This post arrived from Randall Roth, a one of the signers of the article:
The following commentary appears in the October 8 edition of the Honolulu Star-Advertiser under the headline, “New testing regime at public schools is a recipe for disaster.” The byline follows the piece:
Testing obviously plays an important role in educating children — particularly tests designed to help teachers identify the needs of individual students.
The state’s new testing regime, called the Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBA), is quite different. It is not just unhelpful, but counterproductive.
First, SBA test results are not available until long after the test-takers have moved on from their current teachers’ classrooms and, in many instances, from their current school.
Second, SBA tests and the entire battery of tests administered cost more money to buy and consume more time to prepare for and administer than most members of the public would ever imagine possible.
These resources should instead be spent educating the children.
Third, test-takers perceive these tests as inconsequential and have little incentive to take them seriously, yet teaching careers are on the line, including those of teachers in subject areas not even covered by these tests.
Fourth, subject areas not covered by the SBA tests, such as art, music, history and science, tend to be de-emphasized by school communities seeking higher test scores, and individual teachers have a strong incentive to “teach to the test” in the areas that are tested.
The superintendent has long contended that the SBA test results would be helpful in evaluating teachers.
Ironically, the combination of these flawed tests and their role in an equally flawed teacher-evaluation system has already adversely affected a principal’s ability to deal effectively with teachers who require their attention and support.
Such unintended consequences can be expected when non-educators like the superintendent take it upon themselves to dramatically alter the way schools work without first seeking the meaningful involvement of school-level personnel.
Businessmen Terrence George and Harry Saunders recently expressed enthusiastic support for the new testing regime in Hawaii’s public schools (“Students did well on challenging exams,” Island Voices, Sept. 27).
They described recently released test scores as “encouraging,” not because the scores were high — they were not — but because the scores had been expected to be even lower.
After acknowledging that making sense of all this is “admittedly confusing,” these businessmen concluded that senior members of Hawaii’s Department of Education should be commended.
With all due respect, we strongly disagree.
And Hawaii’s public school principals overwhelmingly disagree.
According to our 2015 survey of public school principals, approximately nine out of 10 believe that the DOE has performed poorly in this area of implementing the SBA.
There is an inherent risk in harmful unintended consequences as a result of top-down decisions such as these decisions about the recent testing.
Such risks can be minimized or eliminated by seeking involvement and using the meaningful feedback of students, parents, teachers, and principals.
Such consequences can be avoided if DOE leadership has a deep understanding of what works and what does not.
We can’t help but wonder if the superintendent has ever asked herself why no private schools in Hawaii have adopted anything remotely close to the new SBA testing regime currently being forced on every public school in Hawaii.
Darrel Galera is executive director of the Education Institute of Hawaii (EIH) and former principal of Moanalua High School, and Roberta Mayor is EIH president and former principal of Waianae High School and education superintendent in Oakland, Calif. This commentary was also signed by EIH board members Marsha Alegre, John Sosa and Randall Roth.
The commentary can be found at http://www.staradvertiser.com/editorialspremium/20151008_new_testing_regime_at_public_schools_is_a_recipe_for_disaster.html?id=331193142&c=n (registration required)

What more can be added to the response by the superintendents et al.
When those who know not and know not that they know not but are absolutely certain they know and are given positions of responsibility the results are very predictable.
LikeLike
Gordon Wilder…So very true. It’s an issue only touched upon here occasionally, but which determines the daily lives of teachers and the educational priorities that affect our students across the country. Our school based “leaders,” on the whole, pretty much suck.
LikeLike
When Hawaii teachers finally got a new contract after their grassroots protest, it came with a big dose of VAM. What got me is how Hawaii teachers (not union) tried to sell it with comments like “If you do your job, your kids will pass” and other nonsense statements just so they could get a well-deserved raise. However, they put down those who warned against VAM and testing. This is what happens when teachers don’t peek out to see what’s happening around the rest of the USA. Now the rock fell on their heads and they are shocked that the testing is inappropriate. Then again, NYC, Newark, DC and other cities did the same thing. Teachers need to stop voting with their wallets because in the end you can be out of a job and benefits will be slashed. Don’t leave it to your union to protect you. Stay informed!!!
What ever happened with the union vote in Hawaii?? Who finally won??
LikeLike
Thanks for reconnecting me to Randall Roth. He has been a trans-formative figure in Hawaii for at least thirty years. He is always engaged in the community.
LikeLike
6,076 emails and letters sent to Congress and the President to date. This is the kind of political pressure that just may result in a favorable re-write and re-authorization of the still pending NCLB act. Citizens of Hawaii, show President Obama that public school advocates from his home state stand united against Common Core, test-and-punish policies. Enough is enough; it’s time to STOP the MADNESS!
http://www.petition2congress.com/15080/stop-common-core-testing/
LikeLike
Diane
It’s time for us (Teachers. parents, students, public education advocates, NPE, NYSAPE, BATS, et. al) to make a collective, singular, unified and formal demand:
1) An END to Common Core standards
2) An END to punitive, high-stakes testing
3) An END to developmentally inappropriate, invalid, and unreliable tests
4) An END to the use of NEAP proficiency cut scores that have ensured artificial,
super-failure rates
5) The implementation of GRADE SPAN TESTING
combined with a “TEST-and-SUPPORT” consequences that
use test scores to funnel resources to those in need.
And then dare the reform crowd to reject a “TEST-and-SUPPORT” approach. Dare them to use test scores to HELP rather than threaten and punish.
It is a fair compromise that may be our only chance.
LikeLike
In my district, history/social studies and science haven’t been shoved aside so much as coopted by the reading and math folk. They rearranged the science curriculum to do more math in physics classes in freshman classes, dropped earth science from the curriculum, moved chemistry to sophomore year and biology to junior year. (These classes are given to students who are unable to multiply 5 x 10 without a calculator, and can’t do division with a calculator!). Science teachers are to do close readings regularly, as well. Those of us in history classes have been told history isn’t important – we are reading teachers with different informational text. When it’s suggested that students need to know some basic world and US History facts, including a few dates, we are now told we don’t have to teach this information because kids can just look it up on the internet. When the lack of background knowledge that primary documents assume students know is missing, one of new admin said it doesn’t matter because they can get all the information for background and unfamiliar vocab by close readings, so history teachers just need to have the kids do lots of DBQs.
I don’t agree, and I think we are doing a horrible disservice to an entire generation of students that will come back to haunt us. Isn’t there something about those who don’t study history being doomed to repeat it? I think the next 50 years will demonstrate the truth in that simple question.
LikeLike
The demand by your administrators to ignore content knowledge and focus on the four corners of the page is embarrassing. Sounds like a fantastic way to make kids dislike history more than ever. And since when does promoting ignorance help to make students “college ready”? Any professional educator who claims that looking up dates and facts on the internet is a substitute for a content rich history curriculum is in the wrong line of work. And how exactly does this approach work with AP Global or APUSH?
LikeLike
Now that I am out of there, I can say what drakestraw can’t say: it is highly questionable whether a significant number of the administrators can or should be called educators. There are some very dedicated people in the district, but the kindest thing that can be said about the district is that it is highly dysfunctional, and I am definitely being kind.
LikeLike
In my experience, they are not educators. Administrators are far more of THE problem, but their role in silencing and diminishing teachers is rarely addressed here. I don’t know why…
LikeLike
What is also rarely addressed is the fact that the blame for any truly incompetent teacher rests squarely on the administrator that looked the other way. Not the teacher; they didn’t grant themselves tenure nor do they counsel themselves out of a the classroom. In general most principals I have worked under couldn’t teach their way out of a paper bag. I am very fortunate now to work for a principal that really gets it. But I would say that he is an exception not the rule.
LikeLike