Florida has a constitutional obligation to make public education a “paramount duty,” but Governor Scott and the Florida Legislature have other concerns.
Here is a report from Fund Education Now on the budget travesty.
To summarize, Florida is in the nation’s lowest quintile in funding. Yet scarce funds are diverted to the state’s booming (but ineffective) charter sector. And to add insult to injury, the Legislature will award a $10,000 bonus to “the best and the brightest” teachers, those with high SAT scores. Note that the bonus is not based on performance, but on SAT scores. This has the effect of rewarding TFA teachers just for showing up, not for their performance or their willingness to remain in teaching.
The Florida House and Senate finally agreed on an Education budget early Tuesday, June 16th at 12:30 am. The budget is expected to pass this Friday, June 19th following the required 72 hour cooling off period.
Despite promises of an historic funding increase, lawmakers fell short of making public education their “paramount duty” as required in Article IX, section 1 of the Florida Constitution. Funding per student will increase by a mere 3% or $200 less than the record 2007 high point. Instead of investing in public schools, the legislature spent an additional $300 million on personal projects and another $400 million on tax exemptions.
It should also be noted that PECO funds were split evenly between for profit charters and public schools, with each receiving $50 million for capital outlay. For years charters have received most of the PECO dollars and districts got nothing, making it difficult to plan for growth. Sharing this year’s PECO is a ploy to justify reviving legislation in 2016 forcing districts to share voter-approved millage dollars with for-profit charter chains that can use the funds to purchase, develop and maintain properties the public may never own.
There are many details buried in the Final Conference Report. Among them is $44 million to provide $10,000 “Best and Brightest” scholarships to up to 4,400 “highly effective” teachers who scored at or above the 80th percentile on either the SAT or ACT. It’s expected that many of the teachers who receive these scholarships will be from Teach for America. The House wanted $45 million for the program, while the Senate wanted only $5 million. This controversial, expensive program is based on the weak assumption that teachers who did well on either the SAT or ACT will automatically be better teachers. It’s disappointing that once again, legislators have based another funding scheme on a single test when there’s no evidence that high SAT or ACT scores are related to great teaching. It’s equally concerning that Florida teachers applying for the scholarship will be sharing their SAT and ACT test scores, providing a trove of new personal data that the state can use to further disaggregate and sort the profession.
At least $750 million dollars were set aside for just these projects and exemptions. That figure divided by 2.74 public school students would have meant an additional $274 per student, proving that Florida has the money, but political leaders refuse to invest in public education. What is behind their effort to keep Florida from climbing out of the nation’s lowest quintile in per pupil funding?
Open the link to see the numbers.

One verse from an old camp fire song which dealt with states names was
“how did Flora die, boys?”
Maybe this is the answer.
LikeLike
Well, as Alfie Kohn as summarized in study after study, getting rewarded for something makes you lose interest in doing it. So, hopefully, these TfAers will get their reward for being brilliant (ahem) and lose interest and go away.
LikeLike
My main concern about TFA in Florida is that as a “right to be fired” state, workers have few rights. The possible misuse of TFA is replacing regular staff with a TFA cheaper alternative.
LikeLike
What is making Florida stay in the bottom quintile of funding to public education? There are too many special interest groups at play that do not value public education or the quality of life of its poorest members. This is why Florida is determined to throw money at charters and religious schools with little to no oversight. This is why Scott is suing the feds for his right to deny the expansion of Medicaid; he feels like he is being “coerced” to do something for the poor. The greedy and immoral have too much power in Florida.
LikeLike
“There are many details buried in the Final Conference Report. Among them is $44 million to provide $10,000 “Best and Brightest” scholarships to up to 4,400 “highly effective” teachers who scored at or above the 80th percentile on either the SAT or ACT.”
The scholarships are for teachers to do what?…pursue an advanced degree? or is this a signing bonus for teachers who have high SAT/ACT scores on the assumption that they will be highly effective.
Just asking. I don’t want to slog through the legislation. But there is a rapidly spreading idea that recruiting “top teaching talent” based on SAT/ACT scores and other indicators of subject-matter mastery will be a panacea for education. Nothing new about this, of course, except that this effort is going forward in tandem with the effort to by-pass or dismantle entirely university-based programs of teacher education in favor of short term programs that “train” teachers to follow procedures and use packaged curriculum modules.
A project of this kind is now being developed by Arthur E. Levine, a long time critic of teacher education who is now president of the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation and former President of Teachers College, Columbia University.
The instructional training and curriculum models for STEM will be developed by MIT faculty with Charlotte Danielson as the instructional expert whose evaluation protocol will be modified for STEM. The graduate program will have strict requirements for admission. The overall plan reminds me of the projects spawned by the post-Sputnik National Defense Education Act and Bruner’s little book, the Process of Education. Let the experts working at the frontiers of knowledge design the curriculum units aided by experts in instructional design and delivery systems. Train teachers to implement the units. Bruner’s prototype unit followed those rules and forgot a few others, producing the flap that surrounded that grand effort: Man: A Course of Study. For Levine’s project look for various press releases. You can start at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arthur-e-levine/throwing-out-the-clock-on-teacher-education_b_7603470.html
LikeLike
What does “top teaching” mean? Who decides, politicians or scholars who have done prolonged deep research to try to find answers?
WE know the answers. Ignorant and/or bought politicians know more than educators.
Years ago one of the best teachers in our area resigned when her school won recognition from the politicians. Most will have forgotten that by now, I remember well.
Nothing that new right now. That was several decades ago.
LikeLike
Laura Chapman, what is bizarre about the “best and brightest” signing bonus of $10,000 is that these are the teachers who are not likely to stay in teaching. So Florida will endlessly give bonuses to newcomers, who may stay for a year or two, then move on. What a dumb way to spend taxpayer dollars.
LikeLike
Paying people with bonuses rather than regular increases in salaries is bad for middle class people. It’s a rip off, but it’s very popular in the private sector so I’m not at all surprised ed reformers have adopted it.
They’re giving young people bad financial advice by promoting this form of compensation. They’ll have less savings and assets when they are mid-career and older:
“While a few more dollars in each paycheck may lack that Christmas-morning feeling, a raise is the gift that keeps on giving. The benefits of wage increases are compounded each year, with every future raise building on the back of the one before it. In addition, salaries are the foundation of a range of other benefits, like Social Security and pensions.”
The only shot middle class people have is their money slowly and consistently compounded over time. Millionaire rules don’t apply to teachers. We’re going to have a lot of poverty stricken old people if we keep taking lousy financial advice from politicians. Bad deal, teachers. Reject it.
LikeLike
The SAT score thing is ridiculous in a long line of ridiculousness. I took the ACT (which was the test for Western schools at the time) nearly 30 years ago. Why should teachers be categorized by something so trivial, particularly those who took the admission test decades ago?
It goes without saying that merit pay is ridiculous on its face.
LikeLike
They’re just”winding down” public schools, Diane. Transitioning to a fully privatized system.
They obviously prefer the charter “sector” over the unfashionable public sector.
LikeLike
Chiara,
Call it the charter industry, not sector.
LikeLike
So SAT and ACT scores, which are not predictive of college success, are being used as a criteria for a bonus for wonderfulness of “highly effective” teachers? How long do you have to be “highly effective”?
LikeLike
2old2teach:
The bonus in Florida is for “highly effective” teachers who have high SAT/ACT scores. Maybe they haven’t taught yet but legislators assume that the teachers’ high scores equal “highly effective” without ever having taught
LikeLike
Incredible. So, all I ever had to do to be a “highly effective” teacher was to get good scores on the SAT and/or ACT. Silly me.
LikeLike
Students who can afford expensive SAT prep courses can improve their scores. The rich get richer …..
LikeLike