Vicki Abeles is the author of “Beyond Measure: Rescuing an Overscheduled, Overtested, Underestimated Generation,” and director and producer of the documentaries “Race to Nowhere” and “Beyond Measure.” She recently wrote an important article in the New York Times about the mental toll on children caused by testing pressure. She asks, “Is the drive for success making our children sick?”
She writes:
STUART SLAVIN, a pediatrician and professor at the St. Louis University School of Medicine, knows something about the impact of stress. After uncovering alarming rates of anxiety and depression among his medical students, Dr. Slavin and his colleagues remade the program: implementing pass/fail grading in introductory classes, instituting a half-day off every other week, and creating small learning groups to strengthen connections among students. Over the course of six years, the students’ rates of depression and anxiety dropped considerably.
But even Dr. Slavin seemed unprepared for the results of testing he did in cooperation with Irvington High School in Fremont, Calif., a once-working-class city that is increasingly in Silicon Valley’s orbit. He had anonymously surveyed two-thirds of Irvington’s 2,100 students last spring, using two standard measures, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The results were stunning: 54 percent of students showed moderate to severe symptoms of depression. More alarming, 80 percent suffered moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety.
“This is so far beyond what you would typically see in an adolescent population,” he told the school’s faculty at a meeting just before the fall semester began. “It’s unprecedented.” Worse, those alarming figures were probably an underestimation; some students had missed the survey while taking Advanced Placement exams.
What Dr. Slavin saw at Irvington is a microcosm of a nationwide epidemic of school-related stress. We think of this as a problem only of the urban and suburban elite, but in traveling the country to report on this issue, I have seen that this stress has a powerful effect on children across the socioeconomic spectrum.
Expectations surrounding education have spun out of control. On top of a seven-hour school day, our kids march through hours of nightly homework, daily sports practices and band rehearsals, and weekend-consuming assignments and tournaments. Each activity is seen as a step on the ladder to a top college, an enviable job and a successful life. Children living in poverty who aspire to college face the same daunting admissions arms race, as well as the burden of competing for scholarships, with less support than their privileged peers. Even those not bound for college are ground down by the constant measurement in schools under pressure to push through mountains of rote, impersonal material as early as preschool.
Yet instead of empowering them to thrive, this drive for success is eroding children’s health and undermining their potential. Modern education is actually making them sick.
Nearly one in three teenagers told the American Psychological Association that stress drove them to sadness or depression — and their single biggest source of stress was school. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a vast majority of American teenagers get at least two hours less sleep each night than recommended — and research shows the more homework they do, the fewer hours they sleep. At the university level, 94 percent of college counseling directors in a survey from last year said they were seeing rising numbers of students with severe psychological problems.
At the other end of the age spectrum, doctors increasingly see children in early elementary school suffering from migraine headaches and ulcers. Many physicians see a clear connection to performance pressure….
What sets Irvington apart in a nation of unhealthy schools is that educators, parents and students there have chosen to start making a change. Teachers are re-examining their homework demands, in some cases reviving the school district’s forgotten homework guideline — no more than 20 minutes per class per night, and none on weekends. In fact, research supports limits on homework. Students have started a task force to promote healthy habits and balanced schedules. And for the past two years, school counselors have met one on one with every student at registration time to guide them toward a manageable course load….
Contrary to a commonly voiced fear that easing pressure will lead to poorer performance, St. Louis medical school students’ scores on the medical boards exams have actually gone up since the stress reduction strategy was put in place.
At Irvington, it’s too early to gauge the impact of new reforms, but educators see promising signs. Calls to school counselors to help students having emotional episodes in class have dropped from routine to nearly nonexistent. The A.P. class failure rate dropped by half. Irvington students continue to be accepted at respected colleges.
There is a choice to be made, Vicki Abeles argues, between high-stakes testing and children’s health.
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Let’s thank the Bill Gates cabal for pushing for early college and career readiness through flawed high stakes testing for these results: “doctors increasingly see children in early elementary school suffering from migraine headaches and ulcers. Many physicians see a clear connection to performance pressure”
What I really meant is “Curse the Bastards!”
But what are these young people going to do when they enter a labor market predicated on worker powerlessness, overwork, tedium, meaninglessness and absurdity? Why, if we don’t pound tolerance for those things into the kids’ heads while they’re in K-12, they’ll be completely unprepared for a life of post-industrial serfdom!
Only people who hate children would deny them this “choice.”
When it comes to the youngest students: when did we as a nation become accustomed to the Pearson battle cry—
“Kids! Break out the vomit bags!” at the commencement of standardized tests?
😒
“The VAMmit bags”
The VAMmit bags
Are given out
By Pearson nags
For testing bout
The letters in response from educators, parents and most importantly students, were interesting too.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/13/opinion/reducing-the-stress-on-students.html?ref=opinion
Thank you. Mine was one of them.
Controlling other people’s private lives and choices, promoting pseudoscience (the idea that stress is causing five- and six-year-olds to get ulcers is laughable), referring to a school’s “working class” past rather than its mostly affluent present, failing to put current levels of teen anxiety and depression into any historical context . . . lots to like here!
She is describing what some people perceive is happening in a narrow subset of high-end communities and competitive academic environments. If the mostly privileged parents of these kids want out, they can rest assured that in the vast majority of US districts their kids will receive little homework and have plenty of free time.
“A day without laughter is a day wasted.” [Charlie Chaplin]
Thank you.
This day was not wasted.
😎
Keeping school district control local allows parents to have a voice and lets the district respond to the needs of their particular community. Locally elected school boards represent each community & tax payers get an actual vote. Every community needs to weigh in on what their kids are experiencing and respond in appropriate ways. Abeles’
book (not the film of the same name, which is very different) represents many voices, and ALL voices need to be heard and considered. Parents and families raise their children. Public schools work for those parents and families. All schools should.
I think the “social emotional learning” metrics ed reformers are coming up with will be opposed by parents here. I can almost guarantee they will consider that a huge over-reach. If they thought the Common Core blowback was bad, wait ’till they tell parents they intend to measure “motivation” with a standardized test 🙂
This is the US Department of Education:
“Similarly, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) recently announced plans to expand its testing program to begin to include measures of students’ motivation, mindset, and perseverance in an effort to build the evidence base for more widespread use.”
Measure their “mindset”! Not only can they measure what they know, they can determine if they have the proper “mindset”
Do they even think about how parents will perceive these things? I’m of the opinion my son is permitted to have any number of private thoughts in school that may or may not be “growth oriented”.
They lack restraint. To put it mildly 🙂
http://tech.ed.gov/netp/assessment/
I would opt my kids right out of that. You are spot on, Chiara. If parents want to opt into their kids being measured in these ways, they should go for it, but it strikes many of us uncomfortable, intrusive, government overreach.
“I think the “social emotional learning” metrics ed reformers are coming up with will be opposed by parents here.”
I would certainly hope so, considering that nothing social or emotional can be measured and the mere attempt is chilling.
Danielle
January 13, 2016 at 1:07 pm
I would opt my kids right out of that. You are spot on, Chiara. If parents want to opt into their kids being measured in these ways, they should go for it, but it strikes many of us uncomfortable, intrusive, government overreach.
I don’t know, but I live and work here and I’m on a school committee. Parents will think these things they’re trying to measure are subjective – value judgments- and parents generally put that stuff into the parental/child-raising wheelhouse.
In other words, the testing freaks can attempt to measure what kids know and can do, but they are overreaching if they’re attempting to both define and then measure what kids ARE.
It’s the difference between demanding someone behave a certain way and demanding someone THINK a certain way and value the same traits that ed reformers value.
AGREED!
I remember high school as the most stressful period of my life. When I got to college, I could finally get 8 hours of sleep every night! College was a piece of cake compared to the demands of high school.
Part of the problem is that most high schools, public and private, have a curriculum of about 7 classes that meet every single day. Teachers generally assign homework for every night of class, and the amount of homework compounds rapidly. As a student who took 10 AP classes in high school, the amount of homework was crushing. I remember that we would compare with each other each morning who got the least amount of sleep the previous night. We were intensely involved with extracurricular activities, because we knew that it was the extracurriculars that made a student stand out among all of their other overachieving peers in the eyes of college admissions committees.
As a teacher at the secondary and higher ed levels, I do not feel that I need to see my students everyday. I would prefer to see them 2 or 3 times a week. That way, I could give them more meaningful and substantial homework assignments that they can complete in a reasonable timeframe, and our class time could be spent more efficiently rather than just “punching the time card.”
I know that high schools in Sweden have a curriculum of 10-15 subjects, but each class meets only a couple of times a week. This allows the curriculum to be much broader than the typical U.S. curriculum of language arts, math, history, science, and 1 foreign language (if you’re lucky!). High schoolers in Sweden take several foreign languages at the same time as well as classes like philosophy, economics, psychology, art history, music theory, art… Doesn’t that sound much more appealing? It makes me want to be a student again!
This!
It’s no wonder that #1 song on the itunes Alternative music list is “Stressed Out” by Twenty One Pilots: http://www.popvortex.com/music/charts/top-alternative-songs.php This is an important sociological indicator of the state of our teenagers.