Carol Burris, principal of South Side High School, has been an outspoken critic of both the Common Core standards (which she once supported, even wrote a book about them) and the testing associated with them. She is a leader of the Opt Out movement on Long Island in New York.
In this article for Valerie Strauss’s Answer Sheet blog, Burris reveals some of the most problematic questions on the Common Core ELA tests, administered last week. So many of the questions and the reading passages are now circulating on the Internet that it is hard to believe that Pearson thinks its tests are secure. They are not.
The article includes links to all the items mentioned.
Burris writes:
Disgusted teachers and parents are defying the “gag order” and talking about the tests, anonymously, on blogs. The sixth-grade test has consistently come under fire, especially during Day 3 when an article entitled, “Nimbus Clouds: Mysterious, Ephemeral, and Now Indoors” from the Smithsonian Magazine appeared on one version of the test.
Here is a passage from the article:
“As a result, the location of the cloud is an important aspect, as it is the setting for his creation and part of the artwork. In his favorite piece, Nimbus D’Aspremont, the architecture of the D’Aspremont-Lynden Castle in Rekem, Belgium, plays a significant role in the feel of the picture. “The contrast between the original castle and its former use as a military hospital and mental institution is still visible,” he writes. “You could say the spaces function as a plinth for the work.””
You can read the entire article here.
The genius at Pearson who put that article on the sixth-grade test should take his nimbi and his plinth and go contemplate his belly button in whatever corner of that Belgian castle he chooses. The members of the State Education Department who approved the article’s inclusion should go with him.
Other complaints include:
* requiring fourth graders to write about the architectural design of roller coasters and why cables are used instead of chains
* a sixth-grade passage from “That Spot” by Jack London, which included words and phrases such as “beaten curs,” “absconders of justice,” surmise, “savve our cabin,” and “let’s maroon him”
* a passage on the third-grade test from “Drag Racer” which has a grade level of 5.9 and an interest level of 9-12th grade.
The eighth-grade test required 13-year-olds to read articles on playground safety. Vocabulary included: bowdlerized, habituation techniques, counterintuitive, orthodoxy, circuitous, risk averse culture, and litigious. One of the articles, which was from The New York Times, can be found here. Here is an excerpt:
Paradoxically, we posit that our fear of children being harmed by mostly harmless injuries may result in more fearful children and increased levels of psychopathology.
I am sure that 13-year old ESL students were delighted by that close read.
[Guess the subjects deemed too ‘sensitive’ for new Common Core tests]
And who will be scoring this new generation of tests? If you have a bachelor’s degree, you can ‘soar to new heights’ working either the day or night shift with Pearson making $13 an hour. Or, if you would like to spend some quality time in Menands, New York, the temp agency, Kelly Services, will hire you for $11.50 an hour to score. No degree? No problem. The company’s last ad on Craig’s list for test scorers didn’t require one.
With these exams, the testing industry is enriching itself at the expense of taxpayers, all supported by politicians who self-righteously claim that being subjected to these Common Core tests is a “civil right.” Nonsense. It is clear that none of this will stop unless the American public puts an end to this. I have only two words left to say—opt out.
Do you think Pearson,et al, are making these horrendous questions, choosing these terrible readings on purpose so the country looks like the schools are indeed failing and then in another year or two they plan to make the tests/readings more appropriate so as the scores increase they can come back and say it is all due to the wonderful Common Core instruction going on? And sell more materials, more tests, more packaged education?
I believe your prediction is the most likely scenario that will unfold in the coming years. The contentious atmosphere is reaching a tipping point, so my guess is that Pearson will do this sooner than later.
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé.
Others think that the purpose of the tests is to “fail” a large number of students so they can justify their privatization schemes. Personally, I think too many tax dollars from the “colonies” have flowed back to the Queen and country, and it’s time for another revolution. We should send Pearson packing back to the British Isles where they can remain and endlessly “contemplate their belly buttons.”
And to think that I used to worry that Mill on the Floss was to difficult and obscure for middle schoolers.
‘too’ difficult that is…
My UCLA undergrad major so long ago was English/Language Arts, and my excellent professors who are now in the Elysian Fields would not recognize Language Arts these days as it is being forced on students by CC.
Amen, Ellen. A mutant form of English has driven out the heirloom variety.
“The British are Coming”
The British are Coming
They’re PARCCing in schools
The Pearson’s are drumming
We’re acting like fools
We beat them in battle
But now we surrender
They treat us like cattle
As corporate provender
Perhaps we should have another Boston Tea Party scene but this time dump everything and everything Pearson and McGraw Hill related into the ocean including the technology used to test on? I could happily teach without my Pearson Scott Foresman Common Core Reading Street series!
That 6th grade passage is so unbelievably bad, and in so many ways. Just about every key noun in that passage is an abstraction: aspect, location, feel, architecture, contrast, creation, institution, spaces. It’s not just that the vocabulary is too “difficult” or rarified – it’s that the whole passage is a word salad. I’m still enjoying the idea that spaces can function as plinths. I must remember that the next time I’m redoing the living-room.
All I see is: “The location is an aspect. The architecture plays a role in the feel. “The contrast is still visible,” someone writes. “You could say derp derp herp derp.”
Darn, forgot the nested quotation marks. Again:
Exactly. The architecture plays a role in the feel? Come again? I mean – God knows my ten-year-old is fascinated by the way conceptual artists use dislocated spaces to challenge our preconceptions about material ephemera, but I think she will have a hard time arranging the words here into a meaningful pattern.
It sounds to me like the teacher in Charlie Brown, “Rah rah, way, wha way aha.” But in written form!
I thought the ephemeral indoor nimbus cloud might be a reference to the
Peanuts character Pig-Pen.
TAGO!, Madeline
jb2,
Now I know what your comment on the other thread was about. I think psilocybin would have been better than acid to determine that!
Imagine that the same passage was given as a test of fluency in speaking English. Perfect for Pearson logic.
As a result, the location of the cloud is an important aspect, as it is the setting for his creation and part of the artwork. In his favorite piece, Nimbus D’Aspremont, the architecture of the D’Aspremont-Lynden Castle in Rekem, Belgium, plays a significant role in the feel of the picture. “The contrast between the original castle and its former use as a military hospital and mental institution is still visible,” he writes. “You could say the spaces function as a plinth for the work.”
The 6th grade “cohort” that visit my house think they have the Common Core English tests figured out.
They think if they refer back to the text constantly they’ll get a higher score. They don’t use that ;language but that’s what they’re doing in the essays. They took “text dependent” rather literally 🙂
Maybe they’re right. The essays are only read by the temps, right? They must be using some kind of metric to churn out the scores.
Maybe they cracked the code.
You know Duane,
I’m thinkin that Timothy Leary is prolly the only one who would have a chance in hell of understanding these Pearson tests.
And he’s not with us any more.
But maybe Cheech and Chong might be able to shed some light on them.
…or maybe Ram Das….
“I’m still enjoying the idea that spaces can function as plinths. I must remember that the next time I’m redoing the living-room.”
Chuckle. My husband uses stacks of crap as plinths. Oh, for a space to be a plinth!
“A Plinth of Space”
A plinth of space
Is Common Core
An empty base
Of Coleman lore
Is there one expert who will stand up for Pearson (who has any credibility) and say this is an age appropriate reading passage of suitable difficulty for all learners?
I’m trying to “function as a plinth,” but I don’t know how.
Can anyone help me?
Put something heavy on top of you and stay very, very still.
Mind you – tried that with a “space” as the article recommended, and my nice vase shattered on the floor. That’s the last time I take decorating advice from a conceptual artist.
Madeleine..you are terrific. Only laugh I have had today.
I’m with Ellen. Any time you want to lighten the mood…
Carol Burris is a wonderful writer. This is useful information if your kid is taking the Common Core tests AND a good, lively read.
Is this really true, people hired off of craigslist may be grading the tests? So murderers can now moonlight as test graders? From temp agencies? this is distressing. I thought only educators from other schools would be grading the tests.
President Obama in 2007 before the NEA: “Don’t tell us that the only way to teach a child is to spend too much of a year preparing him to fill out a few bubbles on a standardized test. We know that is not true. You didn’t devote your lives to testing, you devoted it to teaching! And teaching is what you should be allowed to do!”
Thanks, Carol, for the expose. We need to pay attention to “the man behind the curtain” –the frauds who hide behind the authoritative facade of the Common Core and its tests like that cowardly little man controlling the Great Oz in The Wizard of Oz.
I want the makers to answer me these questions to my satisfaction:
1. What exactly does a low score on the ELA test tell us about a kid’s cognitive situation? And what is your evidence for that assertion?
2. What kind of teaching will lead to a high score? And what is your proof?
Can any fans of the ELA test answer these questions for me? I promise to be civil in my response to you.
“Ephemeral indoor nimbus cloud”
‘Ephemeral indoor nimbus cloud’
Is David Coleman’s fart
‘Ephemeral indoor dimbus crowd’
Is Coleman’s testing mart
Something’s in the air today!
(Besides tree pollen out here in my neck of the woods.)
If Cuomo and NYSE keep mocking parents and teachers for opt out, all staff working at NYSE, Pearson, or Cuomo’s chamber should send their school kids to take NY CC tests and report test scores for the record. Pretty sure their kids will teach them how their plan is reckless and wrong-headed, by getting so mad at a giant test maker and state Ed department over the tests.
One 4th grade question that bothered me asked which part of the passage could readers most relate to their lives. This was a passage about colonial times and how the children had little access to stores and no batteries so they came up with their own games and toys. Paraphrasing, Choice B said children did not get store bought toys, so created their own. Choice C said that, even now, kids still play games like hopscotch, Mother-May-I, etc. ALL of my students chose B, which makes sense. They don’t play the games mentioned. However, to my eyes, Choice C is the answer they must pick. This question is skewed to favor children born to Americans – not children of immigrants who live in an urban environment!
How on earth can there be a “right” answer to that kind of the question, anyway?
There can’t be one right answer to a subjective item. When written properly, the three plausible distractors have to be wrong. There should be no arguing among teachers on MC items. This can only work when the item stem is objective. Pearson writers violate a critical rule for MC test writing. Yet a teacher’s career and livelihood can hinge on this crap.
That is my point, exactly! There is so much wrong with the tests, but this question particularly bothered me because they will mark someone’s answer based on their experiences as wrong, even if it is right.
This example typifies the fundamental flaw in the Pearson ELA tests. They use subjective item stems in an MC format. Anyone with experience in test construction would tell you that this completely invalidates the exam. These Pearson tests are littered with such garbage items. Here are three possible explanations:
1) Incompetent test development
2) Intentional trickery.
3) Wrong tool for the right job
(i.e. CC standards rare lists of abstract skills which can’t be tested using MC format)
The thing that most bothers me is that the “reformers” are painting this as an issue between NYS and the Union. It’s not! It is about the state giving a test that is 4 and a half hours long and educationally inappropriate in order to ” find out if the taxpayers are getting their money’s worth.” What about the damage it does to a child’s delicate psyche to work so hard on a test that they are bound to fail ( unless of course the state decides not to count lots of questions).. The union is not making the students collateral damage, that would be the Governor and state ed.
Finally, finally, finally the truth is coming out. Blimey!
“Vocabulary included: bowdlerized, habituation techniques, counterintuitive, orthodoxy, circuitous, risk averse culture, and litigious”
Oh my goodness, it is truly an outrage that mere 12 year olds could be faced with such difficult vocabulary words, and I applaud Ms. Carol Burris for even attempting to spell these words herself.
Nothing more complicated than LOL and BRB should be on these tests. Expecting kids to know anything about educated speech? Stuff and nonsense.
This test is written for every 12 year old in New York state; including the cognitively impaired, dyslexic, abused and neglected, and children just learning English. It is a test for minimum competencies in reading and writing. It’s not an entrance exam for Phillips Exeter you ass.
You listed some of the ‘easier’ vocabulary words. These tests were ridiculous. 4th graders had vocabulary much harder than the terms you have listed above. Special Education students and ELLs, particularly, just don’t stand a chance.
Yeah, well, I read everything under the sun throughout my youth, excelled in school, got a scholarship to Cambridge, and have a research degree in English literature. And I don’t think I knew half those words when I was twelve.
And as other people have explained, the issue is not about whether or not kids should be exposed to this kind of vocabulary. Sure they should. I think children can and should read real books – I would have 90% of Scholastic’s hideous made-for-grade-level-reading junk burned in a ritual fire, and replaced with actual children’s literature. I just finished reading “Great Expectations” to my ten-year-old daughter, with only a few judicious cuts and trims, and she loved it.
But this is a test administered to EVERY student in the system, and intended to establish a basic level of passing. It defines failure, not success. And it’s batshit crazy.
Apparently Pearson does not require a Bachelor’s degree for test item writers.
So I’m thinking they should probably hire some sixth graders. 🙂
Very funny comment written by a 6th grader on the Smithsonian site.
Reblogged this on Naked Teaching and commented:
Why isn’t this fraud, or at the very least, malpractice?
Fraud
The term ‘fraud’ is generally defined in the law as an intentional misrepresentation of material existing fact made by one person to another with knowledge of its falsity and for the purpose of inducing the other person to act, and upon which the other person relies with resulting injury or damage.
Malpractice
The breach by a member of a profession of either a standard of care or a standard of conduct. Malpractice refers to negligence or misconduct by a professional person, such as a lawyer, a doctor, a dentist, or an accountant. The failure to meet a standard of care or standard of conduct that is recognized by a profession reaches the level of malpractice when a client or patient is injured or damaged because of error.
“Send lawyers guns, and money – the tests have hit the fan.” WZ
The plan is to lighten up/get real over the next couple of years so they can pronounce Common Core is having a very positive impact. Those behind this agenda are deceitful and self serving. That is why OPTING OUT right now becomes critical. Do not feed the beast! Your child should not become complicit in the fraud that is being perpetrated by Pearson.
Reblogged this on stopcommoncorenys.
I saw the actual article on the nimbus clouds. It had pictures showing the artist’s unusual works. A friend asked whether these pictures- which are critical to understanding the article- were included in the test. As is the article is too difficult but without the pictures I don’t think even an educated adult could really understand.
It’s hard enough to understand conceptual art critic talk even *with* the pictures…. But yes, I can just imagine them trying to figure out that Nimbus D’Aspremont is a picture, and not a cologne.
Ephemeral indoor nimbus cloud anagram challenge (I’ll start) our incomprehensible dud loam