Angry parents and educators bombarded Senator Legg, chair of the Senate Education Committee in Florida, with 45,000 letters, complaining about the state’s standardized tests. Kathleen Oporeza of Fund Education Now spurred the protests by pointing out that the tests had so many problems that the results were invalid and should not be used to grade schools or teachers.
She wrote:
“There isn’t a Florida student, parent, teacher, superintendent, board member or administrator who doesn’t see through this charade. Superintendents from Leon to Miami-Dade have expressed their deep concerns. The study’s own numbers point out that just 65 percent of the test items match the Florida Standards. It concludes that it would be wrong to retain students or deny diplomas based on the 2015 FSA, yet Commissioner Stewart plans to use these same flawed test results to set pass/fail cut scores, grade schools and evaluate teachers. It’s fundamentally unfair to punish teachers and grade schools based on scores where 35 percent of the test items were never taught to Florida students.
“Put another way, if a student answered every question based on the Florida standards correctly, he would receive a 65 or a D letter grade. It’s hard to reconcile this poor finding with Commissioner Stewart’s glowing reaction to the study. Who or what is she trying to protect?”
Senator Legg responded to protestors, claiming it was too late and there was nothing he could do. Apparently in Florida, the Legislature can pile on tests, but it can’t reduce them or prevent their misuse.
Jessica Bakeman of Politico wrote:
“TALLAHASSEE — A key state senator said Thursday it’s time to stop harping on the problems that arose during state standardized testing earlier this year because there’s little the Legislature can do to fix it now anyway.
“Sen. John Legg, who chairs the chamber’s pre-kindergarten to 12th grade education committee, said it’s not worth entertaining district leaders’ push for education officials to withhold school grades after cyber attacks and technical glitches disrupted state testing for thousands of students.
“Legg, a Republican from Lutz, believes results from the state’s controversial new exams are valid for use in evaluating schools’ performance. But even if they weren’t, he said, lawmakers wouldn’t be able to stop the Department of Education from assigning school grades.”
Florida may be the testing Capitol of the nation. But no one can stop this train wreck.
Oporeza wrote:
“After decades of micro-managing public education, Legg claims “there’s nothing the legislature can do.” He goes on to assert that they are “unable to stop” Commissioner Pam Stewart and the Department of Education from setting pass/fail cut scores, issuing school grades or using the flawed scores to evaluate teachers. Legg’s comment lacks credibility. He knows Stewart is an unelected political appointee with an ardent penchant for rule following. The FSA testing mess was wholly created by the Florida Legislature. Period.
“During the Senate hearing, politicians were dogmatic about preserving the political agenda of “ed reform.” Even though the EdCount/Alpine study team will not deem the FSA 100% “valid,” committee members said any discussion of alternatives is useless. Looking for a better way, such as using limited standardized tests only as transparent diagnostic tools would destroy Florida’s A-F Accountability scheme. Reformers know that without high stakes there would be no classroom fear or chaos. There would be no leverage to use against us.”

New York and Florida following the same play book.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Withering Apple and commented:
Ol’ JohnnyBoy is at it again.
LikeLike
It’s called “passing the buck.” Parents should unite to work to get some of these “good ol’ boys” out of the legislature. Many of these people have served multiple terms, and they take the office for granted. The longer they stay in power the more opportunities they have to forge alliances with ALEC or the Koch Bros. They need a shake up, wake up in Tallahassee.
LikeLike
I hope that the parents are organizing an opt out movement; Florida has to be the test capital of the world, and its academic record has shown everyone how THAT’S working out for them…
LikeLike
The bombardment of tests forced upon Florida students is unconscionable!
LikeLike
“Harping”. And of course he’s speaking to women.
LikeLike
Senator Legg: a prime example of a fierce defender of the rheephorm opt out movement.
¿?
You know, where the heavyweights and enablers and enforcers of self-proclaimed “education reform” opt out of taking responsibility for their own words and deeds.
😡
LikeLike
Back in the dark ages when I was a child we had a campfire song which was a question and answer text utilizing the names of states. One question
“How did Flora die, boys, how did Flora die?
This kind of shenanigans answers that question very well.
LikeLike
During an interview on C-SPAN, when asked about Florida’s intense emphasis on standardized testing, Harvard Economics Professor—and the privatization industry’s bought-paid-for theorist—-Roland Fryer bloviates the hypocrisy of the elite… (which, after growing up in poverty, Fryer has joined and now sadly parrots their specious, elitist cant).
When it comes to testing requirements, Fryer wants a two-tiered system —
TIER ONE: The elite kids in the suburbs—including his own—should be excused from the whole testing and test prep regime, and in its place, get Shakespeare, art, drama, music, and other enriching electives.
TIER TWO: Meanwhile, the urban kids in failing schools should get TEST PREP… followed by TESTING… followed by more TEST PREP… followed by MORE TESTING… followed by MORE TEST PREP…. and on and on and on…
He says urban children in “failing schools”…” ought to be tested every day” in lieu of the rich curriculum that their peers in suburbs—again, including Fryer’s own children— receive and enjoy.
Fryer has it exactly backwards… a big part of the reason the kids in the suburbs are “high-performing” is that, from DAY ONE, they have a rich curriculum devoid of constant test prep and testing, and that’s due to massive advantages in funding that they enjoy over urban schools.
Watch the video:
http://www.c-span.org/video/?304111-1/roland-fryer-education
(it’s somewhere between 48:00 and 50:00… it varies every time I try to find it)
TRANSCRIPT:
(somewhere between 48:00 and 50:00)
———————————————–
———————————————-
MODERATOR: “Well, as a follow-up to that, this question from the audience is:
” ‘What would you say to Governor Scott of Florida regarding his emphasis on standardized tests as a way to rate all of our schools? And that’s what’s happening in Florida right now.’ ”
–
ROLAND FRYER: “Yeah, ya know… I… I think… uhmm… I haven’t figured out why no one has tried out a two-tier system for standardized testing, soooo, you know… if you’re-… I live in Concord, Massachusetts, which is a wonderful suburb of Boston. My wife and I just moved there, annnnd… ya know, I actually don’t want standardized testing in Concord because it will crowd out my kids learning Shakespeare and those types of things, things that I never really read…. uhmm…
“However, in the schools that are… failing, we really do need standardized tests, because at least, we know… where they are, and that’s really, really important. Just because we don’t test them, doesn’t mean they’re not failing.
“And so I would actually say if schools are high-performing—high-performing suburban schools, or high-performing schools—ought to be able to say,
” ‘You know that? 90% of our kids have passed the test in 2008. Let’s not take the test for two or three years, so that we can focus on more different and more wholistic types of instruction.’
“For schools who are in the bottom, I think that you oughta test those kids every day. I think we just need to be (unintelligible) to be (unintelligible)”
–
MODERATOR: “Well this (next question) is something… be careful what you ask for… you asked for this… but…
” ‘Would you expand on the reasons for those differences between Math and Reading on standardized tests (between socio-economic groups). and the reasons for those differences?’ ”
–
FRYER: “I have no idea. Uhhm.. That’s the great thing about being a professor. You can say you don’t know and keep talking…. ”
——————————————————
This was an opening for Fryer to acknowledge the difficulties in education posed by poverty, but because he’s following the corporate reform playbook, Fryer won’t go there. Even given his own first-hand experiences with poverty, he’s totally bought the corporate reform agenda. Someone at the HARVARD CRIMSON should do a take-down of Fryer based on the above quote.
Here’s an answer from Ravitch’s “REIGN OF ERROR”:
RAVITCH (p. 55-56) : “Poverty is not an excuse. It’s a harsh reality. Poverty matters. Poverty affects children’s health and well-being. It affects their emotional lives an their attention spans, their attendance, and their academic performance. Poverty affects their motivation and their ability to concentrate on anything other than day-to-day survival. In a society of abundance, poverty is degrading and humiliating.
“… it is easy for people who enjoy lives of economic ease to say that poverty doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter to THEM. It is an abstraction. For them, it is a hurdle to overcome, like having a bad day, or a headache, or an ill-fitting jacket.”
“After more than a decade of No Child Left Behind, we now know that a program of more testing and more accountability leaves millions of children behind and does not eliminate poverty or close achievement gaps. The growing demand for more testing and more accountability in the wake of NCLB is akin to bringing a blowtorch to put out a fire.
“More of the same is not change. The testing, accountability, and choice strategies after the illusion of change while changing nothing. They mask the inequity and injustice that are now so apparent in our social order. They do nothing to alter the status quo. They preserve the status quo. They are the status quo.”
Speaking of parents like Fryer. Ravitch says,
RAVITCH: “An educated parent will not accept a school where many weeks of every school year were spent preparing for state tests. An educated parent would not tolerate a school that cut back or eliminated the arts to spend more time preparing for state tests.”
LikeLike
EVA MOSKOWITZ: “Teacher shortage, Schmeacher shortage! U.S. Teachers suck!”
That pretty much sums up Eva’s first contribution to Campbell Brown’s “THE 74”
blog. In this piece, Eva dismisses the distress expressed by districts who started
the school year short hundreds of teachers (or like Las Vegas over 1,000) as just a lot of “hand-wringing”.
Eva, tell that to the parents upset that, due to these shortages, their kids are being taught in giant classes where there’s no room to sit, nor desks upon which to sit, or kids who are being taught by untrained office temps who have never taught a day in their lives.
Instead of “hand-wringing” about teacher shortages, she says we should focus on the vast majority of current lousy teachers, and the institutions who trained them, or failed to train them to be effective in the classroom.
Got that? Persistent and ubiquitous teacher bashing is one of the main contributors to the growing teacher shortage—i.e. provoking teachers to leave, and prospective teacherst to avoid the profession altogether—but Ms. Moskowitz remedy for that shortage is… you guessed it… MORE TEACHER BASHING!
https://www.the74million.org/article/eva-moskowitz-student-performance-is-a-mirror
EVA MOSKOWITZ:
“It’s easy to blame the kids – poverty, single-parent families, etc. – but school isn’t really about the children, it’s about the adults, and the adults in our classrooms aren’t getting the job done. No wonder there’s a backlash against the Common Core and standardized tests: They tell the ugly truth about the quality of our schools, and the teachers and unions don’t want to hear it.”
So says the woman who has never taught a day in her life.
So what’s the solution? Not the university departments of education that have been successfully preparing teachers for over 200 years, according to Eva. She accuses them of using “the old failed methods” that do not produce “dramatic gains for children.”
So who DOES have the solution?
Why Eva does, of course. Don’t forget. She runs the schools where kids have to wear diapers from all the stress caused by the authoritarian methods of classroom management. (which Eva admitted to in the recent New York Times expose, but shows no shame, arguing that making kids urinate and defecate on themselves will toughen them up, and make them better students. Anti-child-abuse activist Campbell Brown went eerily silent at this reported and admitted abuse at Success Academy schools.)
EVA MOSKOWITZ:
“If we want to truly reform education in the United States, we must fundamentally reform how we train America’s teachers. Innovative approaches like those employed by small organizations such as Success Academy to create better teacher training programs should be viewed as a model for achieving this important goal.
‘We all know that strong teachers make a tremendous difference – maybe the greatest difference – in educational outcomes for children. As a country, we need to abandon the old, failed methods and instead foster programs that are improving teacher preparation and producing dramatic gains for children.”
LikeLike
where does Eva say her students wear diapers?
I’m just curious to see it or read it, especially if it shut Campbell Brown up.
LikeLike
It’s a really potent political message though because it lets everyone other than teachers completely off the hook.
All we have to do to fix the country’s economy is train teachers differently and have students work harder. That alone will quite literally fix all our economic problems. That’s what she says.
No one else has to do anything, sacrifice anything or change anything.
No wonder politicians and business leaders love this theory and have grabbed it with both hands. Forget all those pesky questions about CEO pay, income inequality, tax rates, trade deals and the fact that wages haven’t gone up in 15 years. Train teachers differently and poof! – all of that disappears.
I don’t think people will buy it because really what she’s saying is that everything wrong with the economy is the fault of a low quality US workforce and I think people who have actually been in the private sector workforce for the last 20 or 30 years know better than that.
LikeLike
What Eva says: “Students learn best through engaging, inquiry-based, child-focused lessons that let the kids do the hard working of thinking.”
What Eva wants for other people’s children: narrowed curriculum, drill ‘n kill, perpetual testing.
She truly is an offal P.O.S.
What’s also interesting is that the 74 doesn’t allow comments (unlike Diane Ravitch’s site, which encourages thoughtful, spirited discussion). At the 74, one has to submit a letter to the editor. That must be how Campbell & Co. control the narrative.
LikeLike
I also find it interesting that Sen. Legg owns and operates charter schools. Gotta keep those tax dollars flowing to charters through the ed reform movement….
LikeLike
What a conflict of interest!
LikeLike
There’s a lot of them who are getting paid by charter schools while writing legislation that benefits charter schools. Not campaign donations, so not an indirect payment. Actually on the payroll:
http://www.wftv.com/news/news/local/9-investigates-lawmakers-connections-charter-schoo/nS6Z3/
LikeLike
As a Florida teacher, I have been watching the opt out movement grow by leaps and bounds since the FSA disaster. Parents are fed up. Moms are angry, and that’s exactly what we need!! Please support Florida’s opt out movement,
LikeLike
I DEFINITELY SUPPORT Florida’s OPT OUT Movement.
LikeLike
These are the “recommendations” of Jeb Bush’s lobbying shop for Florida public school children.
People could compare this to what state lawmakers drafted and see if they’re simply cutting and pasting the work of lobbyists and submitting it as their own work:
http://afloridapromise.org/PressReleases/2015/Letter_from_Patricia_Levesque_to_Sen_Legg_and_Rep_OToole_on_Testing_and_Teacher_Evaluations.aspx
We had one ed reform bill in Ohio where they had to pull it off the floor because they had forgotten to change the wording on the caption- they had submitted a boilerplate, lobbyist-drafted ed reform law without adding something about “Ohio” to the title 🙂
Ooops!
LikeLike