Mercedes Schneider reports on an important court case in Louisiana.
In 2010, a research group called “Research on Reforms,” which is skeptical of privatization, was denied access to state data by the Louisiana Department of Education. The same decided student data was released by the state agency to CREDO, which studies charter school performance.
ROR sued for access to the data available exclusively to CREDO. A lower court rejected their request, but last month a state appeals court ruled that ROR should have access to the data.
Let the data wars begin!
Diane Ravitch's blog 
Where’s the bucket so I can puke?
I expect I will hear from every pro-charter and pro-voucher and pro-privatization advocate that has visited this blog celebrating what looks like transparency—
Not! And if any pipe up, it is after the fact (and that’s a fact!). If charters, e.g., are supposed to be so much better than the public schools they are determined to ruin and displace—than all the data on them should be more available, more open, more accessible so their advocates and beneficiaries have more than anecdotes and paid-for praise studies to show the success of self-proclaimed “education reform.”
But, of course, it’s only “traditional public schools” that have to prove anything because when it comes to the “thought leaders” of the “new civil rights movement of our time,” proof by assertion is always sufficient.
100% graduation rate, anyone? And let them love them some 90th percentiles…
😎
P.S. Note for all you CCSS fangirls and fanboys: am I exaggerating for effect. Sure! But sadly, not by much…
P.P.S. And it’s ironic that all those free market fundamentalists that tout the beauties of injecting the profit motive into the education of children and young adults, with all their talk of the free flow of information so that rational market decisions can be made (so that, in their public discourse, parents have the means to make informed choices about preferring charters and vouchers)—
So tightly control the free flow of verifiable, testable and reliable information.
Apparently the now-vanished Soviet Union with its Potemkin Village numbers & stats was a source of envy that needs to be emulated.
Strange twist, indeed…
I have been looking into issues of data use and privacy. The US Department of Education has a new privacy czar… sort of.
If you want to register a complaint about the loss of privacy due to holes punched in the Family Educational Rights Privacy Act (FERPA) by Arne Duncan and his tech buddies, why not go to the top privacy official at the US Department of Education, Kathleen Styles? She is USDE’s first Chief Privacy Officer—Email: kathleen.styles@ed.gov. Or go to Michael Hawes, Email: michael.hawes@ed.gov who is her advisor and the person who oversees USDE’s Privacy Technical Assistance Center (PTAC).
What is PTAC? PTAC is supposed to be a “one-stop” resource for learning about “data privacy, confidentiality, and security practices related to student-level longitudinal data systems and other uses of student data. PTAC provides timely information and updated guidance on privacy, confidentiality, and security practices through a variety of resources, including training materials and opportunities to receive direct assistance with privacy, security, and confidentiality of student data systems.” This technical assistance is targeted to meet the needs of state and local education agencies and institutions of higher education.
What fascinates me is that these PTAC services—the production and review of “privacy technical assistance products”—are outsourced to an unnamed contractor. The contractor works under “the guidance of the Chief Privacy Officer and in close collaboration with the FERPA Working Group, which consists of representatives of the Office of Management, the Family Policy Compliance Office, and the Office of General Counsel.
PTAC also “regularly consults with the USDE’s Privacy Advisory Committee, whose members include Chief Statistician of National Center of Education Statistics, the program officer of the Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS), and representatives from the office of Federal Student Aid, the Office of Civil Rights, and the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (among others).
Because the unnamed contractor is smack in the middle of this administrative and “technical assistance” architecture on privacy, I wanted to discover who had that contract.
It is a for-profit company, Applied Engineering Management Corporation (AEM). Since 2010, (AEM) appears to have been awarded about $12 million to set up the resources at PTAC.
AEM also has contracts with other federal, state, and local governments and agencies.. Their work for USDE includes management of data gathering required to support the “No Child Left Behind” legislation including the 180 data descriptions for EDFacts. EdFacts is the destination for AYP reports, all of those disaggregated test scores, and so on. That is heavy-duty data warehousing.
AEM has also operated the National Student Loan Data System receiving data from every college, university, and agency that participates in Title IV loan guarantees and related programs. AEM also designed the management system to track funds allocated to school districts for the National Math and Science Initiative.
AEM’s website also says it helps “educators in developing high quality longitudinal P-20 data warehouses and business intelligence solutions that stand the test of time and enable data-driven decision making.”
I could not find any of the full contracts with AEM. I suppose they are available somewhere. I am sure this company has expertise in data management.
The part that bothers me is the idea that “business intelligence solutions” might well be made with all of that P-20 data that is being warehoused, especially since AEM is functioning as if it is major branch of USDE and AEM’s name is not disclosed as the contractor that designed and operates the “Privacy Technical Assistance Center.”
AEM–the go-to corporation for USDE’s data management and privacy–has managed to suppress it’s identity as the conduit for USDE’s “big data” projects and guidance to state and local agencies on privacy. Use this phrase to get to the PTAC resources “Privacy Technical Assistance Center.”