Mike Lillis, president of the Lakeland County Federation of Teachers, tells his members that education is at a “tipping point.”
“In my opening remarks last year, I painted a picture of education reform on the run, with evidence such as Inbloom shuttering its doors, 65,000 students refusing the state tests, and polls showing increased opposition from parents as well as educators to the Common Core standards and high-stakes tests.
“Well…a lot has happened since then. To borrow from Charles Dickens, who would have a great deal to say about our treatment of children today, in many ways what we are seeing now is the tale of two education systems; it is the best of times and the worst of times.
“Since I like to rip band aids off quickly, let’s talk about the worst of times first. Despite the fact that high-stakes tests took a beating last year, their use in teacher evaluation being discredited by the American Statistical Association, American Education Research Association, National Academy of Education, as well as parents and educators, this April the Legislature and Governor doubled-down by rewriting the law on teacher evaluation and dramatically increasing the role that tests will take on.
“Here is why I believe it is also the best of times. Within a couple of weeks of our legislative rout, the parents of over 220,000 students said, “enough is enough” and refused to have their children take the state tests. This level of direct parent participation is unlike anything we have seen before in New York and no, it is not because the “union told them to.”
“This is a grassroots movement of parents that have tried every other means they have to protect the integrity of their child’s education.
“There are not 220,000 parents in New York that wake up daily and try to figure out which act of civil disobedience is best for them that day. This is a movement that will grow until sanity is restored to our classrooms. They have built a lever, and it will continue to grow until it is successful.”
He notes that Commissioner MaryEllen Elia said teachers were”unethical” if they encouraged opt outs.
Lillis said:
“Since the Commissioner would like to discuss ethics, I would like to contribute some of my own thoughts about State Education Department policies and hopefully begin a debate about whether or not they are ethical or even moral.
“I do not believe that it is ethical to correlate proficiency on grade 3-8 math and ELA assessments to a score of 1630 on the SAT, a score that only 34% of college bound students achieve nationally.
“I do not believe it is ethical to label students. More importantly, I do not believe it is ethical for the state of New York to label students “College and Career Ready” based on a single annual test.
“I do not believe it is ethical to take students that remain on target to getting a 1500 on the SAT and labeling them not ready for college or a career, in third grade, fourth grade, fifth grade, and on and on through high school. I believe this is state-sponsored abuse.
“I do not believe it is ethical to use a formula to evaluate the state’s 3-8th grade teachers that guarantees 7% of them will be ineffective before a single student takes the tests.
“I do not believe it is ethical to put a test ( a test I remind you that statistically is designed to have only the top 34% college bound students nationally pass it) and have students know that their performance will have a very real impact on the career of someone they love—their teacher.”
Lillis concluded: we are a tipping point. Which way will we tip?

Is it ethical to force students to take a test when they have NEVER learned the material?? That is what is happening for teacher SLOs. Sick.
LikeLike
Once people catch on to stupid, things won’t tip back to stupid.
LikeLike
Well said and I couldn’t agree more!
LikeLike
I think the public–i.e., a coalition of parents, students, teachers, administrators and superintendents– will determine the tipping point, parents being the most important. As they realize what is at stake– loss of public schools/community centers and competent teachers; their tax dollars spent on religious schools– they will either form strong groups like the opt out group and translate them into political power houses, thus perhaps saving public ed, or they won’t. I think that more diaries will also be sued for lack of adequate funding. Nevertheless, I feel very nervous about the future of public ed and the teaching profession at large– the public really has to wake up SOON.
LikeLike
I think the public–i.e., a coalition of parents, students, teachers, administrators and superintendents– will determine the tipping point, parents being the most important. As they realize what is at stake– loss of public schools/community centers and competent teachers; their tax dollars spent on religious schools– they will either form strong groups like the opt out one and translate them into political powerhouses, thus perhaps saving public ed, or they won’t. I think that more districts will also be sued for lack of adequate funding. Nevertheless, I feel very nervous about the future of public ed and the teaching profession at large– the public really has to wake up SOON.
LikeLike
“So far, on the 2016 presidential campaign trail, Democratic candidates have steered away from discussing K-12 education, which can be divisive. Instead, they have focused on the softer issues of preschool and higher education.”
“Divisive” means “unpopular”, so no one should let them get away with this. We need a real debate. They’ve been bobbing and weaving since NCLB. Hillary Clinton doesn’t want to talk about K-12 schools because Hillary Clinton knows there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between her and Jeb Bush. She should have to admit that, at a minimum.
http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-na-education-reform-20150904-story.html
LikeLike
We already know what to expect from Hillary. The one I want to hear from is Sanders. He too is carefully avoiding K-12, which doesn’t bode well. I still really want to support him, but I’m in no mood for a repeat of Obama 2008. A wise (ahem) man once said, “There’s an old saying in Tennessee — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.”
LikeLike
I don’t want to hear about how they love teachers, which is what Clinton says.. I think it’s silly and patronizing and avoids the issue.
Does she value public schools as more than testing centers and career prep? Is she going to hire the same set of people Bush and Obama hired? Why or why not?
LikeLike
Dienne, do you not believe Sanders is by far the best candidate, even without hearing him belabor on K-12 education policy?
LikeLike
Well, Jill Stein would be a lot better. But, yes, of the candidates with a remote chance, he is the best. But I’m just getting niggling vibes that he’s not as liberal as we’ve been led to believe, and I’ve been down this path before. As it stands now, I will definitely vote for him.
LikeLike
Dienne, I would like to discuss this (and other things) further. Could you please email me? eddetective@gmail.com
LikeLike
You are correct about the absolute avoidance of K-12 education in most of the campaign rhetoric except for the yes/no tap dancing around the Common Core and taking cheap shots at teachers.
LikeLike
You gotta just love it when the ethically challenged lecture the rest of us on ethics.
MaryEllen Elia’s moral development stunted somewhere between Kohlberg’s Level 1 (Pre-Conventional) Self-interest orientation (What’s in it for me?[$250K per year for Elia])
and Level 2 (Conventional): Interpersonal accord and conformity (Social norms)(The good boy/girl attitude); Authority and social-order maintaining orientation (law and order mentality)
while many (if not most) teachers (and certainly all those parents who have opted their children out) operate at Level 3 (Post conventional): Social contract orientation; Universal ethical principles (Principled conscience)
Pathetic.
LikeLike
Love your comment!
LikeLike
I am sure Kohlberg is relegated to the forgotten status of Piaget, the reformers know them not. Destroying their cognitive dissonance would probably kill them.
LikeLike
Sad days
LikeLike
I think it is unethical to use tests that have no proof of validity or reliability to rank students and by the extension teachers. I think it is unethical to call a crisis in education when there wasn’t one. I find it unethical to refuse to fund schools adequately and then blame teachers, parents and children for school failure. I find it unethical to insist that common core standards would be better and internationally bench marked when they clearly don’t meet this basic standard. I find in unethical to claim that the standards were state led and created when they were not. I find it unethical to adopt new standards without public input and proper investigation of their efficacy before foisting them on the public. I find it unethical to collect student data and teacher data and pretend that we have no right to privacy! I find it unethical to tell teachers that they have no business discussing the standards with parents. This is a breach to the right of free speech and forces teachers to appear as if they approve when they do not! This forces teachers into the position of having to lie to parents about their own experiences in the classroom and their personal knowledge about education. And furthermore, I believe that politicians who refuse to openly and honestly state their opinion about education to be dishonest and untrustworthy. Openly lying to the public is immoral.
LikeLike