Ever wonder who does the fun job of reading your children’s tweets, Facebook pages, and Instagrams? Stephanie Simon has done the investigative work, on behalf of politico.com, but really on behalf of parents and children across America.
In the new age of Common Core and online testing, student privacy is dead.
Simon visits companies that do the “monitoring.” She calls them “Common Core’s cyber-spies.”
She writes:
“Pearson is hardly the only company keeping a watchful eye on students.
“School districts and colleges across the nation are hiring private companies to monitor students’ online activity, down to individual keystrokes, to scan their emails for objectionable content and to scrutinize their public posts on Twitter, Facebook, Vine, Instagram and other popular sites. The surveillance services will send principals text-message alerts if a student types a suspicious phrase or surfs to a web site that raises red flags.
“A dozen states have tried to limit cyber snooping by banning either colleges or K-12 schools, or both, from requesting student user names and passwords, which could be used to pry open social media accounts protected by privacy settings. Among those taking action: California, Illinois, Michigan and Utah.
“At least five other states, among them New York and Maryland, are considering similar laws this session, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
“But such laws protect only accounts marked as private. Many kids post publicly to build up their online followings.
“And when they do, companies with names like Social Sentinel, Geo Listening, Varsity Monitor and UDiligence are there to read them.
The rise of online student monitoring comes at a time of rising parent protests against other forms of digital surveillance — namely, the vast quantities of data that technology companies collect on kids as they click through online textbooks, games and homework. Companies providing those online resources can collect millions of unique data points on a child in a single day. Much of that information is not protected by federal privacy law.”
Think of it: these companies “can collect millions of unique data points on a child in a single day.”
And that’s not all:
“Some of the monitoring software on the market can track and log every keystroke a student makes while using a school computer in any location, including at home…..
“Sometimes the monitoring is covert: One company advertises that its surveillance software, known as CompuGuardian, can run on “stealth mode.” At the other extreme, some high schools and colleges explicitly warn students that they are being watched and advise them not to cling to “a false sense of security about your rights to freedom of speech.”
Privacy is dead. Privacy is dead. Yes, your children are being watched. Companies you never heard of have collected vast amounts of information about them.
As the CEO of Sun Microsystems famously said in 1999, “you have zero privacy anyway. Get over it.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/cyber-snoops-track-students-116276.html#ixzz3V4nbs8Jj

It sure sounds catchy and cool to say that “privacy is dead” and to “get over it.” But privacy is far from “dead.”
What am I thinking right now? Where am I standing? What am I wearing and doing as I type?
See?
LikeLike
Actually, someone can hack your webcam and watch you! So, make sure you have clothes on!
LikeLike
Mercedes, I will check with Pearson and let you know.
LikeLike
This could pass for one of Winston’s internal monologues in 1984, which may suggest that privacy is not quite so far from dead.
LikeLike
Winston was already dead.
LikeLike
His eyes re-focused on the page. He discovered that while he sat helplessly musing he had also been writing, as though by automatic action. And it was no longer the same cramped, awkward handwriting as before. His pen had slid voluptuously over the smooth paper, printing in large neat capitals
DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER
DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER
DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER
DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER
DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER
He could not help feeling a twinge of panic. It was absurd, since the writing of those particular words was not more dangerous than the initial act of opening the diary, but for a moment he was tempted to tear out the spoiled pages and abandon the enterprise altogether.
He did not do so, however, because he knew that it was useless. Whether he wrote DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, or whether he refrained from writing it, made no difference. Whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed — would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper — the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed for ever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you.
LikeLike
Mercedes,
AMEN to YOU!
LikeLike
In Florida, it is also of great concern that children are asked to sign a document to prevent children from discussing the FSA test with their parents : http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/bn9/2015/3/19/hernando_fourth_grad.html
So, essentially testing corporations and schools are creating an environment in which our children can be monitored online and children are not supposed to discuss their academic assessments with their own families? This is incredibly alarming. We are supposed to live in a country in which democracy and freedom of expression is encouraged. What is going on?
LikeLike
How Many Parents ever recall being told not to discuss standardized test with anyone after the testing period was over? In fact, I would also asked if any legislators can ever recall that. I certainly do not. This is getting way out of hand. The child in the TV segment is in 4th grade. Is this what Ed Reform is teaching our children–sign here and keep information from your parents?
LikeLike
How can children legally sign a contract like that?
LikeLike
Students in East Germany were to covertly report on their parents to their teachers. Is that the next step here?
LikeLike