Scott McLeod, a blogger in Iowa, explains how politicians are following a script that details how to kill public education. Watch what they do. The same game plan is being repeated in other states.
McLeod knows that Iowa is not the worst-hit state, but it is being targeted for privatization.
Follow the steps. See if your state is suffering the same treatment at the hands of “reformers.”
He writes:
*underfund schools so that they can’t keep up with operational costs, will struggle to meet educational mandates, and will have to reduce personnel (bonus: fewer union members!)
*maintain claims about ‘fiscal accountability’ and future revenue concerns, even when they require ignoring strong revenue generation and projections
*reduce existing revenue streams in order to bolster claims of fiscal hardship (bonus: less government!)
*employ bait-and-switch funding mechanisms that supplant rather than supplement and/or disappear at the last minute
*ignore legal requirements to timely establish school funding levels that would allow districts to adequately plan and budget
*implement new, supplemental ‘bread and circuses’ initiatives (say, STEM or financial literacy) that distract the general public from the year-to-year erosion of base school funding
*give as little policy attention as possible to the known educational needs of students who live in poverty or don’t speak English as their primary language (and thus struggle academically), even as those student and family populations increase markedly within the state
*deflect the blame for your underfunding of schools by alleging schools’ inefficiency and superintendents’ mismanagement
*frequently change state standards and assessments and/or make them more difficult so that educators and students struggle to keep up and have less chance of hitting the moving targets
use selective data (say, NAEP scores) to manufacture educational crises that feed your rhetoric of public school failure
*create school grading and ranking schemes that shame struggling schools, demoralize the educators within them, and alarm parents
implement teacher evaluation schemes that are guaranteed to be unfair, demoralize educators, and confuse the public
*pitch tax credits and private/religious school vouchers or ’scholarships’ (‘money that will follow students in their backpacks’) to the general public as natural recourses to the failures of public schools
*write legislation that expands public school alternatives such as charters or homeschooling, particularly ones that can siphon funds away from public schools
*create double-standard school and educator ‘accountability’ provisions that apply to public schools but not non-public alternatives
*accept policy proposals, money, and political influence from seemingly anyone other than actual educators
affiliate with anti-public-school organizations (say, ALEC) that will feed you ‘model’ legislation proposals, connect you with successful players and tactics from other states, and provide ongoing encouragement to stay the course
*hold yearly education summits at which educators can only listen passively to carefully-vetted speakers who feed your desired agendas
*publicly dismiss, disparage, intimidate, or try to silence educators, parents, researchers, and others who speak out against your policies

The Plan has been in effect for a long time. Here is the original playbook: http://www.alec.org/model-legislation/indiana-education-reform-package/
All that was needed to get this going is the politicians to make it happen. Pay attention to which members of your state legislature are members of ALEC.
LikeLike
I started going through the ALEC proposal. It is tightening
.
LikeLike
The recent history of Florida public education . . .
LikeLike
I’m in AZ, where they’ve been playing this game for a long time!
LikeLike
Agree. My first reaction, the Arizona story, without exception.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve always found it better to approach it from the point of view, “If you wanted to tap into the hundreds of billions of tax dollars spent for your own profit, what would it make sense to do to be able to pull it off?” This is the basic question of “disaster capitalism”. Then the answer would be pretty much what we’ve seen. I’ve always believed NCLB had a hidden agenda of gathering data to help create the narrative that public education is failing, and teachers unions and teachers are to blame, all to justify privatization, both in the forms of charters and vouchers, but also in the form of infusing massive amounts of technology into education. If I were one of those wanting to tap into the hundreds of billions, I would do exactly what they have done. In particular, get “believers” elected to office.
LikeLike
Good point. I don’t think the rephormers want to kill public education entirely, for the same reason that FedEx and UPS don’t want to kill USPS entirely. USPS delivers to places that it’s not profitable for FedEx or UPS to deliver to, so USPS finishes a lot of their deliveries for them and makes their business possible. Similarly, public education is needed to serve “those kids” who are not profitable for privatized schools to serve. The rephormers want to get their hands on the money – as much of it as possible. I think they really are “agnostic” about public vs. private – whichever one will give them the best ROI is fine with them.
LikeLike
I really worry about the big push to have public schools redirect funds to ed tech. I just think any reasonable, responsible steward of public funds would admit that spending X in one area without an increase in funding means funds will be redirected from Y.
That’s how this works. There isn’t an unlimited amount of funding and energy and time.
“Plus/and” is a fairy tale. There is no set of circumstances where one can add and add and add without subtracting something in a real-life system. Either they admit priorities and consciously tier them, or priorities WILL BE created, by default, in a haphazard way.
Ignoring limits doesn’t mean limits go away. They’re there.
LikeLike
Union busting has been at the core of the “approach” from the beginning. The teachers unions are the last large and strong unions in the country. The powers that be aren’t going to be happy until they are also destroyed.
LikeLike
The part that is scary is how there’s no real debate. Both Republicans and Democrats are on board, so that means it’s the conventional wisdom that schools have to be privatized and we’re only discussing details- for profit/non profit, what form of voucher, what will “governance” of contractors look like, that sort of thing.
The central question- privatization or not- was never presented as a question so never debated.
It also really bothers me how politicians and others are busy replacing the whole concept of “public” with “nonprofit”. Those two words are not interchangeable in meaning. Just because an entity is organized as a nonprofit does not mean it’s “public”.
They’re really redefining “public” to mean “publicly funded”. That’s radical. That would never be accepted outside education, because it simply isn’t true.
LikeLike
Unless parents and concerned citizens stop voting for complicit representatives, this pattern will continue. Until people wake up and start supporting progressive candidates, we will lose more public schools and anything else promoting the common good. Groups like ALEC are hiding in the shadows actively lobbying to destroy democracy. I read ALEC wants to rewrite the Constitution.http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/01/us/politics/clamor-rises-to-rewrite-the-us-constitution.html
LikeLike
Much of this posting can be summed up as the reflexive sneer, jeer and smear of the enablers and enforcers of the self-proclaimed “education reform” movement.
Destroy trust in public schools (along with other public institutions) and the road to $tudent $ucce$$ is clear.
Thank you to the commenters on this thread and to the owner of this blog for the posting.
😎
LikeLike
sllightly off-topic …
*** UPDATE on Adelanto charter created
by the Parent Trigger … December 15, 2015 ***
In response to some manipulative misinformation
being circulated by Debra Tarver the founder of
the Adelanto charter (DTPA) the Adelanto
school board has put out information
clarifying their position regarding its non-renewal
of the Debra Tarver-led and Parent-Revolution-allied
charter school, Desert Trails Prepatory Academy (DTPA)
and the mandatory conditions DTPA must meet in order
for the board to reverse the board’s non-renewal.
Pursuant to that end, the Board posted this
timeline of the most recent events,
with links to all relevant correspondence:
http://www.aesd.net/article/desert-trails-charter-petition-information
“Based on the concerns raised by parents of Desert Trails Preparatory Academy (DTPA) and from members of the public asking for clarification and transparency on what has transpired, the following is a timeline of events involving the DTPA charter renewal petition and extension request.”
The upshot of this timeline is the same:
— the district will not approve the renewal of either
DTPA’s charter or its agreement to use the facilities without
Tarver — along with the various Tarver-controlled
charter corporations involved — first instituting
major reforms in its governance, financial practices,
accountability to the Adeanto board, etc … reforms that
must be negotiated with the board.
MEANWHILE
— Tarver is refusing to change anything, nor even admit
that anything needs to be changed… As before,
she’s still saying, “Just give us
the two-year extension for both the charter and
use of the building with no strings attached, no
more questions asked.. Just basically renew us
and butt the-hell out of operations.”
The promised “parent decision-making power” and
parent involvement touted by Parent Revolution
never happened. (SEE VIDEO at the end of this
post.) The parents voted or —
if you believe Yasha Levine’s piece — were
tricked into voting to make one decision
and one decision only:
— they gave the former traditional public
school’s multi-million-dollar annual budget
and free use of the facilities to Tarver and her
confusing web of corporations that run the school
… and after that, Tarver basically told the parents
and the Adelanto Board, “Butt out! We’re in charge!”
Here’s an article about Levine’s piece:
There has been egregious mismanagement corruption
— “lawbreakingly unprofessional” one
insider told CAPITAL & MAIN’s Bill Raden in
this piece: (which includes video interviews
embedded in the page)
http://capitalandmain.com/features/california-expose/adelanto-report-card-year-zero-of-the-parent-trigger-revolution/
In the face of this, the Adelanto Board
finally rebelled against this arrangement,
and voted to cancel the charter — technically
they voted “non-renewal.” This was a board
that was and is stacked with Parent Revolution
puppets who basically cut their puppet strings
and turned on their puppeteer masters.
Reading the Adelanto School Board’s timeline
and the correspondence is enlightening.
The Board claims that Tarver wrote a false and
misleading letter to the Adelanto School
Board had sent them, one that contradicted
a prior letter that Adelanto Board had sent
Tarver. In an effort to manipulate the situation
Tarver then distributed this letter to the parents.
Tarver’s letter falsely asserted that Adelanto
district board had changed course (it hadnt) and
would renew the two agreements unconditionally
—- one for the charter/budget, and one for
use of the buildings—and that the
Tarver and her charter folks were
happily accepting this latest offer
(with only a changein a timeline.)
Writing this, then giving it out to parents seems an attempt
to fabricate a scenario where Tarver can later tell
the parents at her charter that the Adelanto board
reneged on a promise and double-crossed them —
making Tarver & Co. victims, and the Adelanto
board the villains.
Again, the letter is apparently in total contradiction to
Adelanto board’s November non-renewal motion, which
included the major concerns that caused the non-renewal.
Again, here’s that resolution:
Click to access Resolution_No_15-16-09.pdf
The initial motion of non-renewal didn’t
rule out any possible reversal of the non-renewal.
Indeed, the Adelanto board made an offer to “negotiate” —
i.e. negotiation that would result in necessary and
mandatory reforms —with Tarver and her charter folks.
Instituting those negotiated reforms would be an absolute
and necessary pre-condition of any renewal of either
of the two major agreements — the charter & the
facilities agreement
Here’s Tarver’s false and misleading letter to the Adelanto
board, which she, again, passed out to all her parents:
Click to access Dec_4_Request_for_two_year_extension.pdf
The Adelanto school board responded that it never
made an unconditional offer to renew. Its letter responding
to Tarver’s included an excerpt from an earlier letter in which it clearly
stated that any renewal was, is, and always will be conditional on reforms,
and that the Adelanto board was only open to “negotiate”
a renewal that would ultimately result in these reforms being instituted.
If Tarver refused to agree to this and refused to “negotiate”, the
non-renewal will stand and the school will close in May.
The board states that Tarver continues
to refuse any such negotiation, and resist any such
negotiated reforms.
Here’s the Adelanto’s school board’s letter to Tarver
and the charter fokls— which includes a demand that
this letter, like the other one, also be
distributed to the parents at her school (i.e. stop
lying to them as part of your attempt to trick them,
manipulate them, fabricate victimhood, etc) :
Click to access Dec_9_Letter.pdf
My guess is that Tarver will then take this to court, and
hope that they get the kind of judge (or the same exact judge)
that made the incredible ruling that parents would not be
allowed to rescind their signatures, even if those parents
were lied to and tricked into signing a petition that they
otherwise would never have signed.
See you in court in 2016, Debra!
One more thing …
Given what’s transpiring now, where Adelanto parents
today have zero — we’re talking ZE – RO — decision-making
power in Debra Tarver’s corrupt charter, it’s interesting
to hear Parent Revolution’s spokesman and
Deputy Director Christina Sanchez make
all these claims and promises about how the parents
are taking control and, from this moment forward,
will now be in control of the new charter that will be
formed— in an archived video from March 2012:
How ‘trigger laws’ empower parents
“How ‘trigger laws’ empower parents
CNN’s Kyra Phillips questions Christina Sanchez of Parent Revolution about laws that enable parents to take over public schools.”
Compare Sanchez’ laughable description with
what actually happened (i.e. the latest board
actions, the Capital & Main article).
——————————————————
CHRISTINA SANCHEZ: ” … parents now have
real formal power under the Parent Trigger Law,
and, at Desert Trails, where parents organized
and united — not to run the operations of the
school — but to actually be equal partners in deciding
the key strategies that the school’s going to use
to educate their children
(NEVER HAPPENED)
… will now have the ability to guide the
vision and the direction of their school.”
(NEVER HAPPENED)
KYRA PHILLIPS: “But explain to me exactly
what the parents would do. I mean
have you decided WHO would run WHAT.
I mean, the criticismis: what gives the
parents more qualifications than a
principal or a teacher or other staff members
who have been trained to do these jobs?
CHRISTINA SANCHEZ: (blathers about
the signature-verification process then says)
” …the parents have called for a partnership
with the district.
(NEVER HAPPENED)
“They want to have say over the principal
who’s going to run the school.
(NEVER HAPPENED)
“They want to be able to make changes to
to curriculum,
(NEVER HAPPENED)
” and to some of the basic
operations of the school,
(NEVER HAPPENED)
“make sure it’s safe,
(NEVER HAPPENED)
makes sure that the children are being
prepared for college, and for a career.
(NEVER HAPPENED)
“And so, right now, the actual plan that’s
proposed, is still being designed by the
parents and the district, and we’re hopeful
that the district will continue to engage
in conversations with the parents and
put together a partnership.”
——————————————————
The so-called partnership never happened.
Per the Parent Trigger Law, Debra Tarver
and her various corporations took over, and
from the point on, the parents nor the
Adelanto Board had ZERO decision-making
power. Tarver & Co. has had ZERO accountability
to the Adelanto board. Tarver & Co. refuses
to give any transparency to the board or to
the parents.
Phillips continues her questioning, and
Sanchez claims that social movements
like Parent Revolution face opposition from
evil forces… blah-blah-blah….
—-
Robert Skeels wrote about of a confrontation between Christina
Sanchez and Ingrid Villeda, a veteran LAUSD teacher and
LAUSD parent, at a community forum.
BACKGROUND: Villeda knew that Sanchez, as
a TFA temp, taught for two years at Belvedere Middle School,
an East L.A. traditional public school,
then took a six-figure job (in her mid-20’s, mind you)
from Ben Austin’s Parent Revolution to help privatize schools.
Sanchez is getting paid — and paid well — to play
her phony, yet perfectly-cast role as a poor, mid-20’s
telegenic girl from the barrio, and former teacher
from the barrio, fighting for the educational rights
of the rest of the barrio’s poor children.
Villleda, a 20-year veteran public school teacher —
a Latino, who like Sanches, is also from the barrio — publicly
laid Sanchez out in front of the community present, saying:
“Christina, you abandoned your students (when she left Belvedere
Middle School) then sold out for big money, so that corporations
can seize our schools! Shame on you!”
I wish I could have been a fly on the wall for that one.
Here’s Villeda testifying in front of the LAUSD Board
in favor of a resolution that would rein in the Parent
Trigger: (and, unlike Sanchez, not being paid a nickel,
t must be noted)
Here’s Villeda being interviewed in Spanish: ( … lies,
violence, etc.)
Here’s more interviews re Parent Trigger:
And finally, here’s another great speech regarding
the Parent Trigger, from then-UTLA teachers union
president Warren Fletcher:
Watch how pro-privatization Board Member Tamar
Galatzan try to block Fletcher from speaking, before
the late, great Margueritte LaMotte intervenes to
allow Fletcher to speak.
Last spring, Galatzan was thrown out
of office, in large part due to her alliance with and
moves to privatize LAUSD schools, defeated in
the election by veteran public school teacher and
administrator Scott Schmerelson.
LikeLike
*publicly dismiss, disparage, intimidate, or try to silence educators, parents, researchers, and others who speak out against your policies”
Yes…this happens both at the state and district level. It’s why—it breaks my heart to say—I had my first interview at a private school last week.
Iowa has much cause to worry, especially with Terry Branstad as our governor. Vetoing (essentially stealing) money that was allocated for our children, he has made teacher leadership his only education issue. If only that could fix the rising poverty, the closing of rural schools, the loss of the arts….
LikeLike
I think these reform guys are weenies. They are too afraid of the public, so they make all kinds of shady steps that don’t show the clear goal.
A military style, general-based reform plan has 3 strategic steps to conquer education.
1) Introduce enough standardized tests so that the goal of education would become test preparation. This will weaken the need for good teachers.
2) Replace real teachers by college juniors who need only a few weeks of training to be able to force military style test preparation on their little “scholars”. Once the public is exposed to these teachlings, they’ll basically wish for the next, ultimate step.
3) Replace the teachlings by software. Once the public sees that education expenses get reduced by $100 billion, they will be on board. There’s still $1 trillion – $100 billion = $900 billion left for software companies to shark over, making Economy overweight again.
LikeLike
You left out – try to pass legislation making it illegal for any relative of any employee in the public school system to serve on local school boards – making sure that the people who know what is going on in education will be under-represented in the operation of the schools.
LikeLike
Ken Harder has a very valid point. We have relatives, and friends of the relatives, and many of the same faith and many from the same church mind you in every part of our local Govt to privatize public education. Des Moines, Ia. The corruption and favors amongst these folks is just unreal. This goes all up the pike to Rep Terry Branstad and crew.
Check out the RiceField.Weebly.com or Ginny AntrimFriendsofRiceField@Facebook.com. Amy Moore is right about the shaming of advocate and activists, parents and teachers when they speak up.Bullying in fact those who protest any actions.
LikeLike