A letter from a teacher:
“Two of the students that I tutor called me up to give me feedback about the tests. One student is an honors student in the 6th grade in a middle school. He is a high achiever from a professional family. He was so upset that his voice was breaking up on the phone. He described a poem that he did not comprehend at all. He stated that the vocabulary was so difficult and that he never encountered most of the words that were used in this poem.
I asked if at the bottom of the poem some of the meanings were footnoted. He said no.
He then said that at the end of the assessment, his English teacher looked at the poem and said to the class that she did not really understand the poem herself . In addition, there was another nonfiction passage that he had to read twice to get any meaning from. As a result, he was unable to complete all the questions for this passage by the end of the assessment.
My second student is a 8th grade student who goes to a middle school in Queens. He has second language issues that have caused many gaps in his vocabulary. He said that he had to read many of the passages twice and could not finish the test. He said that the passages on the assessment were harder than the passages I gave to him. The readability of the practice passages I gave to him were mostly on the 10th grade level. Most of the material I used came from two well known publishers. Both these publishers claimed that their material supposedly mimic the difficulty level of the assessment. I guess not.
More important is the fact that this is a boy whose parents have very high expectations which have caused him to have issues in self-concept. After this assessment, his self-concept is in the garbage. His parents were always opposed to opting out because of their cultural background. His mother came on the phone and is now considering opting her son out from the rest of the assessment.
What I am hearing is nothing less than criminal. Forget about the fact that it appears that these passages and questions are so hard that teachers cannot comprehend them. Also forget about how these tests are being used against us teachers.
It is more important that these assessments represent, in my mind, child abuse. What is the purpose of destroying children that try so hard. Both of these students are boys who want to please their parents. their teachers and me. They now feel like failures. No child should ever be made to feel this way. I even feel like a failure because I worked so hard with these two boys. At least I understand that it is not me. It is the tests. There is no doubt that the purpose of these tests is to create failure. They were never intended to measure learning.

Is this in NY?
LikeLike
Yes
LikeLike
Yes. Pearson (paper) testing in ELA began today all across NYS. Opt out numbers being reported are astounding.
LikeLike
My daughter is in 4th grade and said there was a non fiction poem that she didn’t understand. She said she guessed at the multiple choice questions. She hopes that she did ok and then started crying.
LikeLike
So sorry!
LikeLike
Unfortunately, too many students AND teachers reported many of the same observations. The grade 6 “poem” is the talk of the town, and many students did not have enough time to complete day one. Grade 8 students with extended time due to individualized education programs used ALL of their time. Anyone who works with these kids knows the rarity of this…it leaves students anxious and in despair, with two more days of this to “conquer.”
LikeLike
Again, child abuse that should be reported to Child Protection Services. Most schools and districts have rules against bullying that are being ignored.
I’d love to see reformers being dragged away in handcuffs and leg irons.
LikeLike
Obviously. New York politicians hate teachers and hope to fire them. At least that is my takeaway from the new laws. Despicable elected officials. I hear that one of our teacher colleges had only ONE math student seeking teaching certification. Why would anyone teach?
LikeLike
Not so fast Nimbus. The parent Revolt 0f 2015 will not go unnoticed.
My son wants to teach and I refuse to discourage him. By the time he gets out, much of this will be fixed. “Captain Education” will find himself all alone, at the bottom of the hole he dug.
LikeLike
The 8th grade test was outrageously difficult. I don’t see how anyone could read it and conclude anything other than they are designed to fail. This situation has truly gotten out of hand. I hope that the media publish some of these tests so the public can see the truth. I know for sure that I would not have been able to pass the test when I was in 8th grade. I am sure that Andrew Cuomo would not be able to pass it right now.
I am depressed as a teacher and saddened for the the children and the future of our country.
LikeLike
I teach 8th grade. The EngageNY blueprint for the test stated that today would be 6 passages, 42 multiple choice questions. My students meticulously planned ahead of time, figuring they could spend 15 minutes reading each passage and answering the questions that followed. They were crushed when they opened the testing booklet to find 7 passages, all several pages in length. One of my boys was reduced to tears, another was literally pulling out his hair. The questions required multiple reads of the text, and my entire class ran out of time. This test was engineered to make teachers appear ineffective. But what weighs heavily on my heart is that my students thought they were ineffective today. This is abuse.
LikeLike
Congrats and thanks to the writer. Reports like this one need to be published far and wide.
The tests aren’t rigorous at all. They represent incompetence at best, at worst criminality. Hopefully some brave soul will just copy one and put it online. Then the fraud will be out in the open. Where are the investigative media when we need them?
LikeLike
Every state legislator enacting these inane laws should be forced to take these tests with the results published.
LikeLike
I think so too — but I would expect that they would cheat.
LikeLike
Absolutely on target. The deformers love the tests so much, they should take each and every test. Treasonous people are in charge.
LikeLike
It is only the end of Day 1 and honestly I feel so numb to the pain that is being unhinged on these children.
I am a fourth grade teacher at a well known public school in Brooklyn. To give a brief summary, the passages were confusing and extremely difficult to comprehend. I had to read one passage three times to even understand what was happening in the story.
It felt like Pearson wrote a passage and then took a thesaurus and made every adjective or verb a more complex word that was not grade appropriate.
I quickly jotted down these few words from just ONE passage on the test. In a three page passage ALL there words were used: Dreary, plodded, gloomy, peered, vast, array, rummaged, floundered, BLITHELY, insurmountable, obliterated, scrutinizing, summoned, astounded.
NOW, don’t get me wrong, I understand we teach out students to use context clues to help us learn and comprehend words we do not know. There was such a higher level of decoding context in all these passages. The words were not even appropriate for the passage itself.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
“Common Core Train Wreck”
The train has left the rails
And falls in the ravine
The Common Core travails
Are worst we’ve ever seen
NY State is welcome to put that on their next test (no charge) 🙂
LikeLike
I’ve never had a student opt out in the past, but this year nearly half my class opted out. I was trying very hard to not let this bother me and to just support them no matter what. I’ve never been a “Teach to the Test” kind of teacher anyway, so I felt it would be fine. When they lined up today to leave the room, I saw the worried looks from the others who were left behind. For the most part and for whatever reason, the ones left to take the test were my strugglers. I think they lost a little bit of confidence when their classmates left the room, so I felt the need to give them a little speech. I simply said that I know how hard each and every one of them has worked this year and I am so proud, but more importantly they know how hard they’ve worked and they should be proud of themselves. They know how well they are achieving the learning targets and they know the areas in which they need to work more. They have set learning goals for themselves and have read books they can’t put down. I told them to feel proud. As the test progressed, they actually seemed to gain confidence. Several students wanted to show me words they knew from learning this year and questions that were very similar to questions they’ve answered this year. You could feel the confidence grow as the test continued. When I had to announce that there were only 10 minutes left, things changed and the worry returned. A handful of students did not finish on time. As you would expect, there was crying as I collected the exams. When my other students returned I began to read out loud to them from a book we’ve been reading that they love. In the corner of the room, I saw the face of my of my students who had seemed so confident early on. There were tears welling in her eyes and my heart broke. I actually began to tear up myself and could not continue reading. Of course my students were confused since this book should not elicit that type of response (especially not the part we were on). I just could not help it. I tried to continue and then one of my students offered to continue reading the chapter. I allowed him to do this so that I could pull myself together. As much as I try to put this into perspective and recognize this test for what it is, it still hits home when you see the direct impact. I wish I could have given my students the opportunity to write to the Board of Regents to let them know how deflated they were left feeling today.
LikeLike
Heartbreaking. But as much as I worry for them, I worry for you. You seem like a caring teacher, and it’s unfair that this test is going to reflect on you. And that also is abusive.
I believe there is a cutoff point where if the number of students taking the test falls beyond a certain point, the tests are not counted. If anyone knows if this is true, please reply.
LikeLike
So, so sorry Calicia to read your letter on what happened yesterday. I have no words & am just so saddened for what you have to endure. It proves that these so called ed reformers do not care about the damage they are doing to our young children. Good luck to you as you continue to work under these circumstances & know that your children are so lucky to have such a wonderful caring teacher in their life.
LikeLike
Keep your chin up and your heart open for all your dear students. Somebody has to since our government is turning a blind eye to what these tests are really doing to our children.
LikeLike
If the parent opts out now that he has started the test, I’m pretty sure the entire exam is still graded and goes against his teacher. I’m sure Diane or others can confirm.
LikeLike
You are correct. They count the others questions as wrong. That student can still opt out of the entire math test without penalty, though because that test has not yet begun.
LikeLike
Hasn’t the cut off to opt out expired? It was due last week or was that just the ELA?
LikeLike
schoolgal – In our Upstate district, you can even refuse the day off the test as long as the student hasn’t touched the test booklet. Maybe it’s a local decision?
LikeLike
I thought the test was untimed. Or at least, we were told that someone took the test and then the time it took was doubled. Can individual districts/ states decide on time restraints?
LikeLike
Each state has different tests and different rules. But it is common for kids with IEPs to get double the amount of time of “regular” students, so maybe that is where this comment is coming from.
LikeLike
Such nonsense. I feel for the students
LikeLike
TY 4 this, Diane. That’s the point. Abuse ’em for their own good. People in charge are immoral and users of others for personal profit. We have a most disgusting government run by big $$$$$.
LikeLike
I also wonder if the passages were “difficult” or if they were just stupid, poorly condensed from the original sources, or edited poorly. This is the first year my family has refused the test. My kids, who luckily did not take the tests seriously, would come home in previous years laughing about the ridiculousness of certain passages and questions. They way they described it to me, the questions often didn’t make any sense. For an English Language Learner this would be especially frustrating because he would assume the problem was his faulty grasp of the language rather than the faulty development of the test.
LikeLike
The tests are timed; however, students with Individualize Education Plans (IEP) or a 504 Plan due to a disability can have testing accommodations. One of those accommodations is for extended time. Extended time can be as much as double the allotted time. For some, it is time and a half. The Committee on Special Education or 504 Committee makes that determination for each individual student when a plan is developed.
What that means is that a student with a learning disability in reading could sit for 180 minutes for a 90 minute test. They would do this for 3 days in a row. And then do it again for 3 days next week for math.
LikeLike
Or–as happened with one ILL-Annoy student, one opted out sp.ed. student was made to “sit & stare” (lead story in The Chicago Tribune–a CONSERVATIVE paper, no less!–accompanied by picture of student “sitting & staring!”) for the ACCOMMODATION time on his IEP–that’s right–time-&-a-half—as per principal’s orders!
The principal gave a rationale for that, but it was not…rational.
LikeLike
Insofar as the PARCC exam is concerned, as a reader, I’ve found the following to be true:
1. Many of the passages are insanely difficult, and most students are not psychologically mature enough to handle them, nor do they have enough background information to handle the passages and tasks.
2. Many from PARCC and Pearson HATE glossing. Trust me, I argued about several passages with them, and they refused to do so. I think it depends on the team you get, though. Other people at various meetings said they glossed a bit more than my team was allowed.
3. The test is bloody difficult, and there are a few answers choices for many of the passages that could be justified; however, according to Pearson, they were not the “best” answers… Whatever that means.
Insanity, power, and money are in cahoots to destroy public education.
LikeLike
Your sign-in name made me laugh, Pearsonblah–thanks!
LikeLike
That’s how I feel right now. I cannot begin to tell you how I feel about these testing companies and how much money they make off of our students. One day, when future teachers read about the testing movement in history classes, they will discuss corporate personhood, standardized exams, and how we had the best of intentions but allowed politics to get in the way of education. It will be a cautionary tale of power, money, and political gain.. Unless they are wearing logos of all of these testing companies, Microsoft, and Wal-Mart while they study. I fear that will happen.
LikeLike
They tell the kids that they have to read CLOSELY, but only give them 70 minutes to read 5 and 6 articles 2 pages plus in length. In addition, the multiple choice questions are like reading a paragraph in and of itself and then the students have to go back into the test to choose the correct answer, or I should say the answer that best fits. The Board of Regents, Cuomo and all the others who advocate for testing should have to take the tests under the same constraints as the children. I wonder how they would do?
LikeLike
yesterday’s article in the NYTimes made me believe that opt out wasn’t successful. But the DN’s article tells a different story. If your child came home feeling depressed due to this test, remember, you had an opportunity to take a stand for justice instead of making your kid a guinea pig!
LikeLike
To all concerned parents and teachers:
Please do not confuse or mistaken the intent and design from the puppet-masters who just have one goal that is their profit, yes, their personal GAIN on the loss and shatter of children confidence of their true abilities.
Confidence is the state of mind that knows what one can and cannot do.
At the early age, children need a guidance to build their confidence, so that they will be sure of their abilities to reach out their setting GOAL
However, corrupted corporations intentionally destroy children’s confidence in their early years of their lives. We MUST ASK OURSELVES the reason WHY the controlled class wants to intimidate people’s children.
If we cannot honestly answer this TYPICAL question, then we will succumb to the VICIOUS TRAP of becoming MODERN SLAVES.
Do we deserve the treatment of DOING WHAT AUTHORITY DEMANDS SENSELESSLY?
Will we be content in knowing that our children feel inferior and failure due to the controlled class’ intention and design?
If we do not accept our children to be treated like a dog who is happy for a “crappy bone” (=inferior and failure), then please besides OPTING OUT ALL INVALID TESTS, all concerned parents and educators need to unite in one strong force to sue any corrupted government officials and its affiliated corporate backers in SUPREME COURT for their destabilizing and ruining AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION. Most of all, all conscientious educators need to demand the protection for:
1) Their tenure track,
2) The validity for their untouchable teaching profession licence except if being convicted in serious crime against humanity, and
3) The independent self-control of their contribution of their own pension.
Whenever enough means enough, together we can make a change for the better for people, and for country. Back2basic
LikeLike
Time for Wikitests, so the public can see the absurdity and lack of validity of these exams.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Someone needs to get that poem out For the world to see.
LikeLike
Just a question. How do your readers and commenters know what the passages were on these tests and one even wrote down vocabulary. I just administered parcc and was deathly afraid of breaking test security. I applaud their bravery but with what has recently happened in Atlanta, I will not dare risk my job.
LikeLike
Cindy–I’m thinking that, with some (inasmuch as was the case w/”The Pineapple Question” several years back), kids came home with pretty good descriptions (sorry, Arne, soccer moms have NOT “overestimated” the brilliance of their kids!). In other instances, special ed. teachers are–as required by many I.E.P.s–reading test passages/questions aloud from a script as provided by the test publisher in math, for example (i.e., where the test is not specifically reading comprehension). I was a sp.ed. teacher in middle school, & we read Pear$on math & science tests (& you wouldn’t believe what CCRAP was on those tests–no right answer, more than one right answer {yes, but one answer was MORE correct than the other right answers!}, science passages that made no scientific sense, & on & on, ad nauseum. Ergo, as there is no oversight of Pear$on/their te$t$ (just look at all the computer crashes as named in this blog!), I have no doubt that their te$t$ have improved in any way.
In fact, they are probably u$ing many of the very $ame que$tion$ that they’ve u$ed on their previou$ly, equally CCRAPpy te$t$ (&, al$o, their CCRAPpy te$t prep material$–EVERYONE can see those, & they are a hoot!)
LikeLike
It is time for people to take back our democracy. Our children must be taught that democracy begins with them, too. We have rights in a democratic society and what better way to learn the power of the people than to protest in mass numbers against this ridiculous corporate model of education. Teachers are professionals for a reason and they must band together to promote the educational values that teachers know are important, not corporate shills who are motivated by greed and power.
LikeLike