When I read this story, my eyes filled with tears. The community public school in Waynesville, North Carolina, is closing. Not because it is a failing school, but because of budget cuts by the state legislature, and because of a charter school launched by a very rich man in Oregon. You read that right: in Oregon! The public school lost nearly a million dollars to the new charter, and it couldn’t survive.
This is the price of privatization. The death of public schools. It is not an accident. This is what ALEC and StudentsFirst and DFER (Democrats for Education Reform) and the Gates Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation and the John and Laura Arnold Foundation and the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation and the Dell Foundation and the Koch brothers and Michael Bloomberg want.
At one elementary school in the North Carolina mountains two-thirds of the students qualify for free or reduced lunch.
That would make you think that the school would not fare well on the state’s A-F grading system where poverty seems a reliable predictor of the arbitrary grade—97 percent of schools receiving a D or F have more than 50 percent of their students who are from low-income families.
But thanks to the efforts of teachers and parents and the community, the rural school managed a C grade in the latest state report card rankings and did even better as far as the N.C. Arts Council is concerned, earning an A+ for art-based education reform.
Clearly something is working at this low-income school, Central Elementary in Waynesville, but not for long.
The Haywood County School Board voted Monday night to close the school thanks to state budget cuts and the opening of a local charter school that has siphoned students and almost a million dollars in state funding from the local system.
Parents and other supporters of the school will appeal to legislators in Raleigh, but no one thinks they have much of a chance.
Most likely Central Elementary will close and the parents of the 250 students who are learning there this year will be reassigned and the community will lose a vital resource, a place where one parent said “…students from the whole socio-economic spectrum learn from the dedicated teachers and from and with one another.”
The proponents of the school privatization always claim that it’s all about parental choice and that competition is good.
But this is not a failing school that is closing, it’s one where students are doing ok despite the hurdles they face. And it is a school that parents and the community work hard to support.
Here is a local article explaining the financial situation of the schools, the budget cuts, and the effect of losing students to a charter, online schooling, and homeschooling. Read the comments. You will be reminded why some people home school; anyone can do it. No education needed. It is a way to preserve your child from the influence of “those children” and to preserve the parents’ religious views.
Once the privatizers and profiteers took control of the North Carolina legislature and governorship, schools like Central Elementary became just so much collateral damage. Its fate was decided by the privatization zealots in Raleigh and by a rich man in Oregon.
If the people of Haywood County don’t like what is happening, they should elect someone else to represent them.

Competition is good when charters’ lobbyists influence on policymakers to stack the deck. Competition is good when a shiny new schools with resources compete unfairly with public schools that are impoverished due to the deliberate starving, coupled with the vampire drain of charter expansion. Competition is always good for those that rig the outcome so they always win.
LikeLike
Oh boy ..you are right on!..I would know because I am retired and subbing in a Charter school. I see the discrepancy.. it is a thorn in the bush and will continue unless parents lead..instead they are following through no fault of their own.
LikeLike
And once this charter school is in operation what will happen to any children it rejects? Will their right to a public education be honored?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great point!
LikeLike
It’s happening in Denver. School after school after school is being closed and either given “innovation status” (meaning the school doesn’t have to play by the union rule book), or they are being turned into another charter. The Denver Public Schools website no longer differentiates between the public schools and the charters within their boundaries. Many parents have come to me, very confused, trying to figure out if they are enrolling in a charter or a public school. For one neighborhood, a charter school is the ONLY neighborhood option for middle school. I’m pretty sure the district is doing all of this so that Bill Gates can live his dream. I just wish I knew what his dream regarding education REALLY involves. Is he misguided or evil?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disillusioned in Denver,
Despite a decade of corporate reforms in Denver, the district is no model for anyone else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for bringing this issue to the light. What makes so little sense in Denver is that even while there have been many voices raised against the abuses tied to a blatant (and growing) test-score segregation, Denver voters continue to put die-hard Show Me The Money school reformers onto their school board. Big Money has made its way into every little feature and every little aspect of the educational decisions made by the Denver Pubic Schools district — and it has no intention of losing its hold.
LikeLike
The majority of North Carolinians vote like they enjoy being the chattel of the richest 1%.
When their charter schools are taken over by the schools-in-a-box, of the for-profit Bridge International Academies, and a family has to spend 30% of its income on education, N.C. will have a lot less disposable money to support other businesses.
LikeLike
but isn’t voting for people who got us into CCSS and other RttT requirements sort of also voting for being the chattel of the richest 1%?
LikeLike
I promise not to clutter..but I completed an exhaustive search, and it is related to everything talked about in this situation…..I will just furnish a link ..http://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1164303 The PD destroyed a 5000 word article—cancelled from their archives….and on the same date, furnished a short article by the mayor….and there is a mountain of history revision going on to protect the takeover and bullying ahead with increased charter schools…it is just beyond belief.
LikeLike
Shining Rock Academy seems to be part of some larger group called Challenge Foundation Academy.
These charter chains are sounding more and more like commercial entities.
A multi-millionaire in Oregon now determines whether people in North Carolina get a public school?
How bought and paid for ARE our lawmakers? Are they ashamed to show their faces in public yet? The level of corruption is stomach-turning.
http://srca.teamcfa.school/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who is their elected representative at the state level? When he or she ran, did the rep tell voters their school was slated for closure and privatization and they would end up with no “choice” at all but to attend a national charter?
Seems like bait and switch to me. Were they lied to?
LikeLike
It’s happening in Baltimore too. Beautiful, beloved Langston Hughes Elementary School.
https://tdpbaltimore.org/2015/09/11/losing-langston-hughes/
LikeLike
Deray Mckesson is being supported by TFA in his run for mayor of Baltimore. Looks like charters would be ushered in under his administration:
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/why-deray-mckessons-plan-baltimores-schools-looks-it-comes-right-out-teach
LikeLike
This story hits close home, literally. I grew up and taught in Cocke Co., TN, which joins Haywood Co., NC. I’m aware of the struggle some of these rural school systems are having as charter schools move into their area, without their approval or input.
LikeLike
I wonder how far ed reform would have gotten politically if they had seen fit to tell voters the goal was privatization of public schools?
At the very least, they could have the courage to run on it.
LikeLike
Courage is not profitable or conducive to survival, deception is profitable and this crowd is so adept at it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This school is in our backyard here in Asheville. For these families the catchphrase “school choice” means: “We’re closing your school! Go make another choice.”
LikeLike
In a community where two-thirds of children qualify for a free or reduced lunch, this is what they can have for lunch at the Shiny charter school:
“Order Lunch
To order school lunch for your child, please click here.
You will be directed to Hot Lunch Online, our ordering and payment system.
Lunch Procedures:
You must order by THURSDAY at midnight the week before.
If your child is absent and you have ordered lunch:
– You may call the school by 11AM to pick up the lunch from the school.
– SRCA can offer the lunch to another student and reimburse the sick student if another student pays for it.
– If no one claims it, unfortunately there are no refunds.
If school is not in session due to weather, you will not be charged and your account will be credited.”
I can’t tell the cost; you have to create an account to find out.
LikeLike
I want to point out a specifically horrible aspect to this. In NC, if a home schooled child decides to attend a charter school, the public schools district in which they live is required to tranfer funds to the charter school, even though they NEVER RECEIVED THE FUNDS FROM THE STATE since the child was never enrolled in the district. This was the case for a number of students in this case making the financial impact worse.
LikeLike
How many times does this have to happen before people get the picture of what is really going on with and to pubic education in our state?….Central Elementary is in our back yard…..
LikeLike
This is especially sad because this school is an original A+ School, a school reform effort centered around the value of the arts in education that started in NC over 20 years ago. The A+ Schools Program has been providing funding for on-going development for the staff and leadership at the school and is committed to continuing that support. Wish it could be enough to stop this tragedy. http://aplus-schools.ncdcr.gov
LikeLike
“DEATH OF A PUBLIC SCHOOL, KILLED BY A CHARTER”
Long post be patient. Before you keep on saying these untruths, please read more info from local media below:
http://www.smokymountainnews.com/news/item/17057-overbuilt-school-consolidation-targets-central-elementary-as-collateral-damage
Overbuilt? School consolidation targets Central Elementary as collateral damage
Written by Becky Johnson
A feasibility report on the potential closure of Central Elementary School in Waynesville was released by Haywood County Schools last week.
Item fulltext
The report didn’t explicitly render a conclusion on whether to close Central, but the data in the report largely seemed to point toward its imminent closure.
The report frequently referenced a $2.4 million budget shortfall facing the school system as the impetus for closing Central, along with data showing all nine of the county’s elementary schools are operating well below capacity — signaling the school system has more buildings than it can justify keeping.
Central Elementary School Principal Jeanann Yates said she is very saddened by the possibility of Central closing, however, and hopes there’s a way it can be avoided.
“I am remaining hopeful that another resolution will be found,” Yates said. “However, the reality of such a huge budget deficit is very apparent. “
Although this is her first year as the principal at Central, Yates said she quickly developed a deep love for the school and its community. Central is the oldest elementary school in the county and one of the last real neighborhood schools that students can still walk to.
“Central has been such a long-standing tradition and an integral part of this community,” Yates said. “I love Central and our sweet students and can’t imagine not coming to Central every day.”
Yates expressed gratitude for the outpouring of support Central’s teachers and staff have received.
The nine-member Haywood County School board will vote on whether to close Central at its next meeting on Monday, Feb. 8. If approved, it would close at the end of this school year.
The report released last week is required under a state statute that lays out the procedure for closing a public school. The statute also requires a public hearing, which will be held at 7 p.m. Wednesday, Jan. 27, at Central.
The students
The report cited Central’s shrinking enrollment in recent years and predicted it would continue. It is the second smallest elementary school in the county, with just two classes per grade.
Meanwhile, two other elementary schools within a two-mile radius could easily absorb Central’s student body.
“There should be no great inconvenience or hardship of the students due to the proximity of Hazelwood Elementary School and Junaluska Elementary School,” the report concludes.
About 115 students from Central would be sent to Hazelwood and 95 would be sent to Junaluska. If the school board votes to close Central, school officials will dive into the details of divvying up students between Hazelwood and Junaluska and reassigning Central’s feeder neighborhoods into one of the other two elementary school districts.
Hazelwood Principal Wendy Rogers said families from Central would be welcomed with open arms.
“Whether they end up at Hazelwood or Junaluska, they will be in good hands. Because of the community we live in, I think the parents and students alike will be embraced,” said Rogers, who was the principal at Central until this year.
Rogers said Hazelwood’s students will be ready to put their training as a national Leader in Me School to work.
“It will be a great way for them to step up and use the leadership skills they have been building and make those students feel welcome from day one,” Rogers said.
If the school board votes to close Central, she said her first step would be putting together a transition team.
The staff
Closing Central would save $500,000 annually — about a third of that in overhead and the rest in staff reductions.
Central has 22 teachers and staff.
“Does that mean those people will lose their jobs if we close? No, it does not,” Superintendent Anne Garrett said during a presentation of the report to school principals during one of last week’s snow days. “If you have 90 children going to Junaluska, of course you are going to have to add teachers there.”
Only nine of the 22 positions now at Central would be cut, according to the report. But that still doesn’t spell layoffs, Garrett said.
“We think there are enough retirements creating openings each year that they would be able to keep their jobs, but at another site,” Garrett said.
The building
The report also addressed rumors about what the school system would do with Central if it closes.
“There are a lot of rumors out there — we’ve already sold it, someone else has already moved in to it, we’ve swapped it,” Garrett said in jest.
None of those are true, and any scenario would be a long way off, she said.
School officials say they don’t know what they would do with the Central yet, and they aren’t willing to speculate since the school board technically hasn’t voted to close Central.
“We don’t know what their decision is going to be. We can guess, but until they vote, the decision is not made,” Garrett said.
Despite Central’s age — it was built in 1954 — it’s actually in good shape, according to a facility assessment. Nonetheless, routine maintenance and upgrades would be unavoidable over the next decade, from a new roof and paint job to flooring and HVAC. Closing Central would avert $400,000 in maintenance costs that would otherwise be incurred over the next decade, the report found.
The unspoken story
The report released last week was brief and mostly technical in nature. It made no reference to the process for how Central would be closed, or how the school system would help students and parents navigate the transition.
“We didn’t want to be presumptive in telling people what that would look like,” Assistant Superintendent Bill Nolte said.
The most striking chart in the report shows just how much extra space there is in all of Haywood County’s schools. The nine elementary schools in Haywood County are only at two-thirds of their total capacity on average — with room to spare for another 1,500 students across all the elementary schools.
Ironically, Central is closer to capacity than any of the other nine elementary schools.
But Central is smaller to start with and has been losing students at a faster pace.
It lost 40 students over the past two years, according to the report. A decline would likely continue, but how much is unclear.
“One of the requirements was to estimate what the future enrollment would be. That is very difficult to do,” Garrett said. “But it is reasonable to predict the school population will continue to decrease.”
Why is another story, one the report didn’t address. While the school system as a whole has witnessed a decline in students, the loss at Central is three times higher — it lost 16 percent of its student body over the past two years compared to 5 percent in the school system overall.
That fact wasn’t included in the report, however. Nor did the report offer an explanation of why Central’s seen a larger decline.
Central used to be an arts magnet school that integrated arts into the curriculum. Students living anywhere in the county could opt to attend Central, even if it wasn’t their assigned elementary school district. They still can, but without the arts magnet status, far fewer do.
Central’s population decline also stems from the demographic shift of in-town neighborhoods that feed it.
Meanwhile, however, Central lost a larger percentage of its student body to the new Shining Rock Classical Academy charter school than any other elementary school in the county. That wasn’t in the report either.
Nor did the report mention that Central’s poverty rate is higher than average compared to the other elementary schools, or that its minority population is the highest, or that its test scores are the lowest, according to school statistics kept by the N.C. Department of Public Instruction.
In the latest school report cards, where the state dishes out a letter grade to every school, Central was the only elementary school in Haywood County that got a C. The rest got Bs, and one got an A+.
That doesn’t exactly make Central an underperforming school, however.
Comparing Central to the other elementary schools in Haywood County isn’t entirely fair, given that Haywood County is one of the top-performing public school districts academically in the state.
It ranks in the top 15 percent in academic performance, according to state test scores. And based on the latest letter grade scoring system for schools, Haywood is in the top 10 percent.
“Haywood County Schools is among only 10 of 115 school districts in North Carolina to have no D or F schools,” Nolte said in a press release two months ago when letter grades came out.
Learn more, speak out
A public hearing on the possible closure of Central Elementary School will be held at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, Jan. 27, at the school.
It was initially planned for Tuesday, but concerns over lingering hazardous road conditions that kept schools closed Tuesday prompted Haywood school officials to bump the hearing back a day. A public hearing is required by state statue in a school closure.
Before the meeting, students and parents from Central Elementary will hold a rally and march protesting the possible closure of their school. All are invited to meet at Central at 5:30 p.m. and join the walk to downtown and back.
http://themountaineer.villagesoup.com/p/gross-mismanagement-prompted-central-elementary-closure/1484364
‘Gross mismanagement’ prompted Central Elementary closure
By Michele Presnell | Feb 19, 2016
The Haywood County School Board decision to close Central Elementary School was an unfortunate consequence of its members’ own failures.
School funding, whether in Haywood County or any other district across the state, is tied directly to student enrollment, also called Average Daily Membership (ADM). School districts are funded based on the number of students they have, which is referred to as per pupil funding, or $/ADM.
When a parent decides to take his or her child out of Haywood County Schools, school funding follows that child wherever he goes. For example, if he were to leave Haywood Schools and enroll in Jackson County Schools, funding would follow him to the Jackson County school system. Alternatively, if a student leaves Jackson County to enroll in Haywood County Schools, funding follows him to Haywood County.
The issue with Haywood Schools lies with the fact that they have lost more than 700 students in the past 10 years. In a smaller school district like Haywood County, that represents about 10% of their current enrollment.
Money also follows children when they transfer to charter schools. Haywood County School Board members and others have blamed the closure of Central Elementary on the new charter school in Waynesville. They have said enrollment in Haywood County Schools dropped “in one fell swoop,” and other categorizations suggesting enrollment decreases came on suddenly and unexpectedly.
It is important to note that Central Elementary only lost 18 students to the new charter schoolin Waynesville. 18 compared with the more than 700 students they’ve lost in the past 10 years does not sound like a “sudden” or “one fell swoop” sort of decrease, but we may leave semantics and other such trivial matters to the uninformed media who continue to incorrectly report on this issue.
As you can see by the fact that funding is tied directly to the number of students in a school district, the true measure of state education funding is per-pupil funding ($/ADM). In Haywood County, the $/ADM state funding for 2015-16 as of this past September is $5,426. Just before the recession in 2008 – and just before previous General Assembly leadership cut more than $800 million from K-12 education in 2009-10 – $/ADM funding for Haywood County was at $5,384.
Therefore, $/ADM funding in Haywood County is at its greatest level in state history, which applies to the rest of the state as well.
One matter of particular note with regard to Haywood County Schools funding is despite the fact that enrollment has dropped by 289 students since I took office, their total state funding has increased from $39,451,664 to $40,020,796 (a $569,132 increase). That’s $569,132 more to educate 289 fewer students.
How is a $569,132 state funding increase to educate 289 fewer students a budget cut? It’s not. Those who report and continue to repeat the same tired lie that education funding has been cut are doing a disservice to the community by simply not reporting the facts. It’s an insult to state taxpayers who fund our state’s schools at the greatest level in history.
Teachers across the board have received raises as part of overall education funding increases. In 2013-14, when I first took office, Haywood County received $18,815,403 to fund 333.5 teacher positions. As of September, the county received $20,417,211 to fund 334.5 teacher positions. That’s an increase of $1,601,808 for one more teacher. That $1.6 million in additional teacher pay is going in teachers’ pockets where it belongs.
State education funding for Haywood County since I took office include increases in the following areas:
· Textbooks: $107,863 to $214,277 ($106,414 or 98.7%)
· Instructional support: $2,171,645 to 2,362,966 ($191,321 or 8.8%)
· DSSF: $242,736 to $255,370 ($12,634 or 5.2%)
· Behavioral support: $72,555 to $99,016 ($26,461 or 36.5%)
· Children with disabilities: $3,911,188 to 4,018,943 ($107,755 or 2.8%)
· Academically gifted: $374,898 to $382,104 ($7,206 or 1.9%)
· Limited English: $115,675 to $131,201 ($15,526 or 13.4%)
· Cooperative innovative schools: $315,823 to 316,646 ($823 or 0.3%)
It is certain that any one of my constituents could not be blamed for thinking that education funding has been cut. My constituents have been fed a narrative of education cuts spread by people who have a lot to lose – and stand to look quite foolish – when the truth is realized.
The facts, not baseless talking points, clearly illustrate where fault for the closure of Central Elementary lies. It does not lie with the legislature, in which I have been honored to serve and have voted for substantial increases to public education funding year after year. It does not lie with the charter school, which only took 18 students from Central Elementary. Fault lies with Haywood County School Board members for their gross mismanagement of resources.
For example, 45% of what was budgeted in local Haywood County funds for teachers went to administration in 2013-14. Assistant principal positions have been increased across the county, despite the fact that enrollment has been falling. Additional assistant principal positions have greatly increased administrative costs for the school district.
The numbers presented thus far are mostly specific to Haywood County. As for overall state funding, 2009-10 was the last year previous leadership was in charge. They budgeted $7,544,465,541 for K-12 education. Reckless spending and a lack of savings leading up to the financial crisis in 2008-09 led them to cut almost $1 billion from the K-12 education budget in 2009-10 and increase taxes substantially.
In the 2015-16 budget that I voted for this past September, $8,516,769,297 was budgeted for K-12 education, which is an increase of $972,303,756. Additionally, the state’s savings reserves were increased, and incomes taxes were decreased. Sales tax rates remained unchanged.
I will continue to vote to provide the support that public education needs, as my record shows I have been doing since taking office.
END OF POST
LikeLike
So, according to your standard, what constitutes truth/untruth is solely based on writer’s social status other than education????
NOTE: the writer of 2nd article is the state representative who is in the eyes of the storm for this mess.
LikeLike
Raj,
Do you see the need for a charter school in this article?
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch,
Your head line states “The Death of a Community Public School in North Carolina–Killed by a Charter and Budget Cuts”
I am only pointing out the following:
1. Community public school did not die, the democratically elected school board voted to close it. It is still not final. School is just a brick and mortar structure.
2. The students from this school were reassigned to other nearby better performing schools.
3. Charter school took away only 28 kids and did not kill the public school. I will not be a judge if the charter school is necessary and I do not have enough info.
4. There was no budget cut, in fact budget on a per student basis actually increased.
5. Budget cuts did not kill the school.
6. The school was closed because the district is overbuilt, student population decreased from 8000 to 7000 which resulted the reduction of the total budget.
8. Reduced number of students requires the reduction of class rooms. The school district does not have any say on the number of students that are in the school district.
9. Instead or running all schools at 7/8 capacity it is better to close some schools and run the rest at full capacity which leads to cost savings on infra structure.
I will state with conviction that the words such as “Death of a public school”, “public schools killed by a charter school,” and “public school killed by budget cuts” is inappropriate. The words death and kill as applicable to a school are obnoxious.
I go by these rules:
1. Is it true?
2. Is it sad?
3. Is it necessary?
Your blog on this matter fails all three of my rules.
LikeLike
Raj, it’s a typical propaganda tactic by legislative representative and its stakeholders. They spin their own tale in a way to deceive students and parents by bringing these lines of items and ignoring their real voices in the matter. Never amazes me to see your recalcitrance and pachyderm mentality in your posting.
LikeLike
https://www.ednc.org/2016/02/11/a-maze-of-facts-muddies-the-education-funding-issue-in-haywood-county-but-a-basic-understanding-is-important/
LikeLike
Raj, are you a reformer at heart? Got kids in school? Teacher? Otherwise, I skim over your comments! I do that anyway. You never make sense to me because you defend those who don’t care! Your points are insidious to me.
In the words of Harper Lee:
“The one thing that doesn’t abide by majority rule is a person’s conscience”.
LikeLike