Jonathan Pelto reports the results of the latest Quinnipiac poll of Connecticut voters. Governor Dannell Malloy’s approval rating has dropped to only 32%. Malloy is known to readers of this blog as a chum of the charter industry and the Connecticut hedge fund managers who love them. Not even the embarrassing implosion of the Jumoke charter chain dimmed his ardor for deregulated, privately managed schools.
From the Quinnipiac University Public Opinion Poll;
Connecticut voters disapprove 58 – 32 percent of the job Gov. Dannel Malloy is doing, his lowest approval rating ever and the lowest score for any governor in the nine states surveyed this year by the independent Quinnipiac University Poll. The governor gets 4-1 negative scores for the way he his handling taxes and the state budget.
“Gov. Dannel Malloy’s job approval rating has plummeted to 32 percent, close to the historic 24 percent low hit by disgraced former Gov. John Rowland in January 2004, and Gov. Malloy is not in the middle of a corruption scandal,” said Quinnipiac University Poll Director Douglas Schwartz, PhD.
“Only 36 percent of voters are satisfied with the way things are going in the state, one of the lowest scores since Quinnipiac University started asking this question in 1997.”
Connecticut is a state with many affluent, well-educated voters. They may remember that Governor Malloy campaigned last year with a promise not to raise taxes or to cut the budget of vital services.
Pelto writes:
“But after being sworn back into office this past January, Malloy raised taxes, cut vital services and has turned his back on Connecticut’s state employees.
“Even after increasing taxes in the first year of his first term and the first year of his second term, when this present state budget cycle is over on June 30, 2017, Connecticut will be facing a two-year General Fund Budget Deficit of $1.6 Billion … YES, A DEFICIT OF $1.6 BILLION … [A deficit of $927 million in FY 2018 and $831 million in FY 2019.]”

In other words, Malloy, just like all the other corporate education reformers, lied to fool people and gain their vote so he could win—-like Obama did too.
LikeLike
Off topic, but I hope Diane will post about David Brooks’ education column in the NYT today. I think David Brooks is starting to see through a lot of the conventional ed reform thinking.
He’s skeptical of the glitzy Silicon Valley vision of the ideal high school and makes what I think are very cogent points about what constitutes good education. The reader recommended comments are good reading too.
LikeLike
We’re building a new high school here and we (sadly) hired a consultant to make a presentation to the community. He was selling High Tech High hard. I was really pleased to see that there were A LOT of skeptical community members. They pretty much rejected the pitch, and they were really wary of “online learning” too- it was gratifying to watch because we’re told again and again we all want this stuff and there’s such universal cheerleading for online learning among lawmakers and lobbyists. Not true where I live.
There are so many ed reform salespeople that communities themselves are going to have to start doing much more due diligence. WE are the one and only line of sales resistance, because our lawmakers seem to have fallen head over heels in love with anything presented as “ed reform”- they’re useless.
We don’t have to buy everything they’re selling- no matter how many of them are selling it- but it will be up to us to decide we have that power and start exercising it.
LikeLike
I gave the Brooks piece to our district director of curriculum. I spoke with him after he read it and it was clear he thought it was a paean to High Tech High. Oy. This is a problem: educators who cannot read at a very high level (often the same folk who demand we jettison the liberal arts to start teaching “complex text reading skills”). The late, great AFT president Albert Shanker once privately lamented about (most) teachers: “But they don’t READ.”
One of the reader comments that’s stuck with me: a medical school professor, challenged by a student to defend assigning so much rote memorization when facts can be looked up, responded: “You can’t see what you don’t look for, and you can’t look for what you don’t know.” As Diane’s “Left Back” indicates, even Mr Progressive John Dewey called for transmitting knowledge. It was Dewey’s zealous student, William Heard Kilpatrick, who dumbed down Dewey to “the project method” in 1918. I’ll bet the High Tech High folk would be mortified to know they’re sporting a crusty, century-old idea –with a very dubious track record.
LikeLike
I also wish they’d stop repeating this:
“Most Likely to Succeed” is inspiring because it reminds us that the new technology demands new schools. ”
Why does new technology demand new schools? When did this become “true”? Is anyone concerned that the people selling the idea we need new schools designed around technology are the people who sell those products? That just seems like an ordinary inquiry to me. I don’t know why tech companies would be somehow immune to self-dealing.
It reminds me of the “digital natives” nonsense they all sold, where children were somehow a completely new category of human beings because they have smart phones. They all fell for that, too.
LikeLike
Ponderosa, don’t count on a conversion by David Brooks. He has written many other columns praising corporate-style reformers. One swallow does not make a spring.
LikeLike
This is Duncan giving a presentation on technology in schools.
He “wants them to think about not just Apple products, but creating Apple products”
I mean, for God’s sake- is he actually on the payroll? Why are we paying him to promote product? Apple can’t sell their own “products” in schools? We have to pay a federal sales force?
LikeLike
Good work, Governor Malloy!
LikeLike
We had a rare sighting of a public official entering a public school in Ohio. It was pretty exciting, considering they spend 100% of their time promoting “choice” in this state. The 93% of children who attend public schools seem to have completely dropped off the list of priorities of Our Ed Reform Leaders.
Sadly, it was the spouse of the governor promoting “school lunch week” so not anyone we actually elected or pay:
Still, I think we’re making progress! They seem to be vaguely aware that public schools exist in state government. Maybe she could go back and tell the governor’s ed team that she discovered a public school.
LikeLike