Peter Greene wonders why the excitement over the Every Student Succeeds Act (replacing No Child Left Behind, which says the same thing). How do you spell NCLB backwards? ESSA.
If the Tea Party and right-wing extremists control your state, you still have to fight for the survival of public schools and professional educators.
The ESSA doesn’t settle anything. It doesn’t solve anything. Every argument and battle that supporters of public schools (and the teachers and students whowork and learn in public schools) will still be fought– the difference is that now those arguments will be held in state capitols instead of Washington DC.
Depending on your state, that may be good news. Or it may be that the best we can say is that your state government isn’t any worse, and they live closer to you.
There are definite advantages. State government officials are easier to find, to get to, to contact, to talk to. When a single state decides to implement terrible policy, they won’t be implementing it for the entire country. And there are now plenty of groups that have become very accomplished and effective at making themselves heard in their home state (looking at you, New York opt outers).
Both those who love it and those who hate it, I think, missing the most important feature. ESSA replaces a great deal of the old “you must do” this language with “you may do this” language and even “you could get money for this but you have several choices here” language.
ESSA makes it possible to take many important steps forward. It also makes it possible for states to step backward. The steps that are taken will be decided state by state, and the same players who have worked hard to break down public education are still right there, still well-funded, still fully committed to the goals they have pursued for over a decade. It is absolutely critical that advocates for public education keep the pressure up on state governments. Congress has taken an unprecedented step in returning some power and control to the states; now we have to make sure that power is well used and that all students, schools and teachers receive the support and the tools needed to do the job we signed up to do.
The struggle is not over. It has just shifted venue. Get ready for the next rounds of debate– all fifty of them. The one big change is the, unlike its predecessors, ESSA mandates relatively few things. But it opens the doors of opportunity wide to many many things, both good and bad. It’s up to all of us to be vigilant about what walks through those doors.

“The struggle is not over. It has just shifted venue. Get ready for the next rounds of debate– all fifty of them.”
Indiana is a state that worships vouchers and charters. Public schools are terribly underfunded. Our government is totally run by conservative Republicans and we have a Tea Party Governor. (Cutting funding for public schools occurs …too bad.)
I was talking recently with an art teacher who works in a poverty level school. He hasn’t had a pay increase in 8 years. Poor students don’t do well enough on standardized tests to warrant teacher raises.
Disgusting that this is happening. It is hard to wage a decent battle in Indiana when the political chips are against teachers.
LikeLike
Maybe moving the struggle for democratically governed equitable education to the states will prove to be a strategic victory. That remains to be seen, as surely the forces of privatization will also regroup in full force locally. However, it could also be a long term loss. About a year ago, I wrote: The problem over the last several decades of education policy is not overreach. It is that the federal government has been reaching for the wrong things in the wrong places with the wrong policy levers….Great advances for economic and social justice, such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and civil rights laws are the result of federal legislation and Supreme Court decisions. All of these benchmarks of progress been initiated by local social and political action, but they have been achieved nationally.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/01/13/u-s-education-policy-federal-overreach-or-reaching-for-the/
I worry about giving credence to the traditionally backwards looking states-right line of argument. I agree, the struggle is not over.
http://www.arthurcamins.com
LikeLike
Camins’ lament is eloquent in its simplicity.
The middle class that elects Democrats, rightfully expected representation for justice.
LikeLike
“I worry about giving credence to the traditionally backwards looking states-right line of argument. I agree, the struggle is not over.”
Agreed. State Universities & Colleges of eduction are under attack. I expect the dismantling of higher ed will be on Obama & all the Republican’s to do list by the end of 2016.
LikeLike
the other major problem with ESSA is that it guts teacher education programs. there are provisions that protect and elevate the status of non-traditional teacher prep programs, like Teach for America and The New Teacher Project, and that provide for the bogus credentials issued by groups like the Relay Graduate School to count as equivalent to Masters degrees for certification purposes.
we have traded a slight softening of language and a move of battle grounds from the federal to state levels for a wholesale attack on the way that teachers are prepared, licensed and certified. the next battle ground will be at the spout of the teacher workforce pipeline, and it’s not going to be pretty. get ready for a never-ending parade of even more unqualified and under qualified “teachers” through urban classrooms, where the children need a consistent, experienced, and quality teaching force the most.
LikeLike
Agree
LikeLike
True. So the big question is where is the voice of the colleges and universities? Universities are under the same threat as K-12 schools. The big difference is that profs, for now, have a great power. What are they waiting for?
LikeLike
As an example to support Greene’s point- Dayton Daily News Reporter, Laura Bischoff, (“Charter school Finances Targeted”, Dec. 1. 2015), delved into why charter schools were left off of a list, from the Ohio Treasurer’s Office, that requested on-line postings of spending. (The Treasurer’s stated intent was spending transparency and, public school systems were on the list.) The Treasurer’s Press Secretary’s response about charters was, “We don’t plan (to ask for cooperation from) charter school management companies.” The state’s explanation follows in the article, “(Our transparency model) is not intended for private sector business expenditures.” The reporter concludes, “Ohioans won’t be able to see details on large swaths of community school spending….Donors with connections to charter schools have contributed more than $117,000 to the Treasurer’s state campaign account. The biggest chunk, $86,390, came from Ann and David Brennan …founders of the largest for-profit charter school operator in the Ohio.”
LikeLike
“(Our transparency model) is not intended for private sector business expenditures.”
😳
Er, um, ah, but we’ve heard so many many times from the rheephormistas that visit this blog that charter schools ARE public schools in every way, shape and fashion—except, natcherly, when it comes to being cage busting achievement gap crushing Centres of Educational Excellence, and that requires being released from a host of stifling onerous regulations.
Like transparency in spending public dollars.
😱
I would never have guessed that rheephormsters are such big fans of Woody Guthrie, but perhaps they mistook his intent in this verse from PRETTY BOY FLOYD:
[start]
Yes, as through this world I’ve wandered
I’ve seen lots of funny men;
Some will rob you with a six-gun,
And some with a fountain pen.
[end]
Thank you for your comments.
😎
LikeLike
“Robbed”, Guthrie was right.
LikeLike
In Colorado it isn’t the Tea Party or the right wing extremists alone who are cramming the privatization down our throats. It is the so-called Democrats who keep pushing “reform.” And it is Democrats who have become totally anti-union, anti-intellectual running the education show. We have to stop treating Democrats as if they aren’t the problem. Really.
LikeLike
Agree
LikeLike
It could be a lot worse. This is the Obama Administration’s “blueprint” for the law from 2010.
It’s horrible. It is literally “test and punish”.
So, count your blessings. We could have ended up with the Obama Team Plan.
Click to access blueprint.pdf
LikeLike
NYS Gubernatorial hopeful, Chris Gibson (US House Rep), lays down the guantlet, using the new found freedom of states to choose their own standards, tests, and evaluation plans.
“U.S. Rep. Chris Gibson, R-Kinderhook, called the bill a major step forward in reducing federal overreach in classrooms and in empowering states and localities. The bill gives New York the flexibility to decide how it wants to test its children and evaluate teachers, he said.”
“The ball is now clearly in the governor’s court,” he said. “We have so many parents and teachers and students that have been upset with Common Core. Well, this bill allows states to withdraw from Common Core without penalty. In addition, the state has taken a heavy-handed approach to schools that are failing, and that has been in part driven by the federal government. That federal overreach is now gone, so anything the governor continues to do in education will be from his own volition. He can no longer lean on the federal government.”
LikeLike
In addition, this bill takes funding under Title 1 that used to go to direct service for the poorest under served students, and opens funding up to competitive grants. This is a mechanism, I fear, to divert funds from public schools to private entities under the veil of “innovation,” This is more bull from Washington cronies.
LikeLike
Of COURSE! We have a most corrupt government.
LikeLike
With so many flaws to this new legislation, I am so disappointed that groups that support public education actually support this law. Very very sad day. In Colorado nothing will change or will become worse as it’s all about playing games.
After reading books like “This Town”, I really don’t believe change can come from laws until we actually fix the government itself. This law is damaging beyond belief.
And why I signed this petition. I realize I have no power in stopping the passage, but I do have the power in letting people know how damaging this bill is.
https://www.change.org/p/u-s-senate-tell-the-u-s-senate-to-say-no-to-esea-reauthorization-plan-ver-traducci%C3%B3n-en-espa%C3%B1ol-abajo
LikeLike
Peter Green asks: “How do you spell NCLB backwards? ESSA.”
..and what do you get when you spell “ESSA” backwards and add an “s”?
Donkeys, of course.
LikeLike
Bottom line: reform has failed. Shifting to states is a ploy to avoid admitting failure of the fed gov Ed policies.
LikeLike
Exactly, Mochael!!
LikeLike
Cx:
Michael
LikeLike
For better or worse, none of us are Senators. We do not have to vote, yay or nay. Our job as citizens (and educators) is to keep telling others citizens and elected leaders what we value and what we do and do not want. So, whether ESSA is may be one step forward and two steps back is not the main point. That discussion may even be a distraction from what is most important, continuing the struggle for democratically governed equitable education. Tell elected leaders what they should be fighting for. Here are some of my suggestions: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arthur-camins/the-k12-education-speech-_b_7755854.html
http://www.arthurcamins.com
LikeLike
You are absolutely right … There are too sides to this coin. We just have to watch who wants to spend it!!
LikeLike
Tennessee public education policies already suck and no doubt, they’ll suck even more with ESSA. TN teachers will have a hard time with the state governor who considers TN his playground.
On the other hand, there will be states where public education will improve dramatically, and those happy examples will spread to the other states.
LikeLike
I’ve written this before but I think it bears repeating: the worst part of passing this with bi-partisan support and the endorsement of unions is that there will be no discussion of education policy in the national election.
LikeLike
One more point: As states begin implementing their new policies, I shudder to think what Abbott (TX), Brownback (KS), Walker (WI), Rauner (IL), Kasich (OH), and Christie (NJ) will dream up… and those are only the first tier of pro-privatization governors. ESSA isn’t only shifting problems to states, it’s giving states the opportunity to “solve them” by eliminating the union work force altogether. We would have been better off doing nothing and having a full blown national debate on this issue. As it stands now, the testing will continue, opting out will be more problematic, and governors like those listed above will be setting policies…. Oh, and the fine print on this bill is sure to reveal more problems.
LikeLike
” We would have been better off doing nothing and having a full blown national debate on this issue.”
Probably there are better examples, but how about abortion? Would it be better to overturn Roe v. Wade or have what we have? We’d have a national debate on abortion either way.
And, btw, with or without Roe v. Wade, abortion can still be an issue during elections, can’t it?
LikeLike