Jan Resseger, a social justice advocate in Cleveland, warns us to beware John Kasich’s calm and mild-mannered approach. He presents himself as the responsible, sensible candidate, not a dyed-in-the-wool conservative like Trump and Cruz. Although Resseger doesn’t mention it, Kasich tried to eliminate collective bargaining, but the law passed by the legislature was repealed by a referendum. Kasich is a strong proponent of privatization, including charters, vouchers, and cyber charters.
Resseger writes:
“You do have to give Kasich credit for one thing. He has been honest about his priorities: he is a tax slasher and a charter school supporter. He is also delusional about his accomplishments as Ohio’s governor since 2010. He claims the state has turned around economically. If there has been a turnaround, it hasn’t yet come to Ohio’s Rust Belt cities. He continues to claim he has turned around the Cleveland schools, but that isn’t true either. To his credit, he did, against the wishes of those in his own party, expand Medicaid.
“He has also slashed the income tax, eliminated the estate tax, and eliminated a reimbursement the state had created for local governments and school districts when a previous administration summarily eliminated a local tax on inventories and equipment. The Plain Dealer reminded us last Friday that local governments have been busy trying to pass local taxes to make up for enormous losses of state revenue because of Kasich’s “sharp reductions in the state’s Local Government Fund, which was created during the Depression when the sales tax was enacted to share money with the cities and villages.” Under Kasich, according to Friday’s Plain Dealer, state funding in Cleveland this year is down by $21 million, in Columbus by $27 million, and in Cincinnati by $28 million, and the big cities are not the only losers. The inner ring suburb where I live is down over $2 million this year. School districts across the state are struggling to pass levies at the same time they are increasing class size and charging students large fees to play sports.
“In a stunning piece published yesterday by Politico, Kimberly Hefling summarizes Kasich’s troubling record of flawed oversight of Ohio’s charter school sector, despite that Kasich has made charter school regulation “a priority.” She quotes Kasich in 2014 claiming: “We are going to fix the lack of regulation on charter schools. There is no excuse for people coming in here and taking advantage of anything.” That was the claim. And to give the governor credit, Kasich signed a law at the end of 2015 that, Hefling explains, “improves the state’s ability to revoke the rights of the poorly rated charter school sponsors and makes it more difficult for schools to switch sponsors.” (It has been a practice in Ohio that if an authorizer tries to shut down a charter school for academic or financial reasons, the school could merely “hop” to a new sponsor.)
“Here, however, are some realities described by Hefling, that demonstrate the seriousness of Ohio’s problem with charter schools and that undermine Kasich’s claim that he has led the way to better regulation: “Ohio ranks among the top five states in the number of charter schools. It has more than 370 charters that enroll 132,000 students… but the sector has been plagued with problems including mid-year school closures, allegations of financial improprieties and charter schools ‘sponsor shopping’ to avoid scrutiny. Ohio has more than 60 charter school sponsors, or authorizers, that open and oversee the schools… A 2014 study by Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes paid for by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute found students in the state’s charter schools perform worse on average in reading and math than their peers in traditional public schools.
“And then there are the notorious online charters. “A big player among Ohio online charters is the Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow, which enrolled 14,000 students last year and was founded by longtime GOP booster William Lager. Another longtime Ohio charter school backer is David Brennan, founder of White Hat Management, who has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Kasich over the years. Innovation Ohio has estimated that since charter schools first opened in Ohio in the late ’90s, $1.8 billion of the $7.3 billion the state has spent on the sector has gone to schools run by Lager and Brennan—or $1 out of every $4 spent. Then, there’s the 11,000-student Ohio Virtual Academy, run by K12 Inc., that donated $100,000 in 2014 to the Republican Governors Association.”
“Finally, Hefling reports, there was the scandal that began last summer when David Hansen, then head of the charter schools office at the Ohio Department of Education, submitted a federal charter school expansion grant application that painted a rosy picture of the performance of Ohio’s charter schools and mysteriously omitted the horrible ratings of Ohio’s online charter schools. This whole mess is very much connected to Kasich, because Hansen’s wife was then the governor’s chief of staff and is now the head of Kasich’s presidential campaign. When the U.S. Department of Education responded by awarding what is a $71 million grant to expand charters—and to take over and charterize the Youngstown City Schools—a firestorm broke out. David Hansen was fired for his flawed rating system, and the federal government has demanded documentation that charter school regulation is being improved. As Hefling reports, “(T)he state took the embarrassing step in January of updating its application figures to say that instead of having nine charters schools that are poor performing, 57 are in that condition.” But even in the updated federal application, Ohio’s amended figures rate only brick and mortar schools and omit the politically connected virtual academies….
“Hefling summarizes her concerns about Kasich and the charter schools he loves: “Ohio Gov. John Kasich is an avid proponent of school choice, but his home state’s notoriously problematic charter school sector is often held up as an example of what can go wrong.”
Resseger includes links to all her statements. Open the post to see them.
Ohio Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown was aware of the salient points about privatized education, which Resseger made in her post, yet he chose not to vote on John King’s confirmation. King will continue the oligarchs’ fleecing of American taxpayers, aided and abetted by the US Department of Education.
Kasich only looks good because all the other Republican candidates are so terrible and obnoxious. Calm demeanor does not necessarily equal good policy.
Kasich is petulant like a child and, he is vindictive. The man currently on the national stage is acting. In Ohio, we remember Kasich’s tirade against a patrolman, calling him a moron.
“Good old” John Kasich, so conscientiously bringing a “good old” corporate education to his state’s schools: ciedieaech.wordpress.com CORPORATE EDUCATION
John is a curtain maker (Oz) and tailor (Emperor) rolled into one.
“Ohio Gov. John Kasich is an avid proponent of school choice…”
He formed this “duck cluster” with a pair a ducks, found in gov. approved text books.
One duck is named Independence, the other is named Freedom.
“Independence/Freedom is the right of all “peoples” in the name of self-determination
within the law.”
His election in OH does prove a point.
The effectiveness of properganda/marketing/campaigns/curtain makers and tailors
starts where critical thinking ends.
Not here to comment on the main premise of this article or the politics behind Kasich. But as parents, students and teachers from ECOT, we have a voice too. Many charter school opponents continue to reference DOE report cards. These reports are in many categories inaccurate. The landscape, format and circumstances of the student population of charters in Ohio is so diverse that the DOE’s calculations on their performance reports are not a fair assessment of the value and success of a school like ECOT. Most of these kids have been discarded, left behind or forced out of traditional public schools in the state. These political attacks leveraged off the heads of our children… some of the most needy in the state are misdirected when the quality of education is brought up or the DOEs sad attempt at modern day performance measurement – If you’d like to step away from the politics for a minute, please come learn more at our newly formed community – http://ecotpals.org/faq
ECOT PALS,
Aside from the state report cards, which tend to look for reasons to say nice things about big campaign contributors, like the multimillionaire who funded ECOT, there is the recent CREDO report. It found that students in online virtual charters learn nearly nothing in a year of enrollment.
This was definitely the case in the online classes I witnessed inside our high school.
Hi Dianeravitch – Thank you for approving my message. Exactly why you will never see PALS rallying around any so-called reports. Our group is surfacing and sharing actual student, family and teacher stories… not bunk and spun data from paid from “reports.” As a parent of 2 ECOT students as well as a professional heavily experienced in educational technology, I can speak to actual results and assure you that ECOT is not only effective but far more effective than 4 public school systems I have had my children in between 2 states. As the founder of ECOT PALS, I can speak confidently that my personal results are not an anomaly. Please, let’s stop blurring the lines between our political debates and our debates about what’s best for our children. There are real people’s lives depending on our state’s ability to support educational innovation and inclusivity for all of our kids regardless of their and your political bend. Again, if you ever want to talk about education…sans politics and how ECOT is shaping the future, you know where to find us. Cheers-
There is no separation between politics and charter schools, including the online variety. The excessive amount of money, made by those in the management and board rooms of privatized schools, proves the point. The political donations of the self anointed “reformers” further highlight, the chicanery. The Ohio Supreme Court case that gave assets, bought by taxpayers, to the charter school operators would never have been filed, if the deformers cared about communities and children. Charter school design would not enrich the wealthy, both in Ohio and elsewhere (Michael Milkin), if the deformers cared about education, instead of dollars.
The hedge funds financing deform, drag down American productivity. Wall Street, which makes 10-18% on charter school debt, has no regard for anything other than lining their pockets with the money of other people, while providing nothing of value.
We don’t agree. We believe there is separation because we are the parents/guardians of these kids. That’s where we are invested both in tax dollars and in blood. No points have been proven. From an education perspective, we’ve experienced first hand what so many others just blather about in these posts. I may be wrong but I’m going to guess that you have no real experience with a child who needs an option like ECOT to succeed. Again… debating the way that ” the political system” works or doesn’t work for you is fine. But keep in mind, the issue that you are so passionate about is systemic and lives across all areas of government. Always puzzled. Why narrow your your debate to focus so hard on charters? Our group doesn’t play politics but we commonly get wrapped up in conversations with folks like you and from experience I can tell you that attempting to destroy, discredit and misrepresent the effectiveness or necessity of schools like ECOT along the way makes it seem like you’re missing your bigger target. Just some advice… Like ECOT has done for the future of education… If you want to fight the system, you should think bigger. 🙂 There are 16,000+ students, 18,000 past grads, thousands of family members, 100’s of amazing teachers and staff… There will be 2500 or so graduating this year… many of which who before ECOT, never thought they had a chance of making it this far. And we’re not willing to sit back any longer and be used as pawns in other people’s politics.
ECOT Pals, get your family and friends ready to spend 25-30% of your income, for K-12 education. You aren’t naïve enough to think that tax-supported charter schools are the end game for Gates and his oligarch allies, are you? The World Bank promotes for-profit Bridge International Academies to the exclusion of tax-supported education. Bill Gates and Z-berg are the investors behind BIA, not their foundations. Charter schools, with their guise of helping the urban poor, were a necessary step towards public acceptance of privatization.
In the short run, some people like Milkin and Lager make money. Some politicians get campaign funds. Then, the 99% lose their common good-public schools, making Silicon Valley moguls rich with their schools-in-a-box, and no tax obligation for infrastructure like education. The richest 0.1% don’t refer to our schools as human capital pipelines b/c they value student development.
But, I think you know that.
Ok then. Touche. You are thinking bigger… If I thought that big, I’d have a hard time sleeping at night. I hope you are well. Back in college I used to get wrapped up in all of the conspiracy theories, political hyper-activism and fear mongering. Not so much any more. As the years passed, I started to realize that the world never ended, my taxes never rose 30%, the government kept on doing what they do, nothing much changed really…. Sadly for traditional public education.. nothing much changed either. The world passed it by. I am not educated nor interested enough in what you wrote about to respond to all of the detail you offered up, but I will remind you of one key point. The first reason why private and public charter school options even exist is out of necessity. This story didn’t start with greed and corruption and scandal…. as it’s played out by the authors of articles like these. The story starts with our kids. I came to this blog titled “Diane Ravitch’s blog – A site to discuss better education for all” on behalf of our community armed with real world and right now perspective on the need and a solution that’s working so well for so many. And that’s about as far as I can ride on this train with you. All the best –
The original online education king, Michael Milkin, a novice to greed? The justice system didn’t think so, when Milkin was convicted and banned from Wall Street.
There’s ample on-line evidence, about the expansion of Bridge international Academies. No need to invent. An entire African nation is on the cusp of outsourcing education to BIA.
For two decades Bill Gates has bragged about giving away his fortune. Still, each year he tops the “richest men” lists.
Sleep well.
Interesting. Thank you for sharing and caring. Yes I did sleep well. Had a great night working with and learning from my daughter about her project for ECOTs amazing annual science expo! So excited for this year’s event at COSI.
ECOT PALS, I have no doubt that you work for s public relations firm hired by William Lager, the businessman who has made millions by suckering parents into his very low-performing online for-profit charter. Next time, use your real name or you will be permanently blocked. This blog will not become a billboard for junk schools run by profiteers.
Hi Diane, My name is Jeremy Aker. I’m no PR agency. I have nothing to hide. My name and whole story is published on the ECOT PALS site I started a few months ago. I am the father of 4 soon to be 5 children.. 1 of which has been an ECOT student for over 4 years. 2 of which are enrolled at a wonderful brick and mortar public school and 1 enrolled in a private Pre-K school. My professional background is diverse but as it pertains to this topic… besides being an engaged parent in my children’s education for over a decade in multiple OH and IL school systems, I have led in the full design development implementation and continuous improvement of 2 enterprise wide learning management systems for large corporations where we transitioned all classroom based training (the way it’s always been done) to modern-day blended learning approaches that combined online instruction with classroom and real world environments. (more effective) — 1 multi-language north american wides system serving over 3000 and another serving over 5000 people. I have professional certifications in instructional design, classroom facilitation and distance learning and have participated in countless related professional development programs. My wife and I run an event services company/non-profit and I do marketing/branding technology services for startups and under-resourced companies as a independent. I am currently working on 2 large scale online learning system projects for clients… not ECOT – but from my experience w/ my daughter and an educational technology perspective… ECOT/ Lager’s IQuity system is absolutely incredible…. I’m currently working on one massive one that will serve 250,000+ learners per year. I have taken my personal time to share my experience and ideas with your readers. If you would take the time putting your politics on the side and look at what I’m building with PALS, I think you will see my intentions and approach. Real stories… real people… no politics….and you should stay tuned. I have 2 new stories being published over the next couple weeks. I only involve myself and group on these topics when I see the politics being blended with misrepresentations and assumptions about the effectiveness and necessity of schools like ECOT. You certainly have every right to censor free speech on your blog, but if this is really a blog that touts “A site to discuss better education for all”, I think I’m qualified to have a seat at the table and at least respond to lies and misrepresentations of ECOT and online education in general. If you’re not interested in authentic perspective and debate, then the only billboard around here is yours and your censored special interest.
Read about me and my cause here – http://www.ecotpals.org/about-us/
Read some PALS stories here – http://www.ecotpals.org/stories/
Here’s my personal PALS story – http://www.ecotpals.org/blog/3-reasons-why-ecot-puts-other-schools-to-the-test
Read PALS FAQ here – http://www.ecotpals.org/faq/
Visit my LinkedIn Profile Here – https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremyaker
Any other questions?
All the best,
Jeremy Aker
ECOT Evangelist
Public Education Choice for All of Ohio’s Children
ecotpals@gmail.com
ECOT Pal’s comments remind me of the main character in the movie, “Thank You For Smoking”.
Interesting.
I’ve never seen that movie but from reading the synopsis, I see what you’re getting at. Hey, I am who I am. Besides doing what I can to make sure that all my kids have public education choices, I have no need or motivation to spin anything. I don’t affiliate with any party nor have I tried to debate politics with anyone here. While people on the sidelines stumble over themselves and their alliances misrepresenting ECOT school/students/staff and mixing up their politics with the important discussion about what public education looks like in the future and how it can be saved to help our kids, I stand confidently speaking from a position of truth and current personal and professional experience. I look the proof in the eyes every day. 🙂
” there was the scandal that began last summer when David Hansen, then head of the charter schools office at the Ohio Department of Education, submitted a federal charter school expansion grant application that painted a rosy picture of the performance of Ohio’s charter schools ”
That the expansion grant with the phony numbers was submitted is on John Kasich but the Obama Administration approved that grant.
All of the information on Ohio’s charter schools is available online. There are also almost DAILY newspaper reports on the charter sector in Ohio. Still, the federal government approved a grant application that was filled with phony claims about the success of charter schools.
This isn’t just a failure of John Kasich’s administration. The federal government failed too. Maybe it was a one-off that they essentially rubber-stamped a charter school building grant for 71 million dollars but I doubt it.
Very nicely detailed report on what has happened here in the Buckeye state. I hope it gets widely read. I’m going to bookmark it so it is handy every time I hear someone say, “He seems okay.”
Kasich is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Domestically and in foreign affairs, his presidency would be the third term of GW.
From CREDO “students in urban charter schools in Ohio post superior yearly gains compared to the statewide average student performance… Another positive result is the learning gain superiority for students in poverty and especially for black charter students in poverty: their progress over a year’s time outpaces that of equivalent traditional public school students.“ Do poor Black kids matter?
RFK, you should read Stephen Dyer’s review of state data for Ohio charter schools. They get significantly worse results than public schools. Start here: https://dianeravitch.net/2015/05/04/stephen-dyer-in-ohio-the-charter-schools-have-the-most-d-and-f-grades/
“Do poor Black kids matter?” Yes, they matter greatly to the community of taxpayers who provide funding for education. In contrast, dollars, instead of education, matter to the schemers behind charter schools, who gouge the public with self-dealing, fraud and the legalized theft of school assets (Ohio Supreme Court ruling).
RFK
Black employment should matter more to the plutocrats, who are hawking school reform, using minorities as cover. Check out Silicon Valley’s and the hedge funds’ hiring records.
Reconciliation of reform verbiage, with photos of all White managers, in the most prominent ed reform organizations, is confounding or duplicitous?
I have taught in an alternative education program for 26 years, a program run by the local taxpayer supported PUBLIC school district. In its years of existence, the program has served tens of thousands of at-risk students and is highly regarded for its success with this population. In fact, it is held in such high regard that its structure, format, and materials have been and are routinely imitated by other school districts. The only reason to establish charter schools to do what the PUBLIC system already does successfully is for someone to make money from it. In the last five years most of the students I have taught have been “discarded, left behind or forced out” of the local CHARTER schools in my district. Those who came from “virtual” charter schools or online charters, earned few if any credits and learned NOTHING. Even the students acknowledged what a waste of time those schools were (which is pretty damning, considering many of them are hard-core street kids and gangbangers who were looking for an easy route to a h.s. diploma). Yes, ECOT Pals, I have a great deal of experience with children who need an option to succeed — and that option is and can be provided by the PUBLIC sector. Oh, yes, I did notice that in your first post you raised the usual canard of “what’s-best-for-the-children” bullshit that only the charter pirates expel. Simply put, ECOT and any charter program like it are completely unnecessary!
You’re making a lot of generalizations based upon your long but narrow experience. As an educator myself and coming from a rich history deep family connections to public education – over 100 of years of combined experience 🙂 – I can say with certainty that when someone leads their debate with how many years of experience they have, that is a sign of a person has been left behind… much like the 10’s of thousands of students we are talking about in the state. You can cling to your old school methodologies until the end but the simple facts remain. If your claims were relevant to today’s debate and as you imply… universally applicable, charter schools both public and private would not exist. Any educator worth their salt would know that the essence of education is student-centered not “your program” centered. In 2016, thankfully we have options like ECOT. And as a parent of kids both currently enrolled in traditional brick and mortar schools and ECOT, I am an advocate for teachers of all formats with open minds. I am thankful and fighting for the families/students choice of what’s best. You appear to be fighting for your way or the highway…. hmmmmm…. kinda make you think…. maybe that’s where traditional public education went wrong. Choice is not your enemy. Choice is the key to the future of the best education for all. I think you owe it to your legacy to start thinking forward instead of backwards.
ECOT pal,
Leveling the charge of, “Your way or the highway” against someone, that’s funny. In Entrepreneur magazine, a self-described corporate “education partner” said in an interview, “Teachers have to shift or get off the pot.” The “partner” worked for Microsoft Canada and was talking about her zeal to get technology into the classrooms of OUR children. From her LinkedIn bio., she had the same amount of classroom experience Gates does.
I call it like I see it. The overwhelming majority of what I’ve read since starting my 2016 labor of love is pretty one sided. From charter school opponents, it’s usually boils down to “our way or the highway” From charter school advocates, it’s “we believe in choice and options.” One side is inclusive and the other is exclusive.This isn’t too complicated to see. I don’t believe that it’s about teacher’s shifting or getting off the pot. I come from a family of public brick and mortar teachers including my own father and a couple of which I will see again here over the Easter holiday. From my personal conversations with them over the last few years, they are becoming more and more disillusioned with the system that they are in, its slowness to adapt and how it affects their ability to be great for their students. They seem to be doing what their told to do with the limited tools given to them. The problem is far above their position. I am an advocate for dedicated teachers regardless of the format of the school system they serve
To Linda up there: Sherrod Brown is also a declared superdelegate for Hillary Clinton–so, guess he’s concerned about disagreeing w/Obama’s pick & POTUS’s continuation of horrendous choices against America’s children and public schools.
I was under the impression he was a progressive. His name was mentioned as a potential veep for HRC (&, after all, she’s going to continue Obama’s agenda) should she win (he’s already refused, I believe).
Also, heard something very interesting on The Big Picture With Thom Hartmann: a discussion in which the current Dem Party was thought of as being what the Republican Party used to be (because, now, the participants feel that no one can figure out if there is, indeed, a Republican Party at this point).
That having been said, I often hear numerous Dems referred to as “Republicans Lite” or “D.I.N.O.s” (Democrats in Name Only). Sad, but, unfortunately, true.
Agree with you.
A newspaper columnist, who is described as liberal, recently wrote about the pension decision affecting Teamsters. There was a time, when the view, that honoring contracts was sacrosanct, as an American principle, would have been the position of both parties.