This is a hilarious explanation of how charter schools succeed. If you might be offended, don’t watch.
If you want to see a hotly debated issue presented in graphic form, then take a peek. Only 2 minutes.
This is a hilarious explanation of how charter schools succeed. If you might be offended, don’t watch.
If you want to see a hotly debated issue presented in graphic form, then take a peek. Only 2 minutes.
LOVE. IT.
Posted on Facebook.
Watch the video back-to-back with its sequel:
Thanks for the added post.
Linda: what you said.
😎
Diane’s “Don’t watch this video” makes fans of George Lakoff smile.
About the artist/
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Mark Fiore delivers hard-hitting and fun political animation to millions of viewers worldwide. Called “the undisputed guru of the form,” by the Wall Street Journal, Fiore’s work has appeared everywhere from CNN to Al Jazeera to the San Francisco Chronicle and Mother Jones. Now you can see, share and embed his work on YouTube!
This is not the publicity that the charter industry seeks.
I am now waiting for the inside of the charter school video.
I just found this great article written and posted this week by three pro-public-school LAUSD Board Members — Steve Zimmer Board Pres., George McKenna Board Vice-Pres., and the recently elected Scott Schmerelson. They’re opposed to Eli Broad’s charter school expansion because “children are not commodities.”
http://edsource.org/2016/our-children-are-not-commodities/94237
What’s interesting is the Comments Section of this article. There is an attempt by Heidi Landers, a wealthy proponent of school privatization out here in Los Angeles, to do a little rhetorical sleight-of-hand in her response to the letter’s criticism of “privately” run schools that use public tax money with no accountability … and the pitfalls inherent in having such schools.
————————-
Heidi Landers 4 days ago
“The term ‘privately’ run is, in my opinion, inaccurate; these schools are ‘independently’ run.”
————————-
Caroline Grannan immediately responds:
————————-
CarolineSF 3 days ago
“Is attempting to replace ‘private’ with ‘independent’ an Orwellian effort to control language and thought, or just a clumsy marketing effort?
“Discuss.”
————————-
Must see video.
Posting about the video could not have been more timely as idaho Legislators were treated to a Kool Aid session. What is this “Ohio Miracle” of which they speak? To me this looks like a charter school hard sell. Idaho’s Albertson Foundation is already pushing online tech charter schools. Anyone know about Ohio’s schools? http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/education/article58703538.html
“Bringing business people in to teach”?
Mary Ollie,
Seriously, the Ohio Miracle? The charters in Ohio lead the way in F ratings. The online charters get disastrous results, but make their owners very rich.
Even the Walton Foundation acknowledged that online schools are dreadful
I love it! I encourage folks to post this beyond your education activist circles. Finally, an easily digestible explanation of the situation. Funny that it takes a cartoon to elevate the discourse.
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads and commented:
Watch the video Diane links to . It’s hysterical!
Wasn’t offended until I saw it. Disappointing partisan and racist presentation.
Hideous bureaucrat, we welcome another charter troll.
No you don’t. High school sarcasm from a towering historian is a little unbecoming. So much for the notion of tolerant progressives. I’m a registered democrat with 39 years teaching experience and am against charter schools since propsed by Shanker. If I could unshake your hand I would.
Hideous Bureaucrat,
Consider your hand unshaken.
Thank you for your input.
Kind of difficult to imagine a more apt avatar than yours, hb.
Diane, you are such a genial host!
@hideousbureaucrat: to lift from the two videos, Note: “racist” does not necessarily mean “racist.”
Well, much as I enjoy tennis, the volleying here isn’t terribly interesting given the vagueness of the above comment. Unless you care to pin down what is “racist” about the videos, it’s hard to know what you’re on about and easy to see why someone might think you a troll. Your second comment clarified nothing, really, as far as your gripes with videos that most folks, myself included, seemed to think hit numerous nails squarely on their heads.
Not sure if there’s sarcasm embedded above, and if so, what grade band it’s drawn from, but my conscious aim is to get you to get down to brass tacks or leave off firing. What are the chances?
And yet you feel compelled to reply…
@Hideogump: and yet you feel compelled to offer nothing of substance. Anyone can throw out epithets. Explicating them takes actual analysis. You should try that some time, rather than what appears here to be your specialty: saying nothing, but with vitriol.
I do. I would explicatify but I might get more vitreous by taking the bait.
No need to continue to prove my point, hb. It’s already clear you can’t put up and won’t shut up. That sort of time-wasting is a drug on the market.
What’s particularly incisive is the distinction between local, grassroots charters and charter chains. I’ve always been willing to look at the former as potentially fitting the role for charter schools that Albert Shanker had; I’ve grown sick (to my stomach) of looking at charter chains and their vapid, dishonest claims of miracles, magic bullets, etc., that are grounded in little more than shameless profiteering and hatred of children. They are another key weapon in the anti-democratic arsenal.