You are surely familiar with Sheri Lederman. She is a fourth-grade teacher in Great Neck, Long Island, New York, whose “growth” scores dropped inexplicably from 14 of 20 to only 1 of 20 in a single year, causing her to be labeled “ineffective” on that measure. The score was assigned by a computer, which compared the growth of students in her class to avatar students in other parts of the state. The assumption is that children are inanimate objects that can be shaped and compelled to increase their standardized test scores. The computer is, in this case, at odds with Sheri’s principal, superintendent, parents, and former students.
Sheri’s husband Bruce Lederman is a lawyer. They decided not to accept this slap in the face to a teacher who had served with distinction for nearly 20 years. Bruce sued and the case was recently heard in state supreme court in Albany.
Here is a video about the case. Meet Sheri and Bruce, who are fighting for teachers across the state and the nation. The best part is the clip where Governor Andrew Cuomo declares his unqualified faith in using test scores to judge teachers and his belief that students will get a better education (or higher test scores) if teachers compete in a market.
This case is of national significance. It is a powerful weapon in the battle to restore humanity to teachers’ workplace.
Also, special Labor Day thanks to Diane, who has supported us since day one, as well as the experts who have both submitted affidavits and provided invaluable help in presenting this case: Linda Darling-Hammond, Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Aaron Pallas, Jesse Rothstein, Brad Lindell, Steven Caldas, Drew Patrick, Sean Corcoran and Carol Burris. Most special thanks to Sheri who has put herself out there in the public to fight this fight even though she is inherently a very private person.
And thank YOU, Mr. Lederman, for putting up this fight. Most of us don’t have the luxury of having an attorney in the family, so I’m grateful both you and your wife have brought this suit.
Bruce Lederman, I noticed you folded and ran on WaPo when your claims were challenged. I believe you claimed that I only understood SGPs at a “high level” and couldn’t quite understand the intricacies of SGPs like your wife, the expert mathematician.
I like Diane because she doesn’t censor almost anything and is rather funny. Not sure if the transcripts are available in your case in NY but I’ll be posting all of mine online for my Virginia case. I did want to thank you for posting the affidavits online as I’ll be submitted those as evidence in my case.
If you can to rekindle our discussion from the WaPo article, I am happy to oblige. Let me make my position clear. I don’t think your wife comprehends how SGPs work. Have your wife post her individual test scores and SGPs online for us to review. Given NY’s N-size is likely greater than 10, there are no identification issues involved. I have 5 million+ records from VDOE to prove that.
Speaking of which, the data I have from Virginia are quite clear: SGPs are consistent and reliable. Your call.
Virginia,
Did you know that Sheri Lederman’s growth scores bounced from 14 out of 20 in the first year to one out of 20 in the second year to 11 out of 20 in the third year? I would say this “measure” is seriously unreliable on its face.
I don’t think Bruce Lederman ran away from a debate with you. I suspect he decided you are so set in your ways that no facts or argument would change your views, and he gave up trying.
Virtually all gadgets that allegedly boost your IQ wind up on TV selling for $9.99 for sets of 5, marked down to $4.99, then you see them on the street to be picked up or tossed out.
Thrusting education into the amoral ethics of the open market, where children’s minds are used as the money is beyond stupid. It is definitely, as Lloyd Lofthouse would say, a psychopathology.
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
The court case that might determine the future of more than 3 million teachers, their famlies and 50 million American children. Will our children be turned into corporate controlled robots or be allowed to grow up as unique individuals?
While it might be technically true that teacher’s scores are “assigned” by a computer, the generation of these numbers is based on algorithms developed by human beings working under the premises, agendas and directives of so-called education reform.
The use of computers is there to give a veneer of scientific objectivity to what are intrinsically (and in this case, fundamentally vicious and extractive) political and economic motives, to mask them, and to attempt to make them unassailable to a public presumed to be in awe of the power of digital processes.
Just as so-called reformers endlessly parroting cliches like “disrupting government monopoly schools,” “closing the Achievement Gap,” and “the Civil Rights Movement of Our Time,” has absolutely nothing to do with the real issues facing public schools, a computer spitting out arbitrary numbers based on politically-premised algorithms is not science, but Scientism used as a vehicle for the will-to-power and capital acquisition by the Overclass.
Exactly.
In short, probably not — but certainly not if the objective of the modelers has nothing to do with the value of education.
I couldn’t agree more. The teaching-learning process is a shared experience that includes so many variables it is impossible to quantify, even though there are feeble attempts to do so in our dot.com world. While it may be convenient for others to distill teaching into an algorithm, it serves no purpose for the teacher or student. The only reason to assign a number to a teacher’s performance is to label and classify as we have seen this fails to improve either teaching or learning. When we claim to determine the impact that a teacher has on the students, we fail to recognize that what students gain from the experience has a great deal to do with what students bring to the dynamic. That is why we have seen standardized scores correlate to family income levels, and this is totally outside the control of the teacher. As a result of false metrics, we are blaming teachers for the poverty of the students they serve. This is a false conclusion that has dire consequences for teachers of students that don’t conform to the norm of the school district.
Amen. If Cuomo and his ilk could, they would pay teachers minimum wage to walk the aisles while pre-recorded video programs “taught” students in the for profit public/private hybrid charter schools where the hedgefunders get their profits, Gates gets his profits, Pearson gets its profits, etc. This is where we are headed.
Hey, remember when nurses were targeted as a way to cut expenses and raise profits? How did that work out?
Oh, and I’m reminded that nurses, by and large, are female. Teachers in elementary school are, by and large, female.
We don’t see these attacks on fireMEN or policeMEN, do we?
I think it is time to start attacking our do-nothing politicians.
Also, Bill Gates spouts that it is all about math, coding, being digital. Hey, if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Computers is all he knows, so he pushes them. He has the audacity to say that there aren’t enough STEM employees available to him, yet he routinely fires Americans and wants a wider door of entry to foreigners on Visas. Smack my head.
Please Bill, find us a digital cure for cancer!
Actually, there is already a digital cure for cancer: death
Digital: 1/0, on/off, live/dead
“Malgorithms”
Teacher VAMs are malgorithms
Cattle mathturbations
Coleman-Duncan palgorithms
Chetty flatulations
You’re my favorite poet.
Thanks, Donna
Glad someone likes my goofy stuff.
Of course, the goofiness fits “Reformers” very well.
Dr. Seuss is my favorite (with Robert Frost coming in second). I think that probably tells you all you need to know (and then some)
Chetty flatulations. That needs to be on a t-shirt. Thanks for the laugh.
Is anyone else in the midwest seeing Common Core materials that look a lot like SAT prep?
I ask because we (generally) take the ACT here but I had one child prep for the SAT and this material Ohio is buying (that is marked Common Core) looks like what he used to prep for that test. It doesn’t matter that much- my 7th grader has an experienced english teacher who I am familiar with and most of her course looks like what she used for my older children but they are using this one text weekly that looks like SAT test prep to me.
I’m just an observer and I don’t pretend to know a lot about this, but I am curious if anyone else is seeing it.
The SAT, last I heard, was being re-tooled and realigned to measure achievement of the new standards as opposed to measuring the aptitude of incoming college students.
Since achievement and outcomes are far more correlated with family income/status than any “3 great teachers in a row” reformy formula, but at the same time-reformers are comfortably in a status strata they are reluctant to share; since the infestation of non-profits/test corporations/private interests into common coring and testing; since the goal for the publicly funded schools for the bottom 95-ish% is that they produce politically inactive and complacent thinkers and adequate (standard) workers/performers (not great thinkers; why the written portion will be optional in most cases )…:
You will see tests like the SAT used to give the future worker-to-be permission to advance into an assigned workforce role.
David Coleman authored the CCSS and now has moved over to College Board/SAT, so it’s just logical, Chiara.
It’s not how is VAM flawed, it’s why would you ever think it could be valid.
It doesn’t pretend to measure a product, but entire learning environments and changes in human minds. There are so many things involved there that cannot possibly be measured in this day and age, some perhaps at any time. It’s a bad joke that should be retracted.
I’ve done enough programming and teaching to realize that the answer is NO! But there seems to be a lingering perception in society that computers and the use of data brings us closer to the ‘truth’; when the truth is that there is far more gigo out there than most users appreciate.
Computers are supposed to be a tool to make life better by allowing us to gain access to information. Trying to use computers to pigeon hole teachers or students is giving people, agencies or governments a license to discriminate. Then, the computer becomes an agent of tyranny.
Yes, use of any new technology is progress, flashy ads must speak truth and always frequent stores will the best signage. I think it goes all the way back to mating rituals.
Great post, Diane. Thank you.
I wish her the very best. I recommend the Governor and others get into the classroom and teach for a month. I will wager they won’t and if the did, would change their tune in a minute.
To answer the question of the post: NO!
I don’t have the words to tell this teacher and her husband how thrilled I am that they are pursuing justice in this case. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
If Governor Cuomo is so concerned about the progress of the students in his state, then why doesn’t he send in professionals to test every child in a teacher’s class in September and then evaluate their SCHOOL progress throughout the year. This professional would be able to separate the learning done in school from the learning done outside of school. Too complicated and expensive? Well, now we’re getting somewhere!
“You can’t be Seri-ous”
When Seri gets her VAM
She’ll throw it in the trash
She’ll see it’s just a scam
To rustle up some cash
The above is supposed to follow this
“Seri-ous School Relationships”
Relationships with Seri
Are Seri-ous and very
Good for learning stuff
In schools, she is enough
The teacher isn’t needed
She really has been beated
By Seri and her kin
The best there’s ever been
But, of course, the Reformer honeymoon with Seri will only last a short while, after which even Seri will find herself VAM BAM thank ya ma’med
Thank you for your family envolvement on behalf of all educators. You should sopena the testing company and ask if the test were designed to test teacher effectiveness. If the answer is no then no magic formula should be applied. Case closed.
Sorry- involvement.
Subpoena.
Hi Diane! I am a 20+ year veteran teacher and an avid reader of your blog. Thank you for your advocacy for public education and for teachers everywhere. As we observe this Labor Day, there is another serious union situation happening on Long Island that may interest you. The teachers who work for the Locust Valley School District have been working under an expired contract since last school year. While this is not unusual, what is unusual is that the district has refused to pay salary step increases as required by the Taylor Law and Triborough Amendment. I’m sure you know that the Taylor Law mandates that teachers and other essential professionals cannot strike, even under an expired contract. The Triborough Amendment to this law stipulates that during labor negotiations, the conditions of the expired contract will remain in place including the agreed to paid step increments. The Locust Valley School District is in violation of the Triborough Amendment and is thereby breaking the law. Interestingly the administrators in the district have received their step increases along with bonuses and merit pay, and so have the teacher assistants. While working in an environment undoubtedly hostile toward teachers, the teachers union has in good faith tried to resolve this situation for a year with the Superintendent and the Board of Education. The teachers have continued to work without a contract, without negotiated rights, and without the ability to strike. They have left the Locust Valley School Employees Association (LVSEA) no choice but to resolve this through the court system and could eventually cost the taxpayers a fortune in legal fees and back interest. While the Teachers Union most definitely has the law on their side, there is some uncertainty in this volatile and hostile climate toward teachers and unions. If the teachers do not win this lawsuit it could establish a very dangerous precedent and have a chilling effect on Unions everywhere. I would be happy to send you any further information and documentation if interested. Thank you!
I am beginning to think that one of the most evil functions of computers is to put a roadblock in the way of human interaction. To managers it can provide a welcome screen behind which they can hide and manipulate their data never having to directly interact with employees. The “machine” tells them what to do based on some magical formula passed down from the data gurus. I read an article today about low wage workers and the way their hours are scheduled, of course, making sure than none of them are ever full time employees. Most nefarious, though, is the total disregard for worker needs that computer scheduling allows. People are sent home after a few hours work because the computer says they won’t be needed. Hours are irregular and changed at a moments notice making plans for a life outside of work impossible and childcare issues a nightmare. All for the cost efficiencies that ignoring the needs of your employees allows. Wasn’t technology supposed to free us? It seems that a major function is to make what should be human interactions impersonal and totally devoid of humanity. No wonder so many companies have outsourced labor to third world companies where people are disposable.
Once again, “Not everything that counts can be counted and not everything that can be counted counts.”
(Simply increasing the sample size doesn’t mean that you are accounting for all available evidence.)