Troy LaRaviere is principal of Blaine Elementary School in Chicago. He was invited to speak on a problem at the Chicago Civic Club, where civic and business leaders convene. The topic was bankruptcy and the schools. Troy was the only school-based educator on the panel.
Here is the link to the event (you might want to hear Paul Vallas on the topic).
And here is Troy’s presentation:
“I recommend watching the last few minutes of Paul Vallas’ presentation in which he lays out the basic rules CPS operated by before the financial crisis. This part of his talk begins at the 36:00 time segment. I think all of Chuck Burbridge’s presentation is worth listening to, and that George Panagakis’ presentation on the intricacies of bankruptcy was eye-opening. This panel represents the first time I’ve prepared all of my remarks beforehand, so I’ve included those remarks below. I learned a lot from my participation on the panel and I hope you learn from it as well.
“Prepared Remarks
“Thank you to the City Club for inviting me to this panel and luncheon. Unfortunately I could not take advantage of the lunch as I am fasting today in solidarity with the 12 parents and community members who are in their 9th Day of a Hunger Strike to save Dyett School as the only open enrollment neighborhood high school left in their community (I mistakenly said “city” in my remarks). This gesture on my part is relatively insignificant when compared to the sacrifice they are making on behalf of their children. But I make it nonetheless before I begin my remarks.
“As residents and taxpayers we have to do more than identify problems. We have to identify and understand the source of those problems. If we don’t neutralize that source then we might be able to solve this problem today but that source will rear its head a few years down the line to re-create the same havoc that it’s wreaking on us today.
“We’re being told that pensions are the problem. We have a problem with pensions but pension are not the source of our problem. This administration consistently misappropriated pension funds, and then attempts to convince us that pensions themselves are the problem. That’s like a thief stealing your rent money and then attempting to convince you that the landlord is the problem.
“The source of our problem is city and school officials who spend and borrow money in a manner that is reckless and corrupt; the parasitic private sector banks and investors who are always looking for creative ways to rip off taxpayers, and the state legislators who enabled this irresponsible fiscal behavior in the first place.
“For the sake of time, I’m going to focus my comments on this administration’s reckless borrowing and the bank that benefit from it. When the Tribune attempted to look into the cost of this borrowing their reporters and attorneys were forced by CPS to spend a year getting the details about how much it spends in interest on its massive debts. So not only are they putting us in debt but they tried to prevent us from finding out just how much debt they put us in.
“Interestingly enough, CPS recently hired Ernst and Young to do an analysis of their structural deficit. That analysis shows that pension costs are projected to rise only 32% over seven years, while debt service is projected to rise 350% from $119 million to $421 million. THIS is the debt that’s driving up costs. This debt is not owed to teachers. This debt is owed to financial institutions like the Pritzker Group, Goldman Sachs and Northern trust—all Emanuel Campaign contributors; and his administration wants to ensure they get paid what they’re owed.
“This debt is also owed to banks and investors who virtually swindled CPS out of $100 million. Financial institutions like Bank of America and the Royal Bank of Canada. They have documented evidence that these banks knew that the auction rate securities market was about to collapse while they were preparing to underwrite a massive auction rate bond issue for CPS.
“That’s illegal. You can sue them and get those millions back. But the Emmanuel administration refuses. They want them to get what’s owed to them even though they got it in through corrupt and deceptive practices.
“This administration wants to pay your tax dollars to EVERYONE they owe, except one group. The only people the Emanuel administration doesn’t want to pay what they’re owed are teachers.
“Let me say it again another way.
“The only group of people the Emanuel administration doesn’t want to pay, just happen to be the only group of people who actually worked for what CPS owes them–spent their entire careers working and sacrificing for what CPS owes them.
“PNC Bank didn’t sacrifice a more lucrative career to dedicate itself to teaching science and mathematics. Chicago’s teachers do that.
“Goldman Sachs didn’t sacrifice time with their own families to stay after school to tutor struggling readers. Chicago teachers do that.
“None of these institutions spent consecutive years of his career working with four struggling students in hopes that that sacrifice and investment of time would pay off on their graduation day …. only to have those hopes destroyed when the news reaches you that you’ll be preparing instead for their funerals—in part, as a result of the neglect of their communities by many of the same people responsible for the neglect of their schools. Their names: Miguel. Tyray. Roberto. Candace. Those are the names I carry with me, but teachers all across Chicago have names of their own etched in their memories forever.
“As our teachers feel this district coming in to take what little they do get in return for their sacrifice, this administration’s hollow, empty, and hypocritical use of the term “shared sacrifice” to justify this encroachment must seem profoundly disrespectful and painfully ironic.
“To reiterate. The source of our problem is:
(1) city and school officials who spend and borrow money in a manner that is reckless and corrupt;
(2) the parasitic private sector banks and investors who are always looking for creative ways to rip off taxpayers, and
(3) the state legislators who are all too eager to create a legislative environment in which this legalized theft can occur.
“If anyone is made to sacrifice, it has to be members of these three groups, because the behavior of teachers did not cause this problem. The behavior of these three groups caused this problem. Teachers have already made their sacrifice a thousand times over, and those whose behavior caused this crisis have no right to ask them for more.”

Illinois borrowed money to pay state bills from the Teachers’ Retirement System of Illinois and underfunded it for years and now the financial problem is our pension. Same problem exists in Chicago with the Chicago Public Schools.
LikeLike
This is a good argument in favor of a defined contribution plan.
LikeLike
Those already exist for teachers. They are called 403b’s and 457’s and are like 401k’s for private sector workers. Teachers should use these but teachers don’t get SS so they still need pensions.
LikeLike
I paid 8% of my salary towards my pension my whole working career. The amount of money paid into pensions by individual teachers has increased since I retired.
The Illinois Supreme court ruled recently that the state caused the financial problem. It upheld the constitution of Illinois which states that our pensions cannot be diminished.
The attorney general of Illinois is now putting a protest to the Supreme Court, hoping it will allow the state to cut pensions. Illinois has the worst funding problem of all states but refuses to cut loopholes which lower taxes on corporations nor tax he wealthy with a progressive income tax.
LikeLike
The defined benefit plans – while they’re still here – are a far superior to the
defined contribution plans.
LikeLike
In a defined benefit plan, the employer can try to steal your earned benefit. In a defined contribution plan, Wall Street will steal it. At least some states (like Illinois, at least so far) have constitutional provisions protecting pensions. No such protection from Wall Street.
Anyway, there are dozens, if not hundreds, of studies and papers that show exactly why defined contribution plans are a rip-off for employees. As an economist, I’d think you would read some of them.
LikeLike
John wrote “The defined benefit plans – while they’re still here – are a far superior to the defined contribution plans.”
They are far superior for the few who are lucky to have them. They suck for everyone else.
The interest groups who receive them and the politicians who assent to giving them are extremely anxious to disguise the true costs, which are considerable. As a result they are invariably underfunded, everyone is shocked and outraged when “Wall Street” doesn’t return Madoff-on-steroids 12-14% returns for 10-30 years in a row, and the taxpayers are left holding the bag. In 2015-2016, New York City will spend approximately $3,000 per student on pensions and retiree benefits–that’s just to keep current, not to get ahead of future obligations. That is money that could go a long way toward reducing class sizes!
Defined benefit plans worked when people retired later, when they didn’t live that long after they retired, and when the country was growing rapidly and the population was much younger than it is now. The priority should be preserving and strengthening Social Security, primarily by raising the contribution limit.
LikeLike
Dienne,
You state that “in a defined benefit plan the employer can try to steal your earned benefit. In a defined contribution plan, Wall Street will steal it.”
If you are so certain of the outcome of the plans, I suggest you create your own plan and get off both defined benefit or contribution plans. Please keep all your savings under the mattress where no one can steal it.
For the rest of the people, they will always contribute 6.1% of their salary to Social Security (no choice) and if they are smart will rely on the available defined contribution plan such as 401K, 403b etc. Besides the rest of us are not teachers.
LikeLike
Raj, as a teacher, I contribute to four plans: Social Security, state retirement, 401K, and my own personal plan. I hope that ONE of those exists by the time I can retire in 30 years.
LikeLike
Me, too, Raj.
I retired at 57 and get a decent pension from the still solvent NYS Retirement System. When I hit 62, I’ll collect Social Security and I have an Annuity that yields $5000 a year, if I choose to spend it (but after last week on Wall Street I’m afraid to look at the total). Then I have a bit of savings – it was more, but it is dwindling down each year.
I consider myself lucky, but over 30% of my pay checks went to fund these endeavors (including my high NYS and Federal taxes).
I personally don’t understand why some states don’t allow teachers to participate in social security. It’s especially heinous for those whose pensions are being threatened. Unless they want a hoard of former teachers selling pencils on street corners, the government better “fix” what they “broke”.
LikeLike
Defined contribution plans are a complete fraud. Wall Street eats up earnings with fees and most people do not have access to real money machines on Wall Street – IPOs, stock options, hedge funds, acquisitions. Few people are able to understand the funds and risks. It is a crap shoot in a rigged system. Company matches have dwindled and plan offerings are increasingly subpar. The volatility and recent market downturn should be a canary in a mine.
But defined contribution did offload the responsibility of funding retirement onto the backs of individual workers. Corporate profits are soaring.
It seems in a “free” market with “choice” workers should have an option in how they fund their retirement, including Freedom to Assemble and demand nation or industry level pensions.
LikeLike
There seems to be a great deal of confusion about defined contribution plans.
John,
the rate of return on investments is not very different for funds invested in a defined benefit plan and those in a defined contribution plan. If defined benefit plans are far superior, it is because they are much more costly. The one extra source for revenue in a defined benefit plan is the money that was paid to support teachers that left before they became vested. This seems to me to be uncomfortably close to wage theft so not really a point in favor of defined benefit plans. From the prospective of the employer, I think the defined contribution plan offers significant advantages, the most important of which is that the politicians who make the promise to public employees are the ones who have to fulfill the promise to public employees.
Dienne,
Defined benefit plans take funds and invest them in asset markets through the companies that specialize in that work. Given this, defined contribution plans run the risk of your employer stealing the funds AND Wall Street steeling them. By your own criteria, a defined contribution fund, which is not subject to theft from your employer, would seem superior.
Mathvale,
If defined contribution funds are a complete fraud, than Dr. Ravitch and I, along with the vast majority of post secondary teachers, are in a great deal of trouble. Defined contribution systems have been the standard for faculty (TIAA was founded in 1918, CREF in 1952). I am confident that both Dr. Ravitch and I will have adequate retirement incomes.
LikeLike
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
Brilliant speech, Troy LaRiviere. Thank you for your courage on behalf of teachers everywhere. This is not only a Chicago problem, this is a national-wide scandal.
LikeLike
“Those with political and financial clout are routinely allowed to break the law with no legal repercussions whatsoever. Often they need not even exploit their access to superior lawyers because they don’t see the inside of a courtroom in the first place — not even when they get caught in the most egregious criminality.”
Glenn Greenwald
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
Well said. Now will Rahm, the bankers, and others listen?
LikeLike
It is heart breaking to see this pattern over and over again with little or no accountability. Where are the voters? Where is the outrage? Very frustrating.
LikeLike
Troy LaRiviere should post him giving his speech on youtube to provide access to a larger audience. He should send it to all the major news outlets including Al Jezeera, America, who might actually have the guts to show it.
LikeLike
Wow. Principled principal with the facts at fingertips. Powerful.
LikeLike
Bravo!!!!!!
LikeLike
They might get a better deal in a bankruptcy court. They’ll at least get a fair hearing with predictable rules, transparency, and what seems to be a still not hopelessly corrupted set of people. I don’t think the systemic corruption and blatant buying of political actors has seeped into that process. Yet.
LikeLike
See news of Troy LaRaviere being reprimanded in today’s Chicago Tribune
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-troy-laraviere-principal-warning-vote-met-0828-20150827-story.html
LikeLike
Mike…this link does not take you to the article, and the Trib pastes endless ads over it looking for subscribers. Please scan the article and paste it here so we can read it. Thanks.
LikeLike
Probably only works for subscribers.
“School board rebukes Rahm Emanuel critic
Principal says reprimand was in response to his policy opposition
By Juan Perez Jr. Chicago Tribune August 28, 2015
A Lakeview school principal who’s a frequent critic of Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s education policies has been formally reprimanded by the Chicago Board of Education — a move that could eventually lead to his dismissal.
Blaine Elementary School Principal Troy La-Raviere, who this week excoriated Chicago Public Schools during a panel discussion on the district’s finances, was the target of a “warning resolution” that board members quietly approved Wednesday.
Reached Thursday, La-Raviere said the school board action was partly linked to his opposition to a controversial standardized test launched last spring. The school board’s public rebuke came months after LaRaviere served as an education adviser and outspoken supporter of Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, who challenged Emanuel for mayor.
LaRaviere said the sanction was the result of “someone putting pressure on somebody to make an example of the principal that was at the school that seemed to be most effective at getting kids to opt out.”
The warning resolution posted on the board’s website Thursday doesn’t detail what spurred the action, instead offering boilerplate language the district uses in these types of cases.
The document stated that LaRaviere “has engaged in unsatisfactory conduct” and that “dismissal charges” could follow “if said conduct is not corrected immediately, and maintained thereafter in a satisfactory fashion following receipt of the warning resolution.”
CPS spokesman Bill McCaffrey said the district does not comment on personnel issues. Such warning resolutions are regularly approved by the board for a variety of infractions. On Wednesday, two other employees received them.
Board Vice President Jesse Ruiz abstained from voting on the action against LaRaviere, but voted for the others with the rest of the board. The district did not say why Ruiz abstained from the vote, which came a day after the board vice president sat near LaRaviere during the panel discussion on the district’s finances put on by the City Club of Chicago.
Last month, LaRaviere published on his website a recollection of a confrontation with Ruiz that he said came during and after a principals-only meeting on the CPS budget.
LaRaviere has long worked to raise his profile. He frequently uses Twitter to promote his appearances and statements to more than 1,000 followers, publishes a stream of blog posts that criticize the district and pens heated op-eds to city newspapers.
His opposition to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers exam came amid a broad backlash to the test. In March, LaRaviere told the Tribune that CPS administrators pressured him to “cease and desist” his actions.
McCaffrey said at the time that the “cease and desist” directive was given to any principal whose conduct could be construed as not following district policy in giving the state exams.
On Thursday, LaRaviere declined to share a detailed copy of the district’s warning until he wrote about the issue on his website.
“That resolution had absolutely no effect on me curtailing my desire to articulate and help the city of Chicago understand how backwards and corrupt this system is,” he said. “If anything, it intensified that desire.” jjperez@tribpub.com “
LikeLike
STUPENDOUS. Would that the Tribune would print this in full. I would die from asphyxiation if I were to wait for that to happen.
How TRAGIC that the news corporate media promotes only their myopic self centered views rather than the REAL news,
Money usurps the search for truth.
LikeLike
He’s a really good advocate though and he somehow manages to get heard a lot so that’s something to celebrate, though, I think.
LikeLike
Brave people willing to speak out!
LikeLike
It is worth to repeat Principal Troy LaRaviere’s courageous wisdom:
[start quote]
We don’t need heroes, and we don’t need saints. We need a movement.
A movement of hundreds of thousands of people across this city, which stand together to retake it from the grips of the corrupt and inept elected and appointed officials who hold the reigns of power.
The hero we need is the public itself, awakened and ready to change our collective reality; ready to serve as examples to our children—examples of citizens who come together to work and change our city for the better.
[end quote]
If parents do not have their courage to protect their own children, would profiteers protect or abuse their children?
The pride does not protect their cubs, would hyenas care for their cub, or eat them alive? Back2basic
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lifelong Quest.
LikeLike