Jeannie Kaplan discovers that Denver ranks #1 on a scorecard compiled by the Center for Reinventing Public Education, an outpost of corporate reform.
Denver has faithfully complied with most elements of the reformster agenda, but what has its compliance done for Denver students, she asks.
And she answers: nothing.
She writes:
“Way back in 1972 there was a committee whose acronym was CRP. CRP stood for Committee to Re-elect the President, who at the time was Richard M. Nixon. Because CRP became integrally involved in some creepy activities including Watergate, its acronym morphed into CREEP. A creepy committee funding some CREEPy goings on. (On a personal note, I worked at CBS News in Washington, D.C. during this time. While I thought some of the activities were CREEPy, I loved the political intrigue).
“Fast forward to 2015 and my continuing involvement with Denver Public Schools. Another creepy organization has touched my life: Center on Reinventing Public Education or (another) CRPE, a University of Washington research center funded in part by Bill and Melinda Gates. It turns out this creepy organization has provided the blueprint for all that is happening and has happened in DPS over the last ten years.
“This creepy CRPE has tried to lead us to believe that a business portfolio strategy can somehow be successful in the public education world. Strategies and phrases such as “risk management,” “assets,” “portfolio rebalancing and managing,” “ridding yourself of portfolio low performers,” “monoploy” dominate the conversations with these folks. And because DPS has been so successful and diligent in adopting these elements it has finally, finally, reached the top of a reformy chart. The problem with this achievement is that it only represents success as it relates to implementation of some convoluted business strategy.
“Remember, a portfolio strategy requires constant churn, for the investor is always ridding his portfolio of low-performing stocks while looking for higher performing ones. This may be a good strategy for business, but schools, children, families and teachers are not stocks and bonds. They should not be treated as such.
“And so far implementation of this strategy has had virtually no impact on improving educational opportunities or outcomes for Denver’s children. So after being national exemplars for choice (or as I like to call it chaos), funding, talent (see here and here for Chalkbeat’s take) and accountability, Denver Public Schools still shows no growth in 2014 standardized tests. Proficiencies across the district slog along at 57% for reading, 47% for math, and 44% for writing with achievement gaps increasing in each subject. Even with a slight increase ACT scores are still only 18.4 (a 26 is needed to enter the University of Colorado) and the overall graduation rate is still at only 62.8%. Sadly, even after ten years, DPS has failed to transfer implementation into outcomes.”

Sounds like CRPE = FEE (Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Educational Excellence) = same old tricks to keep money in power.
LikeLike
CRPE could also stand for “crap”.
LikeLike
Edushyster has a funny report from New Orleans that you-all should read.
Apparently someone asked an unauthorized question about why Ohio charters are using taxpayer money to bust unions 🙂
Somehow I knew it would be Ohio 🙂
LikeLike
Also integral to the process of so-called education reform is, along with trendy B-school jargon like “Talent Managers”, is Throughput, the speed and volume of production. It’s where Management 101 meets The Shock Doctrine.
In education, this plays out as “disruptive innovation,” more accurately described as politically-motivated destabilization of the public schools, via disinvestment (budget cuts/austerity)and the closing or reorganization of community public schools. Add in constant change and churn – of teachers, curricula, standards tests, etc.- and you get the “speed” component.
Regarding volume, that would entail rapid charter expansion and the imposition of costly mandates and programs (NCLB, RttT,Common Core, PARCC, SBAC, etc.), and the sales opportunities that follow.
There’s obvious interplay between the two factors in the political economy of education, and inside the classrooms, but just as capitalist production relies on ever-increasing throughput for increased profits, so too do so-called education reformers seek to ramp up throughput in the systems they increasingly dominate.
LikeLike
Michael writes,…” and the sales opportunities that follow.” This is what drives public education right over the cliff. Then one wonders why Bill and Melinda Gates are so involved in this. They have more money than God. I believe they have been deceived by those who stand to inherit some of that money. The Gates really think that a business model will work on children, just like legislators think that mandating academic success will make it happen.
LikeLike
I know it has been repeatedly pointed out that what is good for the goose should be good for the gander, but if they are so sure that a business model is so superior, you would think that they would apply it to the schools that their children attend. I really would like them to explain why they have not pushed their ideas on their own schools. I don’t think any reformster has ever answered that question.
LikeLike
Good point! It reminds me of Michael Moore trying to find a Congressman whose own child was going to war in Iraq.
LikeLike
“Denver has faithfully complied with most elements of the GREED based RheeFormster agenda.”
I want to put a thumb’s down image here to show the RheeFormsters in Denver who they are.
LikeLike
Will someone here who is capable please respond to the continual support that the Washington Monthly gives to corporate reform and charter schools? For example:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/junejulyaugust_2015/features/how_new_orleans_made_charter_s055905.php#
Thanks.
LikeLike