In an article in The Atlantic, Paul Barnwell describes how difficult it was for him when he was a new teacher assigned to a low-performing school.
In a span of three minutes, the group in room 204 had morphed from contained to out of control. Two boys were shooting dice in the back of the room, and as I instructed them to put their crumpled dollar bills away, several others took off their shoes and began tossing them around like footballs. Before I could react, one boy broke into my supply closet. He snatched handfuls of No. 2 pencils and highlighters and sprinted out of the room, slamming the door behind him.
He was 22 years old, and he was working in one of Kentucky’s most troubled, underperforming, and dysfunctional middle schools. He quit before Christmas. Eventually, he realized that the school needed experienced teachers and stability, but federal policy does not set a priority on either. In fact, NCLB and Race to the Top encourage churn, pretending to “fix” schools by firing principals and teachers and moving in new and often inexperienced teachers.
How can struggling schools attract experienced teachers? Combat pay has repeatedly failed; so has merit pay. The practice of tying teachers’ compensation to test scores will only make matters worse by incentivizing teachers to avoid the toughest schools.
He concludes:
I asked several of my public-school teaching colleagues from around the country—from New Hampshire to Washington—what it would take for them to voluntarily switch to the neediest schools in their regions. Julie Hiltz, an educator in Hillsborough County, Florida, with nearly 13 years of teaching experience, told me that the following would need to be in place: The ability to make local decisions, professional development designed and led in-house, more time for collaboration, and smaller class sizes, among other factors. Unfortunately, current guidelines for struggling schools under No Child Left Behind often disenfranchise administrators and staff.
Lauren Christensen, a social-studies teacher in the Waltham, Massachusetts, with six years of experience, currently works in a low-poverty school. I asked her if she’d voluntarily transfer to a high-poverty school in her area. “Maybe, she said, “but I would need to know that the whole school would be supported with a long-term commitment [from decision-makers]. I think the pressure of standard assessments and the stress put on educators to turn ‘failing’ schools around immediately might be too much to overcome.”
When I think back to my first year, I’m no longer bitter. I’m now completing my 11th year as a teacher; I mentor new educators and advocate for better support and working conditions. But unless those resources are in place, I wouldn’t voluntarily work in another struggling school.

This is exactly right. I started my career at a school with 99% free lunch. I typically had 31 books for 34 students and was given one ream of paper per month. No joke. I lasted two years. Most of my fourth graders had a first or second year teacher every single year from kindergarten. Typically the most supportive words the teachers heard from my principal were that we sucked less than we used to. Now I’ve been teaching for over twenty years. It isn’t about the money. We want to help all students, but to sustain a career you can’t leave work every day feeling emotionally beat up by the system.
LikeLike
Pay teachers what they are worth. When police officers and garbage men are compensated significantly more than teachers for doing their jobs it really highlights the emphasis and value that this Country places on education. In addition, teachers in low performing schools should not be paid the same as teachers in well to do schools as the amount of work and effort required to perform these job are not even close. In my former District first year painters, head custodians, and even school secretaries all made more than teachers with ten years experience and these positions require no college degree whatsoever. I find it extremely hypocritical that all of this emphasis is being placed on teachers making their students college and career ready so that they can be rewarded with better financial opportunities in the future; yet these same people who push these idiotic ideologies don’t even reward their very own teachers for their educational achievements which in many cases includes individuals who hold multiple advanced degrees. A Masters Degree in Broward County gets a teacher an extra $3,600 per year: a figure which has barely changed since the 1980’s. This is simply unnaceptable and if it does not change the churn will only get worse. http://www.nctq.org/docs/Broward_2013-14_Salary_Schedule.pdf
LikeLike
No one should seek or accept a teaching position unless he is offered professional autonomy.
LikeLike
That will never happen. Teachers have never had professional autonomy–that is a myth. Teachers are at the total mercy of administrators.
LikeLike
Not gonna happen. Besides, the “churn” has little to do with where teachers teach and everything to do with the politics of a school district workplace. The politics happens in all kinds of schools. Teachers are vulnerable everywhere because they have no real protections from administrators.
It is not just young teachers who quit teaching because they are burned out or the students are too challenging. There are teachers who are fired illegally by principals and other administrators. There are teachers whose contracts aren’t renewed because a principal has the power to get rid of them and not have to explain why. There are teachers who are forced into early retirement thanks to principal harassment. There are teachers who have to go on disability because of principal harassment. The author of the piece gives a “safe” explanation as to why teachers “leave” but doesn’t tell the whole story. The fact is principals have unchecked power to do whatever they want, and districts will back them because the aim by the districts in dumping teachers is to force them into piddling severance packages in exchange for not suining, or, if suing, settling out of court for a pittance.
As long as the job market is glutted with out of work teachers, as long as most school districts receive hundreds of applications for a single position, as long as school districts don’t actually crack down on their principals, the workplace for teachers will continue to be toxic.
LikeLike
Susan, the question of supply and demand is beginning to favor teachers at least in my state. Applications for open positions are noticeably down from five years ago, including elementary education.
LikeLike
There is ample evidence that compensation
matters to teachers, but that it is not the primary reason
teachers enter and stay in the profession. In a 2013
USDE-funded experiment, 1, 514 teachers identified as
highly effective (VAM estimates for reading and
mathematics) were offered a $20,000 bonus—paid in
installments for two years—if they transferred to a low
performing school. Only 81 teachers applied. Of these,
75 stayed for two years. About 35 stayed beyond two
years. The retention rates for teachers and improved
student scores attributed to these teachers varied by
district. After the end of the bonus plan there was no
sustained improvement in scores.
Other experiments with teacher pay-forperformance
show that few plans survive beyond six
years due to funding and allocation issues in addition to
a failure to make any consistent difference in achievement.
(Murnane, R. J. & Cohen, D. K. 1986; Glazerman,
Protik, Teh, Bruch, & Max, 2013).
Of course, Arne Duncan made pay-for-performance part of his RTT policy anyway because because this and other evidence was contrary to his ideological advisors.
Differential pay for teachers has a long and ugly history. The latest version is in Douglas County Arizona where pay is based on the perceived value of your work, including grade level and subject-matter and only very remotely related to teacher supply and demand stats.
LikeLike
Teachers in underfunded urban schools deserve more support, more funding and less judgment. Most of all they don’t need VAM telling them they are ineffective. I have been in some of those schools as a substitute, and I have visited classes in some these schools as part of a Bank St. College project. Kudos to the teachers that do a great job despite the many obstacles. At the very least they need smaller classes and money for more materials. The barren classrooms with over thirty poor minority children in should be a thing from the past. To me it sends the message that these children do not merit the same level of commitment as others. No wonder urban public schools get criticized! Unfortunately, the teachers have been targeted as the perpetrators of this poor system. The teachers are the glue trying to hold all the elements together. To get answers about why urban schools have so many problems, you really need to look at how we fund schools unfairly, and you would have to ask mayors and governors why they have not done a better job. We need to stop ignoring poverty! At least, De Blasio is attempting to make some changes by offering community based programs for poor students in the schools.
I once had a chance to visit some schools in Yonkers, New York as I was on a hiring committee, and we were making a site visit. As we took the tour, we must have had a half of dozen teachers come to the door and say half jokingly, “Take us with you.” It’s funny, but it really is not funny at all. Why should these schools be entitled to less of the pie when they have the greatest needs?
LikeLike
I didn’t know where to email Diane or where to put this comment: did you know that the NYC DOE is pushing for more Pre-K teachers and suggesting that certified Elementary Ed teachers get additional Birth – 2 certification (3 credits). Part of the certification process is to take the CST again! Since the CST is so difficult now, if you fail, they will count your previous CST test! So, Pearson wins out, because you pay for the test again. What can we do about this?
LikeLike
Benten32,
The answer is always the same: Organize, Agitate, Publicize, Educate.
LikeLike
If you want to know how a principal and teachers can “turn around” a high poverty school without any help from the school district, read “Mc Donogh 15: Becoming a School”. Of course, it was published in 1981 when a school staff was free to create and run their own school. The book is about intelligent, brave and hard-working educators who knew what education really is and how to involve their students in it.
LikeLike
WE ALL know.
Failing schools or failing politicians?
LikeLike
C’mon–they (reformers) WANT the “churn!”
Teachers are like butter (they expect us to melt away & do harm–like clog arteries–to kids). Thus…”churn!” (& waiting for it Some DAM Poet–an ode to churn set to the tune of “Turn, Turn, Turn!”)
LikeLike
I live in NJ, about 20 minutes from Newark. I drive about 20 minutes to my job in a significantly more affluent district. I could make $30,000 more in the Newark public schools. I would never do it.
Why? Because Newark teachers are so abused by the system that it makes state and national news nearly every single day.
I can imagine that during my interviews, the administrators would be courting me glibly, even obsequiously, only to turn their knives on me once I went into the classroom. What kind of organization treats its best resources that way?
I also teach in a private school during the summers…the culture there is so different from any public school I’ve worked in (and I’ve worked in a few). They want us, they treasure us, they treat us well and try to keep us. And year after year, I see the same faces: the faces of some of the best teachers in the area.
LikeLike