The corporate reformers like to say that “school choice” is the civil rights issue of our time. This is a view shared by Jeb Bush, the Walton family, Scott Walker, and various other rightwingers whose real goal is to shrink the public sector by privatization and to eliminate unions.
But a recent story in the New York Times said that the loss of public sector jobs hurts African American workers disproportionately.
“Roughly one in five black adults works for the government, teaching school, delivering mail, driving buses, processing criminal justice and managing large staffs. They are about 30 percent more likely to have a public sector job than non-Hispanic whites, and twice as likely as Hispanics.
“Compared to the private sector, the public sector has offered black and female workers better pay, job stability and more professional and managerial opportunities,” said Jennifer Laird, a sociologist at the University of Washington who has been researching the subject.
“During the Great Recession, though, as tax revenues plunged, federal, state and local governments began shedding jobs. Even now, with the economy regaining strength, public sector employment has still not bounced back. An incomplete recovery is part of the reason, but a combination of strong anti-government and anti-tax sentiment in some places has kept down public payrolls. At the same time, attempts to curb collective bargaining, like those led by Wisconsin’s governor, Scott Walker, a likely Republican presidential candidate, have weakened public unions.
“The Labor Department counts half a million fewer public sector jobs than before the start of the recession in 2007. That figure, however, understates just how much the government’s work force has shrunk, said Elise Gould, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a labor-oriented research organization in Washington. That is because it fails to account for the normal growth in the country’s population: Factor that in, she said, and there are 1.8 million fewer jobs in the public sector for people to fill.
“The decline reverses a historical pattern, researchers say, with public sector employees typically holding onto their jobs even during most economic downturns.
“Because blacks hold a disproportionate share of the jobs, relative to their share of the population, the cutbacks naturally hit them harder.”
The decline in unions has also harmed black and Hispanic families, because union jobs provide a path to the middle class with better wages and a measure of job security.
Anyone who claims that privatization promotes civil rights is purposely distorting the facts. Getting a voucher or a charter (to a school thay may be worse than the public school) does not compensate for the loss of your parents’ employment. It is a devil’s bargain.

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
“Welcome to feudalism, America: How the 1 percent is systematically destroying the middle class”
http://www.salon.com/2015/06/01/welcome_to_feudalism_america_how_the_1_percent_is_systematically_destroying_the_middle_class/
LikeLike
The civil rights issue of our time is saving the middle class before it’s gone.
LikeLike
Dear Diane: Did you see what Edweek is promoting?! A teacher’s blog how to cheat on standardized testing and insider information on testing… this is worth your reading time and maybe expose as to why Edweek would promote this? Sincerely a parent supporter of your great cause! Shannon Saltsman How to Cheat on State Standardized Tests and Not Get Caught
| | | | | | | | | | | How to Cheat on State Standardized Tests and Not Get C…Recently, the Atlanta, Georgia cheating scandal has been in the news as many of the people involved have been convicted, and incredibly sent to prison. This is insa… | | | | View on blogs.edweek.org | Preview by Yahoo | | | | |
LikeLike
The article was tongue in cheek and was not promoting cheating. It merely pointed out, with humor as dry as Bond’s martini, that testing is a game and can therefore be gamed. He showed the various ways that could be done, why they pointed to flaws in the system and how the testing system was therefore criminogenic. And absurd.
LikeLike
Divide-and-rule works just as well as it always has.
It works very well in conjunction with measure-and-punish and the normal human tendency to believe that if someone is punished, he or she must deserve it.
LikeLike
Of course, calling “school choice” the Civil Rights issue of our time, is the newest strain of “the soft bigotry of low expectations.” Same for the need for test-based teacher/school accountability. At one point, a New Jersey DOE spokesperson said it would be child abuse to have tests worth less than 30% of a teacher’s evaluation (apologies for no link, but it can’t be too hard to find). We are fortunate that feedback is beginning to come out that belies the claims of The Reformers (or should I say Reformsters). Not sure how much of it will be reported, however. The media has largely been co-opted (bought?).
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Civil Rights for the 1% (mostly very rich old white men) and very little or nothing for the other 99%
LikeLike
This country will feel the negative consequences of the continued wrong path of privatization. Increased privatization is taking the ability of middle class workers to earn a decent living, and they are redistributing wealth to the top where we already have too much wealth. This will increase the number of people in poverty, and a greater percentage of these people will be African American. Then, taxpayers will have to compensate for those that no longer have the ability to contribute. This is a move in the wrong direction for the all wrong reasons.
LikeLike
“Roughly one in five black adults works for the government, teaching school, delivering mail, driving buses, processing criminal justice and managing large staffs.”
Curious to know if this means one in five black adults who work or one in five black adults who exist. Does anyone know the answer?
LikeLike
They know this Diane. They’re out of touch in DC but they’re not that out of touch.
It was discussed when Kasich and the ed reform lobby went after public sector workers in Ohio, in 2010. It’s not a secret. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is an absolute font of information.
They don’t care, or, I should say they care only to the extent that they can garner public employee political support 6 weeks prior to an election.
They also know this:
“Workers across the country experience a “union premium” — an increase in wages for workers who belong to a labor union compared to workers who are not organized. That premium amounted to $1.24 per hour last year, a 17.3 percent premium. And according to a new study from the Economic Policy Institute, union membership is even more important for African American and Latino workers, whose union premiums exceed that of white workers.
Black union members have a union premium of $2.60, earning them about 17.3 percent more than black non-union workers. Black men who belong to a union see a 20 percent increase over the normal wage; for black women, the increase is 14.8 percent. Union membership is even more beneficial to Latinos, whose men and women workers earn union premiums of 29.3 percent and 15.7 percent, respectively. (Latinos’ union premium is 23.1 percent overall.)”
Inconvenient facts for the anti-labor crowd in both Parties.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/09/04/794201/how-union-membership-workers/
LikeLike
I’m not in a labor union so maybe I’m talking out of turn, but why don’t labor unions stop supporting politicians who don’t support them?
They’ve been really effective in the Fight For Fifteen campaign and they did it without DC completely. I think they’d be more credible as an independent voice for working people if they weren’t connected to politicians, quite frankly. It’s not like they get any support from any of these people anyway. Put the (national) campaign donation money to better use. Maybe we all should. We’re not getting a great return on our investment.
LikeLike
I’m not in a union, either, Chiara, but from what I’ve seen, it’s the union leadership that has really let us down. National teacher union heads bought into both the Common Core and — initially — the idea of teacher evaluation by test scores. It was sickening but not surprising to learn that the Gates Foundation had donated significantly (mid-six figures, if I remember correctly) to these unions. Same story that we’ve seen with many other groups (and I have suspicion that a there’s a similar explanation behind media support for many Gates Foundation policies).
LikeLike
I’m an NEA member, just one rank-and-file member. I haven’t followed all the doings of the teachers union leaders. I expect that if I did, I wouldn’t be pleased.
My understanding of labor history is that unions almost never win unless they have public support. (Plus unity among their members of course!)
Until the opt-out movement arose, the divide-and-rule tactic of marginalizing teachers as enemies of progress had been pretty successful.
That’s enough to explain teachers union leaders’ fearfulness and conciliation. That’s an explanation, not an excuse.
LikeLike
This is great:
“Authorities in Bangladesh have filed murder charges against dozens of people for their roles in the collapse in 2013 of Rana Plaza that killed more than 1,100 people.
The charges were filed on Monday against 41 people, including the building’s owner, Sohel Rana, and his parents and more than a dozen government officials. The lead investigator, Bijoy Krishna Kar of the criminal investigation department, said the charges were over their direct role in the deaths of 1,137 people in the collapse of the garment factory building.”
Boom. Murder. No negotiated agreements, no fines and stern warnings- they’re going to hold someone accountable for this.
LikeLike
Did the legal teams outsource their research work?
LikeLike
Booklady,
Bruce Lederman reached out to me and others and has gotten briefs from some of the nation’s leading experts on VAM and teacher evaluation.
LikeLike
Calling choice or testing a civil rights issue is to gut and hollow out the entire idea of civil rights in order to use it as a Trojan Horse against people of color, while making it that much harder for those who know the truth to attack the reformers for their lies in the affected communities. Who wants to hear that they’ve been lied to and fooled yet again, that it isn’t a civil rights issue at all? It puts us in the position of taking away hope by telling the truth, not a happy place to be. Get those under informed, living under duress chickens to vote for Colonel Sanders by exploiting their desperate desire for justice and a better life? Yup, and make a big ROI at the same time you’re using their aspirations to destroy any chance that they’d ever have decent schools. This is just like the 9/11 hijackers using our own planes to attack us. It’s hideously wrong to profitize poverty and racism via these blatantly false claims, but there’s nothing so low that the reformers won’t do it.
LikeLike
Barack Obama is just another name for Trojan Horse…
LikeLike
I wonder what these groups will say when their students are consistently denied opportunities to improve their lives because of test outcomes. When tests determine every facet of their lives (the elites will be exempted of course) and their misery increases will they cry that they were misled? I am sorry, but you were warned, when has testing ever helped minorities? (Remember the Army testing program? Remember Lewis Terman and the Stanford-Binet tests? These things will ruefully return to memory.
LikeLike
A great question over when testing has ever helped minorities. Similarly, I’ll expand the question as to when the testing has ever helped anybody (other than the snarkily obvious answers of Pearson, Rhee, and others of their ilk)?
LikeLike
Changing the name of a school doesn’t change anything. They all do the same thing I refer to that famous Irish philosopher, George Carlin to name the school “INDOCTRINATION CENTER WHERE CHILDREN ARE STRIPPED OF THEIR INDIVIDUALITY AND TURNED INTO OBEDIENT SOLE DEAD CONFORMIST MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN CONSUMER CULTURE……academy”.
LikeLike
Since 2009, I have been involved as a volunteer at the high school from which I graduated in January, 1958. As an alumni on campus, I intended to develop and be part of a cadre of alumni doing tutoring and mentoring. I was caught up in LAUSD’s Public School Choice program to allow, as I saw it, all public education stakeholders (and who isn’t) an opportunity to get involved in creating a “save the school” plan for campuses deemed failing and in need of restructuring.
I was naive about the “reform” movement, its coded language and the opaque workings of public education bureaucracies. Words like “charters”, STEM, “school choice” and “parent trigger” appealed to me. I took them to be a new progressive language for increasing democracy, not economic opportunity, in public education. NOT!… just the 21st-century, snake-oil pitch for the new-and-improved education game.
Functional and universal public education depends on the separation of the market and pre-K-1X. Public schools in a democracy must not only be supported by public dollars, but also operated through collaboration of all its stakeholders… interacting off and on- campus. Facing the reality of our interdependency, anything less is doom to failure. Data, big, small or in between, is nothing but the latest ruler-to-the-back-of-the-hand, confirming everything George Carlin is quoted above.
LikeLike
You hit the nail on the head:
“Public education depends on the separation of the market and pre-K -1X.”
This concept of maintaining the separation of market and public education sounds like it ought to be one of the amendments to the constitution.
LikeLike
Here in NYS, nearly 90% our Black and Hispanic students currently in fifth grade, will be told for the third consecutive year that they are failures in math and ELA. Since when did internalizing failure become a civil right? The permanent damage to the psyche of this population is a high price to pay. At what point do they simply lose all belief in themselves?
LikeLike