Civil rights attorney Wendy Lecker writes here about the disastrous education policies of Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy. Although he is a Democrat, he gives first allegiance to the charter school industry, whose patrons are the powerful hedge fund managers in the state’s tony suburbs.
She writes that Malloy “slashed funding for social programs, gave no increase for public K-12 education, despite a pending lawsuit alleging that the state owes almost 2 billion dollars to its public schools, and threatened to veto the state budget unless the legislature agreed to fund two charter schools in communities that vehemently opposed them….”
Governor Malloy’s tenure has been characterized by denigrating teachers, vigorously opposing adequate funding of public schools and vastly increasing financial support for privately run charter schools which fail to serve the state’s neediest children, including English Language Learners and students with disabilities, have disturbingly harsh disciplinary policies, increase racial isolation, drain public money from needy public schools and have even been implicated in fraud and theft.
Why would Malloy favor these questionable privately run schools over underfunded public schools? One answer lies in an article reported on by the Hartford Courant, piggy-backing off the years of reporting blogger Jonathan Pelto has done on this issue.
The Courant reported that this year, unprecedented amounts of money were spent to push the charter agenda by ConnCAN, the charter lobby; Northeast Charter Network, another charter lobby founded by disgraced Jumoke leader Michael Sharpe and others; and a newer group operating in Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts: Families for Excellent Schools (FES).
The Courant further noted that the same millionaires and billionaires who copiously donated to Malloy’s campaigns are also major donors to charters and charter lobbyists. This list includes Greenwich millionaire Jonathan Sackler, the founder of ConnCAN and original board member of the Achievement First charter chain; Greenwich hedge funder Steve Mandel, who funded the players behind the illegal takeover of the Bridgeport Board of Education; embattled SAC Capital chief Steven Cohen and his wife; ConnCAN board members Arthur Reimers and Andrew Boas; Andrew Stone, a board member at Success Academy charter chain, a close ally of FES; and ConnCAN donor Marianna McCall. FES even hired two public relations firms that employ Malloy’s recently departed top aides: Roy Occhiogrosso and Andrew Doba.
The web of charter money is so thick it must have blinded Malloy to the needs and wishes of constituents from Stamford and Bridgeport.
There is much more. Read the full article to view the copious links. And to think that Malloy was supported by the state’s teachers when he ran for re-election!
Thanks for posting! In fairness to Connecticut’s teachers, Malloy was endorsed by the leadership of the teachers’ unions, not necessarily by the rank and file. In facts many teachers vehemently opposed (and still oppose Malloy.
I’m still puzzled by union leaders endorsement of candidates who work AGAINST teachers. That would include Randi of AFT and who ever is leading NEA now. Can someone help me out?
Malloy was also supported by Rosa DeLauro, who actually had the gall to ask Jonathan Pelto to withdraw from the race so her pal could run unimpeded by someone raising important issues like charter fraud.
People like Malloy and DeLauro need to be voted out of office but the problem is most voters have no clue what is going on behind the nice “I’m fighting for working Americans” rhetoric and simply vote for the same person time after time because they are (supposedly) “Democrats”.
It’s pathetic.
Sorry to hear about Rosa and her charter support. She’s currently so amped about TPA and TPP, you’d think she would show the same concern for teachers and workers; both of whom may find their jobs off-shored in the future.
I take comfort in the fact that I vote for the person, not the party’s person. Too many toxic folks out there who are DINO’s or RINO’s and none of the above except….(let your imagination roam)
Speaking of off-shoring. This just popped up in my in box. Teach Disney English in China. No lie.
https://xjobs.brassring.com/tgwebhost/jobdetails.aspx?partnerid=25348&siteid=5039&jobid=240721
I think it’s time for my group: Teachers For Excellent Public Schools (TFEPS) to launch. Seems like there is more money to be made fronting groups than actually doing something about the problem. Poverty. Not teachers.
Good piece on charter school accountability since there seems to be a lack of in many places.
http://www.alternet.org/education/do-we-need-national-moratorium-charter-schools?akid=13225.1073613.9c3xx5&rd=1&src=newsletter1038053&t=9
Need a good index with points awarded to states that support public education by their per-student budgets, allocations for instruction (excluding technology), policies on testing, regulations and reporting requirements on for-profits, regulations and reporting requirements for charter schools, laws and enforcement of laws bearing on conflict of interest, and so on and on.
People who are more able (and credible) than I am might try to run with this idea. It could become a different version of the EdWeek “quality counts reports” with stack ratings thrown back into the world for discussion.
This idea hit me when I received a call-back from the Office of the Ohio Attorney General. I had used the website to see if there were any investigations made by that office (including consumer protection) into the nationally publicized charter school fraud in Ohio. I had already determined that there was no channel at the website for reporting any fraud bearing on education. In fact, the assistant who returned my call confirmed that the Attorney General’s Office had no authority to address the issue and that legislation was the only path other than enforcement powers that migh be invested in th State Departmetnof Education. These seem to be non-existent.