Earlier this week, I posted an interview with Peter Cunningham of Education Post, who said that more and more Americans are abandoning public schools for privately managed charters (which may hire uncertified teachers and generally do not get higher test scores than public schools), for homeschooling (where the quality of their education depends directly on the quality of their parents’ education), and vouchers (where children get public money to attend religious schools where many teachers are uncertified and the curriculum may be based on the Bible).
Jeff Bryant sees the walk-ins that occurred yesterday as a response from many thousands of parents and students who support their public schools.
He writes:
In Boston, the walk-in took place at City Hall where hundreds gathered outside to protest an estimated $50 million budget shortfall for the city’s schools. “At the proposed level, district schools could lose teachers, after-school programs, and elective classes like languages and arts,” according to a local news account. The crowd presented to the mayor a list of demands and a petition with more than 3,500 signatures, then proceeded to march to the State House to present their demands to the governor too.
As part of the protest, ninth graders at one school, according to the Boston Globe, wrote a letter to the mayor complaining of the budget cuts and “asking that you come to our school and explain to our students why you are letting this happen.”
School budget cuts were a point of contention in Chicago as well, where walk-in protests occurred at hundreds of schools across the city. “We’re united as a community, “Chicago Teachers Union vide president Jesse Sharkey tells a local reporter. “The cuts are unacceptable.”
Parents and students joined the teachers at many of the Chicago events, according to another local reporter, and voiced their disapproval of school budget that have swollen class sizes and eliminated course offerings. “Not every school is able to get what they want for their students,” one teacher explains. “I hope they get exactly what they’re asking for,” a parent chimes in.
Jeff cites the statement by the Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools, which coordinated the walk-ins:
The future of public education in the United States stands at a critical crossroad.
Over the past two decades, a web of billionaire advocates, national foundations, policy institutes, and local and federal decision-makers have worked to dismantle public education and promote a top-down, market-based approach to school reform.
Under the guise of civil rights advocacy, this approach has targeted low-income, urban African-American, Latino and immigrant communities, while excluding them from the reform process. The reforms have sown distrust and division among parents and teachers, and utterly failed to improve educational outcomes for children. These attacks are racist and must be stopped.
The time is ripe for a new education movement that provides students throughout the United States, regardless of their race or income, with equitably resourced neighborhood schools.
Today, I stand with the Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools to demand and fight for:
Full, fair funding for neighborhood-based community schools that provide students with quality in-school supports and wraparound services
Charter accountability and transparency and an end to state takeovers of low-performing schools and districts
Positive discipline policies and an end to zero-tolerance
Full and equitable funding for all public schools
Racial justice and equity in our schools and communities.
There is too much at stake to be silent in this moment. I commit to fighting until we bend the political will in this country so that we create public schools where parents want to send their kids, students are engaged and educators want to work; the schools all our children deserve.
Members of the public are invited to sign the AROS statement.
Jeff writes:
Views can differ on whether there is “a web” of collaborating groups – as AROS contends – directing education policy, and whether or not the intent is to “dismantle” public schools, but it’s very clear the thousands of people involved in this week’s walk-ins feel they have little choice in what’s happening to their schools.
They did not choose to chronically under fund their schools and send public money somewhere else. Someone else chose to do that.
While some parents may find charter schools and vouchers can provide useful workarounds for them, that doesn’t correct the chronic under funding of the entire system and the unwillingness of political leaders to take that problem on. Participants in this week’s walk-ins see the hard, bitter truth of that. Good for them.
Anyone who denies that there is a “web” of collaborating groups has not been paying attention. Start with Gates, Broad, Walton, Dell, Helmsley, the Fisher Family, Teach for America, ALEC, the Koch brothers, Stand for Children, Democrats for Education Reform, Families for Excellent Schools—or save some time by reviewing the list of those groups that are funded by the Walton Family Foundation. There is a very large part of the web.
My favorite line, although there are many quotables: “The time is ripe for a new education movement that provides students throughout the United States, regardless of their race or income, with equitably resourced neighborhood schools.”
The time has been ripe since our parents, grandparents and even our great grandparents walked this earth. Educational equity is not just something to strive for–I do believe it’s a Constitutional right! America has to decide whether intellectual achievement counts or it doesn’t count. Our immigrant populations know the truth about that. However, we still allow our cities and our city kids to fall behind. We haven’t learned the expenses in human lives and economics we incur as a result of our short-sightedness.
Who’s talking about this on the campaign trail? Hillary: yes. Bernie: some–it’s implied, but economics being more of a focal point. When you invest in education, everyone benefits. But the other side of the aisle is too busy taking pot shots at one another, and at the marginalized, whose voices will never count in their narrow minds. Time to stand up, America. Public education raises the bar for us as a society. It’s a win-win, the whole way around!
Education is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, but I believe it is included in all 50 state constitutions.
As far as Hillary, yes, she’s talking, but pay very close attention to her words and even closer attention to her actions. For instance, when she says she supports “public schools”, she includes “public” charter schools. She is also strongly in favor of standardized testing and evaluating teachers based on those scores.
They’ll be completely dismissed as “resisters” and ignored, if anyone notices them at all:
“Resistance comes in many forms, from parents marching in the streets to unions going on strike; from individual teachers going about their long-established ways behind closed classroom doors to all manner of pundits and intellectuals scribbling, orating, and (now) taking to social media to propagate their reasons why what the reformers are trying to do is somewhere between idiotic and dastardly.”
http://edexcellence.net/articles/fictionalizing-education-reform
Resisting ed reform is just further evidence (as if any was needed!) that ed reformers are right- embracing ed reform is also evidence that ed reformers are right, so really there’s no set of circumstances where they’re even possibly wrong.
Remember the first “Talking to Teachers” Tour in 2010?
Peter Cunningham knows how to “spin”. He and his “people” attended my convention to talk to teachers. I did NOT want him and his “people” there. But, you know …. It went as I predicted … A TOTAL WASTE of TIME and ENERGY.
When I asked him, “What did you learn?”
Cunninghan’s response while holding his hands next to his head waving them wildly was, “I GET IT! I GET IT! Too much testing. But without student test scores, HOW ARE WE GOING TO EVALUATE TEACHERS?”
My response, “Egads, what’s YOUR AGENDA? Do you and your friends whose children attend private schools use student test scores to evaluate the effectiveness of private school teachers? What a waste of time and money. Have you even considered POVERTY?”
Peter Cunningham is just a marketer of bad ideas. He is a “go-fer” 4 the rich.
Have to agree with you Yvonne. He knows doublespeak quite well. This guy could care less about what really works with children, or if teachers can actually teach. All about the $$…
Quoting the Philanthropy Roundtable post at its “K-12” tab,
“…reformers…. declared, we’ve got to blow up the ed. schools.” The article is written by AEI’s Frederick Hess and, an external affairs manager for a Gates-funded organization. As an alternative, they describe a plutocratic takeover of the schools.
IMO, the, for-profit, Bridge International Academies, with investors Gates and Z-berg (BIA website)- NOT their foundations, are using charter schools and standardized testing/curriculum, as the bridge to the grand plan of schools-in-a-box, education as a commodity. BIA is promoted by the World Bank, to the exclusion of tax-supported education.
The divine right of kings, and its manifest, colonialism, as Lincoln warned, is an ever present threat.
Some highly motivated and informed people are not giving up on public education. But all the big money and a huge amount of decision-makers of both political parties and across the political spectrum have given up on it!
In the universe of people who think about and are engaged in education throughout the United States, the side that we are on is getting destroyed….destroyed by the ocean of money, destroyed by the policies, destroyed by the dominant and ceaseless rhetoric, destroyed by a reform narrative that is seeping into every corner and seam of our culture.
I love the walk-ins, I love the petitions, I love how our side continually rips apart the intellectual and philosophical foundations of the reform movement, I love opt out. But we are getting absolutely destroyed. We needed a much bigger, movement-sized, stand-in-front-of-the-machine and say no, labor-based, narrative stealing-effort to have hope here. And that’s not materializing. I’ve lost any faith that it will.
We can’t give up but there’s a time to face the diagnosis. Things are sorta-kinda terminal.
For folks like me, education isn’t just an interest, it’s not just another battleground of the broader American fight between the commons and privatization……it’s my job and livelihood. I eat or not based on where this whole things ends up. I’m shocked on a daily basis by how far the reform movement has been allowed (yes, allowed…..allowed by those institutions whose job it is to disallow threats to teachers and public education) to march down the road towards privatization. One shouldn’t have to scream so loud or fight so hard to get, for example, one’s union to simply say no and mean it.
If any movement that is equal to the threat posed by the reform movement is to ever begin, it can only be from a place of honesty.
And honestly, we are getting destroyed.
Sadly, I have come to this conclusion too. I’m waiting to see what the next move should be. Supporting my son’s public school is the best I can come up with at this time.
It’s such a radical change you wonder if they worry at all about unintended consequences.
A country where everyone takes their government subsidy and enrolls at the school of their choice- schools as contract service providers- is a different place than a country with a universal public school system.
It just seems like there should have been a debate, a national referendum, on such a huge change. Instead it was conducted like a private sector sales campaign, where they seek “market share” and the public schools are just slowly bled of funding and political support.
I hope it works out according to market theory and it’s all win/win. I think they would have benefited from allowing some dissenters in to poke holes in it and raise questions. There’s not just very little public input- there’s very little dissent of any kind, even among the people who are running it.
My husband went to private schools and he thinks the “theory” behind ed reform comes from a private school mindset- where schools are service providers- unconnected to place. If the school isn’t a good fit you just walk and go to another. That kind of “choice” would be unworkable here- we would just have a bunch of underfunded smaller schools- and it was difficult for him to get used to- the push and pull of accommodation and compromise. He was actually kicked out of one private school but he didn’t resent it because that’s the deal- they don’t have to accommodate him- and the students are aware of that. It’s really a fundamentally different premise.
Chiara,
I agree with your points. What is happening in NC is the blame is just all put on austerity. . .when really the “progressive” actions taken prior to 2010 set up the start of the fall of public schools (a western NC county just had to close a public school because of charters). I think, ultimately, the allure of charters indicates a true need for trust in personalities and as local a hold as possible. I used to have a tee shirt in high school (I painted it, actually. . .I think I got the quote from some ad in a fashion magazine) that read: “It is personalities, not principles, that rule the age.” (now I would add that I see far too many people on this blog interchange “Principal” and “Principle”—-I am not talking about school employees on this. I mean true principles). If you consider how colleges of ed and philosophies of ed began, they began with personalities who made it their business to formulate theories, etc. Then they used their personalities to influence the establishment of larger institutions that echoed and perpetuated the theories and principles they had designed. So ultimately, I think humans want to point to other humans and/or look to other humans for leadership and value. . .not far off principles. The DOE operates on principles and then disseminates them through policy and protocol. But as NYSTEACHER points out, it doesn’t work. It’s too far removed.
People are hungry for personalities to guide them; not principles (unless they are around like-minded grounding in principles), necessarily, as evidenced in the flight to charter schools. The perfect formula would be personalities guided by principles, which I guess ultimately they are (sort of a market of personalities. . .although history does show us that this can go very wrong).
I have to put a more positive spin on the charter draw now, because it is happening so much; rather than just “they don’t want to go to school with poor blacks,” or “they just want to feel like they go to a private school,” or even, “this is just guided by investors wanting to make money.” Even if those sentiments are true (which they probably are), what larger mindset is indicated? We are ignoring that in the rhetoric. I just hear blame from progressives. Conservatives don’t really say anything in NC. . .they just slash budgets (for scorched earth, I guess. . .to spin them in their best light (which I think is fair for informed debate) they are, at best, scaling down what they perceived to be a bloat from the 1970s-1990s in public schooling, and they assume the market will straighten it all out; or, at worst, they are riding the wave of destruction that NCLB and RttT created, and realizing the dream of the ideologies, to privatize.
But it’s so far gone, I fear, that we have to understand what other human needs are being exemplified. Until I hear NC progressives stating out loud how they have contributed to this mess, I fear powerless to really help. Because I don’t just think conservative austerity is the reason this his happening. And even if the rationale is, and I know it to be: catch voter’s attention by appealing to the emotion of “rich people are stealing from you,” so we can gid rid of the conservative super majority in NC. . .then what? We still have the issue of charters, we still have a teacher shortage beginning, we still have 1st grade work being required of kindergarteners. . . it’s a giant heap of issues I have not heard progressives even begin to address, other than trying to somehow blame it all on budget cuts.
Thanks Diane!
Peter Cunningham is a complete moron because he has not conducted any sort of scientifically designed study to demonstrate or even suggest what parents want for their children’s education.
It is a very large country and population out there, and his sample size is probably pathetic, if it exists at all.
Spewing forth memes base upon personal philosophy is not the same as reporting out on actual facts.
Peter, go back to school and take some coursework in statistics and journalism, and then come back and try and write something people will not scorn or laugh at . . . .
Colleges don’t offer a course in bullshit, and this guy is already a master of it…
Priscilla, he has a PhD in it . . .
Regarding county/local school system funding issues…
the Federal Government (Congress/President and the Dept of Education) and the State Governments (State Dept of Educ/ Board of Education, State Legislatures/Governor) pass laws and make regulations that the county/local school systems must follow/implement. Huge and costly programs are pushed by law and funding carrots and sticks policies onto county/local school systems.
Feedback back up the chain as to the pros and cons, costs vs benefits, of what has been demanded by the Feds and State is difficult to get through because people’s careers are dependent on the Feds and State officials liking them. The Feds and State officials like to pick Superintendents who are more sales oriented (i.e. sell the Fed and State programs to the parents and teachers) versus excellence in education oriented.
County/local school systems must pay for all of the Federal and State stuff, and then get down to the business of creating excellence in education, teaching students, maintaining buildings, renovations, new buildings for growth in enrollment, buying expensive land, new schools/programs for students with severe behavioral issues, Special Ed, GT, instrumental music programs, fine arts, paying for support staff, paraeducators, etc.. etc..
There seems to be no detail too small (example: school supply lists must be standardized… the really good history teacher who asked for those 4 colored pens in 1 pen… students took notes that were color coded… that was stopped by the State Attorney’s office new interpretation of a 100 year old law that school supply lists had to be standardized and approved)
and no program too costly:
1. The state (federal government influenced? the whole country seemed to do this at the same time?) demanded all day kindergarten by x date in all schools… in our county alone, 80 new classrooms needed, equivalent of 4 new schools, 80 new teachers with salaries pensions and benefits, etc.. etc.. all to help the achievement gap some said? but since everyone gets all day Kindergarten the same gap persists and now 2. all day universal pre-K is needed to resolve the achievement gap. There was no money for 80 teachers to work with students who are below grade level in reading and math throughout K-12, to get them back on track and on the same level with their peers, No, just put those students in regular classrooms and hope for the best… just say the teacher has to work harder to teach 25-35 students with widely varying abilities. As one teacher told me, she had students with pre-school abilities in middle school along with just under GT ability students.
3. all day kindergarten, universal pre-k …. needed New teachers paid union wages/benefits/pensions, new construction, so expensive, especially since new construction projects are billed to pay prevailing union wages for construction work, (by state law) even though the actual construction workers may not speak English and may not be legal immigrants. I guess someone in the middle pockets the difference between the prevailing union wages charged to the local school districts and the amount illegal construction workers will receive as pay for their work on school projects. Of course the 30% of Baltimore City students who drop out of high school compete with illegal workers for jobs.
4. In an election year, the state passes a law requiring that teacher pensions be increased by double digit percentages of the last 3 years of their pay, Young/new teachers must pay an increasing amount of their smaller than the older teachers’ paychecks into the pension system,…7%?? TARP money paid over a hundred million dollars to cover these “increase in pensions” costs for the first 3 years, then the State shifted all of those costs to the county school systems.
5. Common Core… Federal law (i.e. the 2001-2002 No Child Left Behind version of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary School Act) required that all students be “proficient” (i.e. on grade level in reading and math as defined by state standardized tests) by 2013-2014. When states did not meet this requirement, like one Board of Educ member said, it just isn’t possible…. they were to lose millions… hundreds of millions?? of federal dollars is my understanding,……but a deal was offered… if the State accepted Common Core, then they could be FORGIVEN by the Federal Dept of Education and not lose their hundreds of millions of dollars. That is why so many State Education Depts/BOEs (44 in all?) approved the common Core standards before or within days of the final draft of the Common Core standards being unveiled. Our county had to rewrite all K-12 math and language arts curriculum over a very short period of time. Typically they rewrite curriculum for 1 course/level over the summer… here the curriculum was being rewritten just weeks ahead of the teachers who needed and were actually teaching the new curriculum based on Common Core Standards.
6. Standardized testing… the new Federal law (i.e. Every Student Succeeds Act, the 2015 version of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary School Act, replacing the previous version…No Child Left Behind) had an amendment offered (the Tester Amendment, offered by Montana Democrat Senator Jon Tester) that would have allowed states the option to cut their standardized testing time and its COSTS in half… by allowing every other year standardized testing or even once in each level, elem, middle, high school. This amendment was defeated. Even worse, the new tests are not paper and pencil but taken on computers… the associated technology costs of capacity, computers, logistics, coordination to give 700-800 students a test on a computer over a short period of time…. absorbing so much time and energy from the school based staff and for what purpose?? state legislatures/ Dept of Eds/BOEs can influence and change what level is “passing” based on thin air… just like they have been doing for decades. All of that time and money for very little results….. unless you want to use it to “evaluate” teachers…. which of course it is fairly meaningless for, unless you test the same children at the start and end of the school year under the same teacher…. testing them from grade to grade like we are doing… you’re evaluating teachers based on who the kids had for a teacher the year before??? I’ve heard of classes where because of an ineffective teacher, 1/2 of the class failed the following year’s math class.
There seems to be no detail too small and no program too costly for a majority of our Federal and State elected officials and their appointees to influence and control.
The results are becoming more and more chaotic. In the past week, I’ve heard of 3 teacher interns who have chosen to take their first teaching job in private schools low paying, fewer benefits jobs, rather than work in one of the best school systems in the country.
We should cry for the potential we are losing from our children in public schools, especially from our disadvantaged children who are always the canaries in the coal mine when it comes to evaluating our Federal / State / County education policies.
I wish the Federal and State governments would just stop and spend a year or two undoing things, dropping things, taking costs off the table. Let the local school systems start to breathe again and see what miracles so many dedicated teachers and principals and parents can accomplish at the local school level.
The first rule of government should be to do no harm. The Federal and State role should be collaborative, research best practices, disseminate info and success stories for other local school systems to copy, let local school systems breathe… and let them use creativity, flexibility, and customization to their local needs to maximize the money they have to spend for the most benefits to their students. Every child gets only 1 shot at a K-12 education. It is worth every effort to make sure that 1 shot is the best that it can be.
Your statement “Every child gets only 1 shot at a K-12 education” breaks my heart when I think of the so many programs and charters and innovations which have been instigated in our district only to be suddenly discontinued or de-funded or shut down at the terrible expense of the children then left behind.
Part of what (government) ed reformers are doing when they make the argument that The People are abandoning public schools is dodging accountability for any role of government in public schools.
It’s not that the Obama Administration and other ed reformers in government encouraged and rewarded disinvestment in public systems in favor of new privatized systems, it’s that the “invisible hand of the marketplace” made public schools obsolete.
The People Have Spoken is a much better sales pitch than “a small group of us got together and decided to go in a different direction”. It’s also really helpful if there are unintended consequences. If there are failures or glitches or inequity, well, markets will solve that too.
I wonder at it sometimes because it’s as if these government people are talking themselves right out of any relevance at all. If it’s all just markets what do we need them for?
true dat
Democrats for Public Education hasn’t updated its site in more than a year. Ohio’s Ted Strickland, co-chairs DFPE. It’s just been announced that he is part of the newly-formed Ohio’s Leadership Council, working to elect Hillary in the Ohio primary.
I’m voting for Bernie.
And NO HILLARY 4 me. She’s another BIG DEFORMER. Look at her unsavory record of greed and deceit. And her daughter, Chelsea, is taking up the banner of lying with a straight face, just like her parents, the Billaries. Horrors.
Here in CHI town, we continue to be held hostage by Rahm and Rauner. Tomorrow I am going to get leaflets and info for Omar Aquino, a friend to CTU running for DEM primary march 15th because state senator Delgado is retiring. His opponent, Angelica Alfaro, was graduated from, and worked for, Noble Charter schools. One of these schools is named for Rauner. I hope to connect with my neighbors tomorrow by making the following points:
1. You understand that a large part of a community’s worth is based on the performance of the neighborhood public school. Home values are cemented with the integrity of the neighborhood public school. Are you willing to have that school closed?
2. This young lady’s pamphlet states that she is “progressive”. Do you think Rauner is progressive? Guess who is funding her campaign? That’s right, the very same people who fund her alma mater.
3. Now that we’ve established that she’s a rubber stamp for a madman governor, do you agree with Rauner’s idea that Chicago should abolish public schools altogether and set up a situation whereby many charter networks compete for prestige and tax dollars from an increasingly stingy state and federal government?
4. Are you aware that #3 would never come to fruition, as the natural sequence of corrupt capitalism means that a few charter operators would gobble up the competition and give Chicago residents absolutely no input on the education of their children? Do you think these operators might start charging tuition to supplement their tax income? Hint: the answer starts with a Y.
Maybe I’ll bring my 4-year-old with me so people don’t think I’m a complete nut.