Dawn Neely-Randall is an activist teacher in Ohio. She speaks out against injustice and stupidity, especially when students suffer:
Dawn writes:
“Yesterday, I used the word “livid” in a tweet to a legislator for the first time ever. I then talked to two administrators from two different districts; Patrick O’Donnell from the Plain Dealer; left voicemails for legislators; and talked to the Ohio Department of Education…twice…to confirm my findings.
“Base knowledge: A district could choose paper or online testing.
“Let me paint a picture in your head. Ten and eleven year olds. February through May, 2015. Computer Lab. High-pressure and high-stakes testing situation. English Language Arts. PARCC testing (developed by a British monopoly). Test content: Common Core.
“Biggest problem: A time clock on the computer screen counting down the seconds and a slew of hoops of reading/writing passages for students to complete on the screen in front of them.
“Besides the third of my fifth-graders whose parents opted them out (their activist spirit is about the only reason we don’t have this same PARCC test any longer), my students sat in this tense testing situation suffering last year and I begged boards of education, legislators, and parents across the state to help.
“In a longer amount of time than a woman could have conceived, grown, and birthed a new child, the PARCC phantom test scores FINALLY started emerging in piecemeal from the state.
“ACROSS THE BOARD, it turns out that the ONLINE scores were lower than the paper tests, which has sent the Ohio education world into a tailspin since pulling off statewide online testing was nothing short of miraculous.
“Next, the Ohio Report Cards came out slaughtering many hardworking, top performing, accomplishment-proving districts.
“To the tune of “Old McDonald,” let’s sing what the Ohio Department of Education/State Legislature has said to many previously performing stellar districts based on bogus scores (tests never seen; graded tests never returned; scores finally received about a year later):
“….here an F, there an F, everywhere an F, F.”
“And via an onslaught of private conversations, this is what I found out which I am now shouting about to the world:
“Students taking the ONLINE tests had company “field test items” added to them (yes, so students could become guinea pigs and practice test questions for the company to later sell) which means that, within their precious clock counting down, they had to give up time from questions that counted, to then work on questions that DIDN’T count (and they had no clue which were which).
“The Paper tests? NOT AN EXTRA FIELD TEST QUESTION GIVEN.
“AND GUESS WHAT? The Ohio Department of Education confirmed with me that they will do the EXACT same thing with the AIR tests this year.
“Students doing online tests….take extra “company” field test item questions. Students doing paper/pencil tests…they leave them the heck alone.
“But then, of course, they’ll label the students. Compare them to death. And make districts that are jumping through the state’s hoops look like they are the ones who are ducking performance.
“Dear Legislature and Ohio Department of Education, get your freaking act together.
“Here a quack, there a quack, everywhere a quack quack.
“Steal my students time?! Stress little boys and girls out? Call them a failure after robbing them of time to perform?! Now you’re messing with me.
“I’ll be AIRing my grievances far and wide.
“In the heat of a new testing season (students will be testing for three weeks after spring break)….
“Wouldn’t you be livid, too?!”

Texas tests (not Common Core focused, but developed by Pearson) have included “field test” questions for years on the paper/pencil tests. Same problems with kids and stress here as well. Another technique Texas used when they realized the tests here were too difficult was to drastically lower the cut scores which is a very difficult thing to explain to parents. As I recall, somewhere between 45% to 65% of all campuses would have failed the various tests (I’m pretty sure I ‘m being conservative). Can’t have that!
Back to the Pearson connection though. The TEA Party has been remarkably silent in Texas about the relationship between Pearson, Common Core and Texas tests. They were very vocal about being sure CC stayed out of Texas (it was never going to happen, but they spouted off gleefully anyway). As focused as the TEA party is on conspiracies, I’m surprised they don’t think that our tests are CC tests in disguise. After all, no one can see any of those tests, Pearson write them both, so who is to say 🙂 Is the PARTY losing its edge?
On a serious note, the sanity that remains in Texas can be attributed to some very dedicated Legislators (Rs and Ds) who have maintained a focus on what is best for kids as well as a number of organizations that support Public Schools. Many THANKS to them all!
LikeLike
It is obvious that the high muckety mucks have absolutely no interest in the kids. The next jerk who claims the test will inform practice should be strung up. The children taking the test get NOTHING out of them worth knowing. Who cares if they can take a high stakes test with bogus claims of proficiency? Proficiency at what? The vultures continue to circle picking us off bit by bit.
I have a new pet peeve word that my high performing district likes to throw around. They spend months “unpacking” test results to try to glean some useful information from them. As far as I can tell, since the information given to them is limited, the most they may discern is how to incorporate more test specific behaviors into instruction, so once again we can crow about our high performance on these useless assessments.
LikeLike
So DARN TRUE! Makes me ill. The classroom TEACHERS still knows BEST. Duh …
It’s about $$$$$ and CONTROL.
LikeLike
I’m so relieved to almost be at retirement. I can’t do this to my students or myself anymore. It is called abuse, and it is against the law everywhere except in education. I knew test results would be lower on online tests. It all makes sense. Great article! Thank you!
LikeLike
Is there anything that shows kids prefer taking tests online, that it’s in any way easier or more convenient for them? My son and his friends say the opposite- that it’s clunky and time-consuming and frustrating. Their complaints about tiny text boxes and endless scrolling back and forth seem to me to indicate these tests are not suited for online administration- there are long reading and writing sections- they need a proper tool for that job, a full screen for both reading and composing, like an adult would demand for a multi-day, high stakes work project.
Why did they give them such cheap garbage tools to accomplish this multi-day, difficult task?
LikeLike
My 6th grader has generalized anxiety and school phobia. She will take the PARCC for the first time in a few weeks. It will also be her first online test. She is going to be a mess and I am dreading it! I have wanted her to opt out since third grade, but she refuses. No one else will opt out -I have tried to get other parents onboard but failed – and because of her anxiety she follows the “rules” and hates the spotlight. I am livid about this assault on our kids just to make a buck!!!
LikeLike
THOSE who CLAIM online TESTING is GREAT, should TAKE EVERY SINGLE ONE of those BLASTED TESTS.
I’d like to KEEP the DEFORMERS in the TESTING LAB and subject them to what they are doing to our young.
LikeLike
I;m still waiting for one of the test promoters to take a Common Core test. I would absolutely love to see their scores on the 7th grade math test. I just cannot accept that they’re career-ready without more data.
I suspect the results would be shocking, because I was in public school 30 years ago and I don’t believe current students are less well-educated now. I don’t think that’s true.
LikeLike
One of the assessments our kids take is the NWEA MAP test. I found out in the winter that our district bought licenses for at least 20 of these tests, but the one they neglected to buy? The audio test for K-3rd grade kids who need it read to them. So, this Spring, I just refused. Besides, we don’t even have enough laptops for the kids to do them on. It is stupid. That makes me livid!
LikeLike
“Besides, we don’t even have enough laptops for the kids to do them on.”
I find that infuriating. To give schools such a heavy lift and then NOT give them even the basic tools to do it well is so incredibly arrogant and thoughtless. I don’t understand that. I don’t accept that it is necessary to make this as difficult as possible to manage. Why was practicality the last priority?
LikeLike
Chiara- $$$$!
LikeLike
Here’s a piece that really shows the bias that is baked into ed reform:
http://edexcellence.net/articles/john-kasichs-education-record-much-better-than-what-youve-read?mc_cid=dc8fedcde6&mc_eid=f1863f26fa
It’s a defense of John Kasich’s “education record”- that’s the title- Kasich’s education record.
It is 95% about charter schools. Public schools are only mentioned as an after thought in the last section. 93% of Ohio students attend public schools.
To the ed reform “movement”, charter schools are “education”. John Kasich’s record on 93% of Ohio students in public schools is not even important enough to analyze, let alone defend.
This is nuts as public policy. It’s crazy, and anyone who wasn’t in this little “movement” bubble would recognize it, because they would realize they are simply omitting the vast majority of students.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on karenw95 and commented:
Same thing happened with our FL students and the SAT this year!
LikeLike