We learned in the past few days that Pearson is monitoring the Twitter accounts and Facebook accounts and other social media used by America’s children. Some call it spying. Pearson expects America’s teachers and principals to help them police the children to make sure that they don’t write about or even discuss the PARCC test. (The corporation administering the Smarter Balanced Assessments is trying to exercise the same control to protect its tests.)
Mercedes Schneider here describes Pearson’s intrusive policy for non-native speakers of English who take the “Pearson Test of English Academic.”
Part of the agreement signed by the test-taker states:
I confirm that I have carefully reviewed the PTE Academic Test Taker Handbook, including, but not limited to, those provisions relating to testing, score cancellations, privacy policies, and the collection, processing, use and transmission to the United States of the PTE Academic test taker’s personally identifiable data (including the digital photograph, fingerprint, signature, palm-vein scan, and audio/video recording collected at the test centre) and disclosure of such data to Pearson Language Tests, its service providers, any score recipients the PTE Academic test taker selects, and others as necessary to prevent unlawful activity or as required by law.
Excuse me, but what is a “palm-vein scan?” Does everyone know this except me?
Now, there is no point just baying at the moon. If you don’t like Pearson’s policies, why not write to the man in charge, Michael Barber? In Great Britain, he is called “Sir Michael,” but in the United States we don’t recognize titles, so you may address him in the democratic style as Michael Barber, or Mr. Barber, or Mike. He is best known for his ardent faith in targets, goals, or what he calls “deliverology.”
Write him here:
michael.barber@pearson.com
@MichaelBarber9
Be candid. Tell him what you think.

Oh, so that’s what that was – a palm vein scan. When I took 2 massage therapist tests at the Pearson office, I had to give 2 forms of ID, they took a picture of me, and also did one on these scans on my hand. I didn’t know it was a palm vein scan at the time. I can see Pearson or other companies using the argument that they have to do this in schools to make sure they are testing the correct students and that all the data they have goes with the proper student. We’ll see…
LikeLike
Just sent Barber an email, plain English, Shameful, stop it.
LikeLike
I din’t know about the palm-vein scan either so I did a search. Apparently, it’s not new. Pearson has been using it for the GMAT since 2008: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/education/2008-08-23-gmat-scan_N.htm
LikeLike
Our health care system, including doctors and hospitals, regularly take palm vein scans to identify patients. It’s part of their fraud prevention system, to keep people from sharing their medical insurance info with uninsured patients. I didn’t know Pearson was using it. I took an online Praxis test some years ago and had to show ID, but no palm vein scan. I’m betting that’s changed too.
Oh, yeah, BTW, I’m getting emails from Pearson about applying to be a test scorer. (I’d signed up years ago as interested, but never pursued it. Don’t flame me. Hey, when you’re unemployed…) Anyway, I see that their pay scale appears to have risen–$13/hour for scorers, $15/hour for supervisors.
LikeLike
As a teacher, I have heard from different sources about the test scorers hired to read student writing. At least you are a teacher. I’ve heard about people who have no educational background being paid by the item, meaning that they must score as fast as they possibly can. Reading and evaluating student writing is a thoughtful, often time-consuming process. Or should be.
But $13 – $15 an hour? That is just wrong for scorers and students alike.
LikeLike
Oh, I agree: The hourly rate is abysmal. But it’s better than when I originally looked, when it was $10 or $11. I noticed that they have scorers work at an onsite location. I figure it’s very production oriented. You know, price, quality, speed–pick two…
LikeLike
I just love how there’s no conflict with the expert who works for the testing giant selling educational policy that relies on testing.
He must just be a really, really superior person who isn’t subject to the same self-interest and ethical issues ordinary mortals have to struggle with since we are completely relying on his TOTALLY unbiased opinion 🙂
LikeLike
Also, weren’t we assured we were going to get some kind of scholarly, impartial review of the CC tests once they were thru “building the plane in the air” and running this experiment?
When does that happen? All I’ve seen so far out of government and the ed reform “movement” is pom-pom waving and cheerleading.
Two states have been running this experiment for quite a while. Was the CC testing perfect so no analysis required? That seems unlikely.
I’m not a scientist but aren’t experiments supposed to be experimental- subject to change and question and doubt?
LikeLike
Been knowing about this for a couple of years. When you tell people they don’t believe you. When I wrote an opt out letter to my principal in the beginning of the school year about not having my child connected to sensory devices including but not limited to iris scans, palm scans, fingerprint scans, chest straps, etc., he looked at me like I was crazy and said “what in the world is this?” I told him “oh it’s coming, just wait”, he really just does not believe me, he thinks I’m the crazy mom at school. Oh well, I’ve been proven right so far in all of this madness time and time again, this is just another example. If more parents knew about this and would believe that this is the next step for the next tests there should be an outrage but I think a lot of parents are still sleeping. Never let them do this to your child!
LikeLike
cross posted at:
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Pearson-and-Its-Palm-Scan-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Children_Diane-Ravitch_Policies_Spying-150321-705.html#comment537986
LikeLike
I’m certain “Sir Michael” doesn’t really care about what the “proles” have to write to him.
I think it would be a good idea to encourage student’s and their parents to use social media to bash Pearson in a big way online by posting and tweeting what the company is up to, links to articles and posts; like on Diane’s blog etc.
LikeLike
“. . .the “proles”. . . ”
Don’t you mean the colonists?
LikeLike
http://citylimits.org/2015/03/16/ny-state-must-clear-up-mystery-of-missing-test-items/
LikeLike
From an article in USA Today (11/25/12 !) and a couple of excerpts from that article.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/25/palm-scanners-technology-schools/1726175/
––> Here’s how it works: Using the same near-infrared technology that comes in a TV remote control or Nintendo Wii video game, the device takes a super high-resolution infrared photograph of the vein pattern just below a person’s skin. That image, between 1.5 and 2.5 square inches, is recorded and digitized.<––
At schools in Pinellas County, Fla., students aren't paying for lunch with cash or a card, but with a wave of their hand over a palm scanner.
"It's so quick that a child could be standing in line, call mom and say, 'I forgot my lunch money today.' She's by her computer, runs her card, and by the time the child is at the front of the line, it's already recorded," says Art Dunham, director of food services for Pinellas County Schools.
Students take about four seconds to swipe and pay for lunch, Dunham says, and they're doing it with 99% accuracy.
Not everyone loves the idea of scans.
Students in Carroll County, Md., schools are using lunch line palm scanners, but 7-year-old Ian Webb isn't one of them. His father, Michael Webb, decided to have Ian, a second-grader, opt out of the program at Piney Ridge Elementary in Eldersburg.
"My son is not using the technology," he says. "I'll be honest, I think it's horrible. It's an intrusion into our children's rights."
Webb says he's concerned that use of the scanners by elementary school students normalizes the use of biometrics and anesthetizes young children to recognizing privacy violations later in life.
"I understand taking an iris scan of a pilot at an airport, so you know it's the right pilot flying the plane" he says. "This is that level of equipment they're installing in a line that serves steamed corn. I don't think it rises to the level of steamed corn."
LikeLike
I just wonder what exactly it is that Pearson is so concerned about, that this level of “security” is required. What do they have to hide? Why are these test questions so secret? Is it that the wording is so convoluted and confusing that many adults would find it difficult to decider? Is it that the reading level of the text and questions are not on the readability level of the students taking the test? As a test proctor at a school, I heard many of the questions “read aloud” to students. I am not allowed to discuss the specifics because I would risk losing my job. These are our students who have documented difficulty with reading and math, as well as developmental delays and other academic issues. These are the students who require the most resources and supports on a daily basis at our schools. Yet Pearson gets to decide that these students will take the same assessment as their peers. Some of them are capable of taking the test with accommodations. Some are not. Yet as an administrator, I don’t get to meet the individual needs of these students as required by their IEP and IAP because Pearson and some politicians have taken our rights away. Students must now “check” their rights at the school door, and I must check my rights as a teacher and administrator. Our federal government has decided that we no longer have rights. Those rights have been bought and paid for by the corporations who are bleeding our public tax dollars dry. No longer is public education a local initiative. They have decided that parents and educators don’t deserve to have a voice. They are slowly chipping away at our democracy.
LikeLike
Yes, I retired because of the b.s.
LikeLike
Wait, what? “I don’t get to meet the individual needs of these students required by their IEP & IAP because Pearson & some politicians have taken their rights away.” NO–it is STILL ILLEGAL when IEP protocol is NOT followed–the IEP is a binding document, in accordance with IDEA, and legal action should be imminent in such cases. In ILL-ANNOY, someone asked about this very scenario & was told–by at least 3 people–that not giving accommodations for testing when so specified on an IEP is grounds for legal action. NO–that is NOT a decision that can be made by the state, & it is federal law, which, in this case, supercedes the state. Honestly, I am so tired of this double-speak & dependency on ignorance of the law (which, BTW, “is no excuse”). I’m not talking about you, Bridget–I’m referring to Arne
(see earlier post about his unintended “detour” while visiting Chicago) & what some state bureaucrats will tell you.
If the outcomes weren’t so tragic, it would almost be funny–like the Seinfeld episode where George Costanza uses the “it’s not you, it’s me” excuse for breaking up w/his girlfriend.
Except that Arne, et. al., use it the other way around, “It’s not me…it’s THEM,” or the states, “The Feds will w/hold their funding.”
REALLY? Then what’s happening to the vast majority of state which refused the CCRAP?
Finally (I promise!)–NOT ONE SCHOOL ANYWHERE SHOULD BE TAKING AWAY THE RIGHTS OF I.E.P.’ed students–get those lawyers immediately! (And most every state has some excellent special ed. lawyers.)
LikeLike
Where did you read that they were NOT given accommodations?
LikeLike
What I meant was that we were not allowed to modify the Pearson test, even when the IEP stated that tests were to be modified. The IEPs only allow certain types of modifications for the Pearson Standardized tests. I agree that this is all illegal, but NCLB has fooled parents into thinking this is best for their children. You know, raising the bar. Who cares if the bar is out of their reach???
LikeLike
Sorry, I meant “certain types of accommodation for the Pearson tests…”
LikeLike
I hope parents are asking lots of questions about this test, especially if their child is receiving special services.
LikeLike
Maybe the kids should tell an adult and let the adult post. Wonder if they’d start spying on everyone?
LikeLike
Bridget–thanks for the clarifications–I understood what you meant, & it’s not you–it’s THEM! (&–if Pear$on is not “allowing” certain accommodations–$orry–it i$ NOT up to Pear$on &, so, Pear$on, the company, is in violation of children’s I.E.P.s, & it’s time for legal action.(Parents of special education students who are reading this: you probably are on the stick as to what’s happening, here, & are taking some action to protect your children but–if not–do so w/all deliberate speed. AND–tell all other parents {& organizations/local branches of organizations–CHADD, LDA, CEC, PAA, United Opt Out, & any & all advocacy organizations}). It’s time that the absolute finger of judgment is pointed & blame is assigned, & the award for fault & ultimate responsibility goes to…Pear$on. Take action!
LikeLike
Newbie education reporter Allie Bidwell at US News & Word Report discussed the Pearson monitoring of social web sites for references to PARCC test questions in a recent piece:
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/03/16/pearson-common-core-test-monitoring-is-a-free-speech-issue-not-a-privacy-violation?int=a14709
The monitoring is not illegal, but it may displease any number of parents, and students.
Here’s what I found interesting, though:
“The College Board did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether it monitors test-takers’ social media accounts for violations. In its policy for AP exams, however, the College Board says it will automatically cancel an exam score ‘and may permanently bar you from testing’ if the individual discloses test material.”
Now, given that the College Board was a major player in the development of the Common Core, and given that the College Board (along with ACT, Inc.) has aligned all of its tests to the Common Core, it appears likely that the College Board is doing the very same thing.
And, as I’ve mentioned on this site numerous times, both the College Board and ACT, Inc. –– with their testing products, the PSAT, SAT, ACT, and now a smorgasbord of lower -grade tests –– help to perpetuate one of the biggest scams in the history of public education, and that is that their tests are good predictors of college success and are accurate measures of aptitude and intelligence. They’re not.
It’s not just Pearson and PARCc monitoring that people need to worry about.
It’s the whole goofy educational shell game that much of the education establishment has bought into.
LikeLike
Just great. Another burden for our young people. They are already carrying huge student loan debt. Now the test Nazis can hold them hostage. What country is this, anyway?
LikeLike