Stuart Egan teaches AP high school English and Shakespeare in North Carolina. He has great interest in how words are used and he teaches his students to understand rhetoric. Thus, he has puzzled over the current use of the word “reform.”
In the customary usage, “reform” means to improve. In the current usage, it means to make changes that lead to profits for a few. He shows here how language can be used to awaken the public to the sham of “reform” and to the need to restore education to its real purposes.
He tries here to reclaim the meaning of the word “reform.”
He writes:
2016 is a huge year. With many veteran GOP legislators not seeking reelection and a surely contested gubernatorial race, we in North Carolina have an opportunity to add our own meanings to words in the dictionary used in Raleigh. Here are just a few that alphabetically appear on the same pages as “reform.”
Recommit – to pledge to fully fund public schools so they are not lacking for resources or personnel
Redact – to edit legislation that has previously negatively impacted public schools
Redeem – to transfer monies given to for-profit virtual schools and frivolous charter schools back to public schools
Rediscover – to again realize that our state constitution mandates our government fully fund public schools
Refrain – to keep from placing politics and personalities before students’ well-being
Reinvigorate – to give more voice to teachers and educators in school improvement initiatives as they are the people in the classrooms
Renew – to place a new focus on student progress rather than arbitrary test scores
Replace – to exchange current systems of testing and evaluation protocols with ones that truly measure teacher effectiveness and student progress
Respect – to value teachers with both monetary compensation and freedom to do their jobs
Restore – to bring back due process rights and graduate pay for new teachers
Resurrect – to bring back the North Carolina Teaching Fellows and stimulate more growth in our collegiate education programs
Revise – to review how the General Assembly is allowed to craft bills and legislation behind closed doors without proper debate
Revitalize – to allow our school system to have the power and right to make improvements as they see fit
Revive – to focus on all traditional public schools and their health before haphazardly constructing superfluous charter schools and virtual campuses
Revoke (two definitions) – a: to cancel and annul reactionary legislative acts that are simply repackaged, unproven educational alterations which recycle and reinstitute unproven practices that lead to a relapse of regression and regret and rely on resources created by for-profit companies which remove the importance of the teacher in the classroom and reject what educational researchers have identified as vital to the health of public education (shortened definition); b: to take away the legislative power of those who have harmed public education by electing legislators in 2016 who have public education’s best interests in mind.
And that’s just words that begin with “re.”
As the campaign commercials and advertisements become more frequent and riddled with political spin and stretched truths, just remember that the meanings of words can be manipulated like “reform” and that innocuous slogans like “Carolina Comeback” can be misleading.
In these next 10 months, visit your local public schools, ask teachers, parents, and students what obstacles could be removed to improve conditions and vote for those candidates in November who are willing to remove those impediments.

Oligarchs, like the Koch’s and Gates, have co-opted a lot of language. Their money’s influence in the media, has had the effect of a brand’s trademark, for their words and phrases.
Tagging “human capital pipeline” onto the oligarch education messages, in the media, where the 99% have clout, would add to the Egan’s effort,
LikeLike
Ohio public school advocates step up:
“At issue for school districts is the dollar amount the state subtracts from them when a student enrolls in a charter school. That amount — $5,900 per student — is more than what districts get in base, per-pupil state funding. When applied to hundreds of students over multiple years, the difference can amount to millions of dollars.
Fairborn, for example, says it is owed $25 million from the state because of unfair payments to charters over multiple years. Xenia put the number at $9.3 million.”
At some point our charter-captured governor and state legislature are going to have to address this.
The state can’t establish a state-run and state-funded charter system and then not fund it at 5900 per student in state funds.
This accounting the state is doing is a fiction- it’s a lie. They are subtracting 6k from public schools per charter student while only contributing 2k.
They are sacrificing public schools to fund charter schools. No one agreed to this, nor was this transfer of local funds ever mentioned as a funding mechanism for charter schools. In fact., Ohio voters specifically rejected local funding going to state-run charter schools.
http://www.mydaytondailynews.com/news/news/districts-seek-millions-in-lost-revenue/nqFh2/?platform=hootsuite
LikeLike
Unless I am mistaken Ohio’s funding system had been declared unconstitutional many times well before the scandalous charter industry invaded and whined about not have equitable funding.
LikeLike
Laura H. Chapman
February 4, 2016 at 12:43 pm
Unless I am mistaken Ohio’s funding system had been declared unconstitutional many times well before the scandalous charter industry invaded and whined about not have equitable funding.
Right, but this is different, in my opinion. Now they’re actually removing a larger state share of funding than they provide. It’s just crazy. It’s like a state tax on local districts, where they pull a portion of local funding, direct it to Columbus and call it “state funding”. They don’t have any explicit authority to do that, other than an accounting gimmick.
LikeLike
There is only one way to describe test-based reform: An abject, unmitigated, evidence-based FAILURE.
FAILURE to . . .
raise test scores in math
FAILURE to . . .
raise test scores in reading
FAILURE to . . .
raise test scores in writing
FAILURE to . .
close the ‘learning gap’
FAILURE to . .
provide resources to struggling schools
FAILURE to . .
restore school funding
FAILURE to . .
increase graduation rates
FAILURE to . .
increase educational opportunities
FAILURE to . .
enrich K to 12 curricula
FAILURE to . .
improve pedagogy
FAILURE to . .
decrease class sizes
FAILURE to . .
attract highly qualified teachers
FAILURE to . .
develop college readiness
FAILURE to . .
develop career readiness
FAILURE to . .
develop critical thinking skills
FAILURE to . .
Increase content knowledge
FAILURE to . .
provide multiple pathways for student success
FAILURE to . . .
address the effects of generational poverty, family dysfunction, and childhood stress on learning
Just billions upon billions of dollars worth of FAILURE.
And no one on this side of argument has any obligation to provide any alternative other than just STOP.
LikeLike
I suggest “redeem” would be a good word to use before the rheeformers use it. It does not suggest that the public schools were perfect but to redeem them would be more improving than reform with its implications of the schools having been bad, which they were not.
It also sounds better to be a redeemer with its Christian implications.
LikeLike
“Innovation” is another word that masks some questionable motives when it comes to being stewards of the state’s schools. I believe we have allowed the notion of what constitutes good business to trump what is in our constitution. . .hence, the business mindset towards education rather than looking at schooling as a civic responsibility, in cohesive fashion (“free and uniform”), much like the Register of Deeds.
I suppose there is the notion that without schools being set up like the business world, a student could never move on prepared for the business world. But schools are supposed to prepare students for more than just the business world; which is why it’s dangerous to let the business world direct education.
LikeLike
“reconfigure…. excising the oligarchs”
LikeLike