Howard Blume of the Los Angeles Times reports on a controversial decision to grant a renewal to a charter school owned by one of the elected board members, even though the charter division of the school district said its performance was so poor that it did not deserve renewal. The owner of the charter, Ref Rodriguez, recused himself from the vote. As usual, the room was packed with charter students and staff, demanding renewal of a failing school, and they won.
There are more charters in Los Angeles than in any other district, and an independent panel of experts recently warned that charter growth could threaten the solvency of L.A. Unified.
Most charters are non-union, and charter critics include unions. They say that charters serve fewer students who are more challenging and expensive to educate.
Charter advocates include well-heeled foundations and donors, who say continued, rapid charter expansion will improve the education system.
The big charter winner on Tuesday was Partnerships to Uplift Communities, more commonly known as PUC Schools.
PUC overcame the opposition of the charter division, which said its standard review showed that, based on academic performance, PUC’s Excel Charter Academy fell far short of deserving a five-year extension.
Excel supporters — about 140 packed the board room and waited until well after dark to be heard — put forward other statistics that painted a better picture of the middle school in Lincoln Heights.
They also presented testimonials from students, parents, teachers and administrators. Such presentations have become a regular and lengthy ritual when the fate of a charter comes before the school board.
Meanwhile, the members of United Teachers of Los Angeles voted to increase their union dues to fight the billionaire-funded effort to gobble up more and more public schools and turn them into non-union charters.
Sarah Angel, a spokesperson for the California Charter School Association, criticized the union for amassing a “war chest” to fight back against the charter invasion. She said the union was being divisive.
She said:
“UTLA is going to amass the war chest that they feel that they need,” said the California Charter Schools Association’s Sarah Angel. “But I think all of us in public education: moms, dads, teachers, principals, and board members need to be focused on the number one priority which is educating kids and how we do that better, how do we improve outcomes, raise children out of poverty, get them to graduation, college, and career. That needs to be our number one focus, not raising money, not fighting each other.”
In other words, don’t fight the charter takeover of public schools. Let them privatize half the district, the entire district. Don’t resist. I recall that when I wrote an op ed for the LA Times supporting public schools, it was the same Sarah Angel who called me “divisive.” It seems the only way to be a uniter is to support Eli Broad’s program of privatization.

Not one LA Board member asked, what happens when the oligarchs pull the funding from charter schools? Not one asked, if the ultimate goal of privatization is the for-profit model of Bridge International Academies? Not one asked, about the impact of charter schools on democracy?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems one more rigged day at the LAUSD BoE. With the bussed in inner city shills allowed more than a fair share of time to protest and support their master puppeteers, Eli Broad and Ref Rodriguez, and laud in Spanish and in English, the 16 PUC charter schools of multi millionaire Ref Rodriguez, despite the LAUSD and State of
Ca. reports and investigations showing financial and academic failures.
My confidence in the recent momentary reports that the Board was going to stand stronger against the continued onslaught of Broad’s and his partners and his minions plan to takeover the district for privatization, was dashed, and i was brought back to the reality of who runs the LAUSD BoE.
It should not shock me after all these years of bias and mendacity to see the power players continue to reign over the school board…but it does. There seems to be no way to stop all this orchestrated street drama by Broad and his cronies who are now partnered with their representative on the Board…Ref Rodriguez.
And to have to hear from the twisted Angel woman repeatedly telling the same Third Reich-like mendacious reports, is a travesty. And to know that her pal and supporter, Jose Gutierrez-Cole, a close associate of CCSA and of charter profiteer and BoE member Ref Rodriguez, is the overseer of LAUSD charters, paid by taxpayers…is truly obscene.
LikeLike
typo…Cole-Gutierrez
LikeLike
Do you think they might be getting money from the CCSA and their allies, Linda?
LikeLike
mykeyd1,
I know the L. A. board members degrade every sacrifice, made for American democracy, over the past 250+ years, when they shill for the oligarchs.
Lincoln warned us of the persistent threat that oligarchs would be to us. Recently, a Facebook board member falsely claimed colonialism had benefitted India. His post, reflected anger at an Indian regulatory decision against monopoly business practices, by western corporations. That Board member made it clear that Silicon Valley has every intent to supplant democracy.
LikeLike
Who in their right mind would set out today in a career in education to become a charter school teacher? Why in the world anyone spend years and fortunes getting a Masters degree to then get a low paying, high risk, non-unionized job where they are constantly ridiculed, reprimanded, disrespected, and evaluated in order to do what the public schools have always done better. In the end, when the charter system topples under the weight of itself and fails the students, the teacher will only be told that it is their fault. Why? If one truly wants to serve young people then they’d do a better service by staying as far away from this farce as possible.
LikeLike
And topple it will.
LikeLike
Well, I certainly wouldn’t have if conditions had been the same back in the early 1970’s, when I was getting my Masters in special education. 😦
LikeLike
But the overwhelming majority of charter school teachers are either TFA temps, or have passed through some bogus, quickie certification program run by the charters themselves.
Very few of these people have graduated with a Master’s degree from an accredited university education program. And why should they? None of them will be there in five years.
LikeLike
It’s hard to know what kind of politicking was going on behind the scenes. One problem that all school districts in California have is that a charter that is not approved or denied on renewal can go directly to the county. If they fail at the county level, they can then go to the state. I don’t know the statistics, but it’s likely that charters will be successful at the state level. One reason is because they are first reviewed by the CA Advisory Commission on Charter Schools. The head of this Commission is Brian Bauer, Granada Hills Charter High School’s executive director. The majority of the members are also related to charter schools. If this commission recommends approval, you can pretty much guarantee that the State Board will follow suit.
So, LAUSD has to face the possibility that they will ultimately lose these students anyway. They also lose any opportunity to monitor these state authorized charters. If any problems develop, the teachers and parents would have to go to Sacramento to register complaints.
Again, it’s the way the law was written. Everything is in favor of charters at the expense of the public schools.
LikeLike
Your insights into the complexity of who is in charge of both the commissions and the lawmaking is both informative and heartbreaking.
LikeLike
“War chest?” Sarah Angel thinks that the UTLA has amassed a war chest?
Get back to us, Sarah, when the Gates Foundation, the Waltons, Eli Broad, and the other gazillionaires stop shoveling obscene amounts of money into their quest to destroy and privatize (or “charterize,” if you prefer) actual public schools.
LikeLike
CCSA cares so much about the “moms and dads”.
That’s interesting, coming from an organization — CCSA through their spokesperson Sarah Angel — that has called for the elimination of all school boards (watch Reed Hatings’ speech at the CCSA’s 2015 convention.) If successful, this move would permanently remove all decision-making power away that those same “moms and dads” would otherwise participate through a democratically-elected school board.
As in New Orleans and elsewhere, there’s a clear track record of those running privately managed charters that shows they are never accountable to the public, not transparent to the public, and would not be required to educate all the public — barring and/or pushing out those least desirable — Special Ed., foster care kids, homeless kids, English Language Learners, behavior problem kids
LikeLike
There’s an amazing and unexplainable disconnect. Oligarch money isn’t green and holds some beatific power. Newspapers never report the financial backing of Fordham, the charter school alliances, etc. But, let working people cobble together some money to protect middle class jobs, held mostly by women, and the union bogeyman is trotted out.
Where’s Hillary Clinton’s concern for working women? Oh yeah, she’s paling around with Melinda Gates, peddling verbiage about “raising the ceiling”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let’s face it, Linda, newspapers don’t report the financial backing of the charter school alliances, et al, because many of the major newspapers are owned by oligarchs, and most of the rest are owned by very wealthy, would-be oligarchs.
It continues to boggle my mind how many on both sides of the political aisle have bought into the whole extreme testing/privatization-charterization movement.
I am not surprised at the Republican support, but I’m extremely disappointed at the Democratic support.
Ah, well. As I have quoted to Mr. Zorba and my friends, “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party left me.”
LikeLike
Zorba,
In Ohio, it’s the Republicans because they’ve gerrymandered the state to prevent a representative democracy.
Tangentially, Mother Jones reports that Sheldon Adelson clandestinely bought
the newspaper in Las Vegas. A newspaper guy from Connecticut, Michael Schroeder, linked to the buyout, wrote an article, under a false name, that attacked a judge, hearing the alleged bribery trial, involving Adelson’s gambling interests in Macau, China.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is HUGE news that Sarah Angel is disarming and leading by example by not raising any further money for the California Charter School Association and calling for a complete moratorium of billionaire donors to cease and desist donating dark money to elections to advance their agenda.
From Dads, Moms,Teachers and Principals everywhere, we thank you Ms. Angel for your extraordinary gesture to public education.
LikeLike
Dear Geronimo…you are a kick!
Yes, it is laughable to hear the twisted Angel woman decry UTLA who she shrieks, is amassing a war chest to fight her bosses advance to privatize all LAUSD schools. This woman is an embarrassment…or is her thinking so distorted that she really thinks she is influencing anyone with her oft repeated lies?
It might be interesting to have Alex Caputo-Pearl standing next to her and refuting her whacko remarks, rather that Gutierrez-Cole smiling, shining her on. Have never thought of teacher’s dues as ‘dark money’ but guess she does.
Suggest that readers google her, and her husband, and see who they really represent. Might curl lots of folks hair.
LikeLike
So, Geronimo, how much is CCSA paying you to shill for them?
LikeLike
Cool it Zorba…Geronimo, whom I have known for years, is being sarcastic. He could be further from CCSA.
LikeLike
Ah, thank you, Ellen, it wasn’t clear (snark tag needed, perhaps?). Sorry, Geronimo!
LikeLike
ouch…meant he could NOT be further from CCSA. His anti CCSA ascerbic comments in the old days at LASR, when they actually allowed comments, were scrubbed by them quickly.
LikeLike
Thanks Ellen…;) and for your steadfast voice!
And we’re cool, Zorba! Keep up your fire!.
LikeLike
One thing that needs to be said:
… to fight privatization, the teachers took
a big hit in their bank accounts… and did
so freely and willingly
The corporate reformers have claimed
that the majority of teachers don’t like
paying dues, that they only do so because thug
union bosses have the legal power to force them
to pay. Indeed, according the Campbell and
Scott Walker and so many others, the vast
majority of unionized teachers are just salivating for
a union defeat in Friedrichs, so that they can
stop paying ANY dues.
Well, this shows otherwise… tens of thousands
of LAUSD teachers are freely
and willingly choosing not just to pay the current
dues, but a huge permanent increase as well.
It shows that the UTLA membership 32,000 … are fully
aware of the attack on public ed by Broad et al …
and are committed to a bitter fight … so committed
that they just voted a 30% increase in their dues
so that UTLA’s leadership can take that money,
turn around and the use it t go to war against,
Broad, Reed Hastings, the Waltons, John Arnold,
Campbell Brown, etc.
As a UTLA member, I couldn’t be more proud.
As the article below indicates it was an
82% to 18% landslide … when all was needed
was 50% plus 1 vote margin.
It’s called the BFFF campaign.
“Build the Future/ Fund the Fight.”
The members took a hit in their pocketbooks
or bank accounts … money that would go towards
their families’ needs, and made a sacrifice to
keep public schools truly public.
In short, they/we put their money where their
mouths are..
LikeLike
The LA Times also had an op-ed “Stop Whining About Charters”
Where’s the one where they tell Sarah Angel and CCSA
“Stop whining about dues increases to defend public schools” ?
LikeLike
Thank teacher Jack…you are my hero for these posts. And thanks to all the LAUSD teachers for the vote to increase UTLA dues. You are all heroes.
LikeLike
You can find Sarah Angel’s comments in a KPCC article titled:
“As the the LAUSD charter schools conflict escalates, here’s what you need to know.”
Angel cleverly failed to mention the untold millions raised to lobby for charters and to provide campaign funding for charter friendly candidates. In her eyes, that’s okay, but she feels that teachers, on the other hand, should not be wasting time and money defending public education. We wouldn’t need to if it wasn’t for the move to destroy the most important democratic institution in the country. Democracy is under attack and control of our educational institutions is vital to assure that the general public is kept ignorant of the rights of all citizens in a free society.
Sarah Angel will claim that higher test scores at the few charters that can generate them automatically translate into college and career success. That has NEVER been proven. There is much more to an education than parroting information that is being rammed down the throats of unsuspecting children who are being taught to never challenge authority. Sounds scare, doesn’t it???
LikeLike
Here’s some UTLA tidbits:
The LATimes Education section — Education Matters — is funded by Eli Broad and other corporate interests.
Well, UTLA sent in an op-ed to counter a pro-charter-plan editorial from Education Matters.
The response? A form rejection letter, with no explanation for the denial
—————
From a UTLA flyer, readable here: (read the whole thing,
not just the excerpts BELOW)
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/e51f39a03d845e2cafae71eff/files/the_fight_is_on_flyer_020816.pdf?utm_source=All+Member+Email+List%2C+Started+9%2F25%2F2015&utm_campaign=27a07d708e-Chapter_Talking_Points2_8_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a7138b2d58-27a07d708e-
——————————
Thursday, Feb 4:
“Great Public Relations Now”
UTLA submitted an Op Ed to the LA Times blasting
the Broad privatization scheme, while also breaking
the news that the PR company behind the Flint Water
crisis, Mercury Public Affairs, has now been brought
on to spin Broad’s “Great Public Schools Now” plan
to bankrupt LAUSD and privatize the nation’s second-
largest school district.
– – – – – – –
Friday, Feb 5:
“Newspaper Takeover”
In response to the Op-Ed submitted a day earlier on February 5, LA Times sent a form rejection letter of UTLA’s Op Ed, with no explanation as to why.
While LA Timesreporters refuse to use vital research at their fingertips that sheds light on the corporate billionaires who fund privatization, they continue to take a one-sided view
of the education debate in Los Angeles.
It was also announced that the billionaire-backer of privatization and charter expansion, Michael Ferro, has taken 17% ownership of Tribune newspapers, which includes the
LA Times, the Chicago Sun-Times and the San Diego
Union-Tribune.
LikeLike
Taking a page from our brothers and sisters in Milwaukee and elsewhere,
UTLA is doing “Walk-in’s” next Wed., Feb. 17.
http://www.utla.net/walkinsignup?utm_source=All+Member+Email+List%2C+Started+9%2F25%2F2015&utm_campaign=438a86d04c-Chapter_Talking_Points2_1_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a7138b2d58-438a86d04c-&utm_source=All+Member+Email+List%2C+Started+9%2F25%2F2015&utm_campaign=27a07d708e-Chapter_Talking_Points2_8_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a7138b2d58-27a07d708e-
—————-
“This action to RECLAIM OUR SCHOOLS will push back on the privatizing agenda and call for greater investment in public education and justice. UTLA is leading the local effort for this nationwide action by tailoring the walk-in to the needs of each school while also keeping in view the need for fully-funded and resourced public education.
“There are more than 70 schools participating so far. Please REGISTER (below) to include your school in this unprecedented national action.
“UTLA Date of Walk-In
“When: Wednesday, Feb. 17, 2016
“Where: All participating school sites
“Time: Before start of school day
“Go to the Tool Kit page with materials for the Walk-In.
T”he Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools
“About the Alliance: The Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools is a national alliance of parent, youth and community organizations and labor groups fighting for educational justice and equity in access to school resources and opportunities. Together, they represent all students, particularly those from low-income and working-class communities and neighborhoods of color.
“click for more resources and materials
“What’s a Walk-In?
‘Just that! Parents, teachers and students gather out front of their school 30-45 minutes before their duty-day starts. They picket, have donuts, coffee, etc. And then they all walk into their schools together building solidarity amongst our members as they will feel the power of collective action.
“Walk-ins build relationships.
“Walk-ins build power.
“Walk-ins build hope!
“What’s the Point?
“Los Angeles View
“Locally, as we continue to fight against the Broad-Walmart plan to privatize our public schools in Los Angeles, we must fight FOR our concrete vision of the Schools LA Students Deserve. Almost 100 UTLA chapters have signed on to participate with their school partners — parents, students, community organizations, educators and school staff. Our three principles are:
“We are working with parents, students and the community.
“We are building Sustainable Neighborhood Community Schools and call for investment and resources to do it.
“We reject Broad-Walmart’s plan to undermine LAUSD.
“We call on Broad and the Waltons to pay their fair share in taxes to support quality schools that serve all students.
“National View
“From St. Petersburg, Florida to Seattle, Washington, educators across the country are organizing to defend their public schools. For instance, Milwaukee (MTEA) had two sets of Walk-ins protesting a new law that could result in Milwaukee public schools being taken over and converted to charters. As a result of the walk-ins, by a united coalition of parents, educators and students, the power brokers are backing off.
Milwaukee Walks-In for Public Education from MTEA Union on Vimeo.
“Watch this video for an example:
Milwaukee Walks-In for Public Education
LikeLike
Supreme Court logic seems very odd right now:
The right to free speech is perceived as an individual right. Corporations count as individuals even though there are numerous people running them and working for them and they have no biological parts.
Unions, on the other hand, also comprising of many people, count as many people because we want to compel the people within it to contribute to basic costs (unlike a corporation that seeks its funding from external consumer/financial means).
So in short, individuals can say whatever they like, and with as much money as they like, so long as it is in control of only one individual (even if that individual represents many), and, so long as the people that are represented, aren’t asked to do anything for the causes being represented by the organization they work for, even if that organization provides them numerous benefits.
That really paints a really narrow playing field where only a massive corporation or millionaire has meaningful speech to many while creating a scenario where “interested parties” getting a seat at the table now requires them to formally organize a lot more (and spend more time and money on it) and then try to grab a seat at the table with people hanging on to them that are receiving benefits without paying anything.
I hope the SCOTUS sees the absurdity of that and drops the Abood challenge though it seems likely this is the exact lens we are heading towards.
LikeLike
Parents support the charters because of safety issues at the home schools. These charters will get scores similar to their students’ home schools. The issue is that scores tell you little. And rumor has it that KIPP and Green Dot have issues with scores and behaviors in the real inner-city schools.
Interestingly, the charter association would like to withdraw support from my friend’s independent charter based on one behavioral incident and low scores, scores that are higher than the feeder public schools. At that rate, the only surviving charters will serve only middle class areas, effectively resegregating all schools economically. This is the subliminal goal of parents and unintended goal of profiteers.
LikeLike