Across the river in New Jersey, teacher-scholar Jersey Jazzman watched the shenanigans. Perhaps he saw one Democratic member of the Assembly after another stand up to recount his sad feelings, her heavy heart, his misgivings, and then vote “yes” to a cockamamie scheme that will be a nightmare to implement and that will be an enormous unfunded mandate, all meant to discover, identify, and remove those BAD TEACHERS who are dragging down test scores. He refers to the controversy as “New York’s Absurd Debate about Teacher Evaluations and Test Scores.”
That’s putting it mildly.
Governor Cuomo, he says, has made a bad system worse.
He writes (and this is only a small part of his analysis):
APPR, like New Jersey’s AchieveNJ, is predicted on the idea that the educator — and only the educator — is responsible for the “growth” of his or her students. It ignores the impacts of funding inequities or district-level curriculum decisions or inadequate facilities or non-random assignment of students or any of the many factors that impact student learning that are completely out of the control of teachers and/or principals.
In New Jersey, the test-based components of AchieveNJ also ignore student characteristics, even though SGPs — Student Growth Percentiles, the test-based measures of student achievement used in teacher evaluations — are clearly biased against teachers who work in high-poverty, low-resourced schools.
New York’s growth model at least attempts to account for differences in student characteristics. According to the state’s Technical Report, the bias against teachers and schools serving high-needs students has been significantly reduced compared to earlier versions of the model.
But that doesn’t make New York’s growth measures any less statistically noisy or invalid. According to the Technical Report, one-third of New York’s teachers changed ratings from 2012-13 to 2013-14 (p. 43). The report crows that this is relatively stable compared to other growth measures, but in reality, it only means that the measures are merely the best of the worst.
Think about it: does it make any sense whatsoever that a full one-third of New York’s teachers significantly changed in their “effectiveness” within the span of a year? Should a high-stakes decision be compelled by a measure that is this unstable?
Here are the Technical Report’s growth ratings for teachers in “tested grades” over the last two years. If we add together all of the teachers who had at least two consecutive “Developing” or “Ineffective” ratings, we are only dealing with the bottom 5 percent of the teaching corps.
I know that the reformy line is these 5 percent are keeping us from competing with Singapore and Finland, but let’s get real: this small number is not worth Angry Andy’s disproportionate response. Yes, we need to remove bad teachers from classrooms, but does anyone really think the vast majority of these teachers couldn’t be identified through their classroom practices?
Angry Andy doesn’t think so; he is convinced that large numbers of administrators are, for reasons known only to Andy, fudging their observations so they can retain poor teachers. That’s why Andy wants to impose a huge unfunded mandate on school districts and require them to bring in outside observers to evaluate teachers.
It never occurs to Angry Andy that it may be possible administrators retain less-than-optimal teachers simply because there are not enough qualified candidates standing ready to replace them. Angry Andy has actually helped to create this situation in his own state, imposing “financially crippling” exams on teacher candidates (more on this later).
Even more foolishly, Angry Andy Cuomo thinks his demonization of teachers won’t have an effect on the number of bright young people willing to enter the profession. He believes his own inability to properly fund New York’s schools has no effect on the quality of teachers; no, it must be all these deceitful, lazy administrators, handing out phony high marks to lazy, ineffective teachers.

Diane,
This is a question rather than a comment. Thanks for Skyping into our hearing on SB 6030 in the WA State Legislature on Thursday night! We will win eventually! Question: Do you realize that Pearson’s world wide business may enable it to go to a non governmental Trans Pacific Partnership tribunal and fight any state than wishes to suspend its services for its schools? Has any blogger written on this topic because this week would be a good one to have an article about this kind of disaster that could happen. Thanks for your leadership. Don
LikeLike
Well said, Jersey Jazzman. I have two competing fantasies. In one, hoards of angry parents newly aware of the insiduous effects of this horrid new “law” on their beloved children rise up united to demand an immediate repeal of this atrocity. In the second, hoards of disillusioned teachers resign at year’s end while graduate students leave their teaching programs. Parents realize that there will be no remaining teachers, pull up stakes and leave New York State, creating an immediate economic collapse. Andy is then forced to repeal said atrocity, beg our forgiveness and ask us to return and revamo the rules. Ah, the stuff that dreams are made of…
LikeLike
My only fantasy is that several special forces Navy Seal and Delta teams go rouge with help from a deep cover, black ops CIA agent and start taking out the leaders of the corporate eduction reform movement.
Of course, I must reveal that I’m a fan of Covert Affair, the USA TV series. After all, the corporate education reformers fit every definition of traitors to the ideals of the country enshrined in The Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. … when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”
LikeLike
Shelley,
Funny! I’ve had the same thoughts!
LikeLike
And what better a “segway” for Gates & Co. to put their computer based learning into action……”Well….we had to do SOMETHING, as we had no teachers”. If you have a facebook, now is the time to tell everyone you know to read this blog.
LikeLike
I feel like we’re in a catch 22. We’re forced to give and proctor the tests. We’re silenced with threats of disciplinary action. We have to submit to unfair evaluation plans. The system is stacked against us. So, by going along with the system that has been imposed, the end result will be the loss of teachers. It’s going that way. I’m not sure staying in the game will help. Perhaps if there were no teachers and students were put in front of computers all day that might be unacceptable to parents who would then fight back. It’s a vicious circle. I don’t know what the answer is.
LikeLike
I was going to say there is only one way to make $en$e of Cuomo’s plan, but it’s also about his desire for revenge against any and all who oppose him. It’s not just *Pearson*, it’s *Personal* with him.
LikeLike
The story is the same with Christie in New Jersey. He does not miss an opportunity to attempt to humiliate teachers.
LikeLike
False assumptions based on false testing with false metrics. All these falsehoods support Angry Andy’s agenda and ambitions to sell off New York’s public schools to his hedge fund donors. The only truth to come out of this is that Angry Andy is on the take.
LikeLike
It’s very easy to make sense of Andy Cuomo’s teacher evaluation laws: Cuomo is both vindictive and corrupt. With his new law he both takes vengeance on the teacher’s unions that didn’t support him in the last election, while also ensuring that the flow of money to him from the for-profit charter school operators continues
LikeLike
Cuomo and his minions are freaking idiots…RECALL !!
LikeLike
“Lipstick on a Pig”
Lipstick on a pig
Is Cuomo’s teacher ranking
“Evaluate” and dig
With fuzzy dice and spanking
LikeLike
There is no sense to be made of this. This is the revenge of a furious little man using his power to wage a war against the people who dared vote against him.
Much like a two-year-old’s tantrum, but on a gargantuan scale.
LikeLike
Perhaps you mean predicated not predicted….
LikeLike
Just follow the money. Obviously, one of the purposes of this system may to fire many teachers so they will never receive a pension. Any mid-range special education teacher in New York State will be in real danger of losing their pensions. The same goes for ELL teachers and teachers in high need schools. Furthermore, the system will be so rigged that it will be near impossible to ever get tenure under this system. Therefore, in a few years, there will hardly be any teacher’s left with tenure making most New York teachers at will employees.
In my opinion, if you have nothing to lose, you can lose nothing. It is time for parents and teachers in this state to really think about planning some type of organized civil disobedience. However, certain union leaders are going to need to understand how many of their members are becoming more and more dissatisfied and begin to start governing their union in a more democratic manner in order to support their rank and file in such an organized protest–even lead the protest.. Imagine if every pubic school teacher refused to give these assessments. After all, the main goal of the assessment is really to destroy their careers and not help teachers do a better job teaching. Would the leaders of such a protest be willing to be arrested? Would this governor attempt to fire every public school teacher who participated in such an act of civil disobedience? I believe that most parents would support such an action and put a lot of pressure on the governor to prevent such as mass firing. And if this governor would fire every public school teacher, where would he get replacements–especially when fired teachers and supportive parents block the entrance of various public schools? Would the governor send out the national guard to disperse such protests? Imagine guardsmen using tear gas on teachers and parents on national TV and YouTube. I think teachers have no choice but to force the Cuomo to reveal what type of person he really is. One cannot blindly accept the destruction of ones profession, career, and livelihood.
LikeLike
“One cannot blindly accept the destruction of ones profession, career, and livelihood.”
I walked downtown this morning to see Helen Mirren (as Maria Altmann) in the film “Woman in Gold”.
Yes, most people can blindly sit by as their lives are destroyed. The Germans under Hitler did it to the Jews, and million of Jews let it happen to them without resistance. Most people just can’t believe their lives are ending and they go into denial. The few who see what’s happening flee or fight and there was a Jewish resistance under Nazi Rule. Those who survived—all tougher than railroad spikes—founded Israel after WWII and have devastated their enemies in several wars started by most or all of their Arab neighbors.
Therefore, expect most teachers to let their lives be ruined and only a few to fight back.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_resistance_under_Nazi_rule
While millions of Jews perished in the camps, a few hundred or thousand fought back in the resistance in each country occupied by the Nazis.
And when the corporate education wars in the U.S. escalate to that point—and I think from the evidence this is going to happen—the few who fight back will probably have to be violent in their resistance.
For instance, In the aftermath of the war, Holocaust survivors led by former members of Jewish resistance groups banded together. Calling themselves Nokmim (Hebrew for “avengers”), they tracked down and executed former Nazis who took part in the Holocaust. They killed an unknown number of Nazis, and their efforts are believed to have progressed into the 1950s. The Nazis were often kidnapped and killed by hanging or strangulation, others were killed by hit-and-run attacks, and a former high-ranking Gestapo officer died when kerosene was injected into his bloodstream while he was in hospital awaiting an operation.
Teachers and members of their famlies that think they might be willing to join the violent resistance/rebellion that’s probably coming might want to start setting up safe houses as soon as possible and learn how to do this properly so they can’t be easily found. Since there are more parents than teachers, most members of the resistance will probably be found there and among students who grow up to fight back as adults.
And I’m not joking. If history teaches us anything, the corporate education reform movement is being led by people who would easily fit the profile of a tyrant—they are sociopaths and psychopaths.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lloyd, as I wrote my comment, similar thoughts were crossing my mind. As a Jew, and one who has studied the Holocaust, I am hoping some of my colleagues who are still in the trenches will begin to wake up and do something. Through our blogs and comments (and you are definitely a much more eloquent writer than I am), we must try to inspire the radicalization of our profession. Yes, it is very hard to draw that proverbial line in the sand and dare the bully to cross it. But we must. If teachers do not stand up to those who bully us, demean us, we will truly end up with empty pockets. Just a few days ago, one of my colleagues told me that he also felt I was exaggerating. He no longer feels that way. However, he went on to say, there is nothing he can do because any protest might cost him his job. Of course my reply was what would he do when there was no job!
LikeLike
“What will he do when there is no job?”
Good answer
Will he become a janitor for poverty wages?
Will he work at Wall-mart or Target for poverty wages?
Will he go to work in the fast food industry for poverty wages?
Will he sell real estate for commissions?
Will he drive a taxi?
Will he become permanently unemployed and then homeless and join the ranks of poverty?
Will he survive in teaching to reach retirement and discover the reformers took that too?
Tell him if the corporate education reformers start rounding up teachers and their famlies, I have some room under my house with the rats, dirt and cold air where I can hide them and I’ll be able to feed them oatmeal and beans with water—but I’m not sure about the water unless this drought in California lets up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have been expressing this to others as well. I used the example of hostages in large numbers being held by a single terrorist with a pen knife who keeps killing them one at a time. The group just sits there hoping to be rescued before their number comes up. We must play fair while they do not. There will be no joy in saying I told you so 10 years from now as we look at the ashes of the American public education system. This is why teachers need unions.
Still waiting for a PROACTIVE response from NYSUT!
LikeLike
Perhaps it is time for one of the Whitehouse’s famous petitions to be sumitted on decoupling testing and teacher evaluation. It could be well worded to quote the facts regarding a lack of research supporting this test based system and a list of the negative impacts. Retirements and a giant drop in students entering college show the impacts of “reform” on the system. Our president hides behind Arne Duncan and avoids the issue. I feel Common Core should be a separate subject. I would suggest a similar path though. To quote today’s politicians, “repeal and replace” and in the case of common core, we produce national guidelines that states can choose to use, modify, or ignore. Regarding APPR we need to offer a solution as well. I know there are some peer review systems that look promising. I would suggest we ask for the abandonment of the punative APPR system and a jointly developed system which sctually works that could be used as a guide for states to modify and adopt. Our president would be forced to answer us and look pretty silly for not taking the extended hand. With Diane’s influence we could get hundreds of thousands of signatures in just days.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike