A comment from a reader who signs as M:
Contracts are sacred…unless they’re made to a teacher.
What is perhaps the most disheartening is that the deformers have identified every crutch that we leaned on for determining education policy and worked in earnest to commandeer them or dismantle them.
Education research – let’s hire a bunch of researchers to generate what we want to say
Standards – Let’s govern what’s taught in classrooms whether it’s reasonable or not, educationally sound or not (this leads into all the VAMish nonsense)
School boards – let’s buy the races or have control seized from them, or both (buy the board then have it turn over power).
Money – Let’s find every end run through taxes and otherwise that will take money out of the schools from the students we’re trying to save, and blame that on teachers for being so greedy that they need to accept less – let’s take their money spend it elsewhere then blame them for their bloated pensions too.
Purpose of Education – Rather than being student centered it is now job market centered with schools being responsible for generating appropriate human capital (the student matters so much as they need to be come the chattel for said market)
I went into teaching to help students and make a living to help support my family. Pretty simple. If you look at the lens of effectiveness through all of these elements and how they’ve shifted over the last 20 years, it’s pretty disheartening.
They are succeeding (right now anyway) in turning school from a place of wonder, fun, community, and learning, into a hellish individualistic market centered hell hole focused on prepping each individual student for the test they must pass to be deemed “good product” – that takes away from so much of developing students into the types of neighbors we’d want in society. The message is insanely cynical.

The saturday PD in st. louis had what I thought was an interesting story….a black writer named Koran Addo….Women and minorities having a tough go on teaching exams. I ended up thinking he had been bullied into presenting a misleading, laundered account on behalf of the powerful white people who had made some questionable judgments…..it is true that there are stats which indicate that women and minorities are not doing well with the test for having people certified to teach in Missouri……immediately, it drew gleeful scorn mostly from holier than thou conservatives, scolding all about how terrible it would be to dumb down the test to make it easier…….but the reporter had not explained…..last september, a change was made…….the praxis 2 test which had been used for years was replaced by a more difficult test……designed especially for Missouri……It was no real surprise that more were failing it….the testing covered material not presented in the curriculum people had studied the last four years. In places other than St. Louis, this part of the story was emphasized….as I kept digging, I tried to discover just who would be deciding to make this change and why…..it led me to people from the MPEA–the Missouri professors of Educational administration…….the president of the MPEA is a key person at a very fine university……Missouri Baptist University, which happens to have a student body which is more than 80 percent white….and 7 percent black…….usually education stories at the pd get less than ten comments…..and those which appear on saturday get about five. this one is at 123…..there was a lot to protect when the success of white males dominating the testing stats in teaching testing was being questioned.
And make no mistake….MPEA gets funding from the state to even exist…..thanks for your post, m
LikeLike
These are not casual observations. I know that Diane and others are eager to see the cynicism left behind, but it is difficult. The messaging campaigns are ubiquitous, non-stop, well-financed, topically focussed on the points mentioned (among others) and contrived to demonstrate what Edward Bernays, father of 20th century propaganda, called “the engineering of consent.”
So the public portrait of public education is much as M has described it. The most recent tactic is to call supporters of public education “bigots” for objecting to the allocation of public funds for religious education.
The Wall Street Journal editorial for July 3, 2015 (A-2) screams “Religious Bigotry in Colorado.”
It complains about efforts to strike down the Douglas County school voucher program, efforts that The Wall Street Journal calls uncharitable “secularism” that will “deny poor children their right to a good eduction.”
Douglas County is one of the largest and wealthiest districts in Colorado. Having lost in their state battle for the “Choice Scholarship Program” in the Colorado courts, supporters of this case (including the WSJ) hope it move vouchers back into the orbit of the US Supreme Court .
The hope of the Wall Street Journal editorial writer is this: That the US Supreme Court will rule against the Blaine Amendments, vintage 1880s, bearing on the use of public finds to teach religion, and (according to the Wall Street Journal ) “meant to target immigrants, religious minorities and Catholic parochial schools”
The WSJ calls the Blaine Amendments “effluents of the 19th century,” says they “have overstayed their welcome, especially if they’ve merely become a pretext for modern liberals to undermine school choice for kids.”
The WSJ will never admit that it is the schools who will be choosing kids and if the kids do not have the right stuff, off they go…back to the public schools.
LikeLike
It isn’t cynicism when it is realism.
LikeLike
So true. I just retired after 15 years. Left education long ago to seek fame and fortune. Had great learning experiences in medical marketing. Went back to teaching when I realized my daughter needed to be understood. Have a Masters in Special Ed. plus, plus plus. I watched the system die before my eyes. I still love teaching and I know I made a difference, but the people just don’t get it. I intend to continue by tutoring and being an advocate for kids with learning disabilities. It isn’t how much you know anymore, it’s who’s coat tails you are hanging on to. West Coast also and realism it is!
LikeLike
Well said Cathy. Your story is much like mine. After 18 years teaching public high school, I also saw enormous change and watched education transform into something entirely different than when I started, and the changes were not positive. What amazed me is how easily the administration/school leaders bought into all the change. I fled into higher education, however, this stupidity (i.e. accountability, standards) is coming in at this level too. So sad. 😦
LikeLike
I have said it before and you said it again. When I first became a teacher in 1975 I taught students to produce, to create products. They learned skills that would allow them to be productive, to manage their resources and lives. By the time I retired in 2009 the directives and mandates required that we teach our students to BE the product. They had to pass quality control, not their actual work. Instead of educating them to be talented consumers of goods we redirect them to be consumed by goods. Corporate consumerism has taken control of our resources. “Making ends meet” has no real meaning. But most know what it is to “be consumed”.
LikeLike
In 1990 I was named “Most Influential Teacher” by one of my students. Fast forward to 2005, and I was awarded “Customer Appreciation Award” by one of my students.
I think that says it all.
LikeLike
Drooling over Detroit… “As an investor, I’m optimistic,” Chan says. “I sense you’re heading in the right direction.”
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/columnists/ingrid-jacques/2015/07/02/jacques-ed-experts-descend-detroit/29624519/
LikeLike
Thanks, Jeff, that’s a scary story.
LikeLike
This was more intended to pinpoint the multiple community touch stones that existed in community schools that have been cynically co-opted to drive home privatization. Who would have foreseen a bunch of billionaires investing unheard of amounts in local school board races across the country.
We need to identify the levers they can’t corrupt with their media sound bites and bought and paid for astro turf supporters
Number one is the ability to starve the beast of data. But how do we get our school boards back? What would it take for governors to realize taking state control never works. How do we dial down the metrics on the tests to be reasonable assuming they can’t be disposed of totally.
Knowing Naomi Klein’s work, one can’t help but wonder if those at the wheel are driving full speed ahead at the brick wall despite the human cost so they can profit on the pieces that remain from their engineered economic disasters.
Like the plane being built in mid-air, who is going to get stuck with the cost of what our short sighted leaders are doing. Teachers can be in a system 30 years, politicians on the periphery for less than 12 generously in most cases.
Do the math.
LikeLike
I think the profession will need to endure ten years more of this insanity, at which point almost every intervention being imposed by reformers will prove to be costly failures. The question is whether professional teachers will be left to inherit the detritus that will be left behind or will have been swept away by the same forces imposing the mess.
LikeLike
The reformistas do not care about costly failures. If it takes 10 years more, they will have had 10 years more of money flowing into their pockets from yours and from mine.
LikeLike
The key is in the phrase from Chan: “As an investor, I’m optimistic.” Public schools, like health care and many other elements of daily life, have become profit centers. There’s a strong effort to do the same with “higher” education. Underlying all this is an ideology that proposes the “market” as the be-all and end-all of policy choices. Government, as Ronald Reagan argued, is always part of the problem and never a solution.
It seems to me that we need to engage these fundamental issues. The market–i.e., opportunities for profit–is simply NOT always (maybe in fact not often) the solution to social problems. Government is NOT always the, indeed often not “a,” problem. That’s outdated Cold-War thinking and it is sinking the US into a morass as surely as fracking is bringing earthquakes to Oklahoma.
It’s not just the Ayatollahs of “reform” that have to be fought, it is also their underlying ideology of market fundamentalism. Like all fundamentalisms, it is perilous: it fosters arrogance, victimizes ordinary people, and produces the cynicism M has pointed to. As surely as there are alternatives to Isis and Al Queda, there are alternatives to the marketizing of American education.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
“Predatory Deform”
Predators have no conscience
They’re ruled by pure desire
Untouchable insouciance
Unquenchable the fire
LikeLike