Nicholas Kristof seems to have a very big hatred for American public education. Did he go to public schools? Did he have horrible teachers? What does he have against this democratic institution that is part of the fabric of every community in the nation?
The Daily Howler, which catches journalistic fraud, lambastes Kristof for cherry-picking statistics to make American students look stupid.
In his latest screed against our schools and teachers, Kristof offers an example of a question on TIMSS where American students got a low score. There were 88 sample questions. Kristof picked the question where American students did the worst.
In a remarkably deceptive way, Kristof cherry-picked through that long list of questions. The question about the three consecutive numbers is, quite literally, the question on which American kids did least well out of all 88 as compared to the rest of the world.
Let’s make sure you understand that! Quite deliberately, Kristof chose the least representative example out of 88 possible items.
He led his column with that unrepresentative example. He then pretended it shows that stupid-ass Johnny “can’t count.”
Assuming the TIMSS data are accurate, why did American kids perform so poorly on that one question? We have no idea. We also can’t explain why American kids outscored every nation, including Singapore, on the question called “Median number of staff members.” But, by God, they did!
In fact, they outperformed all nations, including Singapore, by a wide margin on that one question. An equally dishonest person could cherry-pick that one example to advance the false impression that U.S. eighth-graders lead the world in math…..
Please. On the test to which Kristof referred, American kids basically matched their counterparts in Finland. They outscored glorious Sweden by 25 points, with its average score of 484.
Germany didn’t take part on the eighth grade level in 2011. It did participate at the fourth grade level, where its kids were outscored by kids from the U.S.
(Other scores in Grade 8 math: Great Britain 507, Australia 505, Italy 498, Norway 475.)
“We know Johnny can’t read; it appears that Johnny is even worse at counting!” It’s hard to imagine why someone like Kristof would want to write such a thing. But such deceptions are completely routine within our upper-end press corps. This has been the reliable norm for a very long time.
We know of no topic on which Americans are so persistently disinformed by American pseudo-journalists. Yesterday, Kristof took the dissembling and the deception to a remarkable low.
Kristof seems to get stranger by the month. As Shakespeare thoughtfully asked, “On what meat doth this our Times pseudo-journalist feed?”
Just for the record: The other examples Kristof presents are also cherry-picked. He had to sift through 88 examples to mislead his readers so.
Why in the world would a life-form like Kristof deceive his readers this way? Beyond that, what makes him so eager to denigrate American kids?
PS: Thanks to reader Chiara for bringing this post to my attention in the comments.

I think it is important to consider how likely it is that an op/ed writer for the NY Times probably lives a pretty tightly defined of extremely influential people who call them up, stroke their egos, and feed them story ideas. I am sure that Frank Bruni didn’t just stumble across the teacher tenure story that he butchered in such a one-sided way. I am positive that he got a nice phone call from his good friend, Campbell Brown, suggesting that she knows a super state legislator from Colorado that would give him some great ideas about this important topic — and then we got what we got.
And yes, Bruni and Brown are buddies: http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20061942,00.html
That’s access to “opinion leaders” that the rest of us cannot get.
LikeLike
One would think a journalist would ask “why is everyone pointing me towards this one cherry picked math problem.?”
The phrase is “working the refs”
LikeLiked by 1 person
“One would think a journalist would ask….”
Sigh. Yes, therein lies the problem. This world would be in such a better position if more journalists (or “journalists”, ahem) thought to ask more often.
LikeLike
Like I wrote to you personally, Diane, Kristoff needs a piece of YOUR mind!
He pretends to be a ‘good hug,’ so interested in the underdogs of this world… and he has been blind to what is ongoing! YOU should tell him!
LikeLike
Daily Howler? Does Harry Potter live? Not quite the same thing, I know, but I loved Harry Potter. Maybe this association will remind me to follow the Daily Howler.
LikeLike
One problem with Kristof is that he is a dilettante with interests in social, political and educational issues. As a result he samples this and that, but is master of none. He is the bleeding heart for the hedge fund crowd. There is no surprise the material he selects would be biased against public education.
LikeLike
In the same column where he cherry-picks scores, he writes this:
“Numeracy isn’t a sign of geekiness, but a basic requirement for intelligent discussions of public policy. Without it, politicians routinely get away with using statistics, as Mark Twain supposedly observed, the way a drunk uses a lamppost: for support rather than illumination.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately, the “numeracy” of the reformers is questionable. It’s called cooking the books. In public schools teachers are being rated by voodoo metrics based on invalid tests, rigged cut scores, and of course, VAM, which sometimes assigns teachers a score based on the performance of students they may not teach.
LikeLike
If it were only education writers that cherry picked, but it’s everywhere. Fox news has made their living cherry picking and so many others as well. The sound bite is king and as long as it rules people without the concentration or love of truth to dig deeper will be willingly and oh so stupidly deceived. It’s a disease of our modern tech society. Truth just doesn’t interest people as much as getting their opinion across as truth no matter how deceptive they have to be. And they keep getting away with it. awful sad.
LikeLike
It’s worse with test scores because the whole point of the tests is supposedly so they can have better information to make policy.
They don’t even serve that limited function. These kids are basically churning out test scores so adults can use the scores against them. It’s such a profound betrayal, on every level. They get NO benefit for the work they put in. None. They’re actually harmed.
LikeLike
If it were only education writers that cherry picked, but it’s everywhere.
Even in academia (as pointed out by Moshe Adler “As per Chetty et al.’s study #2”)
“Chetty Pie”
To bake a Chetty pie
You pick the ripest cherries
Which makes the public buy
“The Chetty Data Queries”
“Standard Deviations”
The Chetty-picker’s standard
Is lower than Death Valley
And even for a VAM nerd
That’s quite a lowly tally
LikeLike
It is disappointing to see Kristof succumb to cherry-picking data to make a point, although in his defense he did choose the international test where US students tend to best — the TIMMS focuses on how well students have learned a curriculum and methods for solving equations.
On the PISA test (administered by the OECD), which is more about higher-order thinking, he would have had a lot more questions to select where US students lagged. While a TIMSS question might be, solve this equation, the PISA question might be here is a real world situation, what equation could your write to define and solve this problem.
With have to all this test-driven curriculum coming in that is narrowing the curriculum to what is measurable, you have to wonder if that gap in PISA scores is going to get even bigger, the offset of course being that other OECD countries like the UK and Sweden have headed down the same data-driven path.
LikeLike
You ask why he would do this. Follow the money: what sells more papers?
LikeLike
Kristoff could not be relegated to a British gossip rag or TMZ even if they paid him, as his brand of journalism is pure crap. Which, in essence, makes him perfect for the NY Times.
LikeLike
you should be ashamed of yourself for relying on secondary sources
if you had bothered to read kristof yourself, and his sources, you would see that overall he is more or less right, although hislead is a little flamboyant and misleading
further, the daily howler is makes many accusations about kristof, without any sources; sleazy journalism – why would you degrade yourself by linking to such a sleazy source ?
you just loose credibility
LikeLike