Does our society value teachers? By objective evidence, you may say no. After all, teachers are not paid as well as lawyers or doctors. And we can’t ignore the fact that quite a few legislatures have passed laws to remove teachers’ due process rights or to tie teacher pay to student test scores. Indeed, the Obama administration has forced this noxious idea on most states as a condition of getting Race to the Top funding.
Consequently, many teachers suffered the humiliation of getting a rating based on student scores,then seeing their rating posted in public. That happened in Los Angeles, and one teacher–Rigoberto Ruelas–committed suicide. That happened in Néw York City, at the in sustenance of media mogul Rupert Murdoch, and the teacher with the city’s worst rating was featured on the front page of Mr. Murdoch’s tabloid. But as it turned out, the “worst teacher” was a very fine teacher of immigrant students who cycled in and out of her class all year. And, sadly, Arne Duncan praised the act of creating and published these lists of teacher ratings.
We can be grateful that Race to the Top is defunct, but its worst effects linger on. The charter industry expanded at the behest of RTTT, leaving behind a voracious sector that absorbs limited education dollars but evades accountability or transparency.
Evaluation by test scores has been debunked time and again, yet it continues because the state laws are still on the books. And many states continue to pursue ways of limiting teacher pay, increasing class size, or otherwise manipulating the conditions of teaching without improving them.
What does it mean to appreciate teachers? It means respecting their professionalism. It means turning to teachers as experts on their work, not to people who study teaching or think about teaching.
John Ewing, who heads Math for America, makes this point in this good article. He writes about the many times he participates in conferences about how to improve teaching, but no teachers are I cited to participate. He counts the number of times major journalists write articles about teaching and schools but never interview a teacher. How many teachers were included on the panel that wrote the Common Core? The typical news story about education includes quotes from the same think tank experts, even though few have ever taught.
Ewing writes:
“When it comes to talking or writing about education, we do not view teachers as experts. We do not trust them as professionals. Can you imagine an engineering conference without engineers as speakers? Can you imagine a science article with no input from scientists? Or a report on some breakthrough in medicine without a quote from a doctor? We treat the profession of teaching differently from all others.
“The teaching profession needs two things in order to thrive—respect and trust. The two go together. You can say nice words and be grateful to teachers, but if you do not trust them as professionals, you are not showing them respect. Trust means giving teachers (appropriate) autonomy in their classrooms, but it also means giving them influence over policy—real influence, not a few token teachers on some committee—and it means giving them control over their own professional growth. We need to stop fixing teachers and create environments in which teachers themselves fix their own profession. We need to trust them to do so.”
As Ronald Reagan said
“Trust but vilify”
“Teach but testify”
In the school
“Trust, but vilify”
Is the rule
Have teachers ever really had the respect and trust of those who purport to have authority over them? The evidence would seem to indicate that teachers are useful only when they do what they are told or when they make someone else look good. Except in the classroom (and not even there for many) we are just pawns in someone else’s game. Interestingly enough, the only place I found respect for the position was among my latino students, the more recently arrived the better.
I taught in Arizona for two years and also got the most respect from first generation immigrant students from Mexico — who also seemed to be the hardest workers. Perhaps it is because they really appreciate how lucky they are to have the opportunity to learn while pretty much everyone else takes it for granted.
I bought a car from a gentlemen immigrating from somewhere in Asia. He asked what I did for a living. I usually don’t tell people, but I went ahead and told him math teacher. He started calling me “sir”. I had to look around to see who he was talking to.
I’m not a teacher but politicians praising teachers is standard.
Completely and utterly without meaning. Watch what they do, not what they say.
They love teachers like they love “the middle class” and those who “work hard and play by the rules” – in a purely theoretical, rhetorical way 🙂
Here is an example of the empty rhetoric from the Obama/Duncan administration, still in play and revealing a totally corrupted set of meanings for trust and respect.
The Obama/Duncan administration launched the so-called RESPECT program for “Recognizing Educational Success, Professional Excellence And Collaborative Teaching” in 2013. RESPECT was nothing more than a pitch from McKinsey & Co. for teachers to give up all quests for job security and embrace longer hours, fewer days off, tiers of merit pay for raising test scores (minimum “a year’s worth of growth” every year) and so on.
USDE enlisted board certified teachers, teachers of the year, and Presidential fellows to endorse and to market these ideas in meetings they were to convene in every state. These spokespersons and meeting conveners were given a draft of the RESPECT proposal to distribute, a fully scripted discussion protocol and time allocations for pacing the meeting (as if the teachers could not be trusted to lead a meeting.) The conveners were asked to distribute a participant form, solicit written comments from every participant on sections of the proposal. These written comments became the “feedback loop” for tailoring the next rounds of marketing. The project was not much more than a large scale series of focus groups from credible leaders, achieved at low cost. It traded on the aura of respect attained by the teachers, but it did trust them to engage in pro-actively in any critically informed discussions about their profession. McKinsey & Co.’s role in this was not advertised.
The Obama/Duncan administration’s trust in teachers and respect for them as professionals is/was nil. Nothing came from the RESPECT program. Apart from marketing USDE’s marketing of that plan, the consultants at McKinsey & Co. continue to earn big fees for the same boilerplate “fixes” for teaching, for school districts, and entire states. The formula is cut, cut, cut.extract more bang for the buck by any means you can get away with. http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/obama-administration-seeks-elevate-teaching-profession-duncan-launch-respect-project-teacher-led-national-conversation
Marketing campaigns framed as “conversations” are IN, so are faux-conversations about elevating the profession, “lifting” it up, “rebranding” this work, calling for “great teachers, great schools, and great leaders…while forwarding the commercialization of these ratings via data feeds to fake non-profit sites like greatschools.org—data for sale there, ready to exploit package deals including access to “site traffic data ” tailored to your interests and wallet.
http://contentmarketinginstitute.com/conversation/
The Obama/Duncan regime in education is coming to a close, but the rhetorical moves it has used to delineate expectations and roles for teachers is still in place: the oxymoronic concept of “impacting student growth,” the mindless demands for “rigorous” and “high quality” this or that. The pompous rhetoric of “elevating” the profession of teacher and of “lifting up” teacher voices—nothing more than marketing drivel to diminish professional autonomy and hype short-cuts for entry into the enter teaching. http://marketingland.com/linkedins-newest-app-elevate-helps-employees-share-content-helps-employers-view-results-124932
Now there are efforts to just rebrand the profession of teaching. I kid you not, expertise from graphic designers, funding from the National Endowment of the Arts, replying on the high arts and developed craft skills of aesthetic persuasion. Check out the rebranding project here: http://www.aiga.org/case-study-teach/
These people are so far into their own little virtual world that they have no idea what is real and what is just marketing.
It’s really rather remarkable.
Thank you, Diane, for always making me feel appreciated and valued! I share and quote and refer to you often. Keep leading the charge for those of us still “in the trenches”!
Lori Barnes
Literacy Teacher
Wilson, NC
(In my 28th year)
That second paragraph of the Ewing quote: precision.
From Peter Greene: Obama Salutes Charters and their career teacher while offering some wishy-washy comments about public school teachers. Any wonder we are where we are?
http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2016/05/a-pair-of-presidential-proclamations.html
If only I could be outsourced in a trade deal. Then Obama would love me.
Obama is decrepit and so is his recently Lily-Munster-garbed wife. Just look at both of them at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner. They have both been instrumental in Chicago think tanks for the last 20 years in getting public schools to close and reopen as charters.
HORRIBLE president, equally bad as G.W. Bush.
May they both rot in hell . . . .
I’m sure we can figure out what Brian Davison thinks about teachers. Love to see him try it some time. We had a former lawyer in my district become a teacher, and he was going to show us how it was done because we were all lazy union members. HS kids ate him alive, and he was gone by mid-year. Rejected any help by other teachers because HE knew BEST. Somehow I sense the same scenario would play out….
http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,4615,7-140-37818_45256_45257-377817–,00.html
Another “gem” for Teacher Appreciation Week.
Also interesting that a presidential proclamation placed Charter Appreciation Week on the exact same week as Teacher Appreciation. Wasn’t there another slot in the calendar to appreciate schools of all types?
And exactly what should we “appreciate” about charter schools?
Invention of the “mouth bubble”?
Developing the “Got-to-Go” program?
Blizzard-defying “test-prep” sessions?
Creative in-house test scoring techniques?
Flipping “choice” ? Because charters choose parents/students
Debunking the “progressive” education?
I think what we should appreciate about charters is that they make public schools look so good.
The Commissioner of Education of Massachusetts, Mitchell Chester, until lately chair of PARCC, will be announcing the MA Teacher of the Year at, mais oui, a charter school in Boston. One of the schools that serves 4% of students in the state. Telegraphing a message, perhaps?
Yesterday he issued this “guidance”:
“Hold Harmless Policy for Scores, not Participation:
As a follow-up to the On the Desktop ESE sent to superintendents on April 1, 2016,ESE would like to clarify a point about students’ participation in statewide standardized tests. Massachusetts’ accountability system is set up to encourage high participation rates (if it weren’t, the school’s results would not reflect school-wide achievement). If fewer than 95 percent of a school’s students take the statewide assessment, the school cannot be designated a Level 1 school. If fewer than 90 percent of a school’s students take the assessment, that school, regardless of its test scores, can earn a designation no higher than Level 3. This is true whether a district takes PARCC or MCAS. The state’s policy of holding schools harmless based on PARCC results in 2015-16 does not apply to cases in which participation falls below 95 percent. This is a change from last year, which was considered unique as the state’s first operational year of PARCC testing.”
So if parents opt their children out of testing, schools will be punished by lowering their status, ripening them up for charter take over.
Honestly, I think a goodly portion of the public has no idea what it is about teachers that needs to be appreciated. My experience with teachers to whom the public has shown a great amount of appreciation are the teachers who make the kids happy…with field trips, plays, trips to McDonalds, prizes, etc., etc., and the teachers who go on about their business, slogging through academics and trying to teach kids how to be good thinkers, be respectful, and tackle challenging work often go unnoticed because they are often not the “fun” ones. While I definitely think that fun has its place in the educational process, I would rather be an interesting teacher who provides challenging activities for her students with high, but flexible standards for those who need that flexibility. That means there will definitely be times when “fun” and “cool” doesn’t cut it. While parent input is definitely important, the idea that parents are looking at the school experience through the lens of their child’s perceptions lead me to think that one should be wary of accolades bestowed solely by parents and students. Educating the public as to what a quality school experience looks like seems like the way to ensure that “teacher appreciation” isn’t disingenuous.