Common Core opt-out movement plans to forge ahead for spring 2016 testing
Updated December 26, 2015 11:28 AM
By John Hildebrand john.hildebrand@newsday.com
HIGHLIGHTS
Opponents: 4-year moratorium on scores’ use is complex, confusing
Commissioner: New regulations meant to provide ‘some relief’
Parent leaders of the test-boycott movement are forging ahead with plans for more opt-outs on Long Island and statewide, despite the state’s adoption last week of a four-year moratorium aimed at revising the Common Core curriculum and easing test anxieties.
“It’s a mess — parents ought to be screaming from the roof,” said Lisa Rudley, a Westchester County mother of three who heads a statewide coalition of parents, teachers and others known as New York State Allies for Public Education.
Opponents of Common Core testing predict the number of students in grades three through eight refusing to take state English and math tests in April could swell to 400,000 — 40 percent of those eligible to take the exams and double the number of refusals in spring 2015. That was the nation’s biggest boycott by far, with Nassau and Suffolk counties the epicenter of the movement in New York.
The revolt, which has galvanized growing numbers of parents on the Island and across the state over the past three years, was fueled by changes in the state’s teacher and principal evaluation system, which ties students’ scores on more rigorous Common Core tests to educators’ job ratings.
The Long Island Opt Out network and other groups aligned with Rudley’s organization have test-refusal forms for parents posted on their websites. Many administrators in local school districts report that hundreds of such forms already have landed on their desks, months ahead of the spring testing season.
Boycott organizers complain the new rules under the moratorium are complex and confusing. The Board of Regents, the state’s policymaking panel, adopted the “emergency regulation” earlier this month, based largely on recommendations of a task force appointed by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.
Delayed until 2019-20
The new rules delay until the 2019-20 school year the use of state test scores to rate teachers in a way that might jeopardize their job status. Teachers will continue receiving such “growth” scores each year, though only on an advisory basis.
In the interim, a brand-new set of “transition” ratings will be used annually to identify teachers’ performance — from educators who are outstanding or satisfactory to those who are subpar. Those ratings will be based on classroom observations and results of student tests selected by local districts.
Some boycott leaders now call for pulling students out of local tests as well as those administered by the state.
New York State United Teachers, a union umbrella group, has taken a wait-and-see position on the moratorium, calling it a “first step” and making clear it wants further changes.
State Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia, who served on the Common Core Task Force, told school superintendents in a recent memo that the moratorium, which Regents passed on an emergency basis, was meant to respond to local complaints that the combination of test scores and teacher evaluations was “causing undue stress.”
“This emergency regulation is intended to provide you with some relief,” Elia stated.
Opponents contend, however, that many districts within the next year could be using more tests — rather than fewer — to help measure teacher performance. Parents active in the opt-out movement have adopted this as one of their talking points, and some school administrators agree.
“It has the effect of exploding the number of tests, especially in the earlier grades,” said Lorna Lewis, superintendent of Plainview-Old Bethpage schools and president of the Nassau County Council of School Superintendents. “It is enormously expensive for districts.”
Elia strongly rejected that argument in an interview last week.
“There will be no additional testing — please get the word out,” the commissioner said.
Some analysts at the state and local levels think concerns about increased testing are exaggerated. They point out that school districts already administer a multitude of locally chosen tests — both standardized commercial assessments and those written by their own teachers.
Such exams, if approved by the state, could be used to assess teachers as well as students, analysts said. They added that the great majority of districts will not have to worry much about this issue until 2016-17, because the state has granted them exemptions from adopting new evaluation plans for this school year.
“This gives us the remainder of this year to deal with concerns,” said Robert Lowry, deputy director of the New York State Council of School Superintendents.
Supporters of the state’s current efforts noted that the demands of opponents go far beyond regulatory changes in teacher evaluations. A recent statement by the NYS Allies group called, among other things, for an outright “halt” to the state’s use of Common Core guidelines.
“We will continue to refuse to allow our children to participate in the system until ALL harmful reforms are removed from our classrooms,” said Jeanette Deutermann, a North Bellmore parent and founder of Long Island Opt Out.
“What the testing opponents are doing is shifting the goalposts, because their real purpose is to end Common Core standards,” said Stephen Sigmund, executive director of High Achievement New York. The Manhattan-based advocacy group includes representatives of business and civil rights organizations, as well as some educators.
“Nothing will end their demands,” Sigmund added. “They refuse to take yes for an answer.”
Rudley acknowledged that those who have fought the education reforms may take a breather.
“This is going to take some time to unwind, and there’s no reason for parents and students to get their toes back in the water yet,” she said. Rudley, a former investment specialist, also has volunteered as an advocate for children with autism.
NY hiring different firm
Meanwhile, the state Education Department is making efforts to win greater teacher support for its new tests. The department in July announced that it was hiring a different company, Questar Assessment Inc., to develop tests for grades three through eight, replacing the much-criticized Pearson Education.
State education officials said local teachers and administrators will be given a much bigger role, working with Questar to write new test questions. Those officials acknowledged, however, that questions developed by Pearson must be used in tests administered in April and in the spring of 2017, because of the time needed to review new questions for validity and accuracy.
Elia, who took office as education commissioner July 1, has traveled to the Island, New York City and points across the state to talk to educators and parents, logging almost 20,000 miles so far, agency spokesman Dennis Tompkins said.
The commissioner is confident the state’s plan “is the best path to lowering the volume on the debate and moving together toward an appropriate assessment and evaluation system,” Tompkins said in a statement. “And it does so by using mechanisms already in place in our schools. . . . Without assessments to measure their progress, we’d never know if we were heading in the right direction to achieve that goal.”
Cuomo shifts support
Still, the drumbeat of public opposition may be a causal factor for more change.
Cuomo, for example, already has shifted his long-held support of the Common Core standards.
“The Common Core was supposed to ensure all of our children had the education they needed to be college and career-ready — but it actually caused confusion and anxiety,” the governor said when his appointed 15-member task force released its report Dec. 10. “That ends now.”
Cuomo aides have contended there’s no reason to rescind a law that the governor pushed through the State Legislature last April that requires districts to base up to half of employees’ evaluations on state test results. However, the moratorium imposed by the Regents’ emergency regulation has the effect of postponing that section of law for four years.
The governor had said he planned to look at the task force’s recommendations in setting his legislative agenda for 2016. He is scheduled to give his State of the State address and release his proposed budget on Jan. 13 in Albany.
Spring 2016 state standardized test dates
English/Language Arts tests in grades 3-8 will be given April 5-7
Mathematics tests in grades 3-8 will be given April 13-15
That didn’t last long 🙂
I wonder if the fight for public education is too important to you, Dr. Ravitch, to allow yourself to take a true break. As long as you are posting, I’ll be reading, and if you do decide to step away from the keyboard for a week, I will look forward to the return of the blog.
Either way, thanks for all you do for the cause.
“Some relief” sounds like a hostage/interrogation technique. I am waiting for some honest, child/learner centered discussion and regulation (as opposed to more market/valuation formula).
Hello, Diane, After reading this opt out blog about New York I saw this Projo RI article on punishing students who did not take the tests. What do you think?
In Rhode Island, at least 34 school districts did not test 95 percent of its students in math and English on the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), which was administered last spring.
Buy Photo
By Linda Borg Journal Staff Writer
Follow @@lborgprojocom
PROVIDENCE, R.I. — Rhode Island is one of 12 states that could face sanctions from the U.S. Department of Education for failing to reach a 95-percent student participation rate on the latest standardized test, according to a letter from the federal agency.
“The U.S. Department of Education is concerned that Rhode Island’s participation rate did not meet requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended,” the undated letter stated. “This letter is asking for information about how Rhode Island is addressing this problem.”
The letter was linked to a story published by Education Week, a national magazine. http://m.providencejournal.com/article/20151223/NEWS/151229655/13809 I
On Saturday, December 26, 2015, Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: “Common Core opt-out movement plans to forge ahead > for spring 2016 testing Updated December 26, 2015 11:28 AM By John > Hildebrand john.hildebrand@newsday.com > HIGHLIGHTS > Opponents: 4-year moratorium on scores’ use is complex, confusing > Commissioner: Ne”
Jo,
The larger the opt out, the smaller the chance of any sanctions. Parent revolts are civil disobedience. State education departments must answer to elected officials, who must answer to voters. Mass civil disobedience will prevail.
The first time I unplugged it was easy. 1998. I literally unplugged the computer and dropped it off at Goodwill. It had been a hand-me-down gift from a tech enthusiastic friend, a computer engineer. Here you go, Luddite. Email and Yahoo were of little use to me at the time. There was nothing there. I went back to my typewriter while everyone else word processed.
My school got a grant and gave me a laptop to use in 2002. I surfed the net a bit, didn’t open an email account. Returned the laptop virtually unused in 2005 and remained unplugged for a couple more years.
I eventually bought a computer, though, started emailing, the whole nine yards. Then something happened. I was contentedly as usual watching the Newshour one evening, when I was introduced to Michelle Rhee. They showed her broom. She fired a principal. Proudly. She was reported to be starting a movement. A churn and burn movement. That night, I believed it was happening. I felt it, like a punch in the gut. I started frantically searching for information about education reform. Frantic. Terrified. Determined to use the internet to stop the corporate reform bleeding in L.A. But the LATimes wouldn’t listen. My students’ test scores were wanted for their public database of VAM. School officials wouldn’t listen. No one would. I was holding back the ocean with a spoon. I was no Diane Ravitch.
…By 2012, I had had it. I was banging my head against the screen, so to speak. It was time again to unplug. I never really liked computers in the first place, you know. Wanted to be Walden in the woods. But something was different this time. It was difficult to stop checking the Answer Sheet each morning. It was difficult to stop reading the LA Times teacher bashing articles online. I kept going for long walks, drives, and so on. But when I returned home, I just kept flipping on the glowing screen.
I began researching unplugging from technology and found nothing but cautionary tales (probably from tech companies), until I eventually found an author who, not only described the benefits of offline living, and they are many, but described the process he had undergone to achieve it. Step by step, he patiently explained to colleagues, friends and loved ones what he was doing and why he was doing it. He bought books, a journal, and pens. He stopped using one app at a time. He worked for weeks toward his goal of total separation. I followed in his footsteps. The computer went to Goodwill…
I just returned to cyberland this summer. I bought an iPhone. The first thing I did that day was check what Valerie Strauss had posted to the Answer Sheet. And there was a link to this blog. I became Left Coast. And thank God for this blog. Thank God there is Diane Ravitch to hold back the ocean. Now, the Times is listening. A light has been shown on Eli Broad’s shadowy underworld. School officials are listening (I’ve won some small victories too, lately.), trying to collaborate more and dictate less. Well, trying, anyways. And yes, I believe Opt Out in 2016 will be magnificent.
So, yesterday, when I mentioned being unplugged and apparently got you thinking about it, Diane, I was not only glad you didn’t make any jokes about my Luddism as most do, but joyful that you were even considering taking some time off too. (And horrified at first that you might take as much time as I have, and that I might have caused it, but you saved me from that this morning. Just a week. Whew!) I feel somewhat responsible if this becomes a burden instead of a vacation. I also feel guilty that I didn’t even mention the difficulties of unplugging, or the process. You seem so much stronger than me, but I still don’t think you can just flip a switch.
I’ve never met you, but I’m writing this tome of a comment because I want you to be happy. I want you to be able to let us go for a while. There is much to be said for pens and typewriters. For face to faces. I hope that somewhere in my experiences there was a small something that could be of use to you, so that this week you can indeed flip that switch. Hopefully, you’re not even reading this. But if you are, please know that we are all with you, blog or not. Drink tea. Light candles. Smell roses. Bask in nature. I will be thinking of you this week as I watch the Pacific lap at the shore. We are a grateful nation of public schools waiting patiently for your online return.
Technology is over taking our lives and making a mess out of it. Look at the bombings in the Middle East by those faraway sheltered in some bomb proof labs way underground. May those who foist bad things on others, live underground in their bomb proof labs forever. Now this kind of technology I can live with.
Like, Yvonne! And sorry, all, for referring to Thoreau as Walden. There was a misplaced comma in there too, and some missing commas… I must stop now. Me too. I need rest too. Tea. Roses. Nature. People…
However, Diane’s use of technology is WELL WORTH the effort. Thanks, Diane, and all the others who refuse to follow the deformers of public education and believe in their lies.
As I read the post, I noticed that NYSUT is taking a “wait and see” attitude toward op-out etc. Sadly, they are wrong. This organization should also be screaming from the rooftops about the illegitimacy of Cuomo’s education laws. Teachers are voters as well!
I respectfully disagree that NYSUT should advocate for opting out. The moment they did the media and the de-formers could accurately state that the unions were part of the opt-out movement. Prior to their support it was entirely a parent-led and organized movement.
IOW, we teachers lost some moral high ground.
NYSUT can rightly scream from the rooftops about the illegitimacy of Cuomo’s education laws. Just be quiet about opt-out in my opinion.
Parents must not forget that the testing and the educational framework of Common Core is developmentally inappropriate and tantamount to cognitive abuse.
Maybe I’m not feeling the love – but it seems to me that 50% of my worth will still be determined by some kind of test developed by someone else who has no knowledge of my students. You can call it local or state, it’s still lipstick on a pig. What’s even more onerous is that my students are still “learning” in order to take The Test. I don’t care if it’s the Regents, ELA, Math, or some other bogus local test – we are still teaching to it. I’ll say that again – WE ARE STILL TEACHING TO A TEST. I want to cry when I think of all of the in depth learning we could do in history if we weren’t racing through the centuries because THAT question might appear on THE TEST. There is not a chance in hell that my students will remember most of the factoids we’re forced to race through.
What the Cuomo Heads don’t understand is that it’s not about teacher ratings; it’s about learning, exploring, thinking. Tests will always get in the way of real learning. This is why parents must continue the fight. It’s about taking back our children’s education!
I have a 10 year old and 13 year old and I will continue to have them opt out of these useless assessments. I’ll never trust the government, especially that useless parasite in Albany…guess who that might be? You are right , you get the prize!
Time to thrust a dagger through the heart of the Quid Pro Quomo, John King and Merrylie Tusch deform agenda. Work for 400,000! To accomplish that objective NYC and the other major cities need to inform parents and get them on board.
I don’t see where substantial growth in opt-out will come from in 2016. There are no new geographical areas getting folded into the mix. NYC will remain absent. Hardcore opt-out folks were the ones that did it in 2015, and they represent peak opt-out. The people not fooled by Cuomo’s/Elia’s latest attempts to “calm things” are the hardcore opt-out folk from last year. It’s not like legions of new parents are suddenly on to Cuomo, etc.
I see marginal growth in opt out for 2016. In spite of the really loud talk (doubling 2015 numbers in some cases), nobody has explained where those numbers will come from.
Lets not forget that slight growth or staying even with last years numbers will be broadcast as a win for Cuomo’s initiatives. The narrative will be “Cuomo has stabilized opt out numbers with his changes.” We will have helped that narrative along nicely with all the loud talk about much bigger opt out for 2016. “Look, it was going to be huge
But Cuomo instituted real changes that limited opt out.”
If Im wrong, and I soooo deeply hope I am, then maybe we should be quiet about projecting what opt outs will be in 2016. Anything except huge growth will be counted as a Cuomo win.
The Regents addressed only one part of the problem; the remaining probkems are daunting. For example, the Education Transformation Act of 2015 still requires that a whopping 50% percent of teachers’ evaluations be based in tests, just not the grades 3-8 tests, meaning testing-based accountability remains in full force. Also, the grades 3-8 tests still very much count for students. They can still be used as part of what determines promotions, as is the current situation in NYC public schools. And they can be used in the admissions process to NYC public middle and high schools.
Why are you and other leaders of this ostensibly grass-roots, parent-driven movement continuing to make these false claims about promotion and admissions decisions in New York City?
The revisions to state education law that were enacted in 2014 are just as much in force in NYC as they are everywhere else in the wonderful Empire State. State law prohibits Grade 3-8 state test scores from being used as a sole or primary determinant of both promotion and admissions decisions.
On top of this clear-cut and unambiguous policy regarding opt-out, there has been a steep decline in the number of NYC DOE students who have been required to attend summer school (19,500 last summer, down from 32,000 two summers ago), and who have been made to repeat a grade (1.2% last year vs. 3.4% in 2010). The truth is that at least 95%+ of the time, a child who opts out will be promoted to the next grade quickly and painlessly, with no further effort required from the student or her family, on the basis of nothing other than her teacher’s say-so.
For the relatively small number of incoming middle school and high school NYC DOE students who will apply to a competitive screened school or program (the vast majority of seats, especially for middle school, are either zoned; based on an admissions test, audition, or other process that is handled by the school; or completely unscreened/blind lottery), accommodations will be made for students who do not have state test scores.
Click to access 2015ELAMathStudentParticipationParentGuide030615.pdf
It is essential to get the details right. Parents deserve transparency and honesty, and by perpetuating the idea that students will be punished for opting out in New York City, the opt-out movement is providing them with neither. Why?
Tim,
I feel sure you will get a response from Lisa Eggert Litvin or some of the other leaders of the opt out movement. Let me assure you from personal knowledge that the opt outs in New York are not “ostensibly” grass roots and parent led, they are in fact grass roots and parent led. Surely you don’t think the teachers’ union has the ability to persuade the parents of nearly a quarter million children not to take the tests. Parents are not dumb. Given where the opt outs were largest, I’d say the parents were very well informed. In New York City, where the teachers’ union is very strong, there were very few opt outs. Don’t sell parents short.
The Opt-Out movement has not taken hold in most NYC schools (despite failure rates in the 80 – 95+% range) for the same reason students struggle – lack of parental involvement. Too many apathetic, disengaged, low information parents.
The high information parents don’t have to opt out because their kids are in private schools.
Got that, my fellow low-information NYC public-school parents? We need to listen to our suburban/exurban betters, who live in hotbeds of white flight and elect legislators who are ferociously hostile to the interests of people living in the state’s urban centers, but who despite that know what’s best for your child.
Your spectacularly insulting comment is wrong. NYC DOE parents across the socioeconomic spectrum are actively invested in their children’s education, whether it is at a rich school like PS 199 or a disadvantaged one like PS 191. Enough is enough with this particular libel.
Beyond that, there’s a problem with your theory–how to explain the negligible amount of opt-out in the richest, best-performing, highest-information districts, where residents move and accept crushingly high real estate costs and property tax bills to gain access to top-ranked schools. Bronxville, Byram Hills, Chappaqua, Manhasset, Scarsdale, Irvington, Briarcliff Manor, Great Neck, etc.: do you think those parents are stupid, too?
Check out the pass rates on CC math and ELA in Bronxville, Byram Hills, Chappaqua, Manhasset, Scarsdale, Irvington, Briarcliff Manor, Great Neck, et. al. These are the most elite and entitled communities in the state. The CC tests posed no threat to them.
My comment was not politically correct but happens to be true.
On the contrary, the much-discussed evaluation system linked to VAM posed a clear threat to these districts: the diminishing of the large advantage that their wealth and working conditions give them in hiring and retaining the very best teachers. High student scores are irrelevant–it is growth that matters–and there was a very real chance these districts would lose beloved, high-ability teachers because the formula said so.
Yet the kids all sat for the exam. Why is that?
I never called anyone, “stupid”. There is a big difference between ignorance, fear, and intelligence.
Nice try at walking your comment back, but it is there for everyone to see (and I have no doubt that many opt-out supporters share your beliefs). You said that the parents of 1.1 million children are apathetic, disengaged, and low-information.
I look forward to Diane and many of her most frequent and strident commenters setting you straight. If they don’t, their silence is agreement.
“On the contrary, the much-discussed evaluation system linked to VAM posed a clear threat to these districts”
70% of most district’s teachers are not linked to these exams. It was a PARENT lead movement, not a teacher lead movement. It was PARENTS who have lead the opt out revolt all across the state. The small rural district my kids attend had one of the highest opt out rates (60+%) of any district in the state thanks to a small handful of very vocal and very concerned PARENTS.
I didn’t walk back anything. Try a close read, it may help.
RageAgainstTestocracy,
Please don’t waste your time with Dim Tim, a.k.a. Bigoted, Ostracized, and Ridiculed (just call him a big BOR for short).
Tim has accused you of insulting parents, and he insists that this movement is merely “ostensible” in terms of who is leading it.
Actually Tim, it IS the the teachers’ union that is leading the opt-out moment! But that’s only because the teachers’ union is also leading and driving the abortion movement, the ACA, off shore tax havens for Apple, the water poisoning in Detroit, the Manson murders, one in four children being born into poverty in the United States, civilian shootings, cops shooting and killing unarmed black men, AIDS, the pipeline, ESSA, the TPP, ISIS, ISIL, heroin addiction, the halt of construction of “Versaille” down in Florida, the Arab Spring, Malala getting shot, Vietnam, WWII, Polpot, the arrest of the former governor of Illinois, cancer, cystic fibrosis, and MS.
The list is far too long to print here. My fingers would fall off if I attempted to type everything the teachers’ union is directly responsible for.
In fact, the teachers’s unions was even linked in a causal nexus to Khloe Kardashian’s recent bout with – GASP – hospitalization and clinically diagnosed exhaustion. She must have collapsed on the runway recently and collected a $15,000 paycheck for three hours of work because she had sucky teachers in high school. I mean, that HAS to make sense, Tim.
In fact, the teachers unions’ are responsible for every ill, movement, cure, and destruction in this world, since the infinity of time. How exactly do you think Eve got to that freakin’ apple? It was not her or Adams’s fault. It was that pesky teachers’ union.
We are THAT powerful a force . . .
Did you not know that? WHERE have you been?
In fact, I would surmise the teachers’ union is responsible for you.
The illusion of high-stakes testing:
Prospero, you are the master of illusion.
Lying is your trademark.
And you have lied so much to me
(Lied about the world, lied about me)
That you have ended by imposing on me
An image of myself.
Underdeveloped, you brand me, inferior,
That s the way you have forced me to see myself
I detest that image! What’s more, it’s a lie!
But now I know you, you old cancer,
And I know myself as well.
~ Caliban, in Aime Cesaire’s A Tempest
Which should be the role of public education?
Illusion? or Enlightenment?
Robert Rendo EFGH CDEF, etc, etc
In your response to RageAgainstTestocracy, you have done it again. Although you missed two important conspiracies, the Tri-lateral commission and the Lyndon Larouche’s conspiracy where Queen Elizabeth II is the major kingpin of drug trafficking in the US. They must all be facilitated by the Teachers Union formed when Adam and Eve were still alive. I am not sure that Adam and Eve went to school. It must be the oldest Union in existence preceding the oldest profession in the world. Congratulations Robert.
Raj,
You are so bad at sarcasm, but you do try.
WSJ doesn’t remotely get it. And their commenters live on a distant planet, in another era.
WSJ is not INTERESTED in getting it . . .
I know. It’s a euphemism. Like saying Cuomo’s PR person just doesn’t get the anti-Cuomo side of an issue.
Pay to play plays into pay to print. That should be the next cauldron of corruption to be tackled. Newspapers may run editorials but that can’t become them, nor can they become ads, unless they represent themselves as such. And then they would no longer be newspapers.
If the only thing we have left are “opt outs” then it is game over. We might as well shut down these blogs. Personally I will vote for Trump and hope that he gives the power back the states. We can’t get more liberal…Oh god.. It’s all turning out just like I thought. The world ends with a whimper (a call out for opt outs) rather than a bang (protests or marches, something..) There is nothing. The public doesn’t care. Why should we? Just do your job and try to make it until retirement. Personally I think many bigger problems are on the horizon that will make school reform pretty insignificant. In fact, school reform will be the last thing on people’s minds.
Diane,
I’m sure there must be some kind of 12 step (no, not the Texas kind) program for your blog addiction. Google it!
Duane,
I had an aunt who became addicted to line dancing.
She had to go through a two-step program to get help.😃
Boy, Diane, you’ll really leave a void.
The single high profile critic of market based ed reform in government OR the private sector is an essential individual 🙂
100% cheerleading isn’t healthy and that’s what we’ve got. The complete and utter lack of any debate on something as profound as privatizing public schools probably doesn’t even benefit “ed reform” as a “movement”. It’s over-reach.
For your stockpile upon your return: http://www.pegwithpen.com/2015/12/gaslighting-turnaround-schools.html
Some sample wisdom from this excellent read:
“Political and public will in the U.S. has failed public education; [public education] has not failed us.”
https://radicalscholarship.wordpress.com/2015/12/28/mainstream-media-in-perpetual-crisis-more-education-meat-grinder/
Diane is correct. This is about civil disobedience. It’s all about the numbers. There are more of us than there are of them. We also must not forget that we elect these folks and pay their salaries. This is still our government. They can be let go. Don’t give up. Don’t give in.
“Never give up…never surrender!” Jason Nesmith
There should be no pause in the campaign to end the corporatization of our schools. Delay is nothing but a tactic aimed at defusing the momentum of parental and constituent resistance. Those who campaign for quieting that resistance are not attempting to have better conversations. They hope to delude the public into thinking we are in it together. But, we can not be in it together for reducing children into products for use by industry. We can not be in it together for the ongoing shift in society from sustainable work life balance to the efficient and inhumane use of human capital as disposable objects. It is not the right goal of society, education or employment… nor should it be aided and abetted by government. This view of citizenry, young and old, must be fought by every generation. Let us hope that parents will continue to refuse predatory testing, that citizens will vote against politicians that support it in any party and that sustained effort on all our parts will force our leaders to treat the public as constituents whose needs matter. Take back our schools, our jobs and our government. Continue to refuse.