I posted last night about a DFER statement commending Senator Sanders for endorsing “public charter schools.”
Contrary to some readers’ responses, I have been completely even-handed in dealing with both candidates. I applaud them when they recognize that charter schools are damaging public schools. I criticize them when they support privatization by charter.
I previously applauded when Hillary Clinton criticized charter schools, then was critical of Hillary when an aide “walked back” her criticism.
Similarly, I applauded Senator Bernie Sanders when he said unequivocally that he opposed charter schools. And last night when I learned about Senator Sanders latest comment, I at first didn’t believe it.
I was stunned to listen to the radio broadcast in which Sanders was asked the question, “Do you support vouchers and charters?”
He answered that he does not support public funding of private schools.
He was then asked, “Do you support public charter schools?”
He answered “Yes.”
Readers of this blog know that Eva Moskowitz claims that her Success Academy charters are “public schools,” even though she fights public audits, refuses to sign contracts for pre-K, closes school for political demonstrations, and excludes children she doesn’t want.
Please, someone, contact Bernie’s office and find out if he understands that there is nothing about “public charter schools” that is public other than the money they get from government, like Lockheed Martin or Boeing or other contractors.
Send him tweets and emails.
In a hotly contested election, we need to encourage both Democratic candidates to stand up for public education with democratic governance.

I’m following the attempts of teachers to organizing a union at a Los Angeles chain of charter schools, and the illegal, expensive, and highly-coordinated attempts of management to suppress any such unionization
The teachers appealed to the California’s Public Employee Relations Board (PERB) for assistance and protection, providing them with evidence.
PERB agreed and appealed to the Los Angeles Superior Court to issue an injunction against the charter school management.
The management’s response?
“We’re a private institution, or private actor that is not subcontracted by the state, and therefore not public.” According to this logic, the state or PERB or the L.A. Superior Court has as much right acting in this case as they do if the teachers were working at Walmart or McDonald’s. This is even though the name of the charter chain is…
“The Alliance of College-Ready Public Schools.”
This claim prompted the California State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the California State Treasurer to issue pointed letters of protest.
Go this article, and its COMMENTS section of this article here to read about all of this:
LikeLike
Here’s a video from the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) where they share “CHARTER SCHOOLS 101” — and my responses to the CCSA:
( 00:07 – 00:15)
( 00:07 – 00:15)
NARRATOR: “But what IS a ‘charter school’ ?
“Charter schools are innovative PUBLIC schools designed by educators, parents, or civic leaders … ”
——
Oh NO, they’re NOT, you lying sacks o’ sh%#!
That is most certainly NOT what your CCSA lawyers argued in court last December in your attempts to crush the teachers trying to organize at the Alliance of College-Read Schools charter school chain.
You argued that they are not “PUBLIC”, but instead are “private actors” exempt from any jurisdiction of either PERB or the court system,
———
( 00:15 – 00:28)
( 00:15 – 00:28)
NARRATOR: ” … charter schools are held accountable by their authorizing body, usually a school board, the County Office of Education, or the State Board of Education.”
——
Oh NO, they’re NOT, you lying sacks o’ sh%#!
That is most certainly NOT what your CCSA lawyers argued in court last December in your attempts to crush the teachers trying to organize at the Alliance chain.
In court, you argued, that when it comes to teachers unionizing, those same political bodies mentioned — local/County/State Boards of Ed. — have the same authority (i.e. NO authority) to protect or support charter teachers’ right to unionize as they do over the same rights of fast food workers, or retail clerks at Best Buy or Target.
———
( 00:28 – 00:31)
( 00:28 – 00:31)
NARRATOR: ” …and (charters are held accountable) by the parents who choose to send their parents to those schools.”
——
Oh NO, they’re NOT, you lying sacks o’ sh%#!
Even if 100% of the parents vote, or sign petitions supporting the goals of their teachers to form a union, THOSE SAME PARENTS HAVE ZERO SAY INTO WHETHER OR NOT TEACHERS HAVE A RIGHT TO ORGANIZE. Even if 100% of the parents support such a union, they have no ultimate say in whether or not that union is formed.
———
———
( 00:53 – 00:101)
( 00:53 – 00:101)
NARRATOR: ” … (charters) are places where adults work together to BUILD A PROFESSIONAL CULTURE, a place where TEACHERS and parents HAVE A STRONG VOICE IN SCHOOL DECISIONS.”
—————-
Ha!
If those teachers even attempt to exercise that “voice,” they are either fired, or — should they try to unionize to protect their right to exercise that voice, and protections against retaliation for exercising that “voice” — they are met with some of the most vicious union-busting tactics right out of the 1800’s.
If the charter operators deem it so, that school has the same “professional culture” as the kitchen at McDonald’s… and there’s nothing that the workers/teachers can do about it … or so the CCSA argued in court last December.
LikeLike
I CALLED SANDERS HOTLINE WEEKS AGO AND ASKED IF HE SUPPORTED COMMON CORE.
ANSWER: YES
MY COMMENT: HE JUST LOST MY VOTE
WHO’S LEFT? NO ONE IN EITHER PARTY
LikeLike
It was either a gaff, which becomes more common as campaign fatigue takes hold, or he truly supports “public charters” which in his mind might be a reference to the ideal that charters once were, or it’s a tactical misstatement for the purposes of confusing the opposition. Politics in general and campaigns in particular are places where the truth is the first victim. I look forward to clarification from the Sanders campaign, but in the mean time, I would suggest googling Sun Tsu quotes as a way of understanding the tactics and strategy that come into play in all things adversarial, especially in large scale conflicts like a political campaign. For example, my opinion of TFA is hat their efforts would be far better spent, if they are truly “in it for the kids” , if they switched their focus from teaching to supporting the parents in underserved communities in their efforts at having their kids show up at school ready, willing and able to learn. The Sun Tsu idea that applies to this is “Build your enemy a golden bridge to retreat over.” A cornered foe is far more dangerous than one whom you have provided and exit for, an exit that suits your needs first and allows the enemy some dignity in retreat.
LikeLike
Excellent post.
What I love about Bernie Sanders, one of the greatest intellectual/political tacticians I have ever observed, is that he rarely must sacrifice the truth for political ends. However, he does omit certain things. I believe there are almost always good, concious reasons why.
Of course, he also doesn’t know certain things. But you would be surprised what he does know. Read his book(s), watch the youtube videos of him speaking over the decades.
Like a great teacher, Bernie Sanders generally understands when to conceal, and when to reveal. It is quite amazing. Art of war.
I am not claiming this is what is happening here. I am saying to not assume too much. Omission or reservation does not mean lack of knowledge or lack of opinion. Just as a mistake or outlier does not sum up a person’s values or actions.
LikeLike
I just contacted Sen. Sanders and urged him to reconsider his support of Charter Schools. I also urged him to contact you for reasons why he should not be supporting them.
LikeLike
Yes. Educating our “liberal” politicians as crucial. I truly believe that pushing them (both Bernie and Hillary) to SAY that they do not support the privatization of public education is necessary; so far, each of them wiggles around, and actually shows little comprehension of the true issue.
LikeLike
I do not believe that Bernie equates the term public charter schools with the privatization of public education.
LikeLike
I really like Bernie – he gives me hope even after I had thought Obama had destroyed that word forever. I will be enthusiastically voting for him in two days’ time.
But with that said, I really think we need to face the fact that Bernie is not “uninformed” on educational issues. For whatever reason, he is choosing to support “public” [sic] charter schools. Many people, including some close to his campaign, have tried to “educate” Bernie about charter schools but, like all the other candidates, Bernie has chosen to screen out this information. Does anyone else remember October 17, 2012 when we tried writing letters en masse to Obama to try to “educate” him on education rephorm? I fear attempts with Bernie will come to similar results.
I’d like to think that Bernie is sincere in his economic policies and I believe that such policies will go a long way to alleviating poverty and inequality and that alone will go far to improve schools. I’m very disappointed with Bernie on education and I certainly hope it’s not a signal of Obama-level betrayals in other arenas, but I do think he is far and away the best candidate overall. I just think we need to go into this with our eyes open that, as Chiara repeatedly points out, *no* candidate (except Jill Stein) is really on the side of public education.
LikeLike
I already did contact his campaign, and I am hoping the “gaff” was a misunderstanding. Perhaps if Bernie comes to New York, he or members of his team should meet with Diane. He needs to realize the war on public schools is a hot button issue for millions of teachers and parents, and they are watching carefully and will respond with their votes. It would be wise for both Bernie and Hillary’s team to follow this blog.
LikeLike
Thank you, Retired Teacher. I am ready and willing to meet with either campaign.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As Mr. Goldberg said on another post of Diane’s, the CONTEXT of Sanders remarks is everything. DFER will naturally spin any edited by them pro charter verbiage to their advantage, their spin is not Sanders position. Also, consider the last election in Illinois that gave us the absurdly anti-qualified Ruiner for governor. Pat Quinn chose Vallas as running mate, in part to stave off the massive cash/media carpet bombing that was sure to come from reformers had he made anything like an anti reformy choice or statement. Remember, this is not policy that’s being made, this is a political campaign. Not the best place to find “reality” Sanders otherwise admirable integrity notwithstanding.
LikeLike
When it looks like there is no choice that supports community based, democratic, transparent, non-profit public schools and that stops many from voting, then the candidate that wins the 2016 election might be the worst possible choice just because of those who didn’t vote. If all of the candidates support corporate charters (no matter what name they call themselves: public charters versus private or corporate) then the vote boils down to the lesser of all evils.
Who is that candidate—that is the question? The answer is non of the GOP candidates so who is the lesser of two evils between Hillary and Sanders when it comes to support for traditional public educaiton?
LikeLike
I question DFER’s motives here, since they are both pro-charter and pro-privatization. Do you think Chicago anti-charter activists like Troy LaRaviere, Rousemary Vega, Chuy Garcia and Asean Johnson would be supporting Sanders without being confident that he puts public schools first, and opposes corporatization of our schools?
LikeLike
Terry, I have no doubt that DFER is exploiting Sanders’ one-word answer for its own benefit. It is up to Senator Sanders to issue a clarification.
LikeLike
I wonder if Bernie Sanders’ reference to PUBLIC charter schools is to schools like Central Park East or Brooklyn New School.
There are lottery schools run through the public school system — not separate entities who have no oversight except a far away agency whose main interest is to expand privatization of public education.
It would not surprise me if this is just a matter of HOW one defines “public charter school.” Despite Eva Moskowitz claiming that Success Academy is one, no one else would. It is like claiming that Cancer Treatment Centers of America is a “public” hospital because public tax dollars pay for the cost of patients there. Or that Kroll Associates or other private security contractors who get public dollars to provide military aid are therefore “public”.
It is part of the dishonesty of the privatization folks that anyone would call themselves a public charter school. A PUBLIC charter school is a lottery school with oversight by the public school system. And I bet that Bernie doesn’t realize that the privatizers have been trying desperately to confuse people by adopting that term in reference to PRIVATE charter schools that can do whatever they want as long as their privately elected board and some separate agency approves.
LikeLike
Some states define a charter school as a “public charter school,” even when they operate for profit and claim private ownership of all equipment purchased with public funds.
Face it, public education is facing a threat to its existence by the clever PR wordsmithing of the privatization movement.
LikeLike
I agree that this is all about clever PR wordsmithing, but I think it needs to be called out and clarified. The right wing has always been very clever about using words to mean something very different than their intention, to confuse the public. Instead of enabling them, those words need to be taken back.
There ARE “public” charter schools that are run by the public school system. And there are “private” charter schools that are run by private organizations. Let’s make sure the public understands the difference and let’s stop allowing private charter schools to use the word “public” to disguise what they are. Let’s point out what a REAL “public charter school” is and make sure politicians and voters understand the difference between that and a charter chain like Success Academy.
LikeLike
You are not entirely correct about public charter schools. It may be the case that, for the most part, public charter schools are not really public. But the Sheboygan Area School District in Wisconsin (where I teach) does have charter schools that are really part of the school district. Some teachers within the district have legitimate concerns about them. They are a mixed bag, to be sure. But they are truly public.
LikeLike
Corey,
A charter school that is privately managed, that has a private board of directors, that has board meetings held in private, that closes its doors for political demonstrations, that does not allows its teachers to form a union, that claims immunity from state laws governing public schools, —–is not a public school.
LikeLike
Right. But that’s not what we have here. So there is such a thing as a public charter school. I don’t think that what most so-called public charter schools are. And I also think the charter system within our district is flawed. But our elected school board holds hearing over whether to renew the charters every five years. So I think you’d have to say ours are public.
LikeLike
Corey, are any of your charters part of national chains? In most states, charters get automatic renewal via political contributions.
LikeLike
No. All but two were started by employees of the district. Two were local private schools, one a Catholic school and one a direct instruction school. They applied to become part of the district when money got tough. I argued against letting in the DI school, but that didn’t go well. The Catholic school is, obviously, no longer a Catholic school.
LikeLike
I’m afraid Bernie is not very informed or articulate on K-12 education issues around the country even though he’s been on the Senate committee for years. He has a long term track record of voting in favor of laws which support Charter Schools and Testing (or as they like to call it, “Accountability.”) He has only emphasized his plans for free college and child care when answering questions on K-12 education. I don’t feel he has a grasp on K-12 issues.
Vermont is an unusual state and many of their schools have used a model in which a private school takes in the surrounding public school students. It’s a totally different system. They should be able to do a better job on maneuvering around the rules on testing, because of their small population and since some schools are really private.
Here’s one example – The Lyndon Institute (From Wikipedia)
“Lyndon Institute has a total tuition of $14,713 for day students and $42,570 for boarding students. “The school has more than 85 boarding students including some from Taiwan, China, Japan, Israel, Germany, Sweden, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Brazil and South Korea. Students from Vermont communities that are not within easy commuting distance take advantage of a five-day boarding program.
The Institute is also the high school of choice for nearby small towns that pay tuition for their students to attend rather than fund a public high school. The Town of Lyndon selects this school for their children. In turn, the Institute accepts their students promoted from their eighth grade without further examination.”
They do have regular style public schools in parts of the state, but it’s certainly nothing like a large urban school district. In fact, the ENTIRE population of Vermont is a little over 600,000 which is smaller than Los Angeles Unified School District student population of 656,000.
LikeLike
The Dems are less friendly toward vouchers, but other than that they aren’t very different from the Republicans on their approach to education. It’s frustrating.
LikeLike
I agree that Bernie may be thinking in terms of what charter schools ideally should be—adjunct public schools offering incubators for testing new methods. I base it on his thanking Rahm Emanuel for not endorsing him, and his clear statement he supports teachers’ unions unequivocally. It can’t hurt, of course, to request he clarify his educational position, but no human being is capable of addressing every individual issue every time they’re called upon to speak.
LikeLike
Yes, Bernie said PUBLIC charter schools, which most people understand as charter schools established and run by the public school system. If he supported charter schools, there would be no need to specify “public”. Not that Bernie did not say “non-profit” charter schools (which are the ones who keep claiming they are “public”) — he said public charter schools, which eliminates every charter school who is not under the public school system.
I certainly hope someone will have him clarify what he defines as “public charter school” and whether the large chains fit that definition.
LikeLike
Albert Shanker supported public charter schools. I am satisfied that is what Bernie means and need no clarification. For this teacher there really is no choice between a candidate who has consistently walked the walk when it came to support for public employee unions. Hillary, like President Obama, talks the union talk but is nowhere to be found when union rights are on the line. See, for example, Wisconsin recall of Walker; Rahm Emanuel; Gov. Cuomo; etc. And any followers of DFER I have to assume are planning on voting for Trump so what they have to say about real Democratic candidates is of no consequence.
Feel the Bern. Good luck on Tuesday, Bernie.
LikeLike
Yeah, GST, we in Wisconsin are still waiting for Obama to don those “comfortable shoes” and join our picket lines.
LikeLike
Perhaps Bernie does not know the difference between charter schools and magnet schools.
LikeLike
Diane, you’re right, you’ve been very even-handed in dealing with both candidates. If I’ve assumed you supported the Clintons I was just reading tea leaves. Many of the reasons I personally could never support a Clinton or a Bush, after all, are based on the education on the history of education “reform” and all its players I have received reading your work. I endorse Bernie Sanders for president; I don’t want you to endorse him unless it’s summer or fall, but I truly enjoy reading the comments of your many readers who so enthusiastically do. Bernie cannot make this a meaningful Democratic primary — keeping the Democrats in the headlines to compete with the Republicans for simple name recognition –without people standing up for him at this crucial point in time.
LikeLike
Possibly even-handed, but remaining neutral in critical moments is questionable.
My advice, for whatever it’s worth, is to prioritize more time and energy for this political cycle — temporarily — over opt out, more charter talk, and so on.
Diane, you must get to the bottom of this decision. Hillary or Bernie would mean DIRE differences in the direction of our country. Hillary is much more likely to yield the white house to Trump, and continue more of the same.
You will not damage one Dem candidate in the general by endorsing the other in the primary. If the opposite candidate were to win the Dem nomination, you can then say that you strongly endorse the best choice still available. I strongly and respectfully disagree with this reason to not support one candidate over the other in the primary.
LikeLike
I’m sorry, but everything I know about Bernie Sanders tells me that he’s not a supporter of the charter chains. Some education writers have properly made the distinction between those chains and their private, for-profit management companies (even those set up as “non-profits”), and the sorts of schools that Shanker supported, the one I taught at for three years, and others folks have mentioned.
This is yet another example of the impossibility of having a sane conversation about education issues in this country in the current century. Since NCLB/RttT/Common Core, etc., I’ve seen a trend towards absolutism of the worst sort in education discussions on and offline. The comments on this blog are no exception. Many people get it. But too many go into bunker mode and insist that a given “thing” (e.g., charter schools, the Common Core) are monoliths that we must reject in every particular because we object to them in general.
I’m not sure that any one political ideology has the market cornered on that sort of absolutism, but it strikes me as generally dangerous and counterproductive. And as Lloyd suggested above, it can easily lead to making some pretty clueless decisions at the ballot box and elsewhere.
LikeLike
“I’m not sure that any one political ideology has the market cornered on that sort of absolutism, but it strikes me as generally dangerous and counterproductive.”
I’m with you.
LikeLike
I believe the public and elected officials truly do not ‘get it’ when they speak their ‘truth.’ Diane is tireless in her efforts to ‘educate.’🌺
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
Here is what Bernie said to the AFT on their Candidate Questionnaire:
Q. What are your views on private school vouchers, tuition tax credits, and charter school accountability and transparency?
BS: I am strongly opposed to any voucher system that would re-direct public education dollars to private schools, including through the use of tax credits. In addition, I believe charter schools should be held to the same standards of transparency as public schools, and that these standards should also apply to the non-profit and for-profit entities that organize charter schools.
– See more at: http://www.aft.org/election2016/candidate-questionnaire-bernie-sanders#sthash.pchhfPnb.dpuf
I like Bernie very much, I feel like if spent more time looking at the matter he would come around on his views. I think he will listen and if you look at his moral and ethical stands on most issues he will want to be on the right side of this.
LikeLike
You’ve made an important point here in quoting Sanders, important because his response to the question describes conditions that are antithetical to the proliferation of rent seeking, wealth extracting CMO’s etc. It is quite probable that DFER is spinning this as a way of diluting and muddying the waters because they know that they will have a better, more accessible and sympathetic friend in HRC who is far more likely to spread the off the shelf propaganda of the deformers.
LikeLike
Thanks Daniel.
Now the question to answer: was Bernie lying with this more lengthy, more thoughtful response? or was the DFER action a calculated attack?
LikeLike
Diane, I take what DFER says with more than a few grains of salt. I still feel confident about Bernie supporting public education. Here is one link to a press conference he gave yesterday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vR1h4etdlwM
Also, Troy LaRaviere has just cut an ad for Bernie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIVypM6zcKQ
LikeLike
Thank you Eleanor for these posts! I saw the ad yesterday, but not the press release. It is a powerful speach, and I do hope people will take the time to watch it. He has my vote! He is an activist just like us, running for president. He is the New Deal.
LikeLike
Don’t you think, though, that at this point we have so many families who are in charters (some to get away from stuff RttT brought) that to criticize would be isolating? To me the question is the long range plan and what charters represent in that plan. Are there plans to recap them? Are there plans to gradually and eventually hand charter control back to a their respective states? Or are we going to continue along the charter trajectory until one or two corporations owns them all (kind of the way of the book store)?
I don’t think it’s fair to ask a candidate what they think of charters at this point. The answer has to be complex to account for folks who work in charters (that’s where the teaching positions were, perhaps) or for the myriad of reasons people have charters in their lives. To me a simple answer is the problem. Some depth is needed in light of where we are, how we got there and where we are going for state supported schooling.
LikeLike
Bernie just said it in the town hall. He stated he does NOT support ANY private management of charters with public money.
LikeLike
Daniel, all charters are privately managed with public money.
LikeLike
I understand that, maybe Bernie is confusing magnets with charters? To me Bernie’s statement would indicate he is not in favor of any of the current charters
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders just said in the town hall that neighborhood schools bring together people of different and disparate backgrounds.
Perhaps that is the case in Vermont, but his answer belies a complete lack of knowledge about the mass sorting, stratification, and segregation the US’s “neighborhood schools” are responsible for, or the lack of any meaningful, actionable solutions to address it.
Stunning.
LikeLike
“his answer belies a complete lack of knowledge about the mass sorting, stratification, and segregation the US’s “neighborhood schools” are responsible for, or the lack of any meaningful, actionable solutions to address it.”
You are jumping to a pretty strong conclusion about what he knows and doesn’t know. Just for a little perspective, check out this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/02/27/noam_chomsky_for_secretary_of_education_bernie_sanders_needs_to_make_this_revolutionary_call_for_our_public_schools/
LikeLike
Here’s some clarification. I don’t think the teacher from the charter school was pleased with his answer. I know why I feel the Bern!
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/02/24/ohio-democratic-town-hall-bernie-sanders-private-charter-schools.cnn/video/playlists/iowa-democratic-town-hall/
LikeLike
I like the NPE letter (I just signed it). That having been said, I am surprised at all of the nit-picky-ness of some of the commentary, here. Honestly, do you think that the Chicago Teachers Union (TRULY rank-&-file arm), C.O.R.E. (Caucus for Rank-&-File Educators)–the group that ran Karen Lewis for C.T.U. President–would endorse Bernie Sanders if he were NOT pro-public education? How about Diane’s Education Hero, Principal Troy LaRaviere, whose high-praise commercial for Bernie has been shown here in Chicago repeatedly? Or Chuy Garcia, who Karen asked to run for mayor in her stead? Or Prof. Jonathan Jackson (Rev. Jesse Jackson Jr’s. son–Rev. Jackson just hosted Bernie at Rainbow-PUSH yesterday morning, & he probably hasn’t endorsed Bernie because he has also been friends {as well as a spiritual adviser to Bill} with the Clintons for years.) I am surprised (& disappointed) at some of the comments here, such as the invocation of “the lesser of 2 evils” between Bernie & Hillary–we FINALLY, now, have a clear choice–no more “lesser of 2 evils,” & we’re going to blow it now? What other candidate has so disparaged the shame of poverty suffered here in the world’s wealthiest nation? (None.) What other candidate has explored and exposed the root of this problem, which this very blog has been exposing and writing about for years (Waltons & Kochs buying school board elections & trying to re-segregate schools)? (None.) What other candidate was arrested protesting school segregation in Chicago (or elsewhere, for that matter)–& I have a second picture from–of all places!–The Chicago Tribune–where he’s resolutely sitting in the middle of the street, holding hands with a fellow protester? (Again–none!) What other candidate has referred to other countries (such as–yes, Finland, in which case, again, this blog has broached many times) that offer universal health care, family leave & extremely low poverty levels? (None.) Of course, I could go on & on. However, one last point: in 2012, Obama was “the lesser of 2 evils”–“he would destroy public education more slowly than Romney.”
(Hard to tell, now.) But–destroy public education–yes, yes he did (Arne Duncan, the RTT/NCLB on steroids & Pear$on $upporter buffoon) and not only that, as a final twist of the knife in our backs, he appointed JOHN KING as Sec. of Ed. Connect the dots, people–Joyce Foundation, Obama, ILL-Annoy (just read Mercedes Schneider, people.
And–what–Hillary wouldn’t CONTINUE these policies?! Come on!!
2old2teach, eleanor, Ed Detective (& you’re a good one!), Jennifer Leuck, Left Coast Teacher, GST (your reference to Albert Shanker blows it out of the water) & Michael Paul Goldenberg–you all have it exactly right. There IS no other candidate–we finally have the one we’ve all been waiting for–he’s the real deal. So please, people, don’t spit in the wind. Please don’t cause another situation where we really DO have to choose between the “lesser of the 2 evils.”
Bernie 2016. He walks the walk…and he WILL put on his walking shoes.
LikeLike
The CTU has not endorsed anyone.
LikeLike
Sorry–I meant to reply to you, earlier, Diane–you’re right–the C.T.U. didn’t come out and endorse anyone–as I stated in my 3/14 comment– C.O.R.E. (the Caucus of Rank-&-File Educators)–the arm of the C.T.U. that successfully ran Karen Lewis, Jesse Sharkey & the other officers of the C.T.U–DID, indeed, endorse Bernie Sanders (I believe that their online news, Substance, first reported it.)
Also–it’s of note that a number of NEA state affiliates (MA Education Assn, for one, NJEA, New Hampshire Ed. Assn. &, I believe, the Rhode Island Ed. Assn.) commented publically against the early NEA endorsement of HRC. Not only that, there were numerous posts & newspaper articles (one on Curmudgecation-sp.?, for example) about the lack of input (i.e., the rank-&-file was NOT asked to participate in any kind of survey, nor was any poll (taken)on the vote to early endorse. Many state leaders abstained or voted no–one fact sheet noted that a total of 180 people (out of a 3 million + member organization) voted for the early endorsement of HRC. And the AFT wasn’t much better–according to some members, they had given a push-poll.
Anyway, this comment is so late that you’re probably the only one who will see it, but I did want to clarify that I hadn’t written that the C.T.U. endorsed anyone, & that C.O.R.E. DID publicly endorse Bernie Sanders several weeks ago.
LikeLike