Jonathan Pelto reports a very important story from Washington State. As we have learned to expect, a majority of the students in the state “failed” the Smarter Balanced Assessment. Why?because the testing groups set the “cut score” (passing mark) unrealistically high.
Remarkably, the state board of education lowered the cut score so that most students would be able to graduate.
Pelto writes:
“Yup, you read that correctly, after taxpayers were forced to spend hundreds of millions of dollars developing the Common Core and the Common Core Tests and students and teachers wasted unfathomable amounts of time prepping and taking the tests that were designed to label the vast majority of students as failures, the “lead” state behind the SBAC testing scheme simply threw out results.
“Instead of going with the cut score that was adopted by the SBAC coordinating committee last November, an unfair rating system that was adopted with the support of [Connecticut] Governor Dannel Malloy’s representatives, the Washington State Board of Education choose a new “passing” level , “where about as many kids are expected to pass the exams as passed the state’s previous tests.”
Now, Pelto wonders, what will Connecticut do?
His answer:
“Okay everyone – now would be a good time for Connecticut’s students, parents and teachers to start screaming out of utter frustration and anger!
“And then let’s go get the pitchforks!”
The reality is that no one knows how the cut scores were set, whether they actually predict college and career readiness, or why they were set so high that most students fail in every state.

Reason for the cut scores are pretty obvious:
Pick:
A) they reflect what skills students do need and can achieve by the end of public school (no evidence to support this)
B) we lowered our standards in response to NCLB demands and still haven’t picked up the pieces (infers a mythical time when our standards were great – some were and some were not – little connection established between standards and success)
C) Very rich and politically connected people saw an opportunity to promote a free market ideology, atk unions, atk women, atk minorities, and segregate schools and get richer while trying to ease their own tax burdens. None of this happens if schools are doing alright so it promotes the failure mantra and manufactures its own proof and focuses resources on the wrong problems further reinforcing it.
LikeLike
Yesterday, during the non-cocktail-hour debate, at least one politician (I forget who, I’m bad with faces) complained about how only 30% of students were college-and-career-ready. I may have hissed “norm-referenced assessment!” at the TV.
LikeLike
It was Jeb, who isn’t president ready.
LikeLike
Clearly the SBAC tests are crap (like the samples) otherwise they would be happy to publish the questions (unless they’ve only got 25 questions altogether). Three cheers for Washington. Did they base this on knowledge of the test questions? I wonder.
LikeLike
No, it was not based on the knowledge of the test questions. They did not have enough data for the juniors because so many of them here opted out. There is also a lot of backlash here against using test scores as graduation requirements. We had a biology test requirement that was preventing several thousand HS kids from graduating even though they had completed all the coursework and passed the class. Legislature had several bills pending about using tests as graduation requirements. Plus some plain old-fashioned pushback against the Feds given how they’ve punished us for not using student test scores in teacher evals even though WA has gone “all-in” for CCSS and SBAC.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Exceptional Delaware and commented:
I’m pretty sure the “no backbone” Delaware DOE and the Emperor Governor Markell are going to play “Follow The Leader” on this. They didn’t even pay the “extra” to have preliminary results released for Smarter Balanced. They are going to see what all the other states do before they release anything. This is the weak-in-the-knees type of stuff Delaware does.
LikeLike
So if politician and “education rheeformsters” in every state are arbitrarily allowed to set their own cut scores for their state, how is that national standardization based on the PARCC and Smarter Ballance. A passing score in Washington state could be a failing score in New York.
What I think is going on is that these educational hucksters have learned from the outrage in New York, particularly Long Island, that if too many students that have historically gone to quality colleges, that the opt out movement of these ridiculous high-stakes assessments will dramatically increase.
The only way to kill the reform monster ( education reform movement – status quo) is to opt out of ALL local state and federal standardize high-stakes testing!:
http://unitedoptout.com
LikeLike
Cross posted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Jon-Pelto-Washington-Stat-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Common-Core_Education_Testing_Time-150807-626.html#comment557697
LikeLike
The reason for the high cut score was to create a narrative of failure to erode support for public education, opening up opportunities to divert public dollars into private hands.
All I needed to know about education reform I learned watching The movie Major League. The Cleveland Indians owner wants to move the team to a more profitable market in Florida. She is prohibited contractually from doing this unless fan attendance plummets. To make this happen she intentionally sabotages the team in an attempt to finish last and repel fans. Sound familiar? The actress even looks like Campbell Brown!
LikeLike
I know you get this¦AND, I hâve sat on several cut score committees. I know EXACTLY how this was done.
I âm disgusted.
I quit!
Tammie Schrader
Regional Science Coordinator
Educational Service District 101
Northeast Washington LASER Director
(509) 323-2725
tschrader@esd101.net
[cid:image001.jpg@01CFB879.2EC13000]
LikeLike
A cut score of 2.5, or maybe it’s two and a half, or two and two bits, or maybe it’s 2.50. Looks like they’re inventing their scoring system on the go if you ask me.
Why would you score on a scale of 1 to 4, and then divide it? That in itself is a mark of ignorance. Just pick a bigger integer, like say 10, 100, 1600, 2400?
LikeLike
Plus, not being an expert, but I’m pretty sure the measuring capability of tests goes way down when the majority of people are getting only half of the questions right, as guessing and confusion is more of what is measured. Just as with the people who score perfect to near perfect on a test, a harder test is needed to differentiate them.
The SBAC is a tool of fools, The legislature can decide how history will measure their mental integrity.
LikeLike
“Plus, not being an expert, but I’m pretty sure the measuring capability of tests goes way down when the majority of people are getting only half of the questions right, as guessing and confusion is more of what is measured.”
TC,
One doesn’t have to be “an expert” to understand that THESE TESTS DON’T MEASURE ANYTHING.
There are no standards of measurement, a la metrology, and no measuring devices and never will be for the teaching and learning process. It’s all a false charade that, unfortunately, almost everyone believes in and can’t seem to reject as a logically false concept. The sooner we discard archaic notions of measuring the unmeasurable, untold/uncounted harm will continue to occur to the most innocent of society, the children/students.
LikeLike
“”Instead of going with the cut score that was adopted by the SBAC coordinating committee last November, an unfair rating system that was adopted with the support of Governor Dannel Malloy’s representatives, the Washington State Board of Education choose a new “passing” level , “where about as many kids are expected to pass the exams as passed the state’s previous tests.”
I live and work in Washington State and my governor is Jay Inslee. I realize the story goes into Connecticut, but this line seems to tell me that Dannel Malloy is governor of Washington. Could this all be made more clear?
>
LikeLike
An article listed the new cut scores for Washington State: 2548 of 2795 would be considered passing for ELA, and 2595 of 2862 would be considered passing for Math.
If these correlate to previous passing scores, at least in math, students got about 40% correct.
Where do they get these numbers? How does 2595/2862 equal about 40%?
Where is the transparency? Smoke and mirrors! Mathemagic!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on VAS Blog and commented:
The astronomical cost, the astronomical arrogance & the astronomical backlash
LikeLike
Well that’s an easy question to answer, the movers and shakers are not educators. They simply have never known what they were doing & have got just about every aspect wrong.
LikeLike