John Merrow posted an important reflection on the broader issues raised by the Atlanta cheating scandal.
““Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold,” William Butler Yeats wrote in 1919 in ‘The Second Coming.’ Yeats was describing the world after the Great War, but it aptly describes American education today[1]: polarized, shouting at, but rarely listening to, each other. We disagree about dozens of issues: the Common Core; whether ‘opting out’ of the Common Core tests is appropriate (or even legal); the role of unions; the effectiveness of charter schools; the federal role; the amount of standardized testing; how to evaluate teachers; poverty’s impact on children’s learning, and more.
“Now, out of the blue, we have two[2] points of agreement: 1) Draconian punishment for the Atlanta cheaters is unjust, unseemly and counter-productive; and 2) students are the losers when adults cheat….”
“Everybody’s got a villain, whether it’s Arne Duncan’s Race to the Top; an obsession with ‘data-driven decision-making; education profiteers; greedy teacher unions; or a right wing vendetta against those same unions. [5]
“Can’t we agree on something else? I suggest two big ideas that everyone who is genuine about putting kid first can support. One, expose hypocrites and hypocrisies, wherever they may be. Two, school spending should be transparent, because we are talking about taxpayer dollars, and sunlight is the best disinfectant.
“Of course, the two are related, because hypocrisy often involves money and secrecy.
“To me, the biggest hypocrites are those who preach, “Poverty can never be offered as an excuse” (for poor student performance) but then do nothing to alleviate poverty and its attendant conditions. What they are saying, bottom line, is “It’s the teachers’ fault” when kids in poverty-ridden schools do poorly on tests or fail to graduate…..
“OK, poverty is not an excuse, but surely substandard housing, inadequate health care, poor nutrition, abuse and abandonment (all of which are more likely in high poverty areas) are factors in poor academic performance. So why are these hypocrites either standing by silently or actively opposing efforts to alleviate poverty and thereby improve the lives of students outside of school?….
“Even if these so-called “thought leaders” genuinely believe that poverty is not an excuse, shouldn’t they be outraged that most states are actively making things worse for poor kids [6]? At least 30 states are systematically shortchanging poor areas when they distribute education dollars, as the Hechinger Report made clear recently. “The richest 25 percent of school districts receive 15.6 percent more funds from state and local governments per student than the poorest 25 percent of school districts, the federal Department of Education pointed out last month. That’s a national funding gap of $1,500 per student,” Jill Barshay reports.”……
“We might want to start the investigation with charter schools, both the for-profit and the non-profit varieties [8] (because, when it comes to money, they’re almost indistinguishable). Rarely do they disclose how they spend their public tax dollars. And why should they, when their political enablers don’t demand it?
“I hope you are following Marian Wang’s reporting on this issue for Pro Publica. She documents how some charter operators are laughing all the way to the bank, taking your dollars to put in their accounts….
Merrow then describes an egregious case of charter profiteering, which he brought to the attention of Nina Rees, the Executive Director of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (who formerly worked for Dick Cheney and Michael Milken).
Merrow asked her in a letter:
“What I wonder is how many Charter Management Organizations [9] are playing fast and loose with the system. Here’s one case in point: We are looking into a CMO that is growing; its records indicate that its President owns the building his charter schools operate in, and so he bill the CMO for rent—a hefty sum. The CMO pays him a salary, a 16% management fee and an additional 7% or so for ‘professional development’ for the staff. In recent years he has added categories, notably ‘back office & support’ for nearly $300,000 and ‘miscellaneous equipment rent’ for $317,000. In FY 2008 he billed for $2.6M, but in FY 2012 the number climbed to $4.1M. His 5-year total is $15.8M….and he’s a CMO, not an EMO.
“We have a number of other examples, which prompts my questions: who’s minding the store, and whose responsibility is it?
“Is it the role of national organizations like yours to set standards for transparency? State politicians? I have no idea but would love to hear your thoughts.”
She said this was the authorizers’ responsibility.
Merrow summarized her response:
“She seems to be saying that her national organization bears no responsibility for policing the charter movement, for pushing states to write tighter rules, or for calling out the profiteers. That’s someone else’s job.”
And his last suggestion:
“Remedial education” is another money pit. Follow the money, you will discover that big bucks being spent on remedial education at every level, and, while some kids get ‘remediated,’ the situation never changes. The adults in charge may be wonderful, likeable human beings, but their jobs depend on a steady stream of failed students, meaning that they do not have a stake in fixing the system. I wrote about this three years ago when I announced that I was leaving PBS [10] to make my fortune in remedial education.
“Follow the money: How many millions of the $100 million Mark Zuckerberg donated to ‘fix’ Newark’s public schools have gone to consultants? How much money goes into the trough labeled ‘professional development’ and is never seen again? How much are school systems spending on highly paid central office staff ($100K+ per year) whose job it is to go watch teachers they don’t trust to do their jobs? How much of the increase in college costs is directly attributable to spending on administrators? Quite a lot, according to the New York Times.
“Schools would be improved if we’d agree to: Follow the money. Call out the hypocrites. Demand transparency. And stop blaming teachers.”
A wonderful column!

John Merrow should change his short list of big ideas for public education. By all means, expose hypocrisy and hypocrites. And shine a light on financing. But first and foremost, make democratic citizenship the focus of public education.
Over the last three decades the drivers for education “reform” have been “economic competitiveness” and college and career preparedness. But there’s been virtually no emphasis on citizenship education, and that’s not by happenstance. Those who emphasize “economic competitiveness” – like the US Chamber of Commerce and corporate America – are the very same who’ve supported the policies that piled of deficits and debt and broke the economy. The “college and career” folks push STEM, yet there is no shortage of STEM workers; there’s a glut. Hypocrisy indeed.
Historically, American public education had citizenship education as its central mission. We’ve strayed far from that purpose. Citizens in a democratic republic must be able to gather, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information and policy arguments. They have to be able to think critically and reflectively, and they should be committed to the core values and principles of democracy outlined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The high-stakes tested pushed by conservatives and corporate “reformers” don’t touch on democratic citizenship. That too is not by happenstance. Some of them are now making the argument that the kinds of standardized tests they advocate are “civil rights.” This is hot-fudged chicanery piled up on hypocrisy.
Before it was scrubbed from the Common Core website, this was the Mission Statement form the Common Core Standards initiative:
“The standards are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in college and careers. With American students fully prepared for the future, our communities will be best positioned to compete successfully in the global economy.”
Those behind the Common Core wove the competitiveness, college, and career nonsense together. And people bought it. Both the NEA and AFT took Common Core cash. Virtually all of the education professional organizations –– from ASCD to the National PTA, from the American Association of School Administrators (superintendents) to the National Association of Elementary School Principals –– signed off on Common Core.
The NEA, now lobbying for a reduction in standardized tests, wants a new measuring stick for schools, one that includes more Advanced Placement courses and tests. Do these dim bulbs not grasp that AP is produced by the College Board, which was instrumental in the development of the Common Core? Do they not realize that the College Board and ACT, Inc. have orchestrated what amounts to a massive fraud on public schooling? Apparently not.
Merrow makes some fine suggestions: “follow the money,” “stop blaming teachers,” “call out the hypocrites.”
But stop being part of the problem. Stop buying into goofiness. Stop catering to the corporate riff-raff. And stop subscribing to policies that that are incongruent with equity and learning.
Most importantly, START making democratic citizenship a central focus of what takes place in public schools.
LikeLike
What about a Public School Board Member that stands to financially benefit with the opening of new charter schools, who forces out an interim superintendent who has the integrity to stand up to all his bullying tactics but is forced to resign so that a new patsy can be hired who will kowtow to that Board Member’s demands?
No matter how much we may despise Cuomo’s tactics, we are still lucky that this Buffalo guy is not currently The New York State Governor.
Ellen#LivingTheNightmare
LikeLike
Reblogged this on donotmalignme.
LikeLike
Excellent article by Mr. Merrow.
LikeLike
I urge all viewers of this blog to click on the link in the posting and read the entire piece. It makes some good points and I applaud the author for trying, albeit in a restricted way, to move the ed debates forward.
However, as I have previously pointed out on threads on this blog, Mr. Merrrow has made contributions of his own to the self-proclaimed “education reform” movement, mostly notably lending much of his reputation and good name to Michelle Rhee.
So, IMHO, if one wants to know where we are going TO, we need to deal with where we are coming FROM. This isn’t a question of self-flagellation or engaging in destructive “speak bitterness meetings” [Mr. Lofthouse: see how I worked Mao’s China into the discussion?]. That means throwing everything up for scrutiny so we can, at a minimum, avoid endlessly repeating avoidable mistakes—and in some cases, true catastrophes—and taking a cue from what was done right. And, of course, perhaps coming up with new ideas and approaches.
As I see it, it also means grappling with defining what genuine learning and teaching is, how it can or can’t be assessed, what it’s true costs are and aren’t, and what are the goals inherent in various approaches to teaching and learning. That process isn’t just for the favored few that run things—it means approaching education and public schools as issues that are an essential part of a democratic society that values (and thrives on) dialogue and transparency.
I stop here because I don’t want to emphasize the negative and downplay the positive of the posting.
I look forward to reading the reactions of others to Mr. Merrow’s piece.
😎
LikeLike
KTA, I love you, BUT is it possible that a national debate on the whole shebang, so to speak, is a little more than we can handle? If we discuss “education and learning” on a national level, who has authority to act on anything that is said and who decides on what we should act? I’m guessing that we may head right back into the same morass of someone with authority and power telling everyone else how to do “it.” I’m thinking that perhaps a much narrower agenda is in order. The problem I have with “best practices” is that in all my years I have never seen one practice that consistently works with all children and produces any uniform result. I am very leery of a national best practice festival that has any authority to mandate practice. If you are talking about vision statements, I could be on board. There are values we should hold as a country that we feel duty bound to uphold, but we recognize that honoring those values happens and will happen in a myriad of ways. I think what I am basically saying, KTA, is “huh?” I think I got lost in your explication.
LikeLike
Spot on, Following suggestions will lead to the reality that the system was never designed to serve all kids. Why stop blaming teachers? Because they are forced to follow an antiquated system and philosophy of education that takes kids away from real learning to an artificial game of win or lose.
When teachers take back their profession, kids, again will learn what is real and valuable, we will recognize kids learn at different rates and in different ways and a narrow scope of 2nd class assessment must be broadened to server all kids.
When will we ever learn?
LikeLike
Too bad they those educators weren’t bankers. They wouldn’t have even been prosecuted.
LikeLike