A Christmas message to reformers: Fund what works. Hello, Bill Gates. Hello, Eli Broad. Hello, Walton Family. Hello, John Arnold. Hello, John Paulson. Hello, hedge fund managers. Fund what works.
I read this story by Emma Brown in the Washington Post a few days ago. It is such a beautiful story that I decided it should be posted on Christmas Day.
Brown reports on the remarkable success of Superintendent Tiffany Anderson in Jennings, Missouri, a town that borders Ferguson and that like Ferguson, is mainly African American and poor. The district has only 3,000 students. What it provides is an exemplar of wrap-around services. Anderson even helps the graduates of her high school find jobs.
School districts don’t usually operate homeless shelters for their students. Nor do they often run food banks or have a system in place to provide whatever clothes kids need. Few offer regular access to pediatricians and mental health counselors, or make washers and dryers available to families desperate to get clean.
But the Jennings School District — serving about 3,000 students in a low-income, predominantly African American jurisdiction just north of St. Louis — does all of these things and more. When Superintendent Tiffany Anderson arrived here 3 1/2 years ago, she was determined to clear the barriers that so often keep poor kids from learning. And her approach has helped fuel a dramatic turnaround in Jennings, which has long been among the lowest-performing school districts in Missouri.
“Schools can do so much to really impact poverty,” Anderson said. “Some people think if you do all this other stuff, it takes away from focusing on instruction, when really it ensures that you can take kids further academically.”
Public education has long felt like a small and fruitless weapon against this town’s generational poverty. But that’s starting to change. Academic achievement, attendance and high school graduation rates have improved since Anderson’s arrival, and, this month, state officials announced that as a result of the improvements, Jennings had reached full accreditation for the first time in more than a decade.
Gwen McDile, a homeless 17-year-old in Jennings, missed so much school this fall — nearly one day in three — that it seemed she would be unlikely to graduate in June. But then she was invited to move into Hope House, a shelter the school system recently opened to give students like her a stable place to live.
She arrived a few days after Thanksgiving. The 3,000-square-foot house had a private bedroom for Gwen, who loves writing and poetry; a living room with a plush sofa she could sink into; and — perhaps most importantly — a full pantry.
She’s no longer hungry. She has been making it to class. She believes she will graduate on time.
“I’ve eaten more in the last two weeks than I’ve eaten in the last two years,” Gwen said on a recent afternoon, after arriving home from school and digging into a piece of caramel chocolate. “I’m truly blessed to be in the situation I’m in right now.”
There also is a new academic intensity in Jennings: Anderson has launched Saturday school, a college-prep program that offers an accelerated curriculum beginning in sixth grade, and a commitment to paying for college courses so students can earn an associate’s degree before they leave high school.
Anderson restored music, dance and drama programs that had been cut, as they so often are in high-poverty schools, finding the money for those and other innovations by closing two half-empty schools, cutting expensive administrative positions and welcoming new grants and a tide of philanthropic contributions. The district was running a deficit of $2 million before Anderson arrived and balanced the budget….
Anderson, 43, has brought rapid change in a manner that is nearly the opposite of the slash-and-burn fierceness of reformers such as Michelle Rhee, the former D.C. schools chancellor who once fired a principal on television. Anderson instead uses a relentless positivity and sense of shared mission.
“Hello, Beautiful,” Anderson says, walking school corridors. “You’re awesome,” she says dozens of times each day.
“I appreciate you,” she says to the teacher working with a small group of students who are struggling in math, to the second-grader excitedly showing off his research project on dinosaurs, to the teenager who sang a solo in the holiday concert the night before….
Philanthropists are giving to Jennings, excited by the story that is unfolding here. The nonprofit foundation that Anderson set up to accept private donations has more than $80,000 in the bank to pay for the shelter, which can house up to 10 homeless and foster children, and for other efforts.
The shelter emerged from a 90-year-old dilapidated house with no roof. Anderson charged her senior administrative staff members with overseeing the renovations, and she said she gave them 30 days for work to be completed. Concept to reality in one month.
And they did it.
“We need to have the urgency for other people’s children that we have for our children, so we move at warp speed,” Anderson said. [Emphasis added.]
Reformers, please remember that one line:
“We need to have the urgency for other people’s children that we have for our children.” We must be sure that they are well-fed, loved, cared for, treated with kindness, regularly checked by a doctor, and given the security of knowing that they have a future.
That is my Christmas message to reformers: Treat all children as if they were your own.
YES
Sounds like the district is combining many good ideas to improve things inside and outside of schools. Good for them.
Nice! Thanks for sharing. We should all support districts and schools that are doing whatever it takes for their students.
Should you be inclined to support this one in particular, you can do so at http://www.jenningsk12.org/?DivisionID=21119&ToggleSideNav=ShowAll.
Happy Holidays, all.
A beautiful way the school makes a difference in the lives of its students. Some districts think you are stepping out of bounds if you help students in this way. I have seen that, I am a retired teacher of the Rochester
City School District.
It’s a fact. Abraham Maslow trumps grit! Superintendent Anderson opened and extended schools to build a community. “Reformers” close schools and destroy communities. It’s no secret why….one empowers people while the other exerts control.
To finish your last statement, Mary:
“. . . while the other exerts control and extracts profit.”
Love this!
Reading this I am reminded of the following words written by John Dewey more than a century ago, in School and Society: “What the best and wisest parent wants for his own child, that must the community want for all of its children. Any other ideal for our schools is narrow and unlovely; acted upon, it destroys our democracy. “
I just saw this on HuffPostEd, 12-22-15, Rebecca Klein.
If the information is correct, this story involved another school in Missouri as well.
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joes-place-hope-house_5674600fe4b0b958f6568c44?utm_hp_ref=education
😎
We know what needs to be done, it just isn’t profitable. We can band together to do this at the local level. My son has extra bedrooms in his house in Missouri, he is using his house for homeless students. If we can elect politicians that understand this it will help, but if not we must each act on our own. Our little 2 acres in Missouri are also being used to feed several families…I can’t wait to retire and operate the homestead full time. Nevada, where I am, is a stingy state that is sinking fast.
Hi Diane –
Merry Christmas! Here’s a little present I thought you might like and that may resonate with you. Curl up and enjoy! ‘You have to treat children as if they were your own’. It’s actually a quote from the longer piece.
Best wishes for a beautiful and peaceful day!
Rita
6 minute on YouTube:
15 minute on YouTube:
15 minute piece on California Endowment FB page:
I realize that I fall on the cynical end of the scale, but for many reformsters I don’t think it’s about the students at all — it’s about profits, ending unions, decreasing their own taxes, making a name for themselves and eliminating the concept of public education. I don’t really see many reformsters wanting to support a public school that works since it doesn’t achieve the other goals previously listed.
And on the other side of Missouri, Kansas City, where I am, is another school district that has risen to “most successful” status by any measure — this is done by meeting students where they are, meeting their needs as best you can, making a “beloved community” of scholars where everyone gives respect, gets respect. Excellent administrators, such as the lady we read about in Jennings, are the magic that holds it together — and the result is an excellent teaching staff, people from whom much is expected, but who are given the support and autonomy they need to make it happen. http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article347294/Center-School-District-bounces-back-with-a-culture-of-achievement-and-caring.html
The Christmas lesson here is that students are less able to focus on learning when basic needs such as food, shelter, cleanliness, healthcare, both mental and physical, are ignored. It’s a simple idea that “reformers” choose to ignore. Utah recently decided to make housing a priority for the homeless. They built tiny houses and a variety of other types of housing. What they found is that with an address, they were able to get people access to benefits, medical attention and jobs. They also significantly reduced homelessness. Programs like these should be what the DOE promotes, not testing. Testing cannot change the future for students that suffer from generational poverty. No excuses policies are like putting a band-aid on a broken arm.
On this Christmas day I would like to add the following to the above:
“The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), in partnership with the Los Angeles Fund for Public Education, California Food Policy Advocates, LA County Department of Public Health’s Choose LA Initiative, and community partners, are embarking a new initiative to serve breakfast to our students through the Breakfast in the Classroom (BIC) project. This is a new program LAUSD is implementing to help provide more breakfast meals to our students.”
This is the second largest school district in the nation and Breakfast In Classroom has been going on for quite some time, even before Superintendent Cortines.
Another pertinent story was on NPR yesterday. It’s about an 80-year-old principal at Furr High School in Houston. Please share widely. A success story like this should get more attention than (un)Success Academy. Furr HS is in a terribly impoverished area, gets no money from wealthy benefactors, and somehow manages to graduate 90% of its students. It’s truly public, accountable, and doesn’t boost its results by skimming!
http://www.npr.org/2015/12/24/460906955/former-teacher-comes-out-of-retirement-to-be-houston-school-s-principal
Thanks for the story on this remarkable woman. She has made a real difference to both the social-emotional and academic growth of her charges. The reason they don’t fire her even though she argues with the higher ups is that she got the graduation rate to over 90%, and she turned around the school climate. She will be hard to replace! Even if scores aren’t the best because of so much poverty, she is doing an outstanding job by getting most of these kids to leave with a diploma. A diploma is a milestone that enables young people to get more education, training or a job. It is far more valuable than a score on a standardized test.
The Wash Post has great education reporters. Too bad the Post editors have gone all squishy over vouchers and charters.
A message to Diane that I suspect she already knows. The oligarchs and plutocrats she mentions do not fund reform out of concern for Americas children . If they were truly concerned they would reform the economic policies that have worsened inequality and now are destroying the working class as well as the poor . They have forgotten the lessons of history . The people will only be told to eat cake for so long before the pitch forks come out . Perhaps that is why they seek to change the focus away from literature to deep reading of technical journals .
At the upcoming TFA “Happy Thoughts” Love Fest how much do you think these stories are going to be aired—and those present urged to emulate—by all the ostensibly “platform-agnostic” attendees?
Or is “agnostic” only paired with “platform” and not with “media-worthy” and “worthy of emulation” and “best practices example”?
Perhaps I am not up with cage busting achievement crushing 21t century redefinitions of widely used words.
But one thing I am sure of: “agnostic” will not be paired with “$tudent $ucce$$.”
Just ask John Deasy re his buh-bye farewell hug from LAUSD of $60,000.
Oops! Incoming email from, er, well: “I resemble that remark!”
Oops again. My bad. That was from Curly of the Three Stooges. From John Deasy: 😄.
A golden parachute into the Broad Academy needs no comment.
😎
This superintendent sounds incredible. Generally speaking, I think the Balkanization of the smaller segregated districts around St. Louis is a large reason so many are struggling financially, but here small size has allowed at least this one district to reinvent itself very quickly.
But with that being said, most of its reforms wouldn’t fly in many high-poverty urban districts:
— “closing two half-empty schools, cutting expensive administrative positions and welcoming new grants and a tide of philanthropic contributions.” School closings, consolidations, and restructurings are ferociously opposed by employees and unions, even when there are clear-cut drops in enrollment. And while philanthropy can work great on a school-by-school basis (see the million-dollar PTA budgets at schools like PS 321), or even on a larger scale, like Geoffrey Canada’s Harlem Children’s Zone, school districts have had a tougher time of attracting donations. Philanthropists want results and efficiency, two things districts may find tough to deliver.
— “And prospective hires must pass a 10-question quiz — usually in math — written for students two grade levels above the students the teacher is applying to teach. Most applicants don’t pass.” This is not an option in most districts, where state licensing and certification are all that matter. It is also — improving teacher quality and content mastery — straight out of the “reform” playbook.
— “Her energy has helped persuade teachers to buy into initiatives such as Saturday school that require extra hours, said Curt Wrisberg, an elementary school principal who has worked in Jennings for more than 20 years. “If you see her doing it times a thousand, how can we not do it? She’s nonstop,” Wrisberg said.” Working late hours and on weekends at school for free? Another non-starter taken directly from the “reform” playbook.
— “Employees who don’t meet Anderson’s standards face heat, and some have lost or left their jobs, said Michael McMurran, president of the Jennings National Education Association.” I wish the reporter had dug a little deeper here, but it sounds like these teachers were removed the way that Eva Moskowitz or former PS 6 principal Carmen Fariña remove teachers, not after a lengthy and expensive due process.
If we want to replicate Jennings, then, we can’t just call on the billionaires to donate more to traditional public schools. We also have to ask our superintendents to be superhuman and our teachers to work a lot more without any increase in salary, and we have to untie our administrators’ hands when it comes to hiring and firing.
Right?
What a heartwarming story to read on this Christmas. There is Hope. The core of teaching is to reach thecore of whatit means to be a person no matter how small, no matter how unseen by others.
This is great. Combating poverty’s effect in the classroom is more than just throwing around the word “rigor.” Success often depends on having support in those areas of life outside school.
That being said, I hope the teachers get ongoing training and support in working with the kids. I teach middle school in a stable middle-class town. Over the years, the behavior of the students has gotten increasingly worse, while their buy-in to school decreases. I (and many teachers) feel helpless, impotent and I know I don’t always rise to the occasion. This is my second worse year in a teaching career that has spanned 24 years. I feel I lack the training and support in dealing with so many behavior problems, all while trying to provide “rigorous curriculum.” I’m not an ED teacher, yet I feel that role has been thrust upon me, with no support from administration or district. My only consolation is that I’m not the only teacher feeling this way.
Happy New Year!
This story was covered yesterday by NPR. They interviewed Superintendent Anderson.