditures in behalf of Cecilia Aguiar-Curry in Assembly District 4 likely kept one favored candidate, endorsed by CTA, from finishing in the top two.
LikeLike
“Zimmer accused the CCSA of trying to control lucrative procurement contracts. Charter schools are not subject to the same standards for selecting vendors as public school districts.
“The reality is that his statements are not rooted in evidence or fact, they are rooted in emotion, ideology and rhetoric,” Marquez said, noting that the majority of charter schools are run by non-profits.”
The non-profit dodge. Ed reform loves this one.
Procurement contracts are for outsourced services- vendors. They have absolutely nothing to do with whether charter schools are “run by non-profits”.
The “non-profit” label means nothing in contracts re: for-profit vendors at the schools.
The CCSA know this of course. They’re hoping the public hears “non-profit” and stops there.
This was inevitable. If you have a group of zealous charter promoters and then a group of “agnostics” 2 things are inevitable- the “agnostics” will get rolled by the fanatics and public schools will end up on the short end of the stick.
Charter advocates on one side versus “agnostics” on the other is unbalanced. It leaves public schools without an advocate.
John King is one of the keynote speakers at the charter school conference, along with Andre Agassi. Does this mean the US Department of Education is endorsing a specific commercial chain of charter schools- the Rocketship chain? Wow, That’s some seal of approval for Mr. Agassi. Can a public school district get that kind of endorsement or is it only for the well-connected/famous? I don’t think my district can compete with a national chain backed by big investors and the federal government.
http://www.publiccharters.org/involved/conference-2016/scheduleandevents/speakers/?utm_content=33382374&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
LikeLike
“This is no longer about choice. This is no longer about kids. It’s certainly not about civil rights,” he said. “It’s about deregulation. It’s about privatization.”
It’s brave of Zimmer to speak so plainly, but the fact that it’s about privatization has been obvious for a long time.
If you’re allied with a group of people who spend all their time, energy and money privatizing public schools, it’s probably “about” privatization 🙂
He must have noticed they don’t do anything for public schools, that public schools are completely omitted from any ed reform effort other then testing and teacher ranking. That’s been clear in my state for years. Seems like that would be a tip-off.
LikeLike
If you want to know what your “independent, agnostic” federal lawmakers are up to, here’s John King prominently displayed on the Broad lobby Twitter page:
https://twitter.com/BroadFoundation?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
How much influence do the ed reform lobbies have over the Obama Administration and does an ordinary public school district get this kind of access and clout?
It’s going to be tough for public schools to compete with these national organizations and chains, particularly since they’ve captured the federal government.
“Level playing field” my foot. They rigged this game like they rig everything else.
LikeLike
Aspen’s, Gates-funded, “Senior Congressional Education Staff Network” says it all.
If America was a righteous and just nation, fellowship in Aspen’s. Gates-funded, Pahara, would be a badge of dishonor.
LikeLike
Here in San Diego CCSA did not win everything but they sure did send the message that if you are not for a privatized school system big money will smear you and find an opponent to contest your election. In the San Diego County School Board election CCSA defeated one incumbent lost to one and two other contests are too close to call before the mail in ballots are certified. The incumbents do have a small lead in both. http://sandiegouniontribune.ca.newsmemory.com/publink.php?shareid=518a72292&pSetup=sandiegouniontribune
LikeLike
T Ultican,
Big money did not win all the races. I am waiting for a full accounting and will post it.
CCSA is an organization determined to destroy public education and open the door to full privatization and profit making in California.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Check out ‘Governor “Charter School”‘ – I think you will like it. https://tultican.wordpress.com/2016/06/08/governor-charter-school/
LikeLike
In Contra Costa County, where I live Bill Dodd and Tim Grayson, both sponsored by the EdVoice PAC (EdVoice funded the Vergara lawsuit), both made it through to the general election as State Senate and Assembly candidates, although Grayson did not “win”. So you see its is not just the CCSA and they are spending not only on school board races, but are also looking to put their friends in legislative positions in key districts. EdVoice is said to have spent upwards of $800,000 on this primary race, according to the local paper, and is anticipated to spend even more on the general.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems as though California is leading the country in privatizing the us public schools
LikeLike
cally has all the court cases as well like the friedrichs crap fake case against tenure
LikeLike