The public schools of the District of Columbia began their era of radical “reform” in 2007. The City Council, desperate for a quick fix to the low test scores and bureaucratic dysfunction of the school system, believed the much-heralded claims of a “New York City miracle,” supposedly due to mayoral control. The D.C. Council adopted mayoral control, hoping for the same miracle. Hard-charging Mayor Adrian Fenty, acting on the advice of NYC Chancellor Joel Klein, hired Michelle Rhee to be the Chancellor of the D.C. school system in 2007.
Rhee became the national face of the new reform movement. She closed schools, despite community protests. She fired principals and teachers. She ridiculed anyone who spoke of poverty as making excuses. She negotiated a sweeping teacher evaluation system and made war with the teachers’ union. She appeared on the covers of both TIME and Newsweek. She even won plaudits from both Presidential candidates during one of their debates in 2008. According to TIME, Rhee had a plan to fix the D.C. schools. She even predicted she would make it the best urban district in the nation.
Rhee was a lightning rod for admirers and critics. In 2010, Mayor Fenty lost his bid for re-election; Rhee was the central issue. She resigned, and the new Mayor Vincent Gray appointed Rhee’s deputy Kaya Henderson, fearful of offending the powerful supporters of Rhee and her methods. Henderson pledged to continue Rhee’s initiatives, but with a less confrontational style.
So after eight years, how did D.C. students do on the new PARCC test? Recall that D.C. won a Race to the Top Grant and embraced the Common Core standards.
The results are in, and they are appalling.
“District of Columbia officials released results from a recent citywide elementary school exam Monday, and the scores are abysmal. Less than a quarter of students met expectations in either math or English.
“Among all eighth grade students who took the test, just 3 percent met expectations in math, while 8 percent of seventh graders met the math expectations, according to Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) test results….
“Of all the D.C. public school students in grades three through eight who took the test, only 25 percent met English expectations, and just 21 percent are on the correct level in math achievement.
“Around half of individual elementary schools didn’t have a single student who exceeded expectations in math….
“In October the test results for high school students showed just one in 10 sophomores is on track to be prepared for college.
“The vast majority of city schools scored flat zeros in math preparedness, with the 10 percent average being largely propped up by two premiere magnet schools with rigorous admission standards.
“Kaya Henderson, chancellor of DC Public Schools, called the test results “sobering,” and called for more “strategic investments” in the city’s failing schools.”
G.F. Brandenburg, retired D.C. Teacher and lose observer of the District’s schools, says the combination of all-testing-all-the-time and putting half the students in unregulated charter schools was not successful.
Eight years of reform and what was accomplished? D.C. reforms cost many hundreds of millions of dollars. Many professionals were fired. There was little or no benefit to students. In Wendy Kopp’s last book, “A Chance to Make History,” she points to D.C. as an example of Teach for America’s ability to reform an entire district. That story line just dissolved.
Who will be held accountable? Who will really put students in the District of Columbia first? If any district can be considered a full-scale trial of the new punitive, competitive, business-style approach to education, it is the District of Columbia. How sad.

I don’t think test results can ever be “appalling”. Silly, yes. But considering that no standardized test “measures” (or even assesses) anything useful and that the PARCC is a particularly bad test, even among standardized tests, I think the best word to describe the results is “predictable”. Yes, there’s the issue that the rephormsters are failing even by their own metric. But “success” (even by test score standards) was never the objective. The objective has always been to prove how bad public schools are.
LikeLike
Yes. You nailed it, Dienne.
LikeLike
I was about to point out the obvious, so thanks for saving me time. Next move? Lots of new, expensive technology?
LikeLike
TFA and mayoral control. You can’t beat it! 8 years and declining. The only change was running out some really exceptional teachers and replacing them with cultural tourists and …. let me stop know. I’m trying to model my life after Malcolm, King, Gandhi, Jesus and others.
LikeLike
“cultural tourists” – I love the phrase. Bingo, and TAGO.
LikeLike
Given the rampant gentrification in DC, are these people cultural tourists, or colonizers?
LikeLike
Here’s my commentary on RI’s PARCC scores: http://cgri.ghost.io/the-strangely-muted-response-to-ris-parcc-tes-scores/
Among other things, Central Falls High School didn’t do too well.
LikeLike
It’s great. Thank you.
I wonder if it’s bewildering for the 10th graders, to “fall” so far so late in the game. I wonder if they think it’s valid or just dismiss it as another test score after years and years of tests.
LikeLike
Tom – I read your post and please not that only about half of the schools in MA took PARCC last year as a pilot and only grades 3-8. High schools all took the MCAS as the high school graduation requirement.
LikeLike
No way: She said this! In Wendy Kopp’s last book, “A Chance to Make History,” she points to D.C. as an example of Teach for America’s ability to reform an entire district. Oh Wendy…more like how to destroy a district and harm children of color. So many right-wing radicals are saluting you…so many.
LikeLike
Mark Collins: her book is only a few years old—so her ability to predict has been put to the test and found…
If possible, could you give us a short excerpt or two?
In any case, thank you for bringing this up.
😎
LikeLike
“Who will be held accountable? Who will really put students in the District of Columbia first?”
ANSWER: From the top starting with the White House, I think that no one who is part of the corporate public education demolition derby will be held accountable. The only way anyone will be held accountable will be at the ballot box, but for that to happen the traditional media will have to educated the voters so they will know what’s happened since 2007
Did the front page of The Washington Post (or any of the other six Washington DC papers) lead with this story and have banner headlines that stretched across the top of the front page from margin to margin in a huge font?
LikeLike
“corporate public education demolition derby”
Good description.
LikeLike
You must remember the number one rule….it’s always the teacher’s fault.
LikeLike
I know. I have not forgotten. The foundation of the corporate public education demolition derby for decades going back as far as the 1980s has always been, “It’s the public school teachers fault for just about everything—-prison populations, poverty, starvation, war, terrorism, the 2007-08 global financial collapse, the mortgage debacle, unemployment, corporations moving their manufacturing to China to boost profits by using cheaper labor, Hedge Fund taking over public pensions and bankrupting them, etc.
LikeLike
I do see a point where the bubble is going to burst real soon. All the veteran teachers are reaching retirement age and running for the door. When you combine that with the inability to keep new teachers more than 2-3 years, we are headed for some dire times. There won’t be enough money to pay teachers to take the abuse that they are currently taking.
LikeLike
I think this abuse is exactly what the corporate public education demolition derby wants—to drive out teachers who remember the way it was, and recruit a new crop that will be trained to monitor kids sitting isolated in front of computer screens working their way through scripted lessons/
Teachers in that future will not be teachers as we knew them. They will be low paid room monitors who are paid low wages to make sure the children keep their eyes on the screens and spend every heart beat doing the computer lessons that companies like Pearson and Microsoft will earn billions off of.
They will call it individualized teaching and will never mention it will be conducted without interaction with teachers or other students.
LikeLike
I can see that happening. Then we can do the things that Wisconsin is discussing, like lower the standard to be a teacher to “having a pulse”.
LikeLike
I won’t be surprised if the oligarchs replaced human teachers with highly trained service dogs. These burly dogs will payroll the crowded classrooms and will be trained to sense when a student is not focused on the computer screen workign on their scripted lessons. Once the dog is paid for, there is no salary, hourly wage or benefits and the dogs will never attempt to form labor unions or go to court over abusive treatment by management. Dogs will also be cheap to feed.
LikeLike
That would be about right.
LikeLike
It might reach the point we could a politician in a room to monitor. After all it will have been reduced to a position that requires no training or intelligence. Politicians seem to be the least competent people in this country at the moment.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, TFA is right now exalting and congratulating Kaya Henderson as the new queen of rheeform. TFA thinks she is just about the greatest thing since her majesty Rhee. Ugh. The spin, the lies, the smarminess of it all. Makes me ill and sorry for the students who have to put up with the B.S.
LikeLike
But is it a big shocker? Do these test scores differ from those in the past other than the absolute numbers?
I ask because my son’s public school released their CC test scores and they’re about 20 points lower across the board, which shouldn’t surprise anyone because that result was carefully designed, was it not?
LikeLike
As I understand it, and as Diane regularly reminds us, state tests aligned with the Common Core use NEAP proficiency rates as their benchmark. These are much higher than grade level proficiency, and are more indicative of grade level mastery.
So, no it’s not a big shocker.
In PA, where I teach 4th grade, consistent with the PARCC, our core aligned state test (PSSA) set the cut score rate for proficiency much higher than the non aligned PSSA of previous years. So our state also dropped steeply in % proficient for reading and math.
Of course after 8 years of the best and the brightest corporate school reform, one would expect the poor kids of DC to be more career and college ready.
LikeLike
Based on this massive Common Core failure, do the civil rights groups still want more of it? That would be strange.
LikeLike
The civil rights groups that support the Common Core should have to explain how these tests are improving outcomes for low income students. Chronic failure is a slap in the face to building self esteem.
LikeLike
Good question.
and…
retired teacher your point about chronic failure is a good one.
Chronic failure is a slap in the face, and, I would add, chronic failure is a kind of oppression.
LikeLike
When it comes to so-called education reform, nothing succeeds – public school closings, charter school metastasis, teacher scapegoating and destroyed careers, neutralized unions – like failure.
LikeLike
Any results from 2007/2008 or before to compare with the most recent ones? Are the results now worse?
Cali
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
LikeLike
There are 2 possible ways to look at this: 1 is from the lense that education reform is intended to help kids succeed, the other from the lens that it is intended to “prove” failure.
1- If RTTT’s prongs: CCSS, accountability etc. were intended to succeed- then game over. As parents have been saying for 5 years, CC is not rigorous. It relies on a combination of chaos and developmentally inappropriate material to APPEAR rigorous, while in reality depriving students of a true education.
The corresponding tests do the same. Difficult software, confusing questions, content above grade level combined to appear rigorous when in reality all it is is a hot mess measuring nothing valuable.
How many ways does this add up to poor education? Oh let’s count just a few..
1- not learning content in the first place.
2- constant testing taking the place of learning
3- years of chaos and disruption for teachers and students
4- no aligned source materials leading to education via a barrage of worksheets, self-made “books” containing only their own notes, power point presentations and apps. And when a child is confused as to the content she needs to study? Too bad. All you have is that mush mash of materials. Maybe you should google it.
5. I go back to #1. There was never any hope of a true education via CCSS in the first place.
Scenario 2- Education reform is meant to trigger failure and create the political will to privatize public school. I have long believed this to be true and have felt it was inevitable given the billionaire factor. But seeing the whole thing play out, and how gut wrenching the actual visual really is- I feel hope.
WE MUST EDUCATE PARENTS!!! No one would EVER allow this plot to be perpetrated on children if they knew about it,
Perhaps the waste that lays in this path can be useful. It exposes the intention. Or at least exposes incompetence. Reform is failing 3/4 of children??? I can’t help but think the public wouldn’t stand for that.
LikeLike
The National Academy released a study of the DC schools since mayoral takeover this summer. I reported on this report that shows the utter failure of Corporate Education Reform. https://tultican.wordpress.com/2015/10/21/d-c-schools-a-portrait-of-corporate-education-reform-failure/
LikeLike
AZ scores have just come out from the test that replaced our state test. Even the Education Department said they expected low scores. Another test that will be used against teachers and low-income students. http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/education/2015/11/30/azmerit-scores-most-students-failed-inaugural-test/76561998/
LikeLike
AZ has the worst schools in the country. Also rampant charters in every half-vacant mall.
LikeLike
The Common Core reform movement focuses almost exclusively on “evidence based reading, writing, and thinking”. The practitioners, promoters, and supporters come off as a bunch of hypocrites when it comes to the evidence of their own failure.
LikeLike
They couldn’t care less about that, since, as we see in the Presidential campaign, facts and truth are irrelevant.
Common Core from the beginning has been a bait-and-switch con, whereby people have been promised “standards,” but received high stakes exams and the monetization of students instead.
LikeLike
The poor kids….
LikeLike
“just 3 percent met expectations”
For a second, I thought the article was talking about Congress…but then I realized that was kind of high for Congress.
LikeLike
Rheeely? A 97% failure rate in math. What exactly could this mean? A group of random strangers answering randomly could do better.
LikeLike
Opt-out.
LikeLike
Shame on all of these so-called experts that put the students through this trauma…as a second-grader once told me Shame, Shame Shame.
LikeLike
I agree. Shame on the corporate pbulic educatoin demolition derby! But it wasn’t just the children who suffered. Schools were closed. Teachers and principals lost their jobs. The teachers that remained were treated like trash and forced to do things they knew were wrong but out of fear of losing their jobs, they did them anyway.
LikeLike
Once they “unpack” these scores (must use the current buzz words!), they will confirm what we already know. Kids who are brought up in a resource rich environment are more likely to outperform those who are not. D-u-uh!
LikeLike
What proportion of D.C. teachers were TFA?
LikeLike
Let me get this right, public schools are a failure because of test scores and charter schools are not succeeding as promised because of test scores. Logically, something is wrong with equating test scores with success. Something is wrong with labeling our kids as failures due to biased,profit making, data collection. I refuse to label kids as failures based on these measures. That’s what’s wrong with the whole reform movement, socializing, educating our kids involves more than testing, it always has. Corporate public education demolition indeed.
LikeLike