The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education commended the passage of Every Student Succeeds Act, but warns that its provisions could lower standards for teacher credentialing and that the law allows states to authorize the creation of “academies” to offer master’s degrees. These academies might have no faculty members with graduate degrees, as is the case with some of the charter “graduate” schools of education, where charter teachers grant master’s degrees to other charter teachers.
AACTE Commends Congress on ESEA Reauthorization, Urges Responsible Implementation
(December 9, 2015, Washington, D.C.) – Today, Congress completed its long-overdue reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The bipartisan legislation, titled the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), now awaits the president’s signature. The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) applauds the leadership of Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Ranking Member Patty Murray (D-WA) in the U.S. Senate and Chairman John Kline (R-MN) and Ranking Member Bobby Scott (D-VA) in the U.S. House of Representatives for bringing the bill to closure.
Overall, AACTE supports ESSA for its improvements over existing policy and for returning more power to the states to oversee local PK-12 education. However, certain provisions in the bill could threaten efforts to provide all students equitable access to high-quality teachers and principals. AACTE believes that all students should be taught by a profession-ready teacher who has completed preparation, demonstrated content knowledge and effectiveness, and achieved full state certification or licensure. AACTE members stand ready to assist their states in supporting well-researched, evidence-based approaches to meeting this goal—and steering clear of policies that would undermine it.
Of particular concern in Title II of ESSA is the inclusion of H.R. 848, the Great Teaching and Leading for Schools Act (the GREAT Act), which permits states to authorize new teacher, principal, and school leader academies. Such academies would award certificates that could be treated as equivalent to a master’s degree, effectively bringing the government into the function of academic credentialing.
Yet the academies would not have to meet the same requirements as traditional higher education providers. Higher education has long been held to state standards for key aspects of educator preparation, including academic credentials of faculty, physical infrastructure, number of required course credits, course work previously completed by candidates, the process of obtaining accreditation, and admissions criteria. The new academies are exempt from such restrictions.
Holding academies to a lower set of standards will undermine the nation’s goal of ensuring all students have a profession-ready teacher, especially as the bill requires states to allow teacher candidates to serve as teachers of record before completing their preparation and receiving their certificate or license. AACTE and its members will continue to advocate in the states for the necessity of having a fully prepared, certified or licensed teacher in each classroom.
Beyond the provisions of the GREAT Act, ESSA includes other troubling opportunities for states to expand alternative routes to certification and licensure for high-need fields such as special education and the STEM disciplines—again without attention to standards for such programs.
Furthermore, ESSA does not include minimum entry standards for the teaching profession, leaving this determination up to each state. With multiple provisions in the bill encouraging expansion of alternate routes to the classroom and the use of teachers-in-training as teachers of record, ESSA tempts states to lower standards for the profession, which would have an adverse impact on the students who are most in need of highly skilled, well-prepared teachers. AACTE looks forward to working through its state chapters and membership across the nation to help states execute the provisions of ESSA responsibly.
###
AACTE: The Leading Voice on Educator Preparation
The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education is a national alliance of educator preparation programs dedicated to high-quality, evidence-based preparation that assures educators are profession-ready as they enter the classroom. Its over 800 member institutions represent public and private colleges and universities in every state, the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and Guam. Through advocacy and capacity building, AACTE promotes innovation and effective practices that strengthen educator preparation. Learn more at http://www.aacte.org.
The AACTE’s “Of particular concern” is followed by a long list of disastrous fallout from this law. Why so weak & passive? No other profession would tolerate Congress dumbing down it’s standards. Does anyone think that doctors, lawyers, architects, psychologists, engineers, or pilots would allow such malignant policy to dictate how to prepare their fellow professionals?
See
http://www.nctq.org/commentary/article.do?id=147
Completely agree with jcgrim.
I just don’t get why there is so much wide-spread support for this awful piece of legislation. Is it just a giant case of “anything is better than NCLB?” Although I haven’t had time to personally read the 1000 page document, from what I’ve been reading/hearing, there are are far too many serious and fundamental problems to justify support. In this latest reveal, I am left wondering how long teacher ed. colleges and universities will survive if competing “academies” are encouraged and allowed to offer certification for less time/work and possibly cost.
Am I missing something?
I don’t call giving credibility to fake teachers from fake teacher preparation programs a step forward. I see lots of potential for abuse. Selling off responsibility for special education students and ELLs to unqualified staff or mindless cyber instruction so corporations can profit from them is not a step in the right direction. ESSA legitimizes non evidence based programs from corporations for our most vulnerable students rather than promoting equity based programs from a certified and qualified teacher.
All of these provisions in ESSA comport with a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Grant Program to get rid of academic freedom in university teacher education programs and to bypass all current accreditation and certification programs for teachers.
Gates is jump-starting a network of “Teacher Preparation Transformation Centers” that are designed to by-pass current accreditation and certification processes. The intent is to eliminate faculty voice in shaping teacher education by substituting a suite of “skill sets” complemented by training videos etc. All of the grants are going to outfits that require the Common Core to be part of their programming.
Gates has also used his National Council on Teacher Quality to incubate a freestanding British style inspector system for teacher preparation programs and evaluation of candidates when they get a job.
This Inspectorate system has been piloted in a number of states and it will have the contract to evaluate all of the programs in the “Teacher Preparation Transformation Centers,” including measures of employer satisfaction. The Inspectorate oversees a system that Gates is funding for a three-year scale up (possibly five). The Inspectorate seems to be attached to an LLC based in Florida with a long and amazing list of clients and of course, retreads from USDE.
One of the “Transformation Centers he is funding is attached to Relay Graduate School of Education.” The aim appears to be one grand and “perfect” way to get teachers job-ready for specific districts and job markets with a lot of competency based training modules part of that.
Production target: 2500 of teachers a year, all Gates-certified as trained to deliver the Common Core (protecting his $200 million + investment). Someone said that number of graduates, 2500 a year, is about the same as the current number of new teachers from programs in 23 states.
His initial request for proposals indicated a “Strong preference for centers that impact providers in the following locations:
Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia.”
Side note. I am totally frustrated in posting here and on all WordPress sites. I am prevented from directly entering comments in WordPress by some nasty bug dating back to September.
-I have to draft everything in Word, copy and paste it in. No editing works after that. Keys lock up.
Buffalo used to have their own special certification program for hard to fill subject areas. My husband teaches Earth Science even though his degrees are in Microbiology, Biochemical Pharmacology, Math, and Electrical Engineering. He actually prefers Earth Science and he has Buffalo Certification.
The US Department of Education actively promotes the alternate certification programs:
https://twitter.com/arneduncan
I stopped listening to what DC says a long time ago. Now I just look at what they do. The line all along has been they are “agnostics” and they simply promote at “what works” but if you watch what they do there’s a clear and really pervasive bias towards ed reform “movement” priorities.
They’re utterly captured by a specific set of reforms and ALL of it comes from “market-based” ideology. I don’t think one can get a job in DC without buying the basic premise. It self-selects for a certain brand of “reform”. One can read widely across the “reform” spectrum and it all sounds the same, and that includes the US Department of ED.
how can AACTE laud a bill that opens the door to a lowering of Educator preparation standards. But the AACTE always has sought the lowest common denominator to keep membership up.