William Doyle writes that it is an insult to real corporate reform to confuse it with the misguided methods of those who call themselves school reformers.
Doyle writes:
“It is a mistake to refer to failing education reforms as “corporate reform.”
“No leading company would place the entire foundation of its business on inaccurate, unreliable, system-distorting and often “bad” data like multiple-choice standardized tests.
“No leading company would roll out a multi-billion-dollar national venture (like Common Core) nationally without extensive field-and-market testing first.
“And while much education policy is currently focused on rating, shaming, stressing and punishing teachers, schools and even students based on alleged “performance” on standardized test “data,” according to an article in the April 21, 2015, Wall Street Journal (“The Trouble With Grading Employees“), a number of leading companies including Microsoft, Adobe Systems and Gap, Inc., are realizing that “performance ratings” are counterproductive, are abolishing them, and achieving better results.
“The article reports that the companies “abolished such [performance] ratings after leaders decided they deterred collaboration and stoked staffers’ anxieties,” and quoted David Rock, the director of the NeuroLeadership Institute, as saying that ratings conjure a “threat response” in workers, or “a sensation of danger” that can last for months if they didn’t get the rating they expected.
“The article reports that “companies that have gotten rid of ratings say their employees feel better about their jobs, and actually listen to managers’ feedback instead of obsessing over a number.”
Here is my reaction:
My own view is that the people who think it is “urgent” for them to demoralize teachers and turn public dollars over to private entities with minimal (or no) accountability have honed their message with care. Billionaires, hedge-fund managers, even the U. S. Department of Education share the same vocabulary that portrays themselves as saviors of the poor, as civil rights leaders, as the righteous rich, even as they slander hard-working teachers, close beloved community schools, and promote privatization and segregation.
“I confess that I am guilty of calling these people “corporate reformers” because I can’t think of a better term. Maybe “privatizers” works better. Some call them “deformers,” others call them “privateers.” What do you think?

Sorry, I can’t get past the words “respectable” and “corporation” being used next to each other.
LikeLike
Amen!
LikeLike
You need to get past that Dienne as the vast majority of corporations provide goods and services in an ethical and proper fashion. Not all are irresponsible behemoths, and in fact these days the term includes many mom and pop LLC’s.
The usage of “corporate takeover of public education” is a misnomer and should be dropped as we lose valuable allies of those parents who earn a living working in a corporation and who do not like to be unfairly associated with those few corporations interested in draining off the public school monies to their coffers.
The edudeformers and privateers should be called out when appropriate but they shouldn’t be lumped in with honorable folks who happen to work in a “corporation” (and I would bet that all who read this know quite a few good folk who work in a corporation).
This is one of the very few times I must strongly disagree with you, Dienne.
LikeLike
When you include mom and pop businesses (which, yes, are still corporations/LLCs/partnerships/etc.), then I agree with you. But I tend to associate the word “corporation” with the giant behemoth companies, nearly all of which are grossly unethical in many areas of their practices. I certainly don’t mean to besmirch the people who work for such corporations – they’re just doing what they need to do to put food on their tables and keep a roof over their heads, and they have little or no say in company practices anyway. But the stuff that goes on the in boardrooms and executive meeting spaces of most if not all large corporations is truly sickening. It’s all about profit anyway, anyhow, all’s fair in war and corporate take-over, may the best (meaning: most ruthless) man (or, sometimes, woman) win.
LikeLike
How about “bloodsuckers?”
LikeLike
Profiteers? Isn’t that the truth? None of the reform is based on research or “best practices.” It’s just to make a buck.
LikeLike
Lots of the people currently driving the “reform” movement are corporate based. Their goal is to provide a cheap, generic educational product. They hire an inexpensive staff so they can keep all the money at the top. Then, of course, there are the garden variety frauds. http://www.scribd.com/doc/263415503/New-Report-Finds-Over-200-Million-in-Fraud-and-Abuse-at-Charter-Schools
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
How about public education de-funders, or the anti-public education movement? They are modeling their behavior on the private academies in small southern towns after Brown v. Board of Education. And, instead of simply voting for less funding for the smaller, remaining public schools, the de-funders are now actively pursuing a bigger and bigger share of the public education “pie.”
LikeLike
“. . . the anti-public education movement. . . ”
TAGO!
The plutocratic privateers of the anti-public education ilk.
LikeLike
I work in the for profit and in the not for profit world. I have found that my not for profit friends while kind considerate and compassionate have a lot to learn about how to make operations streamline and efficient. They think way too much which is a blessing in many respects but not when it comes to making the engine go. The reformers have over thought reform. They have made it unbearable.
LikeLike
I believe Reformers want simple minded solutions to complex problems. Assign everything and everyone a parameter in a model, change a few cells in a spreadsheet, and voilà, you have educational nirvana. No thought required.
LikeLike
Disingenuous apologetics …
LikeLike
If a corporation hired leaders and executives that actively sought as part of a strategy to undermine the company, suppress innovation, alienate the best employees, and replace success with guaranteed failure, those leaders would be the laughing stock of corporate America at best, sued into a cardboard box on the street by shareholders at worst.
Yet why do education Reformers embrace that very strategy? And why do voters tolerate it?
LikeLike
Very well said!
LikeLike
Merriam-Webster (11th Edition) defines the noun “privateer” as “a ship used in the past to attack and rob enemy ships; also: a sailor on a privateer.”
It can also be used as an intransitive verb.
Either way, it looks and sounds like the right word to me.
LikeLike
The term “corporate reform” refers to those who are working to impose a corporate agenda on public education and making a democratic system into a world which follows the tenets of those who believe that free-market economics should apply.
It is not about those reforming the corporate culture.
I think it still applies.
LikeLike
Almost exactly, except that the sweet♥ deal they are angling for has nothing to do with free markets and everything to do with public-funded, for-profit industries that are protected by law from labor unions and answerable only to corporate owned politicians. This is properly called the Defense Industry Model (DIM), which is precisely why it was launched under that Nation At Risk rigamarole.
People need to get it through their heads that corporations hate free markets — every corporation seeks a monopoly and will use every means but fair and open competition to get it.
LikeLike
This. We also need to stop using the term “free market” except in quotes and ironically.
LikeLike
It’s not like they want they want to be on copacetic terms with public education. They work to defame, belittle and outright lie about public schools and teachers. Also, our government is promoting the charter industry by offering tax incentives and little or no regulation, while they increase funds for charters at the same time cutting funds for 90% of the students. The government is often actively working against public education.
LikeLike
That’s the Corporate Owned Government (COG) that’s doing that, not the Government Of By For The People we heard so much about in school.
LikeLike
But “corporate” encompasses a lot more than just those “working to impose a corporate [whatever that is] agenda. . . ” That in the quote is just a minor part of what “corporate” relates to in most people’s minds.
And since it encompasses a lot more it is therefore not the appropriate terminology.
LikeLike
They are education pirates. They have boarded uninvited, purposefully harmed the current system in their rhetoric so that they can pillage it for their own means.
LikeLike
YEP!!
LikeLike
I think “corporate reform” works because of the governance systems they choose.
The basic premise behind the whole idea is the public doesn’t need a voice in public schools because they will have “choice” – hence, appointed boards with little or no public input, opaque finances, CEO’s….
I think trading “citizen” for “consumer” is a blatant rip-off. It’s obviously a much-diminished public role. I think the public will deeply regret making this deal. Sure, the public won’t have any responsibility or duty to “public schools” but they won’t have any power or influence either, other than that of consumers purchasing a service.
I don’t mean to be unkind, but if you own the entity you don’t give that ownership interest up for a chance to purchase the service for a coupla years. Not a good deal.
LikeLike
MSMH’s ……….main stream media hypnotists.
LikeLike
That’s because the purpose is to destroy public education!
LikeLike
I suggest “anti-democracy privatizers” because a public school system is essential to a true democracy, and destroying that system in the name of “reform” so that private schools can make profits for hedge-fund billionaires is a direct attack on democracy.
LikeLike
I find that using the phrase “corporate reform” attracts the attention of those in the corporate world who might not be paying attention to education reform otherwise. “Wait, what? What do you mean by corporate reform?” they might say (and have said, to me). It got them reading and thinking. So for that reason, it has been a good thing in my circles. Perhaps it should be amended to something like, “What is loosely generalized as “corporate reform,” and even then it could get their attention and get them thinking.
Public school is something most people just take for granted.
LikeLike
“Public school is something most people just take for granted.”
Amen.
LikeLike
Interesting experience Involved Mom.
For me it’s been quite the opposite as the folks I’ve spoken with find it derogatory to be included in the edudeformer and privateer camp.
LikeLike
I think corporate reform is accurate because education policy has been conjoined with market creation, overwhelmed by it. Privatize rs, privateers or privatization work for the same reason. And because the policy takes apart education, deform is apt. All those terms fit. It’s bad policy by any name.
LikeLike
“All those terms fit. It’s bad policy by any name.”
Agreed that it is bad policy!
But corporate, again, includes much more and many more folks than those privateers who seek to privatize a public good.
LikeLike
Greedy, hate-filled racists.
LikeLike
Please elaborate!
LikeLike
I mean, come on. This isn’t a conflict? The Gates foundation is now paying reporters?
Can we at least get a disclaimer- “this reporter is paid by the Gates Foundation”?
*News is spreading that the Boston Globe is going to join the Seattle Times and BRIGHT in taking the “solutions” approach to education journalism, with funding from Gates and others. That’ll allow the newsroom to hire a second K-12 education reporter (not yet named) and let longtime Globe reporter James Vaznis to do more in-depth pieces.”
It’s not bad enough they purchased the US Department of Education, they now have to own local media coverage of public schools?
LikeLike
The W Administration did the same thing with No Child Left Behind. Only difference is that Gates has more money to spread around.
LikeLike
Call them “Neo-Segregationists.”
They are the George Wallaces of this generation.
Public opinion is swayed by sound bites. Get that label to stick and they are through!
LikeLike
And it would be a false label, a Faux Noise tactic that is reprehensible.
LikeLike
Cross posted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Why-calling-school-reform-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Billionaires_Business_Corporate-Crime_Corporate-Profits-150429-553.html
with this comment at the end.
dianeravitch says about this: “My own view is that the people who think it is “urgent” for them to demoralize teachers and turn public dollars over to private entities with minimal (or no) accountability have honed their message with care. Billionaires, hedge-fund managers, even the U. S. Department of Education share the same vocabulary that portrays themselves as saviors of the poor, as civil rights leaders, as the righteous rich, even as they slander hard-working teachers, close beloved community schools, and promote privatization and segregation. ”
“I confess that I am guilty of calling these people “corporate reformers” because I can’t think of a better term. Maybe “privatizers” works better. Some call them “deformers,” others call them “privateers.”
What do you think? she asks…and this link https://dianeravitch.net/2015/04/29/william-doyle-no-respectable-corporatuon-woukd-use-methods-of-school-reformers/will let YOU comment at the blog where educators, parents
LikeLike
I think of The Movement as Test-Based Reformers.
LikeLike
To reform is to make changes in something in order to improve it. As those of us working in the public schools, or those with children attending them, know, what’s happening in public education has absolutely nothing to do with improvement.
Thus, I always call the people who’ve been invading and colonizing the public schools for the past twenty years “so-called reformers,” since their intention is to smash and grab public education, not reform it.
It’s all they know how to do, since everything they touch turns to s—, harming the many and serving the few. The long list of frauds and scandals that have resulted from the attacks on the public schools – cheating scandals, bogus credit recovery schemes, etc. – show that, even according to their debased standard of test scores, these people are complete and utter failures. That is, unless you think that it was always their intention to destroy.
Just as so-called “welfare reform” was a successful effort to destroy family income supports, and thus the income floor that no one could fall below, giving employers even more power in the labor market, likewise is so-called education reform an effort to destroy and then re-configure public education in the interests of the Overclass.
Corporate reformers, deformers, privatizers, privateers, call them what you will, it’s all about Smash and Grab, tarted up with pseudo-science and appallingly dishonest social justice rhetoric and misdirections.
LikeLike
I live in and with corporations. What’s fascinating to me is that while corporations have plenty of MBA’s who believe in managing though tyrannical application of metrics, reality pulls them back from the brink…usually.
In education, it seems that the “corporation” lacks the right knowledge to fight the metric religionists. Perhaps it’s that educators live in a world of students rather than metric based management and lack toe vocabulary and raw cynicism needed to say “that ain’t gonna work and we know it already”.
But for whatever reason, an important braking system is missing – one that exists in corporations and ensures the corporation pulls back (eventually) from the over-use of metrics.
That said, living in corporate world requires a continual vigilance against the abuse of metrics. Consultants build vast wealth recommending them. Data companies lust after the profits of large contracts for creating metrics. And thousands of executives are promoted each year because they recommended metrics – the “can’t lose” way to get promoted while hurting the company.
Metrics have a place – but only a place. They can’t run the company or education. They can be a useful tool to periodically see if the ship of state is running in the right direction and learn about the way forward.
LikeLike
“the metric religionists”
Part of the High Church of Testology (thanks KTA)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love it… I used the term “religion” intentionally – because it’s based on a faith in metrics and testing. In this case, faith that experience shows is unfounded – but they really don’t want to listen to such trivialities…
LikeLike
Yes, the religious terminology is apt; they are “invested” in metrics, whether appropriate or not.
LikeLike
Love it
LikeLike
Sorry, a word like privateer does not register enough on my contempt meter.
I think “insufferable cloaca” is about the right tone I want to convey when I come up with a synonym for the reformers.
“irredeemable sack of fertilizer” isn’t far off the mark either.
LikeLike
Fertilizer serves a useful purpose.
LikeLike
Correct, but “irredeemable waste material” doesn’t have the same zing. Perhaps some DAM poet can find a good synonym for us.
I’m finding it hard to find civil words to use; what I’d like to really say is unprintable. Maybe I need to check out some colloquial Scots or Aussie terms for these guys (blighter, wanker, etc.).
LikeLike
I found a few after trolling around the ‘net.
“festering pustules on the buttocks of education”
The sad part about this is we can’t ignore them (like we can ignore Donald Trump who, today, spoke out on what was needed to solve the problems in Baltimore). All I can say is people who have no skin in the game haven’t earned the right to consume oxygen and offer an opinion.
LikeLike
Maybe “pirates” works best.
LikeLike
This is a carefully crafted attack on education in the name of what is good and right perpetrated by those who have money as their only motive. They conjure up for me the old stereotype of the villain (Pearson et al.) twirling his mustache as the train (“reform”) chugs relentlessly down the track ready to destroy the screaming leading lady (real education) bound to the tracks. Who will be the hero? Who will save the day? Certainly not the government! It appears to be the parents and students of the Opt Out movement. Unfortunately, in this story the would be rescuers (the teachers) were found bound and gagged (according to a testing agreement) in an abandoned shed.
LikeLike
Disease carrying parasites. They’re going for social security again, too.
LikeLike
Why we hate them: reason 17:
The cat is out of the bag: common core college readyness means community college readiness:
“Mastery of Algebra II is widely thought to be a prerequisite for success in college and careers. Our research shows that that is not so… Based on our data, one cannot make the case that high school graduates must be proficient in Algebra II to be ready for college …fewer than five percent of American workers and an even smaller percentage of community college students will ever need to master the courses in this sequence in their college…”
The higher education community doesn’t even agree on a definition of “college ready” — except to acknowledge that it likely means something different at Stanford than it does at Pellissippi State Community College…
It’s going to be a while before we see a significant change in the preparation level of students … that would really require that higher education adjust their introductory courses,” said Jacqueline King, director of higher education collaboration for the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, a federally funded group developing Common Core tests.
Higher education officials also are unsure of what to expect from the new state Common Core assessments — how they’ll be scored, for example, and what scores of “proficient” will mean in relation to a student’s skills.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/colleges-not-ready-for-college-ready-common-core-115881.html
LikeLike
Why do you people (most of you above) think that every body is against you? Is it because that you cannot imagine any other way?
Words like disease carrying parasites, irredeemable sack of fertilizer, festering pustules on the buttocks of education, the plutocratic privateers of the anti-public education ilk, blighter, wanker, disingenuous apologetics, etc., is obnoxious. Why do you think that Gates Foundation is paying the reporters? Do you any proof for such allegations?
By using such words are you trying to make them understand your point of view or are you just making them have a greater resolve? Do you think that you have all the answers?
Where is the fundamental human behavior of decency and politeness?
I am beginning to question your education. Were you taught this in school or you just developed this type of thinking/language on your own?
What do you say, Diane Ravitch? This is your blog, do you want this informational space to be misused? It is time for you to speak up.
LikeLike
Decency and politeness were replaced with demonizing and punishment by Reformers. People are angry. You can question all you like. That is the beauty of free speech. Even your speech is protected.
Teachers just want to teach. I know of no teacher who relishes the constant battle with the plutocrats, politicians, and pustules.
LikeLike
Raj, it’s pretty well widespread knowledge that the Gates Foundations donates large amounts of money to numerous organizations, including media. A quick Google search brought up this line (among many others): http://current.org/2014/09/gates-funding-spurs-doubts-over-pubmedias-impartiality-in-education-reporting/
Gates has even given money (small amounts for him….but large amounts for the groups to whom he gives) to national teacher unions, and there’s little doubt his generosity has influenced policies from these groups in the past. It’s extremely frustrating to see someone so powerful experimenting with public education as a personal hobby in the hopes that maybe ten years from now we’ll see if his ideas work…while real-life students, parents, and teachers struggle with their ham-handed implementation in ways he and his family will never have to confront. One of the biggest problems with The Reform Movement is that there is no accountability for those people behind it, and there is no better example of this than Bill Gates, himself.
LikeLike
Raj, instead of just focusing on the language used by people on this site, perhaps you should look at the actual behavior, repeated so often as to constitute a discernible pattern, of the people we’re referring to.
LikeLike
You don’t really know why ‘Corporate America’ has been stigmatized by the public for so many years, do you?
LikeLike
Here’s a better article for you, Raj. And, as I mentioned above, the biggest different between what Gates has done and what the W Administration did to promote No Child Left Behind is that Gates has donated far more money to push his policies than any politician ever has: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-bill-gates-pulled-off-the-swift-common-core-revolution/2014/06/07/a830e32e-ec34-11e3-9f5c-9075d5508f0a_story.html
This isn’t conjecture.
LikeLike
I like the term privateers, for their purpose is to rush in, milk the system for every dime they can extract and then move on to the next “profit center.”
The Gates Foundation has been involved in similar robber baron politics in other fields masquerading as reform. He supports Monsanto and its GMO products while the WHO issues a report on how they cause cancer. I’m sure his next venture will be to test a new drug on the cancer victims he helped create. There are other too numerous to mention.
LikeLike
There has always been a tension between academia and business. It is difficult to tease out just those elements that drive each camp crazy. I am not even describing the dichotomy well; it is a mistake to think this is simply a battle between two monolithic entities however we define the combatants. Does it help to ask what is it that we have lost that is driving conflict? At the heart of it, I think it may have to do with the loss of the democratic process. We are being disenfranchised. Our ownership of the common good is being sold to the highest bidders.
LikeLike
Exactly. I’d even go so far to say that this battle is an incredible test of our democracy.
LikeLike
Academics tend to be content-oriented — And they remain hopelessly confused, believing that the points to be won are all about the content of curricula and the content of policies.
The business-corporate forces are control-oriented — they know that the ostensible content of the month is just what they use as decoys, distractions, diversions, foils, and misdirections.
The academics never seem to tumble to the nature of the game. Maybe in rare moments of temporary epiphany — but then they go right back to chasing their tails round and round again.
Business enterprises will rotate their stock of buzz words the way they cycle through any other fashion craze. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon and for a year or a decade they’ll be all abuzz about creativity and cooking grit into mush — but if you think you’ve won a point when that comes round again you shouldn’t be fooled — the content of the message is a matter of indifference, what matters is who controls the message, and they’ll buy up the rights to sell Creativity™ to the public like none of us ever heard of creativity before.
LikeLike
Control the message….H-m-m-m. That requires a different way of thinking for us as you suggest. We can actually believe our message, but we have to very aware of the how to market it successfully. Any friendly PR people out there?
LikeLike
I wasn’t saying that educators should imitate corporatistas — you can’t really beat them by playing their game — you just have to know they’re playing for control of what they can’t help seeing as an education plantation, and they don’t really care what the crop of the season might be.
LikeLike
I don’t think I was either since we believe our message. We believe the content we want to sell. There is absolutely no reason not to draw from the playbook of professionals who are in the business of selling a message. I don’t believe that consciously trying to sell our message requires compromising ethical standards.
LikeLike
Reformistas – giving corporations a bad name.
LikeLike
The only problem I have with the term Corporate Reform is that some people out of the know might think it refers to reforming corporations, which is far more sorely needed than the corporatization of education, but not what it means in this case,
Still, nothing about the term says that corporations are bad — even if they do tend to get badder the bigger they get — it simply says that corporations have no business telling professional educators how to do what they are far more dedicated and far better trained to do.
Corporate Raiders Against Public Schools (CRAPS) might serve better, since everyone knows what corporate raiders do, and it’s always pretty hostile and destructive for the interest that gets raided.
For my part, I’ve started calling them Terror-Reformers — all puns on Terraformers intended.
LikeLike