Peter Cunningham was Arne Duncan’s spokesperson in the first Obama term. He was assistant secretary in charge of communications. I once heard him described as “Arne’s brain.” He now runs a billionaire-funded website called “Education Post,” which advances the “reform” agenda. .
Here is an interview with Peter, in which he expresses his view that public schools are on the way out and the public is turning its back on them, preferring charter schools, home schooling, and vouchers. His answer: more accountability. I guess that means more testing. But when everyone takes the same tests, the public schools usually outperform the students in charter schools and voucher schools.
Since public education is an integral part of a democratic society, I am not sure what he is suggesting or why he thinks it is a good thing for people to turn towards privatization. Privatization produces inequality; it produces segregation; it produces some excellence and some squalor and plenty of mediocrity. The real problem is that we have an inward turning society of deepening inequality where it is every man, woman, and child for him/herself. We lack visionary leadership. We lack the kind of leaders who would call upon the better angels of our nature and inspire us to pursue the common good instead of our own self-interest.

Short-Sighted Self-Interest …
LikeLike
It seems as though Peter’s Twitter feed doesn’t have dozens and dozens of pictures of today’s Walk-In event. Mine does.
I have come to the conclusion that Peter Cunningham, well-meaning though he may be, is deluded.
LikeLike
So-called education reformers are about as far from well-meaning as one can get.
Don’t be taken in by their vapid and deceptive rhetoric; instead, look at their actions: these people are about money, control and nothing else.
LikeLike
It times of stress and insecurity people have a choice between turning toward one another for strength and common struggle or instead against one another for survival. The promoters of the latter are either hopelessly cynical or simply trying to protect their own privilege. Every advance for economic or social justice has been through the optimism of unity across differences. The setbacks come through angry pessimism of disunity.
http://www.arthurcamins.com
LikeLike
He’s a PR and marketing person. He uses numbers to promote charters and private schools, but omits the public school student number (because it’s much higher).
Funnily enough, the public agency where he was on the payroll before he got this lucrative charter promotion gig collects that data, so people don’t have to be misled by promoters and pro-privatization spin:
:http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372
How hostile to public schools IS the Obama Administration that even when former employees leave they all take jobs denigrating public schools and promoting charters and vouchers?
Is this the official position of the Obama Administration and the US Department of Education? That public schools are in decline and it’s time to throw in the towel and go to a completely privatized system? That’s interesting. I didn’t hear any of that from the President and “team” when they campaigned in Ohio. Were voters misled?
I’m not clear why I’m paying a huge group of public employees in DC to oppose public schools. Maybe they should all follow this guy and get on the Gates payroll and off of the public payroll. Maybe we can hire some people who actually support public schools.
LikeLike
With Obama actions speak so much louder than words with regard to charters.
LikeLike
He runs a billionaire funded website that advances education reform. So he says the public is rejecting public schools! The public isn’t rejecting public schools, business men are so they can make money. Did he ask two billionaires their opinions and use those statistics to prove this? (100% of those asked reject public education.) Even if the majority of the public did reject public schools, a public education is a right – not a arbitrary provision that can be eradicated and then sold back to the highest bidder.
LikeLike
Like all ed reform sites. his is 90% charters and 10% testing of public school students.
Reading ed reform sites, one would think public schools are already gone. The schools 90% of kids attend are rarely mentioned, except for endless discussions of how to “assess” public school children and rank schools.
I wouldn’t want to attend a public school either reading ed reformers. It’s a ludicrously biased view, which would be okay if all of them were lobbyists, but they’re not. Half of them are like this guy- they move in and out of government.
LikeLike
Actually I didn’t say that privatization is a good or bad thing. I simply pointed out that it’s happening and we should think about why. When people are choosing alternatives to the traditional public school system, they are sending all of us a message that they want to see something different. We can debate what the difference should be — as we do — but they clearly don’t want things to stay the same. If they did, they would stay.
LikeLike
Peter,
People are “choosing” …
No, PETER the game is being rigged.
Here’s an article from Mark Naison where Naison says that in New York City, parents “choose” …
… “not because of the inherent superiority of charter schools — but because the Bloomberg Administration rigged the game by giving huge preference to charter schools — both substantively and symbolically — and by using charters not as a strategy to improve public education in the city, but as a wedge to privatize it and to smash the influence of the city’s teachers union.
” .. ”
“What occurred was a “tale of two school systems” within inner-city neighborhoods — one favored, given preferential access to scare resources…hailed as the “savior” of inner-city youth…the others demonized, stigmatized, deprived of resources, threatened with closure and deluged with students that charter schools did not want.
“If you were a parent, which school would you want to send your child to?
“But what happens when the game is no longer rigged? When charter schools have to pay rent? When they can’t push out ELL and special-needs students? When facilities in co-located schools are fairly distributed? When schools are no longer given letter grades and threatened with closing, but are given added resources when they serve students with greater needs? When universities and community organizations are encouraged to start innovative public schools…not just create charters?
“If all those things happen — and I expect that some of them will during the next few years of a de Blasio/Farina Department of Education — then public schools in the inner city will gradually improve…charters in those neighborhoods will become less selective…and students, on the whole, will have enhanced choice and opportunity because there will be more good schools in the city.
“The current hunger to enroll students in charter schools is understandable, given the policies pursued by the Bloomberg Administration, but those policies, which undermined public education, did not enhance opportunity for all students, and pitted parent against parent and school against school in a competition for scarce resources.”
———————————-
Here’s Naison whole article:
———————–
Charter School Growth, Bloomberg Style, Creates Dilemma for the de Blasio Administration- A Special Report to BK Nation
January 31, 2014
2 inShare3
Charter School in Hawaii
By Dr. Mark Naison
In today’s New York Post, an article appeared claiming that charter-school applications in New York City were 56 percent ahead of what they were at this time last year…putting pressure on the de Blasio administration to re-evaluate its efforts to slow charter expansion.
Those numbers are REAL. They reflect the desperation of inner-city and working-class parents who hope to find high-performing, safe schools for their children and see charters as the best hope for that.
However, they are making that judgment, based on what they observe in their own neighborhoods — not because of the inherent superiority of charter schools — but because the Bloomberg Administration rigged the game by giving huge preference to charter schools — both substantively and symbolically — and by using charters not as a strategy to improve public education in the city, but as a wedge to privatize it and to smash the influence of the city’s teachers union.
The challenge of the de Blasio Administration is see what happens when the competition is even, and when public schools are given the resources, encouragement and support that charters were given in the Bloomberg years. When and if that happens, the demand for charters is likely to decrease as parents see public schools in their neighborhood improve dramatically and innovative new public schools open in their neighborhoods.
Under the Bloomberg Administration — aided and abetted by police systems of the state and federal departments of education — charter schools were consciously selected over public schools as the preferred alternative when low-performing public schools were closed. This preference was manifested in several important ways:
• Charters were given facilities in public schools rent-free.
• In schools where they were co-located with public schools, the charters were given preferential access to auditoriums, gymnasiums, laboratories, and often put in the most desirable locations in the buildings.
• Although charters selected their students by lottery, they were allowed to weed out students who had disciplinary problems, or who performed poorly on standardized tests. As a result, according to Ben Chapman of the Daily News, only six percent of charter students are ELL students and nine percent are special-needs students…far lower than the city average for public schools.
• When you count space, charters received more city funding than public schools, and when you add to that private contributions that they solicited, charters spent significantly more per student than public schools.
• Community organizations and universities willing to start new schools were encouraged by the NYC Department of Education to start charter schools rather than public schools.
These preferences had an absolutely devastating effect on inner city public schools, which were in the same neighborhood as the charters. In the case of schools who had charter co-location, it led to humiliating exclusion from school facilities that they once had access to, leaving their students starved of essential resources. But in the case of all inner-city public schools, it led to a drain of high- performing students, whose parents put them in charters, and an influx of ELL students, special-needs students and students pushed out of charters for disciplinary problems–taxing those schools’ resources and making it much more difficult for them to perform well on standardized tests. The school-closing policies of the Bloomberg Administration added to the stress on those already hard-pressed schools, forcing their staffs to work under the threat of closure and of exile to the infamous “rubber room” for teachers.
What occurred was a “tale of two school systems” within inner-city neighborhoods — one favored, given preferential access to scare resources…hailed as the “savior” of inner-city youth…the others demonized, stigmatized, deprived of resources, threatened with closure and deluged with students that charter schools did not want.
If you were a parent, which school would you want to send your child to?
But what happens when the game is no longer rigged? When charter schools have to pay rent? When they can’t push out ELL and special-needs students? When facilities in co-located schools are fairly distributed? When schools are no longer given letter grades and threatened with closing, but are given added resources when they serve students with greater needs? When universities and community organizations are encouraged to start innovative public schools…not just create charters?
If all those things happen — and I expect that some of them will during the next few years of a de Blasio/Farina Department of Education — then public schools in the inner city will gradually improve…charters in those neighborhoods will become less selective…and students, on the whole, will have enhanced choice and opportunity because there will be more good schools in the city.
The current hunger to enroll students in charter schools is understandable, given the policies pursued by the Bloomberg Administration, but those policies, which undermined public education, did not enhance opportunity for all students, and pitted parent against parent and school against school in a competition for scarce resources.
The de Blasio policy of restoring public schools to public favor is a sound one, and should be pursued carefully, humanely, and with respect for the hunger of parents and students of New York City for outstanding educational options.
—————-
Oh and another thing, here’s the top comment to the above piece, from Hunter College’s Kari Steeves on the recent, sneaky methods that charter advocates are further ramping up the “rigging of the system” against traditional public schools, and in favor charters:
KARI STEEVES: (CAPS mine, Jack)
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Mr. Naison,
I deeply appreciate your analysis and agree with it wholeheartedly. But I would respectfully propose that you’ve missed a crucial component of WHY charter applications may be up this year.. “Kindergarten Connect,” the online kindergarten application the Bloomberg administration rushed into place this fall, FUNNELS FAMILIES TO CHARTERS
Families CANNOT GO THROUGH ANY OTHER VENUE THAN “KC”, even though the applications are in English only. FAMILIES MAY NOT GO THEIR LOCAL SCHOOLS AND FILL OUT A PAPER APPLICATION, AS THEY COULD LAST YEAR. It’s been a real hardship for the many families who do not own computers or have no internet access.
But more to the point, “KC” FEATURES A LINK DIRECTLY TO THE CHARTER APPLICATION, and conveniently, charter schools moved up their application time to match the opening of “KC” (possibly another reason they didn’t have as many applicants last year: they weren’t taking applications this early!).
The charter application deadline, however, is in April, whereas the public deadline is passed. If you missed it, who knows what school the DoE will assign your child. If you want a choice besides the ONE seat “Kindergarten Connect” will deliver you, YOU -MUST- APPLY TO A CHARTER. Families can no longer receive offers from more than one public school of choice. They rank schools and hope for good luck in the lottery.
So many more families will apply to charters as a back-up. Also, word on the street is the HeadStart programs ARE VIGOROUSLY PUSHING THE CHARTER OPTION, and given the reduction in public choice with “KC”, I can’t blame them.
Lastly, Vanguard, the company providing the software for “Kindergarten Connect” (with access to all K family contact information) USES THE CONTACT INFO THAT THEY GATHER FROM THEIR CONTRACT WITH THE D.O.E. TO SEND MARKETING ON BEHALF OF CHARTER SCHOOL CLIENTS. Kindie families (families with Kindergarten-age children? Jack.), because of “KC,” can now enjoy the barrage of glossy brochures most of them had to wait until summer to receive.
“Kindergarten Connect” WAS BLOOMBERG’S PARTING GIFT TO THE CHARTER INDUSTRY.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Here’s the link to the original piece:
http://bknation.org/2014/01/charter-school-growth-bloomberg-style-creates-dilemma-de-blasio-administration-special-report-bk-nation/
————————–
Here’s a parent pissed off about this:
Dora: “AH! So very wrong! I wondered how they got my address. The glossy charter brochures I received went straight in the trash.”
————————-
Dora’s comment is in the COMMENTS section HERE:
LikeLike
It;s funny you’re promoting the (false) idea that “half” the kids in public schools don’t graduate when the Obama Administration points to increased graduation rates to claim success:
“We are really frustrated with schools where half the kids don’t graduate. We are frustrated with schools where there’s no AP. We’re frustrated with schools that don’t get kids into college. We’re frustrated with schools that send kids to college and find out they need remedial education.”
LikeLike
Another thing, Peter. Out here in Los Angeles, our school board elections are basically referendums on whether or not the public wants to keep traditional public schools, or convert over to private charter management.
Here’s a recap:
In 2011, 30-year teacher Bennett Kayser won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2013, 17-year teacher Steve Zimmer won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2013, 13-year teacher Monica Ratliff won, despite being outspent 42-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2014, teacher & principal George McKenna won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2015, teacher & principal Scott Schmerelson won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
Eli and the billionaire privatizers—who fund Peter Cunningham’s EDUCATION POST website, by the way— lose again and again at the polls
The voters-citizens-taxpayers have spoken loud and clear that they do not want their schools privatized, and that they want the the corporate privatizers’ backed by money-motivated, predatory billionaires to get the-hell out of, and stay the-hell out of LAUSD.
Undaunted at all his candidates losing, Billionaire Eli Broad others announced that he was pumping $1/2 billion dollars into charter expansion in Los Angeles… even though the voters have vehemently rejected this:
The arrogant attitude of Broad, Gates, the Waltons, etc. is…
“Elections schm-elections… school boards, schm-ool boards…
“At the end of the day, we really don’t give a sh#% what the citizens, the parents, and the taxpayers want. If we can’t buy control of the the board via the election process, we’re still gonna shove money-motivated privatization and charterization down the public’s throats whether they want it or not.
“So those unwashed masses should just shut up and accept it!”
LikeLike
Peter, I would trust you far more if you were interested in how many of those students whose parents choose Success Academy actually remain at the school. The ONLY data that would tell us that is looking at each individual Success Academy school to see how many of the lottery-winning Kindergarten parents who sit in a meeting that tells them all that will be demanded of them and still sign a contract and enroll their child actually KEEP their child in the school until 5th grade. Why hide that?
In July 2015, the NYC Independent Budget Office did exactly this longitudinal study of 53 charter schools — including 4 Success Academy schools — looking how how the entering Kindergarten class fared over the next 5 years. Were they taught? Or did they disappear? It turns out 49.5% of those entering Kindergarteners left by 5th grade. The data for the 4 Success Academy schools was hidden so we don’t know whether this supposedly extremely popular and very well-funded charter school offering the best education money can buy lost MORE of their starting Kindergarten class by 5th grade than the other charters in that study. You would certainly assume that very few parents would leave. Unless, of course, their kids were not up to snuff and treated in the manner we see the MODEL Success Academy teacher treats the struggling children. Or perhaps suspended at age 5 and 6 like over 20% of the 5 and 6 year olds at some schools. Can you imagine if OVER 50% of the starting Kindergarten class at some Success Academy schools left? Would be shocked? Or would you just say, “as long as some other parent — with a much more academic student – takes their place, I don’t really care why so many other parents leave.” Unfortunately, I suspect you are among the pro-charter folks who don’t give a darn about the kids who leave and why. I certainly haven’t heard you express one word of curiosity as to why so many didn’t make it – is it that you don’t think they matter?
The measure of a charter school should NOT be how well they educate the most compliant children who are able to grasp educational concepts quickly. The measure of a charter school should be how they teach the children who DON’T grasp those concepts quickly and struggle to learn. The fact that you don’t realize this, and think that as long as “some” kids are treated well, it’s fine to use fake “discipline” and humiliation tactics to encourage the rest to leave, is pretty repellent for someone who says he cares about education.
You have a chance to change this perception. Demand data and see exactly how many Kindergarten children who win the lottery remain at Success Academy schools until 4th and 5th grade. See if more boys of color leave than affluent middle class children whose parents are college educated. Compare the schools — are more kids suspended and is attrition higher at Success Academy Harlem 1 (predominantly low-income children of color) than at Success Academy Upper West (predominantly white and affluent). Funny, since they are in the SAME school district. And compare Success Academy’s attrition rate with other CHARTER schools and find out if they lose far more children and who those children they lose are. And if so, ask yourself why?
But if you continue to offer platitudes instead of any willingness to do a REAL close look at the data of who leaves and who stays and why, then you just look like an apologist. And what you are apologizing for is this: Your racist belief that you NEED to treat young children of color like this in order to give them a good education. That they can’t learn without being shamed and humiliated. I hope that isn’t what you believe. And if you ever bother to look at the real data of how many of the children who win the first K lottery — not the ones who join an older grade after being “tested” to see if they can join their class — remain in the school and actually GET to 4th or 5th grade.
You keep quoting that 11,000 students’ families are happy. 1% of all public schools students is a TINY number and explains why it is so easy to pick and choose among the kids. Notice that Ms. Moskowitz wanted to open more schools in District 2 (very wealthy) than she did in Districts in the Bronx and Harlem where her wait lists are the longest! What kind of school reformer would not go where there is the most desire for her schools and instead would go where there is the least? What kind of school reformer would go to those wealthy districts and promptly drop lottery priority for low-income kids to make sure the affluent parents aren’t shut out by all those desperate kids on out of district wait lists who don’t even have a chance to attend until every child who can afford to live in more expensive neighborhoods turns them down?
How about you look at Ms. Moskowitz’ actions instead of her words? Then you might understand why parents who don’t have the same agenda you seem to have wonder why you are so desperate to enable to keep doing exactly what she is doing.
LikeLike
You are either really stupid or really disingenuous – which do you prefer? You advocate policies that pull funding from public schools and turn them into joyless, stressful, “no excuses” drill-and-kill test prep factories lacking resources for anything other than testing and edtech and then you wonder why people are turning away from public schools?
BTW, if you’re offended by “stupid” or “disingenuous”, there are many other choices I could offer. But Diane won’t let me print them on her blog.
LikeLike
Cunningham,
The oligarchs’ plot against public education, degrades the sacrifices that have been made for American democracy, over the past 250+ years. Lincoln warned us, of the ever present threat, of the divine right of kings, embodied in the plans of Bill Gates and his co-conspirators.
I, and, many faceless people like me, pay our debt to those who have sacrificed for the nation, by working diligently every day. We expose the manipulators, like you, who seek to spread the colonialism, exemplified in for-profit Bridge International Academies.
If a majority of Americans knew of the 2014 summons, from Frederick Hess and Taryn Hochleitner (external affairs manager of the Gates-funded Data Quality Campaign), to takeover university departments of education, the level of the public’s anger would scare you.
You may not hear the hoof beats in the distance. I hear them, and they are growing louder.
LikeLike
Jack- Thanks for your informed response. You should send a copy to DeBlaisio. I had no idea that NYC kindergarten students were being funneled into “Kindergarten Connect.” Do they even have proof that this is a valid approach for early children? Based on what I know about child development, it sounds like an irresponsible idea. The partiality shown toward charters in unjustified in terms of the results they obtain. To me it shows when you let the “market decide,” they rig the game so the market prevails. Then, they hijack any presumption of “choice.” Charter schools are no better than vampire schools that such the life’s blood out of public education. The leadership of the city and the schools are to blame for this undemocratic situation, not parents.
LikeLike
“When people are choosing alternatives to the traditional public school system, they are sending all of us a message that they want to see something different. We can debate what the difference should be — as we do — but they clearly don’t want things to stay the same. If they did, they would stay.”
On the other hand, people are also declining to choose alternatives to the traditional public school system, and sending all of us a message that they don’t want to see something different. If they wanted something different, they would leave.
And back again on the first hand, attrition figures suggest that people are also choosing alternatives to charter schools their children formerly attended. Presumably they’re sending all of us a message that they want to see something different. We can debate what the difference should be, but they clearly don’t want to stay in the charter schools they left. If they did, they would have stayed.
There are probably a bunch of other messages that people are sending us when they do the things they do.
LikeLike
Agnostic in words.
Bitterly partisan in actions.
Perhaps some homegrown talent can explain why:
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
Upton Sinclair had it right.
😎
P.S. According to the usual unconfirmed rumors, it pays wells to defend multibillionaires from feeling swarmed.
LikeLike
Peter,
Charters have expanded because of millions spent on marketing to sell parents a choice that is all too often worse than their public schools. How many hundreds of millions or billions have been wasted on charters that close or never open and on vouchers to fundamentalist church schools?
LikeLike
Diane-Public schools are ill prepared to enter into any type of marketing competition. The premise of public schools is based on community support for the common good. As such, public schools have no marketing tools, staff or budget. In public schools the budget is reserved for instruction as the main focus. They cannot go out and “beat the bushes” or hire spin doctors, nor should they have to. The type of funneling of students into charters described by Jack is unethical to me. How can public schools compete fairly when a large portion of the budget has gone to charters, yet the most difficult, expensive students remain in large classes and a bare bones budget? This is a totally discriminatory practice, paid for by public dollars.
LikeLike
A few years ago, the NY Times had a front page article about Success Academy’s marketing campaign in Harlem. SA spent $325,000 on intense marketing to draw children from the local public school. The local public school had $500 to print flyers and posters.
LikeLike
dianeravitch: public schools thoughtlessly throw away grand sums like $500 while classroom necessities go unmet whilst that $325,000—
Look, adults in advertising have bills to pay too. And I bet many of them have the added burden of paying for private schools for their children. It’s a dog-eat-dog world out there and somebody’s children have to be winners.
Charters and rheephorm and privatization—it’s all about the kids.
Just not the vast majority aka OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN.
😎
LikeLike
Some people ARE NOT CHOOSING CHARTERS – they are not given a choice when their pubic schools are arbitrarily shuttered and replaced with charters – like Newark, NJ, where the One Newark app was employed to force people into charters. Please.
LikeLike
Can public schools get a fair hearing in the Obama Administration when the people who worked there have such a relentlessly negative opinion of public schools?
How widespread is the anti-public school sentiment in that administration, when the moment they leave there they all take jobs promoting charters and vouchers?
LikeLike
Chicago is losing population. The district is losing students, more so as it closes 50 schools in poor neighborhoods. And it continues to add charters.
It places charters where they will draw students from the public school.
Engineered demand.
LikeLike
Cunningham says he keeps an open mind. “I think that there’s a lot of common ground between those on the reform side and those who are opposed to reform,” he explains.
We don’t give a shit what you THINK.
“We are really frustrated with schools where half the kids don’t graduate. We are frustrated with schools where there’s no AP. We’re frustrated with schools that don’t get kids into college. We’re frustrated with schools that send kids to college and find out they need remedial education.”
The source of your FRUSTRATION must be your IGNORANCE of the root causes and underlying problems.
Do you really think that teachers and administrators are preventing their students from graduating are purposefully inhibiting their academic progress? Are they intentionally limiting their opportunities? Or are they simply constrained by the realities of children raised in quagmire of hopelessness produced by generational poverty.
“I say this is why we need accountability. We need accountability to be able to make the case that we’re getting results, and without accountability you can’t go to Springfield or state capitals around the country and say, “Listen, we’re doing the right stuff here for kids. You’ve got to do a better job of funding us.”
You and your beloved reform movement has used test-based accountability for 15 years. And by your very own metric (using tests to raise test scores), test-and-punish reform has FAILED.
Like all edu-fakers, Cunning ham is not only clueless, but is more than proud to display it through garbage interviews like this.
The fog of endless testing has not inspired one child break the cycle of poverty and dependence Mr. Cunningham. So take your endless litany of bullshit into some other field where the harm you and your fellow reformers inflict is not on innocent children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is what the advertising industry does — it pretends everyone wants what it is trying to sell.
The more public education is commercialized, the more public money will be spent on commercials instead of education.
LikeLike
It’s really a shame current and former public employees are engaged in it, though.
Joke’s on us, huh? Here I thought they were in the business of improving public schools. Actually, they are working as hard as they can to eradicate them.
You have to burn down the village to save it, or something.
LikeLike
in my neighborhood, there are lots of families who’ve never considered anything but public schools. and so the local public school serves those families, some of them homeless, some immigrants, some from affluent families who want their kids walking to a neighborhood school. Those who work in this public school serve heroically, pinch-hitting for the lost resources, amid a crumbling infrastructure and an impossibly difficult common core curricula. how dare you rich democratic appointees opt out of public schools and then say the public’s rejecting them? looking at you, peter arne john.
LikeLike
I reject Pete Cunningham.
LikeLike
I wish I believed there was a choice at the national level, but I don’t. The fact is, as far as public schools, you’re getting the same group of people and the same zeal for privatization whether it’s Clinton or Rubio or Kasich.
Obama’s ed approach is identical to that of John Kasich and Clinton won’t be any different. They’re hard-wired for privatization in DC. It’s both Parties and it’s all of them.
I think it’s worthwhile to accept that and go into this with eyes open. If nothing else we won’t feel tricked and misled, which judging by the rise of Trump and Sanders, is a fairly common sentiment.
LikeLike
Chiara,
Also disturbing is that public figures who attended public schools have “the zeal for privatization.” Cory Booker attended public schools in Harrington Park and Northern Valley Reg’l (cushy) districts yet he wanted to make Newark a “charter capital.”
LikeLike
He’s going to be in my neck of the woods spinning the narrative around the Zuckerberg money for Newark schools and ‘the concepts of “common ground” and “common good”.’ How much do you want to bet that he is planning his run for higher office in the future? The fact that he was a Rhodes scholar and played football at Stanford plays really big in my neck of the woods. This information comes from the Family Action Network in the suburbs of Chicago if anyone wants to follow up on it.
LikeLike
Public school parents in Boston protest budget cuts:
http://www.boston.com/news/education/2016/02/17/boston-public-school-parents-teachers-protest-budget-cuts/zvQ06uY1SFc01I8STeQ70M/story.html?utm_content=bufferbd3aa&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Too bad no one from the Obama Administration can ever find time to act as advocates for the schools that actually exist.
LikeLike
My friends are leaving public schools because the schools are continuously underfunded. They are leaving public schools because there is no time for art or music. They are leaving because PTAs have to fund science labs. They are leaving public schools because engineers are being told that they “just don’t understand math” when questioning ridiculous Common Core math problems. They are leaving public schools because the asinine pressure of testing is creating anxiety disorders in nine year-olds! They are leaving because high stakes and high pressure are leaving our children with no time to play outside, due to excessive homework.
The irony is that Peter Cunningham, Arne Duncan, Bill Gates, Barak Obama, et al. created this situation. They subjected these students to this nonsense while keeping their children entirely out of it.
Then to point out that people are fleeing the exact situation “you” created is disingenuous at best, complete and total hypocrisy at worst.
LikeLike
Jill S:
A sober and realistic recap of what is happening and who is making it happen.
Thank you for keeping it real.
Not rheeal.
😎
LikeLike
Right ON, Jill S.
LikeLike
Reminds me of Trent Lott’s lawncare approach to Iraq: “Mow it down.”
Or Nelson Muntz’s “Nuke the Whales” poster. “Gotta nuke something.”
LikeLike
Here’s the actual ed reform record on “support for public schools”
“Most states provide less support per student for elementary and secondary schools — in some cases, much less — than before the Great Recession, our survey of state budget documents over the last three months finds. Worse, some states are still cutting eight years after the recession took hold.”
They’re either the world’s lousiest (paid) advocates or they’re simply not much interested in improving existing public schools. They’ve not only NOT helped public schools, they’ve actually gone backward. Public schools were in better shape the day this President took office than they are now.
http://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/most-states-have-cut-school-funding-and-some-continue-cutting
LikeLike
Chiara-Thank you for the realities of public school spending, not the hype. Governors,influenced by charter lobbyists, continue to slash public school budgets. Some of them slashed so much funding in 2008 that they act like they are giving public schools a bonus when they are really making a modest restoration of lost funds. The general public should understand what these tainted governors and legislatures are doing. Also, in Florida Scott announced huge increases in “public school spending” which actually means that a disproportionate amount was headed to “public charters,”not genuine public schools.
LikeLike
Chiara- Thanks for this important link. Everyone should read it!
LikeLike
“The real problem is that we have an inward turning society of deepening inequality where it is every man, woman, and child for him/herself. We lack visionary leadership. We lack the kind of leaders who would call upon the better angels of our nature and inspire us to pursue the common good instead of our own self-interest.”
H-m-m-m-m.
Sounds so much like a candidate I know and support . . . .
WHAT a coincidence.
LikeLike
Michael Moore makes the same compelling point in his superb new movie, “Where to Invade Next”.
LikeLike
I am always bothered by Journalists that don’t check facts. Mr Cunningham’s numbers seem to be factual if rounded to the nearest million. A quick check of the relevant data shows the rounded to the nearest 100,000 only about 9.2 million k-12 students are enrolled in charter, private and home schools. The relevant numbers for 2007 add up to about 9 million. This overall growth rate 2%, roughly matches the growth of public school enrollment.
In my neck of the woods, Detroit, public schools in the city have been almost destroyed, and low income district in SE Michigan have been forced to close, due to a combination of population loss, charters, and state intervention.
The biggest losers in this fight (?) seem to be private schools. National data shows decreased enrollment from 2007 of about 1.5 million. Private schools in Detroit have lost a larger proportional enrollment, than have the public schools.
Just looking at the numbers, about 20% of parents seem to be dissatisfied with their local district. This number does not seem to have changed in the last 10 years; only their options.
LikeLike
Please don’t confuse Cunningham with a journalist.
LikeLike
The visionary leadership potential we do have gets muddied with politics and philanthropy.
LikeLike
I’m with you there Robert!
LikeLike
Goes deeper than Cunningham’s criticism. According to the platform of the Libertarian campaign of David Koch and Richard Scaife going back to the 1980s: public schools should be abolished, also minimum wage and child labor laws. Check Jane Mayer’s book, “Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the use of the Radical Right.”
LikeLike
The Center for Media and Democracy reported that “National School Choice Week” was promoted by ALEC and State Policy Network, which are funded by the Koch Bros.
LikeLike
Is Peter Cunningham ignoring the annual pdk poll from Pew and Gallup?
64% of Americans have trust and confidence in public school teachers.
61% are opposed to using test results in teacher evaluations.
77% want teachers to be helped in their ablity to teach.
Only 24% thought performing well on standards tests would help students get good jobs.
60% of Americans were opposed to using Common Core State Standards.
56% want local school boards to have the greatest influence on what public schools teach
63% oppose vouchers
And it was obvious that most Americans do not know that most of the publicly funded, private sector, opaque, and autocratic corporate charter schools are Not better than pubic schools.
54% think public charters schools are better, but does the public know the difference between charter school that operate as part of a community based, transparent, democratic, non-profit public school district and publicly funded, opaque, autocratic, private sector charter schools?
41% felt public schools were better or no difference and 5% didn’t know.
http://pdkintl.org/programs-resources/poll/
LikeLike
Hope wiser people prevail.
LikeLike
The Obama Administration hires all turn out for invitation-only ed reform events.
Let’s see if any of them show up for this:
“Parents, teachers, children and community members rallied in support of public education at schools across the country Wednesday morning, many of them calling for more funding and less testing.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2016/02/17/parents-teachers-and-children-rally-for-public-education-at-hundreds-of-schools-nationwide/?postshare=9461455731106248&tid=ss_tw&utm_content=bufferb4807&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Did any politicians show up? They all supposedly support public schools, or that’s what they say when they’re campaigning.
LikeLike
I have a hunch that his statement of people turning their backs on public schools and preferring charters and vouchers is just that reformy rhetoric double-speak they are so good at. Like Eva Moskowitz standing behind a sign that reads “STOP BASHING TEACHERS” when she is the queen of bashing public schools, and public school teachers. They try to turn their nonsense around. As Michael Jackson sang “be careful what you do because the lie becomes the truth” and the reformers put out false perceptions that they hope catch fire. I think at this point you have to live under a rock to believe their nonsense.
I’m sure I’ve written this before, but I had a conversation with a Kmart security guard, in Belleville, NJ, whose daughter was sent to a charter in Newark. It was not her choice. Her daughter hated it, she hated it, and she was going to move out of Newark, nearer to her job in Belleville, and put her kid in public school in her new neighborhood. Now, I don’t know anything about the Belleville public schools versus Newark public schools except that the neighborhoods in Belleville have less murders, while Newark seems to have shootings weekly. That alone should cause someone to move to a safer neighborhood and/or town for the sake of their child. Meanwhile, the politicians do NOTHING to mke Newark safer, but they keep opening charter schools and further deteriorating neighborhoods. They open places like Prudential THE ROCK arenas, NJPAC arenas, or Bears Stadiums in the name of bringing jobs and revenue, but the jobs are minimum wage part time without benefits type jobs, and no one wants to go visit Newark after dark. When the sun goes down, the crime goes up. Two men from Kearny went to a Britney Spears concert and were badly beaten by a gang of GIRLS at 11pm. No one stopped to help the men or break up the beat down.
Unless and until towns like Newark deal with the poverty and crime, siphoning dollars from the public schools into the hands of privatizers/profitizers and calling it progress will suffice for the people who profit off of reform – the builders getting tax breaks, the charter school owners, TFA. OMG, Teacher’s Village on Broad Street – give me a break. What a coup for the builders and TFA that was.
LikeLike
I like the term the common good. My 7 second graders, all with ieps, will receive scholar certificates tomorrow for A’s and B’s. Not because they are the best of everyone, but because with all their accommodations and prompting, they do try. So, for their own egos and their parents’ egos, I made sure they earned those 100s. Smiles will abound and maybe, just maybe, they will feel good about school.
LikeLike
I get really annoyed by comments about “small” reductions in school budgets. Never mind that librarians, counselors, art, music, paraprofessionals,…have already been cut. Never mind that toilet paper is doled out by a dispenser at the entrance to the bathroom. Never mind that water fountains have buckets under them or don’t function at all. I shudder to think what some schools look like. This one has some outside support. If it didn’t, I’m sure they would be on the hit list for turnover to a charter. The school is well run by a strong principal and a dedicated staff, but their scores will lag behind those of wealthier neighborhoods. Anyone who thinks test scores describe this school or its students don’t know what they are talking about.
LikeLike