Frank Bruni is worried about the teacher shortage. Over the few years in which he has been a regular on the Néw York Times opinion page, Bruni has written column after column demeaning teachers and teachers’ unions and asserting that American kids are “coddled” (like the 51% who live in low-income families and the 23% who live in poverty, and the rest who spend their days in test-prep drudgery, competing to stay in the shrinking middle class). He praised the film “Won’t Back Down,” which demonizes teachers and unions and celebrates charters. The same producer was behind the fact-challenged “Wating for ‘Superman,'” which launched the privatization movement.
Now Frank Bruni frets about the teacher shortage. Veteran teacher Arthur Goldstein says Bruni doesn’t have to search far for the causes. He could begin by looking in the mirror. Bruni, he says, is part of the problem:
“As it happens, Bruni himself is a prominent teacher basher. He believes passionately in junk science rating of teachers and can’t be bothered to do the most fundamental research. Who cares if the American Statistical Association says teachers change test scores by a factor of 1-14%? What’s the big deal if they say use of high stakes evaluation is counter-productive? He knows some guy who likes it and that should be good enough for anyone. Bruni does other important work, like spitting out press releases for Joel Klein’s latest book.
“But now he’s amazed no one wants to be a teacher. Naturally, being a New York Times reporter who has access to pretty much anyone, he goes right to the source, the very best representative of teachers he can muster:
“Teachers crave better opportunities for career growth. Evan Stone, one of the chief executives of Educators 4 Excellence, which represents about 17,000 teachers nationwide, called for “career ladders for teachers to move into specialist roles, master-teacher roles.”
“They’re worried that they’re going to be doing the same thing on Day 1 as they’ll be doing 30 years in,” he told me.
“This is what Frank Bruni interprets as vision. Let’s make one thing clear–Evan Stone is not a teacher. He was for a few excruciating and miserable years, but he learned all he could from that dead end job, and started this big old E4E thing with Gates money. Now he gets to make pronouncements to distinguished NY Times reporters like Bruni. Meanwhile, the rest of us are stuck actually teaching children. Naturally Bruni doesn’t ask us what we think. After all, given our obvious lack of ambition, what could we possibly know?
“Bruni has gala luncheons to attend, fois gras to critique, and he can’t be bothered. Still just because Evan Stone’s E4E got 17, 000 people to sign papers in exchange for free drinks doesn’t mean they actually represent those people. I happen to know, for example, a UFT official who signed the paper just to see what was going on at one of those meetings.
“In fact, there’s no evidence to indicate anything E4E says is based on anything beyond Bill Gates’s druthers. Their support for junk science and calls to actually worsen already tough working conditions border on lunacy. Their acceptance of reformy money and embrace of a reformy agenda mean they do NOT represent working teachers….
“Yes, Frank Bruni, there is a teacher shortage. And yes, there are reasons for it. Some reasons are your BFFs like Joel Klein, Campbell Brown, and Gates-funded astroturf groups like E4E. They spout nonsense-based corporate ideas designed to destroy public education and union. You talk to them and can’t be bothered with us.
“Another big reason is mainstream media, which hires people like you. When people read nonsense like the stuff you write, they may not know that fundamental research is something you consider beyond the pale. They may not be aware that you have no intent or interest in talking to working teachers. They may think we don’t love our jobs and we don’t love working with and helping children. They may not know that merit pay has been around for 100 years and has never worked, and they may think that Evan Stone knows what he’s talking about. “
Off topic, but check this out. Joel needs a job soon. Another failure for the deformer.
http://www.thestreet.com/story/13252108/1/the-future-of-news-corps-amplify-may-become-clearer-today.html
It proves there is a God
that is good news.
NO! Paraphrasing David Coleman “God doesn’t give a shit about Joel Klein.”
AMEN!
I just dug this 2013 post from this blog… up from one “Tony Brantley,” who’s writing about the same meme that E4E’s Evan Stone promotes in today’s Bruni op-ed.
————————————-:
TONY BRANTLEY:
According to E4E, the “real” reason that teachers are leaving the profession, or opting not to join the profession is…
NOT because of constant propagandizing against and scapegoating of them…
NOR is it that their salaries, benefits, and job protections are being shredded and their unions busted…
NOR is it the de-professionalization of teaching executed by such orgs as E4E’s allies such as NCTQ and TFA…
NOR is it ballooning class size …
NOR is it having themselves evaluated and paid according to the dubious measures of their students’ test scores… and why put up with such a brutal, demanding job in the face of all these attacks.
No, no, no… none of that…
Teachers are leaving because they do not have “opportunities for advancement”…. a “career ladder” in which teachers will achieve the newly-created designation of “Master Teacher”, whereupon they may leave the classroom, either totally or partially, for more fulfillment and higher compensation… or other such nonsense.
(This is, in part, also a justification for Bill Gates’ and Erik Hanushek’s ludicrous idea of firing teachers who are less “excellent”—based on test scores, of course—then increasing the size of the classes taught by the remaining “excellent” “Master Teachers”, who will then be paid more, because… now, more students will be exposed to such “excellent” “Master Teachers”).
This moronic thesis was propagated in an New York Post op-ed by one “Lori Wheal”, a ranking member of E4E’s New York City chapter. She cited the absence of this “career ladder” as her reason for leaving teaching for greener pastures of “education policy”—where thankfully, the heart-breaking agony brought on by her abandonment of her students will now fortunately be compensated with the significantly higher pay that comes with such a courageous move:
(NOTE: Ms Wheal—the E4E op-ed writer and a teacher with just a few years in the classroom—is a self-proclaimed “Master Teacher”, and who actually uses that improvised title for herself on LinkedIn and Twitter… don’t break your arm patting yourself on the back, Ms. Wheal):
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/why_nyc_can_keep_great_teachers_aySFH5cmkDYrnRxwXBnycK
Thankfully—and exactly one year ago today… August 1st—Ms. Wheal’s drivel was met with this withering response from a career teacher on his / her “Accountable Talk” blog (and also from some veteran teacher COMMENTERS that followed this… SEE BELOW):
http://www.accountabletalk.com/2012/08/note-to-lori-wheal-teaching-is-its-own.html
(NOTE, this blogger / teacher has very strong opinions on E4E, strong enough that he / she refuses to use call the group by its actual name, preferring instead to call it by a common nickname among The Big Apple’s veteran, non-E4E educators— “Asshats for Education”—“A4E”. I’m usually averse to such name-calling, but, in this instance at least, my aversion is considerably muted than it otherwise would be.)
———————————————
“Wednesday, August 1, 2012
“Note to Lori Wheal:
Teaching is its own Career Path
“Lori Wheal, member of ‘Asshats for Education’ (‘A4E’), regaled us today with the sorrowful tale of why she is leaving the classroom. In typical ‘Asshat’ style, she tells her tale of woe while informing us–repeatedly–what a wonderful teacher she is and what a shame it is to lose her. She tells us she is a great teacher ‘by all measures’. She lumps herself in with the ‘irreplaceable’ teachers the city loses every year. She talks about being in the ‘Master Teacher’ program, and refers to herself as a ‘Master Teacher’ at every conceivable opportunity.
“No, really. She uses the title on LinkedIn and on Twitter. She even got NY1 to refer to her that way.
“I don’t know Ms. Wheal at all, but I do know that people who feel the need to toot their own horns all the time are usually the weakest and most insecure teachers.
“So what’s causing Ms. Wheal to leave and put the entire NYC school system in jeopardy of imminent collapse? Well, she was (as you may have heard) a ‘Master Teacher’ at a turnaround school, and now that position has been eliminated because those schools will not be closed. This has left poor ‘Master Teacher’ Wheal hopeless, as her precious ‘career ladder’ has been yanked out from under her. Clearly, she has no option but to leave the system, because despite her ‘Master Teacher’ credentials, she no longer has any intention of teaching children and wants to turn to education policy.
“Maybe there’s a way to introduce ‘Master Teacher’ Wheal to Ruben Brosbe, another Asshat who had no trouble telling everyone else how to teach but headed for the hills when there was real teaching to be done.
“I’ve got news for the boo-hoo-ing Asshats like ‘Master Teacher’ Wheal: Teaching is its own career path. If you have gone into teaching because you hope one day to run a school district, you are in the wrong profession. If telling other teachers how wonderful you are is more important to you than getting in front of kids and doing the day in, day out work of actually educating children, you are in the wrong profession.
“I may not know as much as ‘Master Teacher’ Wheal; after all, I have only been teaching for more than twice as long as she has. But I do know that getting a gig in a turnaround school with a nifty title doesn’t make you a ‘master teacher.’
“What makes you a ‘master teacher’ is dedication to those children in the classroom. It’s sticking it out even when the going gets tough. It’s being dedicated to teaching as a career and not looking at it as a stepping stone to greater things for your own advancement. It’s knowing that every year in the classroom teaches you something you can use the next year, and the next.
“If you go into education with the view that being a classroom teacher is the bottom rung of the ladder, you are a disgrace to the profession and you should leave.
“That means you, ‘Master Teacher’ Wheal.
“Don’t let the door hit you on the asshat on the way out.”
————————————–
The COMMENTS following this were as good as the op-ed. (They sort of function as the reply to Evan Stone’s promotion of the whole “Master Teacher” idea, the responses that Bruni would have received from actual teachers, had he bothered to speak to them.)
————————————–
Michael Fiorillo said…
As you correctly point out, this woman’s (Lori Wheal’s) arrogance and self-regard is just beyond the beyonds, to say nothing of her blindness/indifference to using her colleagues’ throats as a career stepping stone.
In a less-debased, disinformed era, something like this would be published as a case study of public preening and vanity, instead of an “opinion” piece.
There must be an Organizational Psychology/Human Resources profile, questionnaire and checklist for deformers to identify and promote these people, since they’re replicating out of control:
— Self-centered-ness?
— Self-importance?
— Seemingly willful lack of awareness of how their actions affect others?
— Unquestioning willingness to obey authority and channel received opinion?
Check, check, check and check.
—————————————–
AND THIS
—————————————
Anonymous said…
Lori Wheal couldn’t even keep herself engaged as a full time teacher. I wonder how many of those years were actually spent full time in the classroom with a full teaching schedule.
In my 16 years of teaching full time in Harlem, I have seen countless teachers come and go. Ms. Wheal is just another one.
August 1, 2012 at 12:37 PM
—————————————–
AND THIS
—————————————
ASTRAKA said…
Ms Wheal, real “Master Teachers” don’t care for the title. They do not look to get out of the classroom for more money. They stay and teach 30-35-40 years.
Their colleagues know them and ask them for help whenever the need arises. You know you are a “master teacher,” (lower case) when your colleagues respect you for your knowledge, and respect you as trustworthy person.
August 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM
—————————————–
AND THIS
—————————————
BronxEnglish said…
I’ve been teaching for fifteen years here in New York City. It has NEVER come into my head to call myself a “Master” teacher. . . nor has it come into my head to enter that stupid “Master Teacher” program.
Why is that, you ask?
#1: I am a teacher because I want to teach students. I want to do the best I can, all year. I want to improve each year. If I run away from my students so I can get a couple thousand extra bucks, what does that say about me as a teacher?
Not much.
(Another concern was the DOE–everyone knows they try a new program, don’t wait to see if it works, throw it away, repeat. Why should I bother, even for one year?)
I am, however, proud to call myself a “veteran” NYC public school teacher. I think I’ve earned that moniker.
“But Wheal’s editorial reads like the bleats of a self-aggrandizing, pompous, self-serving jackass. I can’t imagine any of my colleagues writing a ridiculous column like that. She sounds like a big fan of my favorite deformer, Michelle Rhee.
How she can show her face to colleagues and pretend to be collegial after this debacle is beyond me?
Oh yeah. . . she’s so much smarter and more talented than her colleagues. She’s gonna pull a Brosbe and go into policy?
Can’t wait for her edicts!
I’m surprised that he’s surprised. Why on earth would anyone choose to enter a profession that is devalued, slandered by media and public alike? Teachers are treated and paid badly. If students don’t perform well in underfunded schools, the teachers are blamed and fired. Who in their right mind would sign up for that?
When I started teaching in DC Public Schools back in the late 80’s people encouraged and supported us. They looked at you as a cross between a savior and a fool and constantly said: “better you than I”. In the 20-teens, we’ve become: pariahs, fools, grossly over-paid, malfeasant, incompetent and the sum of all that is wrong with the U.S. We’ve even been accused of threatening the nation’s well-being, economic and national security. Yeah, so I can see the rush to become a member of one of the world’s greatest professions and fraternity.
The scolding from the ed reform camp is really insufferable.
I’m middle aged and I don’t recall this intense rigor and incredible hard work from my “cohort” in public schools. From what heights of excellence are they speaking? The 1980’s and 1990’s when they all graduated and went on to careers as critics of the lazy and ignorant US workforce?
Also, can they find another book? They all quote the Smartest Kids in The World. They should resist peer pressure and look to another source. One. Find one other book. They should start modeling the “rigor” they say the current crop of 3rd graders need.
Chiara, the reformers grew up in a time when there was no rigor at all. How did they become so rich and powerful?
Egolution
Bruni is just mouthing what the NYTimes wants the public to believe rather than what the facts are. Remember Michael Winerip?
Perhaps if I scrambled my brains with a screwdriver Bruni would make sense.
I too have been appalled by the writings of Bruni on K-12 education. It seems that he is repeating sound bites and white paper excerpts that someone has provided to him. However – I have really appreciated his recent writings on college education. He seems to be coming at K12 and college from opposite perspectives. Re colleges he is promoting a rich experience full of diverse opportunities – and criticizes our seeming desire to “cull the herd” at age 18 rather than foster a phase of great intellectual and personal development for our 18 year olds. He also promotes the value, importance and quality of public universities . Yet his K12 writings seem to promote the polar opposite. Diane I wonder if you coulld help him see the light? Could you meet with him? I think he has been wooed by the reformers and would be open minded to changing his tune?
Karen,
I will try.
Thanks, Diane. Take him out for lunch or dinner at a fabulous new restaurant, & encourage him to write about food again, because he obviously knows diddly-squat about education. Bruni is loony!
Everyone he quoted, including Randi who was a IMHO also a hypocrite, are all Reform driven. Yes, teachers in states like Hawaii leave because they can’t afford to live on a teacher’s salary, but for others it’s the constant emphasis on testing and the constant bashing of the profession. And how is it possible for any teacher to get ahead when those jobs go to TFAs or Broadies?
Bruni presents Randi’s statement, hems and haws about it, and then presents the nonsensical E4E assertion, something they’ve been saying for years, as absolute fact. I have never, ever heard a single teacher complain about anything resembling a career path. And I’m bone weary of all these “add water, instant expert” types. REAL experts know what’s really going on.
The career path mantra reminds me of when supervisors all of a sudden wanted us to come up with “five year plans.” Since all I wanted to do was bounded by the classroom, I found the whole exercise pretty useless. My career aspirations centered around becoming a better teacher; I planned to be right where I was in five years only better at it. Where I might choose certain areas of practice to improve, I did not need or want a five year forecast. Each year, each class, each new student demanded a flexibility not defined in five year increments.
Bruni’s sister is the president of a school board in a ritzy NJ district. She is typically hard on the teachers there. Perhaps she is feeding him this rhetoric.
Bruni isn’t alone in opining about education without talking to teachers. Anna Deveare Smith’s new performance about the “school-to-prison” pipeline (hate that term) features a couple dozen voices –but not ONE regular classroom teacher (she does have one “emotional support teacher”). She does have ed school professor Pedro Noguera (who has not gained my respect); a pompous “philosopher of education”; a condescending, teacher-insulting Stanford psychology professor… The unstated implication of the whole performance was that inept public school teachers’ insensitivity was driving poor kids to prison in droves. One thing many elite liberals like Bruni and Smith have in common: contempt for public school teachers. Bruni speaks for his class.